The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview
The scope of this study is to present an integrative review of the prevalence of the use of phytotherapy during pregnancy. A review of the topic was made by research in the Scielo, Medline and Science Direct databases using the following key words: "herbs and pregnancy," "plant and ge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência & saude coletiva 2019-04, Vol.24 (4), p.1439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1439 |
container_title | Ciência & saude coletiva |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Cardoso, Bruce Soares Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana |
description | The scope of this study is to present an integrative review of the prevalence of the use of phytotherapy during pregnancy. A review of the topic was made by research in the Scielo, Medline and Science Direct databases using the following key words: "herbs and pregnancy," "plant and gestation," with their respective terms in Portuguese. Forty-six articles published between 2000 and 2015 met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of these, 11 were carried out in Europe, 10 in Asia, 5 in Africa, 3 in Oceania, 16 in America and only one of which was a multinational study. In most of these (67.39%), the interview method was used. A substantial variability in the prevalence of phytotherapy use was reported in the articles. In addition, camomile, ginger, garlic, mint and echinacea were the species most used by pregnant women. Despite the socioeconomic and ethnic-cultural variables among women worldwide, phytotherapy use during gestation is a widespread practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1413-81232018244.07472017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31066846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31066846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-6a15c4f1e515c1618d5baf1ec3a9cff47409c995f18826ec1562cd84ffaa3f3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURgdBbK2-gowPkDp3_qMrKVaFgpu6LjeTmSSSJsMkreTtDair853NB4eQe2BrUDl7AAkis8AFZ2C5lGtmpJm3uSBL0MZmUmlYkOth-GKMGyH5FVkIYFpbqZfkaV97eho87QON9TT2Y-0TxomWp9R0FY3JVx12bnqkSKu2L7Cl_dmnc-O_b8hlwHbwt39ckc_ty37zlu0-Xt83z7ssArNjphGUkwG8mgkabKkKnNUJzF0I0kiWuzxXAazl2jtQmrvSyhAQRRClWJG73994Ko6-PMTUHDFNh_8K8QOFR0mm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cardoso, Bruce Soares ; Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Bruce Soares ; Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</creatorcontrib><description>The scope of this study is to present an integrative review of the prevalence of the use of phytotherapy during pregnancy. A review of the topic was made by research in the Scielo, Medline and Science Direct databases using the following key words: "herbs and pregnancy," "plant and gestation," with their respective terms in Portuguese. Forty-six articles published between 2000 and 2015 met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of these, 11 were carried out in Europe, 10 in Asia, 5 in Africa, 3 in Oceania, 16 in America and only one of which was a multinational study. In most of these (67.39%), the interview method was used. A substantial variability in the prevalence of phytotherapy use was reported in the articles. In addition, camomile, ginger, garlic, mint and echinacea were the species most used by pregnant women. Despite the socioeconomic and ethnic-cultural variables among women worldwide, phytotherapy use during gestation is a widespread practice.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018244.07472017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31066846</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><ispartof>Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-04, Vol.24 (4), p.1439</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2901-1905 ; 0000-0001-5964-4888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31066846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Bruce Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</creatorcontrib><title>The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview</title><title>Ciência & saude coletiva</title><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><description>The scope of this study is to present an integrative review of the prevalence of the use of phytotherapy during pregnancy. A review of the topic was made by research in the Scielo, Medline and Science Direct databases using the following key words: "herbs and pregnancy," "plant and gestation," with their respective terms in Portuguese. Forty-six articles published between 2000 and 2015 met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of these, 11 were carried out in Europe, 10 in Asia, 5 in Africa, 3 in Oceania, 16 in America and only one of which was a multinational study. In most of these (67.39%), the interview method was used. A substantial variability in the prevalence of phytotherapy use was reported in the articles. In addition, camomile, ginger, garlic, mint and echinacea were the species most used by pregnant women. Despite the socioeconomic and ethnic-cultural variables among women worldwide, phytotherapy use during gestation is a widespread practice.</description><issn>1678-4561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j81Kw0AURgdBbK2-gowPkDp3_qMrKVaFgpu6LjeTmSSSJsMkreTtDair853NB4eQe2BrUDl7AAkis8AFZ2C5lGtmpJm3uSBL0MZmUmlYkOth-GKMGyH5FVkIYFpbqZfkaV97eho87QON9TT2Y-0TxomWp9R0FY3JVx12bnqkSKu2L7Cl_dmnc-O_b8hlwHbwt39ckc_ty37zlu0-Xt83z7ssArNjphGUkwG8mgkabKkKnNUJzF0I0kiWuzxXAazl2jtQmrvSyhAQRRClWJG73994Ko6-PMTUHDFNh_8K8QOFR0mm</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Cardoso, Bruce Soares</creator><creator>Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</creator><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-1905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-4888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview</title><author>Cardoso, Bruce Soares ; Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-6a15c4f1e515c1618d5baf1ec3a9cff47409c995f18826ec1562cd84ffaa3f3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Bruce Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardoso, Bruce Soares</au><au>Amaral, Vanessa Cristiane Santana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview</atitle><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1439</spage><pages>1439-</pages><eissn>1678-4561</eissn><abstract>The scope of this study is to present an integrative review of the prevalence of the use of phytotherapy during pregnancy. A review of the topic was made by research in the Scielo, Medline and Science Direct databases using the following key words: "herbs and pregnancy," "plant and gestation," with their respective terms in Portuguese. Forty-six articles published between 2000 and 2015 met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Of these, 11 were carried out in Europe, 10 in Asia, 5 in Africa, 3 in Oceania, 16 in America and only one of which was a multinational study. In most of these (67.39%), the interview method was used. A substantial variability in the prevalence of phytotherapy use was reported in the articles. In addition, camomile, ginger, garlic, mint and echinacea were the species most used by pregnant women. Despite the socioeconomic and ethnic-cultural variables among women worldwide, phytotherapy use during gestation is a widespread practice.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>31066846</pmid><doi>10.1590/1413-81232018244.07472017</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2901-1905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5964-4888</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1678-4561 |
ispartof | Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-04, Vol.24 (4), p.1439 |
issn | 1678-4561 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31066846 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | The use of phytotherapy during pregnancy: a global overview |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A29%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20phytotherapy%20during%20pregnancy:%20a%20global%20overview&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20&%20saude%20coletiva&rft.au=Cardoso,%20Bruce%20Soares&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1439&rft.pages=1439-&rft.eissn=1678-4561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-81232018244.07472017&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E31066846%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31066846&rfr_iscdi=true |