Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the retention rate and clinical responses following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with iguratimod (IGU) vs. salazosulfapyridine (SASP) as the first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Methods: We analyzed 197...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern rheumatology 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.249-258
Hauptverfasser: Nozaki, Yuji, Inoue, Asuka, Kinoshita, Koji, Funauchi, Masanori, Matsumura, Itaru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
container_title Modern rheumatology
container_volume 30
creator Nozaki, Yuji
Inoue, Asuka
Kinoshita, Koji
Funauchi, Masanori
Matsumura, Itaru
description Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the retention rate and clinical responses following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with iguratimod (IGU) vs. salazosulfapyridine (SASP) as the first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Methods: We analyzed 197 RA patients who were treated with IGU or SASP as the initial treatment in the 3-year study period. The retention rate, clinical response, the dosage and percent user of prednisolone (PSL), and safety profiles were evaluated. Results: At month 36, the retention rates of the IGU and SASP groups were 52.4 vs. 32.1%. The rate of responders (good or moderate response) at month 36 was 85.8 vs. 65.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. At month 36 for the IGU and SASP groups, the percentages of PSL users were 16.7 vs. 46.7%, and the PSL dosage was 0.3 mg/d vs. 2.0 mg/d, respectively. The cumulative rates of any adverse event (AE) at month 36 were 19.8 vs. 29.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. Conclusion: IGU is a useful first-line csDMARD treatment for RA patients, showing a high retention rate and good efficacy without an increased risk of serious AEs, including serious infections. Our findings also indicate a PSL dose-sparing effect of IGU treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14397595.2019.1572267
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30676812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179450359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-36325ed841f2d436010f7dafea7930a4f00b93f8da57331fb995e7970bba4c7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-BCVHL12Tpmmam-I3KILoOUybxI20mzVJlfXX27K7Hj3N8PK8M_AgdELJjJKKnNOCScEln-WEyhnlIs9LsYMOxjwTJZG7232AJugwxg9CGJeV3EcTRkpRVjQ_QHBjrWugWWFvsXvvAyTXeY2_4gxHaOHHx761sFwFp93CYIg4zQ22LsSUtWPSxOuny5drbH3AYW76DpJ3GkNI8-CSi0doz0IbzfFmTtHb7c3r1X32-Hz3cHX5mDVMkpSxkuXc6KqgNtcFKwklVmiwBoRkBApLSC2ZrTRwwRi1tZTcCClIXUPRCMOm6Gx9dxn8Z29iUp2LjWlbWBjfR5VTIQs-KhhQvkab4GMMxqplcB2ElaJEjXbV1q4a7aqN3aF3unnR153Rf62tzgG4WANuMejo4NuHVqsEq9YHG2DRuKjY_z9-Acs6igY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179450359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Nozaki, Yuji ; Inoue, Asuka ; Kinoshita, Koji ; Funauchi, Masanori ; Matsumura, Itaru</creator><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Yuji ; Inoue, Asuka ; Kinoshita, Koji ; Funauchi, Masanori ; Matsumura, Itaru</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the retention rate and clinical responses following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with iguratimod (IGU) vs. salazosulfapyridine (SASP) as the first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Methods: We analyzed 197 RA patients who were treated with IGU or SASP as the initial treatment in the 3-year study period. The retention rate, clinical response, the dosage and percent user of prednisolone (PSL), and safety profiles were evaluated. Results: At month 36, the retention rates of the IGU and SASP groups were 52.4 vs. 32.1%. The rate of responders (good or moderate response) at month 36 was 85.8 vs. 65.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. At month 36 for the IGU and SASP groups, the percentages of PSL users were 16.7 vs. 46.7%, and the PSL dosage was 0.3 mg/d vs. 2.0 mg/d, respectively. The cumulative rates of any adverse event (AE) at month 36 were 19.8 vs. 29.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. Conclusion: IGU is a useful first-line csDMARD treatment for RA patients, showing a high retention rate and good efficacy without an increased risk of serious AEs, including serious infections. Our findings also indicate a PSL dose-sparing effect of IGU treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-7595</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-7609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2019.1572267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30676812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>csDMARD ; iguratimod ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; salazosulfapyridine</subject><ispartof>Modern rheumatology, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.249-258</ispartof><rights>2019 Japan College of Rheumatology 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-36325ed841f2d436010f7dafea7930a4f00b93f8da57331fb995e7970bba4c7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-36325ed841f2d436010f7dafea7930a4f00b93f8da57331fb995e7970bba4c7e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5925-7404 ; 0000-0003-2818-4270 ; 0000-0003-1809-5143 ; 0000-0003-4423-5103 ; 0000-0003-2810-1519</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30676812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Asuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funauchi, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumura, Itaru</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>Modern rheumatology</title><addtitle>Mod Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the retention rate and clinical responses following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with iguratimod (IGU) vs. salazosulfapyridine (SASP) as the first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Methods: We analyzed 197 RA patients who were treated with IGU or SASP as the initial treatment in the 3-year study period. The retention rate, clinical response, the dosage and percent user of prednisolone (PSL), and safety profiles were evaluated. Results: At month 36, the retention rates of the IGU and SASP groups were 52.4 vs. 32.1%. The rate of responders (good or moderate response) at month 36 was 85.8 vs. 65.