Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study

To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk. From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction 2017-01, Vol.46 (1), p.43
Hauptverfasser: Hamouda, S, Mancini, J, Marchand, F, Bretelle, F, Boubli, L, D'Ercole, C, Carcopino, X
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
container_volume 46
creator Hamouda, S
Mancini, J
Marchand, F
Bretelle, F
Boubli, L
D'Ercole, C
Carcopino, X
description To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk. From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prospectively included. Each spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) following each included IVD were included as control cases (1-1 ratio). Careful perineal examination was systematically performed. Severe perineal tear was defined by the occurrence of anal sphincter rupture with or without anal mucosa tear. A total of 761 patients were included in the current study: 248 (64%) spatulas, 137 (36%) vacuums and 381 (49%) SVDs. Severe perineal tear was diagnosed in 19 (2.5%) cases. Episiotomy had been performed in 276 (36.9%) patients. Only spatulas extraction was found to significantly increase the risk of severe perineal tear (AOR=7.66; 95% CI: 2.06-28; P=0.02). Although vacuum extraction seemed to increase this risk, it was not found to be significant (AOR=3.25; 95% CI: 0.65-16.24; P=0.15). No significant difference was observed between the risk of severe perineal tear following spatulas and vacuum (AOR=2.36; 95% CI: 0.63-8.82; P=0.202). Finally, neither foetal macrosomia, nor episiotomy, nor foetal extraction with the head in the deep pelvis, nor delivery at night had a significant impact on the probability of severe perineal tear. Spatulas extraction is an independent risk factor for severe perineal tear. The practice of episiotomy was not shown to have any significant impact on this risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_28403956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28403956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-d630837e941ff06b00f34327a91079f82f4e6346ff0b390ff632d04b1d5fc8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtOwzAURC0kRCvoD7BA3rFKuI5dx2FXVbykSizovnLi69ZVXrKdiHwE_0wQsBqNzugshpBbBikDJh_O6fk4tWkGbJ0ylgLwC7LMhFRJrkS-IKsQzgDAVCYll1dkkSkBvFjLJfn6wBE90h69a1HXtOl86YyLE-0sdW2IfmiwjTMxWLt56zDQIbj2SPcnh95P94GGXseh1oHq1tBRV8PQUPyMXlfRde0j3dDed6HHuY5IuzKgH_UPmrVVd-p8pCEOZrohl1bXAVd_eU32z0_77Wuye3952252Sc9AxcRIDornWAhmLcgSwHLBs1wXDPLCqswKlFzIGZa8AGslzwyIkpm1rVTFr8ndr7YfygbNofeu0X46_N_CvwExLWja</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hamouda, S ; Mancini, J ; Marchand, F ; Bretelle, F ; Boubli, L ; D'Ercole, C ; Carcopino, X</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamouda, S ; Mancini, J ; Marchand, F ; Bretelle, F ; Boubli, L ; D'Ercole, C ; Carcopino, X</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk. From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prospectively included. Each spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) following each included IVD were included as control cases (1-1 ratio). Careful perineal examination was systematically performed. Severe perineal tear was defined by the occurrence of anal sphincter rupture with or without anal mucosa tear. A total of 761 patients were included in the current study: 248 (64%) spatulas, 137 (36%) vacuums and 381 (49%) SVDs. Severe perineal tear was diagnosed in 19 (2.5%) cases. Episiotomy had been performed in 276 (36.9%) patients. Only spatulas extraction was found to significantly increase the risk of severe perineal tear (AOR=7.66; 95% CI: 2.06-28; P=0.02). Although vacuum extraction seemed to increase this risk, it was not found to be significant (AOR=3.25; 95% CI: 0.65-16.24; P=0.15). No significant difference was observed between the risk of severe perineal tear following spatulas and vacuum (AOR=2.36; 95% CI: 0.63-8.82; P=0.202). Finally, neither foetal macrosomia, nor episiotomy, nor foetal extraction with the head in the deep pelvis, nor delivery at night had a significant impact on the probability of severe perineal tear. Spatulas extraction is an independent risk factor for severe perineal tear. The practice of episiotomy was not shown to have any significant impact on this risk.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28403956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anal Canal - injuries ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa - injuries ; Obstetrical Forceps - adverse effects ; Perineum - injuries ; Perineum - surgery ; Pregnancy ; Rupture ; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2017-01, Vol.46 (1), p.43</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28403956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamouda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretelle, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boubli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Ercole, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carcopino, X</creatorcontrib><title>Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study</title><title>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</title><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk. From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prospectively included. Each spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) following each included IVD were included as control cases (1-1 ratio). Careful perineal examination was systematically performed. Severe perineal tear was defined by the occurrence of anal sphincter rupture with or without anal mucosa tear. A total of 761 patients were included in the current study: 248 (64%) spatulas, 137 (36%) vacuums and 381 (49%) SVDs. Severe perineal tear was diagnosed in 19 (2.5%) cases. Episiotomy had been performed in 276 (36.9%) patients. Only spatulas extraction was found to significantly increase the risk of severe perineal tear (AOR=7.66; 95% CI: 2.06-28; P=0.02). Although vacuum extraction seemed to increase this risk, it was not found to be significant (AOR=3.25; 95% CI: 0.65-16.24; P=0.15). No significant difference was observed between the risk of severe perineal tear following spatulas and vacuum (AOR=2.36; 95% CI: 0.63-8.82; P=0.202). Finally, neither foetal macrosomia, nor episiotomy, nor foetal extraction with the head in the deep pelvis, nor delivery at night had a significant impact on the probability of severe perineal tear. Spatulas extraction is an independent risk factor for severe perineal tear. The practice of episiotomy was not shown to have any significant impact on this risk.