Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding

Field metabolic rate (FMR) links the energy budget of an animal with the constraints of its ecosystem, but is particularly difficult to measure for small organisms. Landscape degradation exacerbates environmental adversity and reduces resource availability, imposing higher costs of living for many o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2017-02, Vol.284 (1848), p.20162676-20162676
Hauptverfasser: Tomlinson, Sean, Dixon, Kingsley W., Didham, Raphael K., Bradshaw, S. Donald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20162676
container_issue 1848
container_start_page 20162676
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 284
creator Tomlinson, Sean
Dixon, Kingsley W.
Didham, Raphael K.
Bradshaw, S. Donald
description Field metabolic rate (FMR) links the energy budget of an animal with the constraints of its ecosystem, but is particularly difficult to measure for small organisms. Landscape degradation exacerbates environmental adversity and reduces resource availability, imposing higher costs of living for many organisms. Here, we report a significant effect of landscape degradation on the FMR of free-flying Apis mellifera, estimated using 86Rb radio-isotopic turnover. We validated the relationship between 86Rb kb and metabolic rate for worker bees in the laboratory using flow-through respirometry. We then released radioisotopically enriched individuals into a natural woodland and a heavily degraded and deforested plantation. FMRs of worker bees in natural woodland vegetation were significantly higher than in a deforested landscape. Nectar consumption, estimated using 22Na radio-isotopic turnover, also differed significantly between natural and degraded landscapes. In the deforested landscape, we infer that the costs of foraging exceeded energetic availability, and honeybees instead foraged less and depended more on stored resources in the hive. If this is generally the case with increasing landscape degradation, this will have important implications for the provision of pollination services and the effectiveness and resilience of ecological restoration practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2016.2676
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_28179522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1872818793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-4dc70b5acf302d18b0bcebb50a73c0d75957ce66d2a1afa1728505c40159b99f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCliWKxIZNhmvHzw0SVJSHRgLxWFu247QuSTy1kxHDr8fDDFVbCcTGluXvnGPfg9ATDEsMSr5IeW2XBDBfEi74PbTAVOCaKEbvowUoTmpJGTlCxzlfAoBikj1ER0RioRghC_RhZcY2O7P2lYvj5H9Mleknn3I55qmKXdWHTRjPqzBWF3H0W-t9NfjJ2NiHPFRFXXXetwV5hB50ps_-8WE_Qd_O3nw9fVevPr59f_pqVTum2FTT1gmwzLiuAdJiacE6by0DIxoHrSiQcJ7zlhhsOoMFkQyYo4CZskp1zQl6ufddz3bwrfPjlEyv1ykMJm11NEHfvhnDhT6PG80aDBw3xeD5wSDFq9nnSQ8hO9_3ZvRxzhrLklkW9T8o51w1FNOCPruDXsY5jWUSGitJQeIGoFDLPeVSzDn57vrdGPSuUb1rVO8a1btGi-Dpzd9e438qLECzB1LclrDogp-2N7L_Zvv9X6rPXz693hBJA5ZUapBlcoKKRumfYX2wklSHnGevfyO37e-m_QKdK9Fx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984081300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tomlinson, Sean ; Dixon, Kingsley W. ; Didham, Raphael K. ; Bradshaw, S. Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean ; Dixon, Kingsley W. ; Didham, Raphael K. ; Bradshaw, S. Donald</creatorcontrib><description>Field metabolic rate (FMR) links the energy budget of an animal with the constraints of its ecosystem, but is particularly difficult to measure for small organisms. Landscape degradation exacerbates environmental adversity and reduces resource availability, imposing higher costs of living for many organisms. Here, we report a significant effect of landscape degradation on the FMR of free-flying Apis mellifera, estimated using 86Rb radio-isotopic turnover. We validated the relationship between 86Rb kb and metabolic rate for worker bees in the laboratory using flow-through respirometry. We then released radioisotopically enriched individuals into a natural woodland and a heavily degraded and deforested plantation. FMRs of worker bees in natural woodland vegetation were significantly higher than in a deforested landscape. Nectar consumption, estimated using 22Na radio-isotopic turnover, also differed significantly between natural and degraded landscapes. In the deforested landscape, we infer that the costs of foraging exceeded energetic availability, and honeybees instead foraged less and depended more on stored resources in the hive. If this is generally the case with increasing landscape degradation, this will have important implications for the provision of pollination services and the effectiveness and resilience of ecological restoration practice.