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. At month 36 for the IGU and SASP groups, the percentages of PSL users were 16.7 vs. 46.7%, and the PSL dosage was 0.3 mg/d vs. 2.0 mg/d, respectively. The cumulative rates of any adverse event (AE) at month 36 were 19.8 vs. 29.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. Conclusion: IGU is a useful first-line csDMARD treatment for RA patients, showing a high retention rate and good efficacy without an increased risk of serious AEs, including serious infections. Our findings also indicate a PSL dose-sparing effect of IGU treatment.</description><subject>csDMARD</subject><subject>iguratimod</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>salazosulfapyridine</subject><issn>1439-7595</issn><issn>1439-7609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMorq7-BCVHL12Tpmmam-I3KILoOUybxI20mzVJlfXX27K7Hj3N8PK8M_AgdELJjJKKnNOCScEln-WEyhnlIs9LsYMOxjwTJZG7232AJugwxg9CGJeV3EcTRkpRVjQ_QHBjrWugWWFvsXvvAyTXeY2_4gxHaOHHx761sFwFp93CYIg4zQ22LsSUtWPSxOuny5drbH3AYW76DpJ3GkNI8-CSi0doz0IbzfFmTtHb7c3r1X32-Hz3cHX5mDVMkpSxkuXc6KqgNtcFKwklVmiwBoRkBApLSC2ZrTRwwRi1tZTcCClIXUPRCMOm6Gx9dxn8Z29iUp2LjWlbWBjfR5VTIQs-KhhQvkab4GMMxqplcB2ElaJEjXbV1q4a7aqN3aF3unnR153Rf62tzgG4WANuMejo4NuHVqsEq9YHG2DRuKjY_z9-Acs6igY</recordid><startdate>20200303</startdate><enddate>20200303</enddate><creator>Nozaki, Yuji</creator><creator>Inoue, Asuka</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Koji</creator><creator>Funauchi, Masanori</creator><creator>Matsumura, Itaru</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-7404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-4270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-5103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-1519</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200303</creationdate><title>Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Nozaki, Yuji ; Inoue, Asuka ; Kinoshita, Koji ; Funauchi, Masanori ; Matsumura, Itaru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-36325ed841f2d436010f7dafea7930a4f00b93f8da57331fb995e7970bba4c7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>csDMARD</topic><topic>iguratimod</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>salazosulfapyridine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Asuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funauchi, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumura, Itaru</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Modern rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nozaki, Yuji</au><au>Inoue, Asuka</au><au>Kinoshita, Koji</au><au>Funauchi, Masanori</au><au>Matsumura, Itaru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Modern rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Mod Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2020-03-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>249-258</pages><issn>1439-7595</issn><eissn>1439-7609</eissn><abstract>Objectives: We retrospectively evaluated the retention rate and clinical responses following treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with iguratimod (IGU) vs. salazosulfapyridine (SASP) as the first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). Methods: We analyzed 197 RA patients who were treated with IGU or SASP as the initial treatment in the 3-year study period. The retention rate, clinical response, the dosage and percent user of prednisolone (PSL), and safety profiles were evaluated. Results: At month 36, the retention rates of the IGU and SASP groups were 52.4 vs. 32.1%. The rate of responders (good or moderate response) at month 36 was 85.8 vs. 65.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. At month 36 for the IGU and SASP groups, the percentages of PSL users were 16.7 vs. 46.7%, and the PSL dosage was 0.3 mg/d vs. 2.0 mg/d, respectively. The cumulative rates of any adverse event (AE) at month 36 were 19.8 vs. 29.2% in the IGU and SASP groups, respectively. Conclusion: IGU is a useful first-line csDMARD treatment for RA patients, showing a high retention rate and good efficacy without an increased risk of serious AEs, including serious infections. Our findings also indicate a PSL dose-sparing effect of IGU treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30676812</pmid><doi>10.1080/14397595.2019.1572267</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-7404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-4270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-5103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-1519</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-7595
ispartof Modern rheumatology, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.249-258
issn 1439-7595
1439-7609
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_30676812
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects csDMARD
iguratimod
Rheumatoid arthritis
salazosulfapyridine
title Efficacy of iguratimod vs. salazosulfapyridine as the first-line csDMARD for rheumatoid arthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A15%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20iguratimod%20vs.%20salazosulfapyridine%20as%20the%20first-line%20csDMARD%20for%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=Modern%20rheumatology&rft.au=Nozaki,%20Yuji&rft.date=2020-03-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=249-258&rft.issn=1439-7595&rft.eissn=1439-7609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14397595.2019.1572267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2179450359%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179450359&rft_id=info:pmid/30676812&rfr_iscdi=true