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anal Canal - injuries</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - injuries</subject><subject>Obstetrical Forceps - adverse effects</subject><subject>Perineum - injuries</subject><subject>Perineum - surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><issn>2468-7847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMtOwzAURC0kRCvoD7BA3rFKuI5dx2FXVbykSizovnLi69ZVXrKdiHwE_0wQsBqNzugshpBbBikDJh_O6fk4tWkGbJ0ylgLwC7LMhFRJrkS-IKsQzgDAVCYll1dkkSkBvFjLJfn6wBE90h69a1HXtOl86YyLE-0sdW2IfmiwjTMxWLt56zDQIbj2SPcnh95P94GGXseh1oHq1tBRV8PQUPyMXlfRde0j3dDed6HHuY5IuzKgH_UPmrVVd-p8pCEOZrohl1bXAVd_eU32z0_77Wuye3952252Sc9AxcRIDornWAhmLcgSwHLBs1wXDPLCqswKlFzIGZa8AGslzwyIkpm1rVTFr8ndr7YfygbNofeu0X46_N_CvwExLWja</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Hamouda, S</creator><creator>Mancini, J</creator><creator>Marchand, F</creator><creator>Bretelle, F</creator><creator>Boubli, L</creator><creator>D'Ercole, C</creator><creator>Carcopino, X</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study</title><author>Hamouda, S ; Mancini, J ; Marchand, F ; Bretelle, F ; Boubli, L ; D'Ercole, C ; Carcopino, X</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-d630837e941ff06b00f34327a91079f82f4e6346ff0b390ff632d04b1d5fc8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anal Canal - injuries</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - injuries</topic><topic>Obstetrical Forceps - adverse effects</topic><topic>Perineum - injuries</topic><topic>Perineum - surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamouda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretelle, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boubli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Ercole, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carcopino, X</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamouda, S</au><au>Mancini, J</au><au>Marchand, F</au><au>Bretelle, F</au><au>Boubli, L</au><au>D'Ercole, C</au><au>Carcopino, X</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><pages>43-</pages><eissn>2468-7847</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the risk of severe perineal tear following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) performed with spatulas and vacuum extraction. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact of episiotomy on this risk. From December 2008 to October 2012, women who underwent spatulas or vacuum were prospectively included. Each spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) following each included IVD were included as control cases (1-1 ratio). Careful perineal examination was systematically performed. Severe perineal tear was defined by the occurrence of anal sphincter rupture with or without anal mucosa tear. A total of 761 patients were included in the current study: 248 (64%) spatulas, 137 (36%) vacuums and 381 (49%) SVDs. Severe perineal tear was diagnosed in 19 (2.5%) cases. Episiotomy had been performed in 276 (36.9%) patients. Only spatulas extraction was found to significantly increase the risk of severe perineal tear (AOR=7.66; 95% CI: 2.06-28; P=0.02). Although vacuum extraction seemed to increase this risk, it was not found to be significant (AOR=3.25; 95% CI: 0.65-16.24; P=0.15). No significant difference was observed between the risk of severe perineal tear following spatulas and vacuum (AOR=2.36; 95% CI: 0.63-8.82; P=0.202). Finally, neither foetal macrosomia, nor episiotomy, nor foetal extraction with the head in the deep pelvis, nor delivery at night had a significant impact on the probability of severe perineal tear. Spatulas extraction is an independent risk factor for severe perineal tear. The practice of episiotomy was not shown to have any significant impact on this risk.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>28403956</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.11.003</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2468-7847
ispartof Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2017-01, Vol.46 (1), p.43
issn 2468-7847
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_28403956
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Anal Canal - injuries
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Intestinal Mucosa - injuries
Obstetrical Forceps - adverse effects
Perineum - injuries
Perineum - surgery
Pregnancy
Rupture
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects
title Severe perineal morbidity of instrumental deliveries using Thierry's spatulas and vacuum extraction: A prospective observational cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Severe%20perineal%20morbidity%20of%20instrumental%20deliveries%20using%20Thierry's%20spatulas%20and%20vacuum%20extraction:%20A%20prospective%20observational%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecology%20obstetrics%20and%20human%20reproduction&rft.au=Hamouda,%20S&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.pages=43-&rft.eissn=2468-7847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E28403956%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28403956&rfr_iscdi=true