Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011

Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176
Hauptverfasser: Tinker, Sarah C., Gilboa, Suzanne M., Moore, Cynthia A., Waller, D. Kim, Simeone, Regina M., Kim, Shin Y., Jamieson, Denise J., Botto, Lorenzo D., Reefhuis, Jennita
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176.e11
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 222
creator Tinker, Sarah C.
Gilboa, Suzanne M.
Moore, Cynthia A.
Waller, D. Kim
Simeone, Regina M.
Kim, Shin Y.
Jamieson, Denise J.
Botto, Lorenzo D.
Reefhuis, Jennita
description Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls. Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed. We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios. Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted od
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31454511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937819310300</els_id><sourcerecordid>2281866103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd-OEyEYxYnRuHX1BbwwXJq4MwIzMGA2Jm79m2zUZPWaMPSbLs0UKsy02TvfwTf0SWS2tdEbY7gAwjmH8-WH0GNKSkqoeL4qzSosS0aoKoksCZN30IwS1RRCCnkXzQghrFBVI0_Qg5RW05Updh-dVLTmNad0huLVBqzrnMWti8M1XkAHdkjYebyJsPTGWwcJhw7vwho83rlJ5EwLA6QX-KMZXPCmxxe37tcH9-cIW_DTE74axsXNGaZKNT-__8hd6UN0rzN9gkeH_RR9ffvmy_x9cfnp3Yf5q8vC1pwPRaVE20AjTcM5AG8pqZqWCCZAibyMsq2kspZ5VC6UNKxWjADrVN0aXtesOkUv97mbsV3DwuZC0fR6E93axBsdjNN_v3h3rZdhqxsqRY7MAU8PATF8GyENeu2Shb43HsKYNGO5gBC5WJayvdTGkFKE7vgNJXqCpVd6gqUnWJpInWFl05M_Cx4tv-lkgdwLdtCGLmUS3sJRlnFyomrFeT5ROXfDLYx5GP2Qrc_-35rV53s1ZB5bB1EfHAsXM1C9CO5fg_wCubLG5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281866103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita ; National Birth Defects Prevention Study ; Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls. Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed. We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios. Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis). Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31454511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology ; Adult ; atrioventricular septal defect ; birth defect ; case control study ; Case-Control Studies ; Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroschisis - epidemiology ; gestational diabetes ; Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology ; heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly ; Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology ; longitudinal limb deficiency ; Meningocele - epidemiology ; Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology ; Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology ; pregestational diabetes ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology ; sacral agenesis ; Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities ; Science &amp; Technology ; single ventricle complex ; truncus arteriosus ; type 1 diabetes ; type 2 diabetes ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>91</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000509495500018</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2597-1201 ; 0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,3554,27933,27934,28257,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, D. Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeone, Regina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Denise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reefhuis, Jennita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>AM J OBSTET GYNECOL</addtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls. Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed. We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios. Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis). Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>atrioventricular septal defect</subject><subject>birth defect</subject><subject>case control study</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</subject><subject>gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly</subject><subject>Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology</subject><subject>longitudinal limb deficiency</subject><subject>Meningocele - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</subject><subject>pregestational diabetes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology</subject><subject>sacral agenesis</subject><subject>Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>single ventricle complex</subject><subject>truncus arteriosus</subject><subject>type 1 diabetes</subject><subject>type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd-OEyEYxYnRuHX1BbwwXJq4MwIzMGA2Jm79m2zUZPWaMPSbLs0UKsy02TvfwTf0SWS2tdEbY7gAwjmH8-WH0GNKSkqoeL4qzSosS0aoKoksCZN30IwS1RRCCnkXzQghrFBVI0_Qg5RW05Updh-dVLTmNad0huLVBqzrnMWti8M1XkAHdkjYebyJsPTGWwcJhw7vwho83rlJ5EwLA6QX-KMZXPCmxxe37tcH9-cIW_DTE74axsXNGaZKNT-__8hd6UN0rzN9gkeH_RR9ffvmy_x9cfnp3Yf5q8vC1pwPRaVE20AjTcM5AG8pqZqWCCZAibyMsq2kspZ5VC6UNKxWjADrVN0aXtesOkUv97mbsV3DwuZC0fR6E93axBsdjNN_v3h3rZdhqxsqRY7MAU8PATF8GyENeu2Shb43HsKYNGO5gBC5WJayvdTGkFKE7vgNJXqCpVd6gqUnWJpInWFl05M_Cx4tv-lkgdwLdtCGLmUS3sJRlnFyomrFeT5ROXfDLYx5GP2Qrc_-35rV53s1ZB5bB1EfHAsXM1C9CO5fg_wCubLG5A</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Tinker, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creator><creator>Moore, Cynthia A.</creator><creator>Waller, D. Kim</creator><creator>Simeone, Regina M.</creator><creator>Kim, Shin Y.</creator><creator>Jamieson, Denise J.</creator><creator>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creator><creator>Reefhuis, Jennita</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>95M</scope><scope>ABMOY</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</title><author>Tinker, Sarah C. ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Waller, D. Kim ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Kim, Shin Y. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Botto, Lorenzo D. ; Reefhuis, Jennita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-396b7e78a755ee5b1037b0626e96969a9cb818488685698a24920e2f94ba54423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>atrioventricular septal defect</topic><topic>birth defect</topic><topic>case control study</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroschisis - epidemiology</topic><topic>gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly</topic><topic>Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology</topic><topic>longitudinal limb deficiency</topic><topic>Meningocele - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</topic><topic>pregestational diabetes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology</topic><topic>sacral agenesis</topic><topic>Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>single ventricle complex</topic><topic>truncus arteriosus</topic><topic>type 1 diabetes</topic><topic>type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinker, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, D. Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeone, Regina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Denise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botto, Lorenzo D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reefhuis, Jennita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</creatorcontrib><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)</collection><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinker, Sarah C.</au><au>Gilboa, Suzanne M.</au><au>Moore, Cynthia A.</au><au>Waller, D. Kim</au><au>Simeone, Regina M.</au><au>Kim, Shin Y.</au><au>Jamieson, Denise J.</au><au>Botto, Lorenzo D.</au><au>Reefhuis, Jennita</au><aucorp>National Birth Defects Prevention Study</aucorp><aucorp>Natl Birth Defects Prevention</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><stitle>AM J OBSTET GYNECOL</stitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176.e1</spage><epage>176.e11</epage><pages>176.e1-176.e11</pages><artnum>176</artnum><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Diabetes is associated with an increased risk for many birth defects and is likely to have an increasing impact on birth defect prevalence because of the rise in diabetes in the United States in recent decades. One of the first analyses in which specific birth defects were assessed for their relationship with both pregestational and gestational diabetes used data from the initial 6 years of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. That analysis reported strong associations for pregestational diabetes with several birth defects, but few exposures among some of the less common birth defects led to unstable estimates with wide confidence intervals. Since that analysis, the study continued to collect data for another 8 years, including information on approximately 19,000 additional cases and 6900 additional controls. Our objective was to use data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, the largest population-based birth defects case-control study in the United States, to provide updated and more precise estimates of the association between diabetes and birth defects, including some defects not previously assessed. We analyzed data on deliveries from October 1997 through December 2011. Mothers of case and control infants were interviewed about their health conditions and exposures during pregnancy, including diagnosis of pregestational (type 1 or type 2) diabetes before the index pregnancy or gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy. Using logistic regression, we separately assessed the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with specific categories of structural birth defects for which there were at least 3 exposed case infants. For birth defect categories for which there were at least 5 exposed case infants, we calculated odds ratios adjusted for maternal body mass index, age, education, race/ethnicity, and study site; for defect categories with 3 or 4 exposed cases, we calculated crude odds ratios. Pregestational diabetes was reported by 0.6% of mothers of control infants (71 of 11,447) and 2.5% of mothers of case infants (775 of 31,007). Gestational diabetes during the index pregnancy was reported by 4.7% of mothers of control infants (536 of 11,447) and 5.3% of mothers of case infants (1,653 of 31,007). Pregestational diabetes was associated with strong, statistically significant odds ratios (range, 2.5–80.2) for 46 of 50 birth defects considered. The largest odds ratio was observed for sacral agenesis (adjusted odds ratio, 80.2; 95% confidence interval, 46.1–139.3). A greater than 10-fold increased risk was also observed for holoprosencephaly (adjusted odds ratio, 13.1; 95% confidence interval, 7.0–24.5), longitudinal limb deficiency (adjusted odds ratio, 10.1; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–16.5), heterotaxy (adjusted odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–20.5), truncus arteriosus (adjusted odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.6–29.3), atrioventricular septal defect (adjusted odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 6.2–17.9), and single ventricle complex (adjusted odds ratio, 14.7; 95% confidence interval, 8.9–24.3). For gestational diabetes, statistically significant odds ratios were fewer (12 of 56) and of smaller magnitude (range, 1.3– 2.1; 0.5 for gastroschisis). Pregestational diabetes is associated with a markedly increased risk for many specific births defects. Because glycemic control before pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk for birth defects, ongoing quality care for persons with diabetes is an important opportunity for prevention.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31454511</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-3747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.176.e1-176.e11, Article 176
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_31454511
source MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Abnormalities, Multiple - epidemiology
Adult
atrioventricular septal defect
birth defect
case control study
Case-Control Studies
Congenital Abnormalities - epidemiology
Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology
epidemiology
Female
Gastroschisis - epidemiology
gestational diabetes
Heart Defects, Congenital - epidemiology
heterotaxy, holoprosencephaly
Holoprosencephaly - epidemiology
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Limb Deformities, Congenital - epidemiology
longitudinal limb deficiency
Meningocele - epidemiology
Nervous System Malformations - epidemiology
Obstetrics & Gynecology
pregestational diabetes
Pregnancy
Pregnancy in Diabetics - epidemiology
sacral agenesis
Sacrococcygeal Region - abnormalities
Science & Technology
single ventricle complex
truncus arteriosus
type 1 diabetes
type 2 diabetes
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T05%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specific%20birth%20defects%20in%20pregnancies%20of%20women%20with%20diabetes:%20National%20Birth%20Defects%20Prevention%20Study,%201997%E2%80%932011&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Tinker,%20Sarah%20C.&rft.aucorp=National%20Birth%20Defects%20Prevention%20Study&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176.e1&rft.epage=176.e11&rft.pages=176.e1-176.e11&rft.artnum=176&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2281866103%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281866103&rft_id=info:pmid/31454511&rft_els_id=S0002937819310300&rfr_iscdi=true