Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011
Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176.e11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176.e1 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 222 |
creator | Tinker, Sarah C. Gilboa, Suzanne M. Moore, Cynthia A. Waller, D. Kim Simeone, Regina M. Kim, Shin Y. Jamieson, Denise J. Botto, Lorenzo D. Reefhuis, Jennita |
description | Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls.
Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed.
We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios.
Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted od |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31454511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937819310300</els_id><sourcerecordid>2281866103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd-OEyEYxYnRuHX1BbwwXJq4MwIzMGA2Jm79m2zUZPWaMPSbLs0UKsy02TvfwTf0SWS2tdEbY7gAwjmH8-WH0GNKSkqoeL4qzSosS0aoKoksCZN30IwS1RRCCnkXzQghrFBVI0_Qg5RW05Updh-dVLTmNad0huLVBqzrnMWti8M1XkAHdkjYebyJsPTGWwcJhw7vwho83rlJ5EwLA6QX-KMZXPCmxxe37tcH9-cIW_DTE74axsXNGaZKNT-__8hd6UN0rzN9gkeH_RR9ffvmy_x9cfnp3Yf5q8vC1pwPRaVE20AjTcM5AG8pqZqWCCZAibyMsq2kspZ5VC6UNKxWjADrVN0aXtesOkUv97mbsV3DwuZC0fR6E93axBsdjNN_v3h3rZdhqxsqRY7MAU8PATF8GyENeu2Shb43HsKYNGO5gBC5WJayvdTGkFKE7vgNJXqCpVd6gqUnWJpInWFl05M_Cx4tv-lkgdwLdtCGLmUS3sJRlnFyomrFeT5ROXfDLYx5GP2Qrc_-35rV53s1ZB5bB1EfHAsXM1C9CO5fg_wCubLG5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281866103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita ; National Birth Defects Prevention Study ; Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls.
Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed.
We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios.
Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis).
Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31454511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology ; Adult ; atrioventricular septal defect ; birth defect ; case control study ; Case-Control Studies ; Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroschisis - epidemiology ; gestational diabetes ; Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology ; heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly ; Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology ; longitudinal limb deficiency ; Meningocele - epidemiology ; Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology ; Obstetrics & Gynecology ; pregestational diabetes ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology ; sacral agenesis ; Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities ; Science & Technology ; single ventricle complex ; truncus arteriosus ; type 1 diabetes ; type 2 diabetes ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>91</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000509495500018</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2597-1201 ; 0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,3554,27933,27934,28257,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, D. Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeone, Regina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Denise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reefhuis, Jennita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>AM J OBSTET GYNECOL</addtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls.
Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed.
We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios.
Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis).
Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>atrioventricular septal defect</subject><subject>birth defect</subject><subject>case control study</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</subject><subject>gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly</subject><subject>Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>longitudinal limb deficiency</subject><subject>Meningocele - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics & Gynecology</subject><subject>pregestational diabetes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology</subject><subject>sacral agenesis</subject><subject>Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>single ventricle complex</subject><subject>truncus arteriosus</subject><subject>type 1 diabetes</subject><subject>type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd-OEyEYxYnRuHX1BbwwXJq4MwIzMGA2Jm79m2zUZPWaMPSbLs0UKsy02TvfwTf0SWS2tdEbY7gAwjmH8-WH0GNKSkqoeL4qzSosS0aoKoksCZN30IwS1RRCCnkXzQghrFBVI0_Qg5RW05Updh-dVLTmNad0huLVBqzrnMWti8M1XkAHdkjYebyJsPTGWwcJhw7vwho83rlJ5EwLA6QX-KMZXPCmxxe37tcH9-cIW_DTE74axsXNGaZKNT-__8hd6UN0rzN9gkeH_RR9ffvmy_x9cfnp3Yf5q8vC1pwPRaVE20AjTcM5AG8pqZqWCCZAibyMsq2kspZ5VC6UNKxWjADrVN0aXtesOkUv97mbsV3DwuZC0fR6E93axBsdjNN_v3h3rZdhqxsqRY7MAU8PATF8GyENeu2Shb43HsKYNGO5gBC5WJayvdTGkFKE7vgNJXqCpVd6gqUnWJpInWFl05M_Cx4tv-lkgdwLdtCGLmUS3sJRlnFyomrFeT5ROXfDLYx5GP2Qrc_-35rV53s1ZB5bB1EfHAsXM1C9CO5fg_wCubLG5A</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Tinker, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creator><creator>Moore, Cynthia A.</creator><creator>Waller, D. Kim</creator><creator>Simeone, Regina M.</creator><creator>Kim, Shin Y.</creator><creator>Jamieson, Denise J.</creator><creator>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creator><creator>Reefhuis, Jennita</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>95M</scope><scope>ABMOY</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><author>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>atrioventricular septal defect</topic><topic>birth defect</topic><topic>case control study</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</topic><topic>gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly</topic><topic>Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>longitudinal limb deficiency</topic><topic>Meningocele - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics & Gynecology</topic><topic>pregestational diabetes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology</topic><topic>sacral agenesis</topic><topic>Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>single ventricle complex</topic><topic>truncus arteriosus</topic><topic>type 1 diabetes</topic><topic>type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, D. Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeone, Regina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Denise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reefhuis, Jennita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)</collection><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinker, Sarah C.</au><au>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</au><au>Moore, Cynthia A.</au><au>Waller, D. Kim</au><au>Simeone, Regina M.</au><au>Kim, Shin Y.</au><au>Jamieson, Denise J.</au><au>Botto, Lorenzo D.</au><au>Reefhuis, Jennita</au><aucorp>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</aucorp><aucorp>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><stitle>AM J OBSTET GYNECOL</stitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176.e1</spage><epage>176.e11</epage><pages>176.e1-176.e11</pages><artnum>176</artnum><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls.
Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed.
We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios.
Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis).
Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31454511</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31454511 |
source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology Adult atrioventricular septal defect birth defect case control study Case-Control Studies Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology epidemiology Female Gastroschisis - epidemiology gestational diabetes Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology longitudinal limb deficiency Meningocele - epidemiology Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology Obstetrics & Gynecology pregestational diabetes Pregnancy Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology sacral agenesis Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities Science & Technology single ventricle complex truncus arteriosus type 1 diabetes type 2 diabetes United States - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T05%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specific%20birth%20defects%20in%20pregnancies%20of%20women%20with%20diabetes:%20National%20Birth%20Defects%20Prevention%20Study,%201997%E2%80%932011&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Tinker,%20Sarah%20C.&rft.aucorp=National%20Birth%20Defects%20Prevention%20Study&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176.e1&rft.epage=176.e11&rft.pages=176.e1-176.e11&rft.artnum=176&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2281866103%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281866103&rft_id=info:pmid/31454511&rft_els_id=S0002937819310300&rfr_iscdi=true |