Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech

The role of working memory (WM) capacity and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration (PR) of missing speech was investigated using the interrupted speech perception paradigm. Speech identification ability, which indexed PR, was measured using low-context sentences periodically interrupted at 1.5...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2017-12, Vol.142 (6), p.3756-3766
Hauptverfasser: Nagaraj, Naveen K., Magimairaj, Beula M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3766
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3756
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 142
creator Nagaraj, Naveen K.
Magimairaj, Beula M.
description The role of working memory (WM) capacity and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration (PR) of missing speech was investigated using the interrupted speech perception paradigm. Speech identification ability, which indexed PR, was measured using low-context sentences periodically interrupted at 1.5 Hz. PR was measured for silent gated, low-frequency speech noise filled, and low-frequency fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions. WM capacity was measured using verbal and visuospatial span tasks. Lexical knowledge was assessed using both receptive vocabulary and meaning from context tests. Results showed that PR was better for speech noise filled condition than other conditions tested. Both receptive vocabulary and verbal WM capacity explained unique variance in PR for the speech noise filled condition, but were unrelated to performance in the silent gated condition. It was only receptive vocabulary that uniquely predicted PR for fine-structure and envelope filled conditions. These findings suggest that the contribution of lexical knowledge and verbal WM during PR depends crucially on the information content that replaced the silent intervals. When perceptual continuity was partially restored by filler speech noise, both lexical knowledge and verbal WM capacity facilitated PR. Importantly, for fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions, lexical knowledge was crucial for PR.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.5018429
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29289104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1983256845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-34838c47988580ba5d48c1b55e9176c14fd7be50e7a314d3fa165f59795496653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AOyRxWiO8lusnuU4hcUBNGbELabSY1NsnE3sfbfm9paD4KnYYaHd2YeQo6BXQCEcAkXgoHkodohQxAhC6QI-S4ZMsYg4CqOB-TA-7e-FTJS-2QQqlAqYHxIXh5tidTmdGHdvKhntMLKuiXVdUZL_CyMLum8tosSsxnSoqYNOoNN2_Vzh761TreFrVcJRd2ic13TYkZ9g2heD8lerkuPR5s6Is8310_ju2DycHs_vpoEJhKiDSIuI2l4oqQUkk21yLg0MBUCFSSxAZ5nyRQFw0RHwLMo1xCLXKhEidVzIhqR03Vu4-x711-VVoU3WJa6Rtv5FJSMQhFLvkLP1qhx1nuHedq4otJumQJLVzJTSDcye_ZkE9tNK8y25I-9HjhfA94U7beHLfNh3W9S2mT5f_Df1V8pZIqv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983256845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Nagaraj, Naveen K. ; Magimairaj, Beula M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagaraj, Naveen K. ; Magimairaj, Beula M.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of working memory (WM) capacity and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration (PR) of missing speech was investigated using the interrupted speech perception paradigm. Speech identification ability, which indexed PR, was measured using low-context sentences periodically interrupted at 1.5 Hz. PR was measured for silent gated, low-frequency speech noise filled, and low-frequency fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions. WM capacity was measured using verbal and visuospatial span tasks. Lexical knowledge was assessed using both receptive vocabulary and meaning from context tests. Results showed that PR was better for speech noise filled condition than other conditions tested. Both receptive vocabulary and verbal WM capacity explained unique variance in PR for the speech noise filled condition, but were unrelated to performance in the silent gated condition. It was only receptive vocabulary that uniquely predicted PR for fine-structure and envelope filled conditions. These findings suggest that the contribution of lexical knowledge and verbal WM during PR depends crucially on the information content that replaced the silent intervals. When perceptual continuity was partially restored by filler speech noise, both lexical knowledge and verbal WM capacity facilitated PR. Importantly, for fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions, lexical knowledge was crucial for PR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5018429</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29289104</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-12, Vol.142 (6), p.3756-3766</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-34838c47988580ba5d48c1b55e9176c14fd7be50e7a314d3fa165f59795496653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-34838c47988580ba5d48c1b55e9176c14fd7be50e7a314d3fa165f59795496653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.5018429$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1565,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagaraj, Naveen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magimairaj, Beula M.