Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests

Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) is a frequent event affecting 3% of pregnancies. PROM causes 30% of premature deliveries and 20% of perinatal mortality. The diagnosis relies mainly on the clinical visualization of the amniotic fluid flow in the vagina. If not, clinicians can use bedside te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annales de biologie clinique (Paris) 2018-06, Vol.76 (3), p.300
Hauptverfasser: Julien, Mélissa, N'guema, Laury, Bouzerara, Amina, Toro, Benoit, Lecarpentier, Edouard, Guibourdenche, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; fre
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 300
container_title Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)
container_volume 76
creator Julien, Mélissa
N'guema, Laury
Bouzerara, Amina
Toro, Benoit
Lecarpentier, Edouard
Guibourdenche, Jean
description Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) is a frequent event affecting 3% of pregnancies. PROM causes 30% of premature deliveries and 20% of perinatal mortality. The diagnosis relies mainly on the clinical visualization of the amniotic fluid flow in the vagina. If not, clinicians can use bedside tests detecting either the change of the vaginal pH or the presence of amniotic components mainly IGFBP-1 or AFP in the vaginal fluid. We aimed to study the technical and analytical characteristics of 5 immunochromatographic tests (easyProm®, ActimProm®, Toda Amniodiag 5 strip®, Amnioquick® Duo, Amnisure®) that mainly detect IGFBP-1 in order to compare our results with the data from the manufacturer. We evaluated the pre-analytical phase (sampling, sample stability and elution) and the analytical phase (limit of detection, reading time and interferences related to a physiological contamination). Compliance with the pre-analytical step is crucial because the absorption and the elution of the samples in the buffer vary with the swab. Once eluted, the sample is stable. The recommended reading times are adequate but must not be exceeded, otherwise the result can be falsely positive. The detection limits announced appear to be to optimistic. The presence of maternal blood but not maternal urine can perturb the results.
doi_str_mv 10.1684/abc.2018.1346
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29862970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29862970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c152t-16bff04d439fb7d9964023696b07f1386f0df13b258c3ff789a8be2a8aacfd463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z0tLAzEUBeAgiK3VpVvJH5gxN8lkEndStAoVXei63EwSHZkXSUbov7e-Vt_iHA4cQi6AlaC0vELblJyBLkFIdUSWYCpWKAC-IKcpfTAGXAtxQhbcaMVNzZbk8Tn6HvMcPY3z9OMYaH73tPe9jTj4dE1xwG6f2wY76j-xmzG34_Ddcy2-DWM6RDT7lNMZOQ7YJX_-54q83t2-rO-L7dPmYX2zLRqoeC5A2RCYdFKYYGtnjJKMC2WUZXUAoVVg7qDllW5ECLU2qK3nqBGb4KQSK3L5uzvNtvduN8W2x7jf_f8SXwMnTrE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Julien, Mélissa ; N'guema, Laury ; Bouzerara, Amina ; Toro, Benoit ; Lecarpentier, Edouard ; Guibourdenche, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Julien, Mélissa ; N'guema, Laury ; Bouzerara, Amina ; Toro, Benoit ; Lecarpentier, Edouard ; Guibourdenche, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) is a frequent event affecting 3% of pregnancies. PROM causes 30% of premature deliveries and 20% of perinatal mortality. The diagnosis relies mainly on the clinical visualization of the amniotic fluid flow in the vagina. If not, clinicians can use bedside tests detecting either the change of the vaginal pH or the presence of amniotic components mainly IGFBP-1 or AFP in the vaginal fluid. We aimed to study the technical and analytical characteristics of 5 immunochromatographic tests (easyProm®, ActimProm®, Toda Amniodiag 5 strip®, Amnioquick® Duo, Amnisure®) that mainly detect IGFBP-1 in order to compare our results with the data from the manufacturer. We evaluated the pre-analytical phase (sampling, sample stability and elution) and the analytical phase (limit of detection, reading time and interferences related to a physiological contamination). Compliance with the pre-analytical step is crucial because the absorption and the elution of the samples in the buffer vary with the swab. Once eluted, the sample is stable. The recommended reading times are adequate but must not be exceeded, otherwise the result can be falsely positive. The detection limits announced appear to be to optimistic. The presence of maternal blood but not maternal urine can perturb the results.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1950-6112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1684/abc.2018.1346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29862970</identifier><language>eng ; fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><ispartof>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris), 2018-06, Vol.76 (3), p.300</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c152t-16bff04d439fb7d9964023696b07f1386f0df13b258c3ff789a8be2a8aacfd463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julien, Mélissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N'guema, Laury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzerara, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toro, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecarpentier, Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guibourdenche, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests</title><title>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</title><addtitle>Ann