Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory

This study investigated the triggers for removing irrelevant information from working memory. Based on the perspective that removal is a unique process of updating working memory (Ecker et al., 2010), we hypothesized that the removal process begins after selection of task-relevant information. To te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Shinrigaku kenkyū 2017-02, Vol.87 (6), p.600
Hauptverfasser: Tamaki, Kentaro, Naito, Katsuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:jpn
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 600
container_title Shinrigaku kenkyū
container_volume 87
creator Tamaki, Kentaro
Naito, Katsuo
description This study investigated the triggers for removing irrelevant information from working memory. Based on the perspective that removal is a unique process of updating working memory (Ecker et al., 2010), we hypothesized that the removal process begins after selection of task-relevant information. To test this hypothesis, we employed a modified Sternberg task that reflects the time-course for the removal of information. In a standard procedure of this task, the removal process is thought to be completed in approximately 1,500 ms after directing relevant information. If selection induces removal, removal might not end within 1,500 ms when selection requires more time. To increase the time for selection, we created a circumstance with high interference. Experiment 1 showed that removal was incomplete within 2,000 ms after directing relevant information. Experiment 2 showed that removal could be completed given more time. These results support the hypothesis that the trigger for the removal process is the completion of selection. This is in consistent with recent frameworks concerning executive functions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29630296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29630296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_296302963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjssKwjAURLNQbNH-guQHCmn6ENeiuNd9iTYJF_MoN7XSvzeKLly5mYGZMzAzkjLGi7zmZZOQLAS4MM6qTV0V1YIkfNuULEpK5EkaeR3AO-oV1V6YvAOMiewoOOXRinc5IGgtMVCU1o_CvGhAjONRuOEHVegtfXi8gdPURhynFZkrYYLMPr4k68P-vDvm_f1iZdf2CFbg1H5_lX-BJ-jJRl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Tamaki, Kentaro ; Naito, Katsuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamaki, Kentaro ; Naito, Katsuo</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the triggers for removing irrelevant information from working memory. Based on the perspective that removal is a unique process of updating working memory (Ecker et al., 2010), we hypothesized that the removal process begins after selection of task-relevant information. To test this hypothesis, we employed a modified Sternberg task that reflects the time-course for the removal of information. In a standard procedure of this task, the removal process is thought to be completed in approximately 1,500 ms after directing relevant information. If selection induces removal, removal might not end within 1,500 ms when selection requires more time. To increase the time for selection, we created a circumstance with high interference. Experiment 1 showed that removal was incomplete within 2,000 ms after directing relevant information. Experiment 2 showed that removal could be completed given more time. These results support the hypothesis that the trigger for the removal process is the completion of selection. This is in consistent with recent frameworks concerning executive functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-5236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29630296</identifier><language>jpn</language><publisher>Japan</publisher><ispartof>Shinrigaku kenkyū, 2017-02, Vol.87 (6), p.600</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29630296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Katsuo</creatorcontrib><title>Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory</title><title>Shinrigaku kenkyū</title><addtitle>Shinrigaku Kenkyu</addtitle><description>This study investigated the triggers for removing irrelevant information from working memory. Based on the perspective that removal is a unique process of updating working memory (Ecker et al., 2010), we hypothesized that the removal process begins after selection of task-relevant information. To test this hypothesis, we employed a modified Sternberg task that reflects the time-course for the removal of information. In a standard procedure of this task, the removal process is thought to be completed in approximately 1,500 ms after directing relevant information. If selection induces removal, removal might not end within 1,500 ms when selection requires more time. To increase the time for selection, we created a circumstance with high interference. Experiment 1 showed that removal was incomplete within 2,000 ms after directing relevant information. Experiment 2 showed that removal could be completed given more time. These results support the hypothesis that the trigger for the removal process is the completion of selection. This is in consistent with recent frameworks concerning executive functions.</description><issn>0021-5236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjssKwjAURLNQbNH-guQHCmn6ENeiuNd9iTYJF_MoN7XSvzeKLly5mYGZMzAzkjLGi7zmZZOQLAS4MM6qTV0V1YIkfNuULEpK5EkaeR3AO-oV1V6YvAOMiewoOOXRinc5IGgtMVCU1o_CvGhAjONRuOEHVegtfXi8gdPURhynFZkrYYLMPr4k68P-vDvm_f1iZdf2CFbg1H5_lX-BJ-jJRl8</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Tamaki, Kentaro</creator><creator>Naito, Katsuo</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory</title><author>Tamaki, Kentaro ; Naito, Katsuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_296302963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>jpn</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Katsuo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Shinrigaku kenkyū</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamaki, Kentaro</au><au>Naito, Katsuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory</atitle><jtitle>Shinrigaku kenkyū</jtitle><addtitle>Shinrigaku Kenkyu</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>600</spage><pages>600-</pages><issn>0021-5236</issn><abstract>This study investigated the triggers for removing irrelevant information from working memory. Based on the perspective that removal is a unique process of updating working memory (Ecker et al., 2010), we hypothesized that the removal process begins after selection of task-relevant information. To test this hypothesis, we employed a modified Sternberg task that reflects the time-course for the removal of information. In a standard procedure of this task, the removal process is thought to be completed in approximately 1,500 ms after directing relevant information. If selection induces removal, removal might not end within 1,500 ms when selection requires more time. To increase the time for selection, we created a circumstance with high interference. Experiment 1 showed that removal was incomplete within 2,000 ms after directing relevant information. Experiment 2 showed that removal could be completed given more time. These results support the hypothesis that the trigger for the removal process is the completion of selection. This is in consistent with recent frameworks concerning executive functions.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pmid>29630296</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-5236
ispartof Shinrigaku kenkyū, 2017-02, Vol.87 (6), p.600
issn 0021-5236
language jpn
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29630296
source J-STAGE Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Selection of goal-directed information triggers removal of irrelevant information from working memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A18%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selection%20of%20goal-directed%20information%20triggers%20removal%20of%20irrelevant%20information%20from%20working%20memory&rft.jtitle=Shinrigaku%20kenky%C5%AB&rft.au=Tamaki,%20Kentaro&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=600&rft.pages=600-&rft.issn=0021-5236&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E29630296%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29630296&rfr_iscdi=true