Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer radiothérapie 2019-09, Vol.23 (5), p.439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 439 |
container_title | Cancer radiothérapie |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Beddok, A Vela, A Calugaru, V Tessonnier, T Kubes, J Dutheil, P Gérard, A Vidal, M Goudjil, F Florescu, C Kammerer, E Bénézery, K Hérault, J Bourhis, J Thariat, J |
description | Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31358445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31358445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-10ed3eb9406d5a49ac438fd54cb68284b62561b26a252aaf675c8715895625c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j9FKwzAUQIMgbk7_QCQ_0Jo0uWnqmww3hYEKex-3SUo726Qm7UP_XkF9Og8HDhxC7jjLOePq4Zwb9BFtXjBe5QxyxuGCrHmpqkwp0CtyndKZMaZUBVdkJbgALSWsycd7DFPwdGpdxHGhTYi0dWgpeku9M580fc04hDlR4_qeGoym82HA9Eh3MQx0bJfUmUSnQE3f-c7ckMsG--Ru_7ghx93zcfuSHd72r9unQzZypqeMM2eFqyvJlAWUFRopdGNBmlrpQstaFaB4XSgsoEBsVAlGlxx0BT_GiA25_82Ocz04expjN2BcTv9r4hvxR1Bh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Beddok, A ; Vela, A ; Calugaru, V ; Tessonnier, T ; Kubes, J ; Dutheil, P ; Gérard, A ; Vidal, M ; Goudjil, F ; Florescu, C ; Kammerer, E ; Bénézery, K ; Hérault, J ; Bourhis, J ; Thariat, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Beddok, A ; Vela, A ; Calugaru, V ; Tessonnier, T ; Kubes, J ; Dutheil, P ; Gérard, A ; Vidal, M ; Goudjil, F ; Florescu, C ; Kammerer, E ; Bénézery, K ; Hérault, J ; Bourhis, J ; Thariat, J ; Gortec et de trois centres français</creatorcontrib><description>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1769-6658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31358445</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><ispartof>Cancer radiothérapie, 2019-09, Vol.23 (5), p.439</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31358445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beddok, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calugaru, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tessonnier, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubes, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutheil, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gérard, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudjil, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florescu, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kammerer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénézery, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hérault, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourhis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thariat, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gortec et de trois centres français</creatorcontrib><title>Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic</title><title>Cancer radiothérapie</title><addtitle>Cancer Radiother</addtitle><description>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.</description><issn>1769-6658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j9FKwzAUQIMgbk7_QCQ_0Jo0uWnqmww3hYEKex-3SUo726Qm7UP_XkF9Og8HDhxC7jjLOePq4Zwb9BFtXjBe5QxyxuGCrHmpqkwp0CtyndKZMaZUBVdkJbgALSWsycd7DFPwdGpdxHGhTYi0dWgpeku9M580fc04hDlR4_qeGoym82HA9Eh3MQx0bJfUmUSnQE3f-c7ckMsG--Ru_7ghx93zcfuSHd72r9unQzZypqeMM2eFqyvJlAWUFRopdGNBmlrpQstaFaB4XSgsoEBsVAlGlxx0BT_GiA25_82Ocz04expjN2BcTv9r4hvxR1Bh</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Beddok, A</creator><creator>Vela, A</creator><creator>Calugaru, V</creator><creator>Tessonnier, T</creator><creator>Kubes, J</creator><creator>Dutheil, P</creator><creator>Gérard, A</creator><creator>Vidal, M</creator><creator>Goudjil, F</creator><creator>Florescu, C</creator><creator>Kammerer, E</creator><creator>Bénézery, K</creator><creator>Hérault, J</creator><creator>Bourhis, J</creator><creator>Thariat, J</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic</title><author>Beddok, A ; Vela, A ; Calugaru, V ; Tessonnier, T ; Kubes, J ; Dutheil, P ; Gérard, A ; Vidal, M ; Goudjil, F ; Florescu, C ; Kammerer, E ; Bénézery, K ; Hérault, J ; Bourhis, J ; Thariat, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-10ed3eb9406d5a49ac438fd54cb68284b62561b26a252aaf675c8715895625c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beddok, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calugaru, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tessonnier, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubes, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutheil, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gérard, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goudjil, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florescu, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kammerer, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénézery, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hérault, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourhis, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thariat, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gortec et de trois centres français</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cancer radiothérapie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beddok, A</au><au>Vela, A</au><au>Calugaru, V</au><au>Tessonnier, T</au><au>Kubes, J</au><au>Dutheil, P</au><au>Gérard, A</au><au>Vidal, M</au><au>Goudjil, F</au><au>Florescu, C</au><au>Kammerer, E</au><au>Bénézery, K</au><au>Hérault, J</au><au>Bourhis, J</au><au>Thariat, J</au><aucorp>Gortec et de trois centres français</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic</atitle><jtitle>Cancer radiothérapie</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Radiother</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>439</spage><pages>439-</pages><eissn>1769-6658</eissn><abstract>Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>31358445</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1769-6658 |
ispartof | Cancer radiothérapie, 2019-09, Vol.23 (5), p.439 |
issn | 1769-6658 |
language | fre |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31358445 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
title | Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A14%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proton%20therapy%20for%20head%20and%20neck%20squamous%20cell%20carcinomas:%20From%20physics%20to%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20radioth%C3%A9rapie&rft.au=Beddok,%20A&rft.aucorp=Gortec%20et%20de%20trois%20centres%20fran%C3%A7ais&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=439&rft.pages=439-&rft.eissn=1769-6658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.canrad.2019.05.015&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E31358445%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31358445&rfr_iscdi=true |