Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version

There is consensus that military personnel can encounter a far more diverse set of challenges than researchers and clinicians have historically appreciated. Moral injury (MI) represents an emerging construct to capture behavioural, social, and spiritual suffering that may transcend and overlap with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2017-12
Hauptverfasser: Currier, Joseph M, Farnsworth, Jacob K, Drescher, Kent D, McDermott, Ryon C, Sims, Brook M, Albright, David L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical psychology and psychotherapy
container_volume
creator Currier, Joseph M
Farnsworth, Jacob K
Drescher, Kent D
McDermott, Ryon C
Sims, Brook M
Albright, David L
description There is consensus that military personnel can encounter a far more diverse set of challenges than researchers and clinicians have historically appreciated. Moral injury (MI) represents an emerging construct to capture behavioural, social, and spiritual suffering that may transcend and overlap with mental health diagnoses (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder). The Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version (EMIS-M) was developed to provide a reliable and valid means for assessing the warning signs of a MI in military populations. Drawing on independent samples of veterans who had served in a war-zone environment, factor analytic results revealed 2 distinct factors related to MI expressions directed at both self (9 items) and others (8 items). These subscales generated excellent internal consistency and temporal stability over a 6-month period. When compared to measures of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and other theoretically relevant constructs (e.g., forgiveness, social support, moral emotions, and combat exposure), EMIS-M scores demonstrated strong convergent, divergent, and incremental validity. In addition, although structural equation modelling findings supported a possible general MI factor in Study 2, the patterns of associations for self- and other-directed expressions yielded evidence for differential validity with varying forms of forgiveness and combat exposure. As such, the EMIS-M provides a face valid, psychometrically validated tool for assessing expressions of apparent MI subtypes in research and clinical settings. Looking ahead, the EMIS-M will hopefully advance the scientific understanding of MI while supporting innovation for clinicians to tailor evidence-based treatments and/or develop novel approaches for addressing MI in their work.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_29282787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29282787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_292827873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjr0KwjAYRYMgtv68guQFCjEOaWat6NDJ4lqi_YopaRKStOjbm4LOTvfewxnuDKU7wnlGcsYTtPS-I4QwlrMFSiinOY01RdURRlDG9qADFrrBMAo1iCCNxqbF4Qm4eFkH3kfiJ1QaJxS-6G5wb3x9CAVZKZUMIs4buMlbo3krlIfNN1doeyqqwzmzw72HprZO9lGvfzf2f4UPA4k-QQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Currier, Joseph M ; Farnsworth, Jacob K ; Drescher, Kent D ; McDermott, Ryon C ; Sims, Brook M ; Albright, David L</creator><creatorcontrib>Currier, Joseph M ; Farnsworth, Jacob K ; Drescher, Kent D ; McDermott, Ryon C ; Sims, Brook M ; Albright, David L</creatorcontrib><description>There is consensus that military personnel can encounter a far more diverse set of challenges than researchers and clinicians have historically appreciated. Moral injury (MI) represents an emerging construct to capture behavioural, social, and spiritual suffering that may transcend and overlap with mental health diagnoses (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder). The Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version (EMIS-M) was developed to provide a reliable and valid means for assessing the warning signs of a MI in military populations. Drawing on independent samples of veterans who had served in a war-zone environment, factor analytic results revealed 2 distinct factors related to MI expressions directed at both self (9 items) and others (8 items). These subscales generated excellent internal consistency and temporal stability over a 6-month period. When compared to measures of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and other theoretically relevant constructs (e.g., forgiveness, social support, moral emotions, and combat exposure), EMIS-M scores demonstrated strong convergent, divergent, and incremental validity. In addition, although structural equation modelling findings supported a possible general MI factor in Study 2, the patterns of associations for self- and other-directed expressions yielded evidence for differential validity with varying forms of forgiveness and combat exposure. As such, the EMIS-M provides a face valid, psychometrically validated tool for assessing expressions of apparent MI subtypes in research and clinical settings. Looking ahead, the EMIS-M will hopefully advance the scientific understanding of MI while supporting innovation for clinicians to tailor evidence-based treatments and/or develop novel approaches for addressing MI in their work.