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>The role of working memory (WM) capacity and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration (PR) of missing speech was investigated using the interrupted speech perception paradigm. Speech identification ability, which indexed PR, was measured using low-context sentences periodically interrupted at 1.5 Hz. PR was measured for silent gated, low-frequency speech noise filled, and low-frequency fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions. WM capacity was measured using verbal and visuospatial span tasks. Lexical knowledge was assessed using both receptive vocabulary and meaning from context tests. Results showed that PR was better for speech noise filled condition than other conditions tested. Both receptive vocabulary and verbal WM capacity explained unique variance in PR for the speech noise filled condition, but were unrelated to performance in the silent gated condition. It was only receptive vocabulary that uniquely predicted PR for fine-structure and envelope filled conditions. These findings suggest that the contribution of lexical knowledge and verbal WM during PR depends crucially on the information content that replaced the silent intervals. When perceptual continuity was partially restored by filler speech noise, both lexical knowledge and verbal WM capacity facilitated PR. Importantly, for fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions, lexical knowledge was crucial for PR.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AOyRxWiO8lusnuU4hcUBNGbELabSY1NsnE3sfbfm9paD4KnYYaHd2YeQo6BXQCEcAkXgoHkodohQxAhC6QI-S4ZMsYg4CqOB-TA-7e-FTJS-2QQqlAqYHxIXh5tidTmdGHdvKhntMLKuiXVdUZL_CyMLum8tosSsxnSoqYNOoNN2_Vzh761TreFrVcJRd2ic13TYkZ9g2heD8lerkuPR5s6Is8310_ju2DycHs_vpoEJhKiDSIuI2l4oqQUkk21yLg0MBUCFSSxAZ5nyRQFw0RHwLMo1xCLXKhEidVzIhqR03Vu4-x711-VVoU3WJa6Rtv5FJSMQhFLvkLP1qhx1nuHedq4otJumQJLVzJTSDcye_ZkE9tNK8y25I-9HjhfA94U7beHLfNh3W9S2mT5f_Df1V8pZIqv</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Nagaraj, Naveen K.</creator><creator>Magimairaj, Beula M.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech</title><author>Nagaraj, Naveen K. ; Magimairaj, Beula M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-34838c47988580ba5d48c1b55e9176c14fd7be50e7a314d3fa165f59795496653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagaraj, Naveen K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magimairaj, Beula M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagaraj, Naveen K.</au><au>Magimairaj, Beula M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3756</spage><epage>3766</epage><pages>3756-3766</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>The role of working memory (WM) capacity and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration (PR) of missing speech was investigated using the interrupted speech perception paradigm. Speech identification ability, which indexed PR, was measured using low-context sentences periodically interrupted at 1.5 Hz. PR was measured for silent gated, low-frequency speech noise filled, and low-frequency fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions. WM capacity was measured using verbal and visuospatial span tasks. Lexical knowledge was assessed using both receptive vocabulary and meaning from context tests. Results showed that PR was better for speech noise filled condition than other conditions tested. Both receptive vocabulary and verbal WM capacity explained unique variance in PR for the speech noise filled condition, but were unrelated to performance in the silent gated condition. It was only receptive vocabulary that uniquely predicted PR for fine-structure and envelope filled conditions. These findings suggest that the contribution of lexical knowledge and verbal WM during PR depends crucially on the information content that replaced the silent intervals. When perceptual continuity was partially restored by filler speech noise, both lexical knowledge and verbal WM capacity facilitated PR. Importantly, for fine-structure and envelope filled interrupted conditions, lexical knowledge was crucial for PR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29289104</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.5018429</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-12, Vol.142 (6), p.3756-3766
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29289104
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Role of working memory and lexical knowledge in perceptual restoration of interrupted speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20working%20memory%20and%20lexical%20knowledge%20in%20perceptual%20restoration%20of%20interrupted%20speech&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Nagaraj,%20Naveen%20K.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3756&rft.epage=3766&rft.pages=3756-3766&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5018429&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1983256845%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983256845&rft_id=info:pmid/29289104&rfr_iscdi=true