Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching
Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Urologia internationalis |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Tae, Bum Sik Ku, Ja Hyeon Kwak, Cheol Kim, Hyeon Hoe Jeong, Chang Wook |
description | Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p < 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000493763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30317229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706544791</galeid><sourcerecordid>A706544791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCgTtClnqBQ8rYziYNtyqigNQK1HbPkWOPt4bEDrZTaf9EfzNe7bICqZrDSG--N5rRI-QNgzPGls1HACgbUVfiGVmwkosCRNM8J4ss84IxcX5EjmP8CZDhpn5JjgQIVnPeLMhj68dJBhu9o97QG3RyoJezU8lmRZqEgd5IbVWWb-ewxrChxge6mqY8uQtSJboKPt3jYDPSyqCs86OkDxjiHPcLWxz-mX2iP4Kf0EWbNvRW-YD0WiZ1b936FXlh5BDx9b6fkNXl57v2a3H1_cu39uKqUKIWqdBGcNb3itUIJRilOSomoJaCiYrzCpU2WnPgXC97LEHwbVPNUvUozqURJ-T9bu8U_O8ZY-pGG1W-Ujr0c-w4y2aoQFQZPd2hazlgZ53xKX-9xbuLGqplWdYNy9TZE1QujaNV3qGxWf_P8GFnUMHHGNB0U7CjDJuOQbdNtTukmtl3-2vnfkR9IP_GmIG3O-CX3EZ0APb-P8Ttpf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120206036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</creator><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p < 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000493763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30317229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Carcinoma, Renal cell ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Care and treatment ; Comorbidity ; Comparative analysis ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - adverse effects ; Original Paper ; Patient outcomes ; Postoperative Period ; Propensity Score ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urothelium</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408</ispartof><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30317229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p < 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal cell</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urothelium</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS0EotvCgTtClnqBQ8rYziYNtyqigNQK1HbPkWOPt4bEDrZTaf9EfzNe7bICqZrDSG--N5rRI-QNgzPGls1HACgbUVfiGVmwkosCRNM8J4ss84IxcX5EjmP8CZDhpn5JjgQIVnPeLMhj68dJBhu9o97QG3RyoJezU8lmRZqEgd5IbVWWb-ewxrChxge6mqY8uQtSJboKPt3jYDPSyqCs86OkDxjiHPcLWxz-mX2iP4Kf0EWbNvRW-YD0WiZ1b936FXlh5BDx9b6fkNXl57v2a3H1_cu39uKqUKIWqdBGcNb3itUIJRilOSomoJaCiYrzCpU2WnPgXC97LEHwbVPNUvUozqURJ-T9bu8U_O8ZY-pGG1W-Ujr0c-w4y2aoQFQZPd2hazlgZ53xKX-9xbuLGqplWdYNy9TZE1QujaNV3qGxWf_P8GFnUMHHGNB0U7CjDJuOQbdNtTukmtl3-2vnfkR9IP_GmIG3O-CX3EZ0APb-P8Ttpf0</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Tae, Bum Sik</creator><creator>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creator><creator>Kwak, Cheol</creator><creator>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creator><creator>Jeong, Chang Wook</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</title><author>Tae, Bum Sik ; Ku, Ja Hyeon ; Kwak, Cheol ; Kim, Hyeon Hoe ; Jeong, Chang Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-df321bbc17e040fcd2ec1307a3136226ecdfdd2022d5be40325be4c95cbe38af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal cell</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urothelium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tae, Bum Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Ja Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Chang Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tae, Bum Sik</au><au>Ku, Ja Hyeon</au><au>Kwak, Cheol</au><au>Kim, Hyeon Hoe</au><au>Jeong, Chang Wook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>400-408</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To compare renal function after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Method: Data from 1,236 patients with RCC or UTUC treated surgically from 2000 to 2013 were enrolled. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent factors for a decrease in eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and end-stage renal disease. Result: After propensity score matching, a total of 554 patients were included. During follow-up for 5 years, there was statistically significant difference in eGFR between 2 groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing impaired renal function between the 2 groups (UTUC 73.3 vs. RCC 66.1%, p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that old age (OR 3.957, p < 0.001), UTUC (OR 1.838, p = 0.006), BMI (OR 2.463, p = 0.001) and a baseline eGFR (OR 0.976, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative impaired renal function. Conclusion: Patients with UTUC had worse baseline eGFR, old age, comorbidities than RCC patients. Even after adjusting by PS matching, UTUC patients had lower postoperative eGFR and higher rates of CKD development than RCC patients.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30317229</pmid><doi>10.1159/000493763</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-1138 |
ispartof | Urologia internationalis, 2018-11, Vol.101 (4), p.400-408 |
issn | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_30317229 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals |
subjects | Aged Carcinoma - surgery Carcinoma, Renal cell Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery Care and treatment Comorbidity Comparative analysis Female Glomerular Filtration Rate Health aspects Humans Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Nephrectomy Nephrectomy - adverse effects Original Paper Patient outcomes Postoperative Period Propensity Score Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urothelium |
title | Comparison of Renal Function after Radical Surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma versus Renal Cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matching |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Renal%20Function%20after%20Radical%20Surgery%20for%20Upper%20Tract%20Urothelial%20Carcinoma%20versus%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma:%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Tae,%20Bum%C2%A0Sik&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=400-408&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000493763&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA706544791%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120206036&rft_id=info:pmid/30317229&rft_galeid=A706544791&rfr_iscdi=true |