Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT

Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification. Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2020-12, Vol.27 (6), p.2048
Hauptverfasser: Abele, Jonathan T, Raubenheimer, Monique, Bain, Vincent G, Wandzilak, Greg, AlHulaimi, Naji, Coulden, Richard, deKemp, Robert A, Klein, Ran, Williams, Randall G, Warshawski, Robert S, Lalonde, Lucille D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2048
container_title Journal of nuclear cardiology
container_volume 27
creator Abele, Jonathan T
Raubenheimer, Monique
Bain, Vincent G
Wandzilak, Greg
AlHulaimi, Naji
Coulden, Richard
deKemp, Robert A
Klein, Ran
Williams, Randall G
Warshawski, Robert S
Lalonde, Lucille D
description Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification. Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) Rb PET/CT MPI study with no identifiable coronary artery calcium were identified retrospectively and compared to a prospectively identified low-risk of liver disease dipyridamole-stress control group (n = 20). The dipyridamole-stress liver disease group had a lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.89 ± 0.79) than the control group (2.79 ± 0.96, P 
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30456495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30456495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_304564953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFT8tuwjAQtCpVQFt-odofiBoIRs0ZUfVIq9yjDd7AIseOvHYQH8L_NqLl3NNoXhrNg5otdLHM1lovpupJ5JTneVmU5URNi3yl16tSz9T1K6GLHDHyQNBY7w201p-BBrRpVL0D38KA4g3bG88kBhKBve96DGTgzPEIxjcpYseO7j476McCuSi_EXJm9PBAYMexAIaFUAiSsDvA-xK-G9htq7dN9aIeW7RC8z98Vq8f22rzmfWp6cjUfeAOw6W-_yj-DfwAEJtWMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Abele, Jonathan T ; Raubenheimer, Monique ; Bain, Vincent G ; Wandzilak, Greg ; AlHulaimi, Naji ; Coulden, Richard ; deKemp, Robert A ; Klein, Ran ; Williams, Randall G ; Warshawski, Robert S ; Lalonde, Lucille D</creator><creatorcontrib>Abele, Jonathan T ; Raubenheimer, Monique ; Bain, Vincent G ; Wandzilak, Greg ; AlHulaimi, Naji ; Coulden, Richard ; deKemp, Robert A ; Klein, Ran ; Williams, Randall G ; Warshawski, Robert S ; Lalonde, Lucille D</creatorcontrib><description>Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification. Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) Rb PET/CT MPI study with no identifiable coronary artery calcium were identified retrospectively and compared to a prospectively identified low-risk of liver disease dipyridamole-stress control group (n = 20). The dipyridamole-stress liver disease group had a lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.89 ± 0.79) than the control group (2.79 ± 0.96, P &lt; .05). The dobutamine-stress group had a higher MFR than both other groups (3.69 ± 1.49, P &lt; .05). A moderate negative correlation between MELD score and MFR was demonstrated for the dipyridamole-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.473, P &lt; .05). This correlation was not observed for the dobutamine-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.253, P = .21). The liver failure group as a whole (n = 53) had a higher resting myocardial blood flow (0.97 ± 0.33 mL/min/g) than the control group (0.82 ± 0.26, P &lt; .05). Dipyridamole demonstrates an attenuated vasodilatory response in ESLD patients compared to a non-ESLD control group related to higher resting blood flow and comparatively reduced stress blood flow. Dobutamine does not demonstrate this effect implying it may be the preferred pharmacologic MPI stress agent for ESLD patients.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30456495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; Dipyridamole ; Dobutamine ; End Stage Liver Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Failure - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Failure - surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Rubidium Radioisotopes ; Severity of Illness Index ; Vasodilation ; Vasodilator Agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2020-12, Vol.27 (6), p.2048</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abele, Jonathan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Vincent G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandzilak, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlHulaimi, Naji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Randall G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warshawski, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalonde, Lucille D</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification. Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) Rb PET/CT MPI study with no identifiable coronary artery calcium were identified retrospectively and compared to a prospectively identified low-risk of liver disease dipyridamole-stress control group (n = 20). The dipyridamole-stress liver disease group had a lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.89 ± 0.79) than the control group (2.79 ± 0.96, P &lt; .05). The dobutamine-stress group had a higher MFR than both other groups (3.69 ± 1.49, P &lt; .05). A moderate negative correlation between MELD score and MFR was demonstrated for the dipyridamole-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.473, P &lt; .05). This correlation was not observed for the dobutamine-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.253, P = .21). The liver failure group as a whole (n = 53) had a higher resting myocardial blood flow (0.97 ± 0.33 mL/min/g) than the control group (0.82 ± 0.26, P &lt; .05). Dipyridamole demonstrates an attenuated vasodilatory response in ESLD patients compared to a non-ESLD control group related to higher resting blood flow and comparatively reduced stress blood