Biol Clin (Paris)</addtitle><description>Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) is a frequent event affecting 3% of pregnancies. PROM causes 30% of premature deliveries and 20% of perinatal mortality. The diagnosis relies mainly on the clinical visualization of the amniotic fluid flow in the vagina. If not, clinicians can use bedside tests detecting either the change of the vaginal pH or the presence of amniotic components mainly IGFBP-1 or AFP in the vaginal fluid. We aimed to study the technical and analytical characteristics of 5 immunochromatographic tests (easyProm®, ActimProm®, Toda Amniodiag 5 strip®, Amnioquick® Duo, Amnisure®) that mainly detect IGFBP-1 in order to compare our results with the data from the manufacturer. We evaluated the pre-analytical phase (sampling, sample stability and elution) and the analytical phase (limit of detection, reading time and interferences related to a physiological contamination). Compliance with the pre-analytical step is crucial because the absorption and the elution of the samples in the buffer vary with the swab. Once eluted, the sample is stable. The recommended reading times are adequate but must not be exceeded, otherwise the result can be falsely positive. The detection limits announced appear to be to optimistic. The presence of maternal blood but not maternal urine can perturb the results.</description><issn>1950-6112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1z0tLAzEUBeAgiK3VpVvJH5gxN8lkEndStAoVXei63EwSHZkXSUbov7e-Vt_iHA4cQi6AlaC0vELblJyBLkFIdUSWYCpWKAC-IKcpfTAGXAtxQhbcaMVNzZbk8Tn6HvMcPY3z9OMYaH73tPe9jTj4dE1xwG6f2wY76j-xmzG34_Ddcy2-DWM6RDT7lNMZOQ7YJX_-54q83t2-rO-L7dPmYX2zLRqoeC5A2RCYdFKYYGtnjJKMC2WUZXUAoVVg7qDllW5ECLU2qK3nqBGb4KQSK3L5uzvNtvduN8W2x7jf_f8SXwMnTrE</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Julien, Mélissa</creator><creator>N'guema, Laury</creator><creator>Bouzerara, Amina</creator><creator>Toro, Benoit</creator><creator>Lecarpentier, Edouard</creator><creator>Guibourdenche, Jean</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests</title><author>Julien, Mélissa ; N'guema, Laury ; Bouzerara, Amina ; Toro, Benoit ; Lecarpentier, Edouard ; Guibourdenche, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c152t-16bff04d439fb7d9964023696b07f1386f0df13b258c3ff789a8be2a8aacfd463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julien, Mélissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N'guema, Laury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzerara, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toro, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecarpentier, Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guibourdenche, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julien, Mélissa</au><au>N'guema, Laury</au><au>Bouzerara, Amina</au><au>Toro, Benoit</au><au>Lecarpentier, Edouard</au><au>Guibourdenche, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests</atitle><jtitle>Annales de biologie clinique (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Biol Clin (Paris)</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>300</spage><pages>300-</pages><eissn>1950-6112</eissn><abstract>Premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) is a frequent event affecting 3% of pregnancies. PROM causes 30% of premature deliveries and 20% of perinatal mortality. The diagnosis relies mainly on the clinical visualization of the amniotic fluid flow in the vagina. If not, clinicians can use bedside tests detecting either the change of the vaginal pH or the presence of amniotic components mainly IGFBP-1 or AFP in the vaginal fluid. We aimed to study the technical and analytical characteristics of 5 immunochromatographic tests (easyProm®, ActimProm®, Toda Amniodiag 5 strip®, Amnioquick® Duo, Amnisure®) that mainly detect IGFBP-1 in order to compare our results with the data from the manufacturer. We evaluated the pre-analytical phase (sampling, sample stability and elution) and the analytical phase (limit of detection, reading time and interferences related to a physiological contamination). Compliance with the pre-analytical step is crucial because the absorption and the elution of the samples in the buffer vary with the swab. Once eluted, the sample is stable. The recommended reading times are adequate but must not be exceeded, otherwise the result can be falsely positive. The detection limits announced appear to be to optimistic. The presence of maternal blood but not maternal urine can perturb the results.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>29862970</pmid><doi>10.1684/abc.2018.1346</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1950-6112
ispartof Annales de biologie clinique (Paris), 2018-06, Vol.76 (3), p.300
issn 1950-6112
language eng ; fre
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29862970
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Premature rupture of the membranes: analytical evaluation of diagnostic tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A18%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Premature%20rupture%20of%20the%20membranes:%20analytical%20evaluation%20of%20diagnostic%20tests&rft.jtitle=Annales%20de%20biologie%20clinique%20(Paris)&rft.au=Julien,%20M%C3%A9lissa&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=300&rft.pages=300-&rft.eissn=1950-6112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1684/abc.2018.1346&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E29862970%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29862970&rfr_iscdi=true