Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application

In vitro Dicentric (DC) dose response curves of 6MV X-rays (3Gy/min) and Co γ-rays (0.63Gy/min) were generated and compared (intra-laboratory) to understand their similarities and differences. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to ten different doses (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Gy)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied radiation and isotopes 2017-11, Vol.129, p.124
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, A Arul Anantha, Bakkiam, D, Sonwani, Swetha, Seenisamy, R, Sivasubramanian, K, Venkatraman, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 124
container_title Applied radiation and isotopes
container_volume 129
creator Kumar, A Arul Anantha
Bakkiam, D
Sonwani, Swetha
Seenisamy, R
Sivasubramanian, K
Venkatraman, B
description In vitro Dicentric (DC) dose response curves of 6MV X-rays (3Gy/min) and Co γ-rays (0.63Gy/min) were generated and compared (intra-laboratory) to understand their similarities and differences. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to ten different doses (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Gy) of 6MV X-rays and Co γ-rays were subjected to Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) and dicentrics, excess acentric fragments (AF) and chromatid breaks (CB) were scored. Totally about 31,553 metaphase spreads were scored for the purpose. Dose response curves of both radiation qualities were almost same except for a 13.8% higher β value for 6MV X-rays. However, blind tests results revealed that both these curves are biologically equivalent and exhibited good dose prediction accuracy for the entire dose range. This demonstrated the feasibility of interchangeable use of these curves in biodosimetry. Consequently it has been suggested that LINAC facilities worldwide can be roped in for biodosimetry capacity augmentation towards managing nuclear emergency situations involving γ-radiation exposures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_28843160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28843160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_288431603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjt1KAzEUhIMgtv68QjkvsPEkLdv0UhZFQb0S8a6cbrKQ0s0JJ1thn8v38JlcUa-9mmH4ZhilFga1QVNf7zVlIR8La4tmrdFptHii5satbbVxiDN1XsoeEVduY8_UzDq3Wpoa54ob7jPJ1E3AHfjYhjRIbMFzCSChZE6TaY_yHso3UT-9wuPD800Db5XQWICShxqhYfj8-Ek6FthFnhZiHwYZgXI-xJaGyOlSnXZ0KOHqVy_U4u72pbmv8nHXB7_NEnuScfv3cPkv8AW0wU7j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kumar, A Arul Anantha ; Bakkiam, D ; Sonwani, Swetha ; Seenisamy, R ; Sivasubramanian, K ; Venkatraman, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, A Arul Anantha ; Bakkiam, D ; Sonwani, Swetha ; Seenisamy, R ; Sivasubramanian, K ; Venkatraman, B</creatorcontrib><description>In vitro Dicentric (DC) dose response curves of 6MV X-rays (3Gy/min) and Co γ-rays (0.63Gy/min) were generated and compared (intra-laboratory) to understand their similarities and differences. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to ten different doses (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Gy) of 6MV X-rays and Co γ-rays were subjected to Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) and dicentrics, excess acentric fragments (AF) and chromatid breaks (CB) were scored. Totally about 31,553 metaphase spreads were scored for the purpose. Dose response curves of both radiation qualities were almost same except for a 13.8% higher β value for 6MV X-rays. However, blind tests results revealed that both these curves are biologically equivalent and exhibited good dose prediction accuracy for the entire dose range. This demonstrated the feasibility of interchangeable use of these curves in biodosimetry. Consequently it has been suggested that LINAC facilities worldwide can be roped in for biodosimetry capacity augmentation towards managing nuclear emergency situations involving γ-radiation exposures.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28843160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2017-11, Vol.129, p.124</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, A Arul Anantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakkiam, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonwani, Swetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seenisamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivasubramanian, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatraman, B</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><description>In vitro Dicentric (DC) dose response curves of 6MV X-rays (3Gy/min) and Co γ-rays (0.63Gy/min) were generated and compared (intra-laboratory) to understand their similarities and differences. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to ten different doses (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Gy) of 6MV X-rays and Co γ-rays were subjected to Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) and dicentrics, excess acentric fragments (AF) and chromatid breaks (CB) were scored. Totally about 31,553 metaphase spreads were scored for the purpose. Dose response curves of both radiation qualities were almost same except for a 13.8% higher β value for 6MV X-rays. However, blind tests results revealed that both these curves are biologically equivalent and exhibited good dose prediction accuracy for the entire dose range. This demonstrated the feasibility of interchangeable use of these curves in biodosimetry. Consequently it has been suggested that LINAC facilities worldwide can be roped in for biodosimetry capacity augmentation towards managing nuclear emergency situations involving γ-radiation exposures.</description><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjt1KAzEUhIMgtv68QjkvsPEkLdv0UhZFQb0S8a6cbrKQ0s0JJ1thn8v38JlcUa-9mmH4ZhilFga1QVNf7zVlIR8La4tmrdFptHii5satbbVxiDN1XsoeEVduY8_UzDq3Wpoa54ob7jPJ1E3AHfjYhjRIbMFzCSChZE6TaY_yHso3UT-9wuPD800Db5XQWICShxqhYfj8-Ek6FthFnhZiHwYZgXI-xJaGyOlSnXZ0KOHqVy_U4u72pbmv8nHXB7_NEnuScfv3cPkv8AW0wU7j</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Kumar, A Arul Anantha</creator><creator>Bakkiam, D</creator><creator>Sonwani, Swetha</creator><creator>Seenisamy, R</creator><creator>Sivasubramanian, K</creator><creator>Venkatraman, B</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application</title><author>Kumar, A Arul Anantha ; Bakkiam, D ; Sonwani, Swetha ; Seenisamy, R ; Sivasubramanian, K ; Venkatraman, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_288431603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, A Arul Anantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakkiam, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonwani, Swetha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seenisamy, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivasubramanian, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatraman, B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, A Arul Anantha</au><au>Bakkiam, D</au><au>Sonwani, Swetha</au><au>Seenisamy, R</au><au>Sivasubramanian, K</au><au>Venkatraman, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>124</spage><pages>124-</pages><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>In vitro Dicentric (DC) dose response curves of 6MV X-rays (3Gy/min) and Co γ-rays (0.63Gy/min) were generated and compared (intra-laboratory) to understand their similarities and differences. Human peripheral blood samples exposed to ten different doses (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5Gy) of 6MV X-rays and Co γ-rays were subjected to Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) and dicentrics, excess acentric fragments (AF) and chromatid breaks (CB) were scored. Totally about 31,553 metaphase spreads were scored for the purpose. Dose response curves of both radiation qualities were almost same except for a 13.8% higher β value for 6MV X-rays. However, blind tests results revealed that both these curves are biologically equivalent and exhibited good dose prediction accuracy for the entire dose range. This demonstrated the feasibility of interchangeable use of these curves in biodosimetry. Consequently it has been suggested that LINAC facilities worldwide can be roped in for biodosimetry capacity augmentation towards managing nuclear emergency situations involving γ-radiation exposures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>28843160</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.020</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1872-9800
ispartof Applied radiation and isotopes, 2017-11, Vol.129, p.124
issn 1872-9800
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_28843160
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60 Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A44%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20dicentric%20dose%20response%20curves%20of%206MV%20LINAC%20X-rays%20and%2060%20Co%20%CE%B3-rays%20for%20biodosimetry%20application&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Kumar,%20A%20Arul%20Anantha&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=124&rft.pages=124-&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.020&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E28843160%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28843160&rfr_iscdi=true