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0879</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29282787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2017-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8843-2996</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Currier, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnsworth, Jacob K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Kent D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Ryon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Brook M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albright, David L</creatorcontrib><title>Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version</title><title>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><description>There is consensus that military personnel can encounter a far more diverse set of challenges than researchers and clinicians have historically appreciated. Moral injury (MI) represents an emerging construct to capture behavioural, social, and spiritual suffering that may transcend and overlap with mental health diagnoses (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder). The Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version (EMIS-M) was developed to provide a reliable and valid means for assessing the warning signs of a MI in military populations. Drawing on independent samples of veterans who had served in a war-zone environment, factor analytic results revealed 2 distinct factors related to MI expressions directed at both self (9 items) and others (8 items). These subscales generated excellent internal consistency and temporal stability over a 6-month period. When compared to measures of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and other theoretically relevant constructs (e.g., forgiveness, social support, moral emotions, and combat exposure), EMIS-M scores demonstrated strong convergent, divergent, and incremental validity. In addition, although structural equation modelling findings supported a possible general MI factor in Study 2, the patterns of associations for self- and other-directed expressions yielded evidence for differential validity with varying forms of forgiveness and combat exposure. As such, the EMIS-M provides a face valid, psychometrically validated tool for assessing expressions of apparent MI subtypes in research and clinical settings. Looking ahead, the EMIS-M will hopefully advance the scientific understanding of MI while supporting innovation for clinicians to tailor evidence-based treatments and/or develop novel approaches for addressing MI in their work.</description><issn>1099-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjr0KwjAYRYMgtv68guQFCjEOaWat6NDJ4lqi_YopaRKStOjbm4LOTvfewxnuDKU7wnlGcsYTtPS-I4QwlrMFSiinOY01RdURRlDG9qADFrrBMAo1iCCNxqbF4Qm4eFkH3kfiJ1QaJxS-6G5wb3x9CAVZKZUMIs4buMlbo3krlIfNN1doeyqqwzmzw72HprZO9lGvfzf2f4UPA4k-QQ</recordid><startdate>20171228</startdate><enddate>20171228</enddate><creator>Currier, Joseph M</creator><creator>Farnsworth, Jacob K</creator><creator>Drescher, Kent D</creator><creator>McDermott, Ryon C</creator><creator>Sims, Brook M</creator><creator>Albright, David L</creator><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-2996</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171228</creationdate><title>Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version</title><author>Currier, Joseph M ; Farnsworth, Jacob K ; Drescher, Kent D ; McDermott, Ryon C ; Sims, Brook M ; Albright, David L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_292827873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Currier, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnsworth, Jacob K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drescher, Kent D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Ryon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Brook M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albright, David L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Currier, Joseph M</au><au>Farnsworth, Jacob K</au><au>Drescher, Kent D</au><au>McDermott, Ryon C</au><au>Sims, Brook M</au><au>Albright, David L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><date>2017-12-28</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>1099-0879</eissn><abstract>There is consensus that military personnel can encounter a far more diverse set of challenges than researchers and clinicians have historically appreciated. Moral injury (MI) represents an emerging construct to capture behavioural, social, and spiritual suffering that may transcend and overlap with mental health diagnoses (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder). The Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version (EMIS-M) was developed to provide a reliable and valid means for assessing the warning signs of a MI in military populations. Drawing on independent samples of veterans who had served in a war-zone environment, factor analytic results revealed 2 distinct factors related to MI expressions directed at both self (9 items) and others (8 items). These subscales generated excellent internal consistency and temporal stability over a 6-month period. When compared to measures of post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and other theoretically relevant constructs (e.g., forgiveness, social support, moral emotions, and combat exposure), EMIS-M scores demonstrated strong convergent, divergent, and incremental validity. In addition, although structural equation modelling findings supported a possible general MI factor in Study 2, the patterns of associations for self- and other-directed expressions yielded evidence for differential validity with varying forms of forgiveness and combat exposure. As such, the EMIS-M provides a face valid, psychometrically validated tool for assessing expressions of apparent MI subtypes in research and clinical settings. Looking ahead, the EMIS-M will hopefully advance the scientific understanding of MI while supporting innovation for clinicians to tailor evidence-based treatments and/or develop novel approaches for addressing MI in their work.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29282787</pmid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-2996</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1099-0879
ispartof Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2017-12
issn 1099-0879
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_29282787
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Development and evaluation of the Expressions of Moral Injury Scale-Military Version
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Expressions%20of%20Moral%20Injury%20Scale-Military%20Version&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20and%20psychotherapy&rft.au=Currier,%20Joseph%20M&rft.date=2017-12-28&rft.eissn=1099-0879&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E29282787%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29282787&rfr_iscdi=true