flow. Dobutamine does not demonstrate this effect implying it may be the preferred pharmacologic MPI stress agent for ESLD patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Dipyridamole</subject><subject>Dobutamine</subject><subject>End Stage Liver Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Failure - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Failure - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rubidium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Vasodilation</subject><subject>Vasodilator Agents</subject><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFT8tuwjAQtCpVQFt-odofiBoIRs0ZUfVIq9yjDd7AIseOvHYQH8L_NqLl3NNoXhrNg5otdLHM1lovpupJ5JTneVmU5URNi3yl16tSz9T1K6GLHDHyQNBY7w201p-BBrRpVL0D38KA4g3bG88kBhKBve96DGTgzPEIxjcpYseO7j476McCuSi_EXJm9PBAYMexAIaFUAiSsDvA-xK-G9htq7dN9aIeW7RC8z98Vq8f22rzmfWp6cjUfeAOw6W-_yj-DfwAEJtWMw</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Abele, Jonathan T</creator><creator>Raubenheimer, Monique</creator><creator>Bain, Vincent G</creator><creator>Wandzilak, Greg</creator><creator>AlHulaimi, Naji</creator><creator>Coulden, Richard</creator><creator>deKemp, Robert A</creator><creator>Klein, Ran</creator><creator>Williams, Randall G</creator><creator>Warshawski, Robert S</creator><creator>Lalonde, Lucille D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT</title><author>Abele, Jonathan T ; Raubenheimer, Monique ; Bain, Vincent G ; Wandzilak, Greg ; AlHulaimi, Naji ; Coulden, Richard ; deKemp, Robert A ; Klein, Ran ; Williams, Randall G ; Warshawski, Robert S ; Lalonde, Lucille D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_304564953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Dipyridamole</topic><topic>Dobutamine</topic><topic>End Stage Liver Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Failure - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Failure - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rubidium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Vasodilation</topic><topic>Vasodilator Agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abele, Jonathan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raubenheimer, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bain, Vincent G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandzilak, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlHulaimi, Naji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulden, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deKemp, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Randall G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warshawski, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lalonde, Lucille D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abele, Jonathan T</au><au>Raubenheimer, Monique</au><au>Bain, Vincent G</au><au>Wandzilak, Greg</au><au>AlHulaimi, Naji</au><au>Coulden, Richard</au><au>deKemp, Robert A</au><au>Klein, Ran</au><au>Williams, Randall G</au><au>Warshawski, Robert S</au><au>Lalonde, Lucille D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2048</spage><pages>2048-</pages><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification. Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) Rb PET/CT MPI study with no identifiable coronary artery calcium were identified retrospectively and compared to a prospectively identified low-risk of liver disease dipyridamole-stress control group (n = 20). The dipyridamole-stress liver disease group had a lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.89 ± 0.79) than the control group (2.79 ± 0.96, P &lt; .05). The dobutamine-stress group had a higher MFR than both other groups (3.69 ± 1.49, P &lt; .05). A moderate negative correlation between MELD score and MFR was demonstrated for the dipyridamole-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.473, P &lt; .05). This correlation was not observed for the dobutamine-stress liver disease group (r = - 0.253, P = .21). The liver failure group as a whole (n = 53) had a higher resting myocardial blood flow (0.97 ± 0.33 mL/min/g) than the control group (0.82 ± 0.26, P &lt; .05). Dipyridamole demonstrates an attenuated vasodilatory response in ESLD patients compared to a non-ESLD control group related to higher resting blood flow and comparatively reduced stress blood flow. Dobutamine does not demonstrate this effect implying it may be the preferred pharmacologic MPI stress agent for ESLD patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30456495</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1532-6551
ispartof Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2020-12, Vol.27 (6), p.2048
issn 1532-6551
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_30456495
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Coronary Circulation - physiology
Dipyridamole
Dobutamine
End Stage Liver Disease - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Liver Failure - diagnostic imaging
Liver Failure - surgery
Liver Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging - methods
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Prospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Rubidium Radioisotopes
Severity of Illness Index
Vasodilation
Vasodilator Agents
title Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82 Rb PET/CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20blood%20flow%20evaluation%20of%20vasodilation-stress%20compared%20with%20dobutamine-stress%20in%20patients%20with%20end-stage%20liver%20disease%20using%2082%20Rb%20PET/CT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Abele,%20Jonathan%20T&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2048&rft.pages=2048-&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E30456495%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30456495&rfr_iscdi=true