Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching

Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologia internationalis 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408
Hauptverfasser: Tae, Bum Sik, Ku, Ja Hyeon, Kwak, Cheol, Kim, Hyeon Hoe, Jeong, Chang Wook
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 408
container_issue 4
container_start_page 400
container_title Urologia internationalis
container_volume 101
creator Tae, Bum Sik
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Kwak, Cheol
Kim, Hyeon Hoe
Jeong, Chang Wook
description Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p < 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000493763
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30317229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706544791</galeid><sourcerecordid>A706544791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCgTtClnqBQ8rYziYNtyqigNQK1HbPkWOPt4bEDrZTaf9EfzNe7bICqZrDSG--N5rRI-QNgzPGls1HACgbUVfiGVmwkosCRNM8J4ss84IxcX5EjmP8CZDhpn5JjgQIVnPeLMhj68dJBhu9o97QG3RyoJezU8lmRZqEgd5IbVWWb-ewxrChxge6mqY8uQtSJboKPt3jYDPSyqCs86OkDxjiHPcLWxz-mX2iP4Kf0EWbNvRW-YD0WiZ1b936FXlh5BDx9b6fkNXl57v2a3H1_cu39uKqUKIWqdBGcNb3itUIJRilOSomoJaCiYrzCpU2WnPgXC97LEHwbVPNUvUozqURJ-T9bu8U_O8ZY-pGG1W-Ujr0c-w4y2aoQFQZPd2hazlgZ53xKX-9xbuLGqplWdYNy9TZE1QujaNV3qGxWf_P8GFnUMHHGNB0U7CjDJuOQbdNtTukmtl3-2vnfkR9IP_GmIG3O-CX3EZ0APb-P8Ttpf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120206036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</creator><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to &lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p &lt; 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000493763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30317229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Carcinoma, Renal cell ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Care and treatment ; Comorbidity ; Comparative analysis ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; Original Paper ; Patient outcomes ; Postoperative Period ; Propensity Score ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urothelium</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408</ispartof><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30317229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to &lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p &lt; 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal cell</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urothelium</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCgTtClnqBQ8rYziYNtyqigNQK1HbPkWOPt4bEDrZTaf9EfzNe7bICqZrDSG--N5rRI-QNgzPGls1HACgbUVfiGVmwkosCRNM8J4ss84IxcX5EjmP8CZDhpn5JjgQIVnPeLMhj68dJBhu9o97QG3RyoJezU8lmRZqEgd5IbVWWb-ewxrChxge6mqY8uQtSJboKPt3jYDPSyqCs86OkDxjiHPcLWxz-mX2iP4Kf0EWbNvRW-YD0WiZ1b936FXlh5BDx9b6fkNXl57v2a3H1_cu39uKqUKIWqdBGcNb3itUIJRilOSomoJaCiYrzCpU2WnPgXC97LEHwbVPNUvUozqURJ-T9bu8U_O8ZY-pGG1W-Ujr0c-w4y2aoQFQZPd2hazlgZ53xKX-9xbuLGqplWdYNy9TZE1QujaNV3qGxWf_P8GFnUMHHGNB0U7CjDJuOQbdNtTukmtl3-2vnfkR9IP_GmIG3O-CX3EZ0APb-P8Ttpf0</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Tae, Bum Sik</creator><creator>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creator><creator>Kwak, Cheol</creator><creator>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creator><creator>Jeong, Chang Wook</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><author>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal cell</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urothelium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tae, Bum Sik</au><au>Ku, Ja Hyeon</au><au>Kwak, Cheol</au><au>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</au><au>Jeong, Chang Wook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>400-408</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to &lt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p &lt; 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30317229</pmid><doi>10.1159/000493763</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-1138
ispartof Urologia internationalis, 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408
issn 0042-1138
1423-0399
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_30317229
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Aged
Carcinoma - surgery
Carcinoma, Renal cell
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Care and treatment
Comorbidity
Comparative analysis
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Health aspects
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - adverse effects
Original Paper
Patient outcomes
Postoperative Period
Propensity Score
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery
Urothelium
title Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Renal%20Function%20after%20Radical%20Surgery%20for%20Upper%20Tract%20Urothelial%20Carcinoma%20versus%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma:%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Tae,%20Bum%C2%A0Sik&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=400-408&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000493763&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA706544791%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120206036&rft_id=info:pmid/30317229&rft_galeid=A706544791&rfr_iscdi=true