</description><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2676</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28179522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Bees - metabolism ; Cost Of Living ; Deforestation ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Energy budget ; Environmental degradation ; Field Metabolic Rate ; Flight ; Forage ; Honeybee ; Landscape ; Metabolic rate ; Metabolism ; Nectar ; Plant Nectar ; Plantations ; Pollination ; Resource availability ; Respirometry ; Restoration</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2017-02, Vol.284 (1848), p.20162676-20162676</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright The Royal Society Publishing Feb 8, 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-4dc70b5acf302d18b0bcebb50a73c0d75957ce66d2a1afa1728505c40159b99f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-4dc70b5acf302d18b0bcebb50a73c0d75957ce66d2a1afa1728505c40159b99f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0864-5391</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310613/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310613/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Kingsley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, S. Donald</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Field metabolic rate (FMR) links the energy budget of an animal with the constraints of its ecosystem, but is particularly difficult to measure for small organisms. Landscape degradation exacerbates environmental adversity and reduces resource availability, imposing higher costs of living for many organisms. Here, we report a significant effect of landscape degradation on the FMR of free-flying Apis mellifera, estimated using 86Rb radio-isotopic turnover. We validated the relationship between 86Rb kb and metabolic rate for worker bees in the laboratory using flow-through respirometry. We then released radioisotopically enriched individuals into a natural woodland and a heavily degraded and deforested plantation. FMRs of worker bees in natural woodland vegetation were significantly higher than in a deforested landscape. Nectar consumption, estimated using 22Na radio-isotopic turnover, also differed significantly between natural and degraded landscapes. In the deforested landscape, we infer that the costs of foraging exceeded energetic availability, and honeybees instead foraged less and depended more on stored resources in the hive. If this is generally the case with increasing landscape degradation, this will have important implications for the provision of pollination services and the effectiveness and resilience of ecological restoration practice.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bees - metabolism</subject><subject>Cost Of Living</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Field Metabolic Rate</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Honeybee</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Metabolic rate</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Plant Nectar</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Respirometry</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCliWKxIZNhmvHzw0SVJSHRgLxWFu247QuSTy1kxHDr8fDDFVbCcTGluXvnGPfg9ATDEsMSr5IeW2XBDBfEi74PbTAVOCaKEbvowUoTmpJGTlCxzlfAoBikj1ER0RioRghC_RhZcY2O7P2lYvj5H9Mleknn3I55qmKXdWHTRjPqzBWF3H0W-t9NfjJ2NiHPFRFXXXetwV5hB50ps_-8WE_Qd_O3nw9fVevPr59f_pqVTum2FTT1gmwzLiuAdJiacE6by0DIxoHrSiQcJ7zlhhsOoMFkQyYo4CZskp1zQl6ufddz3bwrfPjlEyv1ykMJm11NEHfvhnDhT6PG80aDBw3xeD5wSDFq9nnSQ8hO9_3ZvRxzhrLklkW9T8o51w1FNOCPruDXsY5jWUSGitJQeIGoFDLPeVSzDn57vrdGPSuUb1rVO8a1btGi-Dpzd9e438qLECzB1LclrDogp-2N7L_Zvv9X6rPXz693hBJA5ZUapBlcoKKRumfYX2wklSHnGevfyO37e-m_QKdK9Fx</recordid><startdate>20170208</startdate><enddate>20170208</enddate><creator>Tomlinson, Sean</creator><creator>Dixon, Kingsley W.</creator><creator>Didham, Raphael K.</creator><creator>Bradshaw, S. Donald</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-5391</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170208</creationdate><title>Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding</title><author>Tomlinson, Sean ; Dixon, Kingsley W. ; Didham, Raphael K. ; Bradshaw, S. Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-4dc70b5acf302d18b0bcebb50a73c0d75957ce66d2a1afa1728505c40159b99f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bees - metabolism</topic><topic>Cost Of Living</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Field Metabolic Rate</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Honeybee</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Metabolic rate</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Plant Nectar</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Respirometry</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Kingsley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Didham, Raphael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, S. Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomlinson, Sean</au><au>Dixon, Kingsley W.</au><au>Didham, Raphael K.</au><au>Bradshaw, S. Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2017-02-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>284</volume><issue>1848</issue><spage>20162676</spage><epage>20162676</epage><pages>20162676-20162676</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Field metabolic rate (FMR) links the energy budget of an animal with the constraints of its ecosystem, but is particularly difficult to measure for small organisms. Landscape degradation exacerbates environmental adversity and reduces resource availability, imposing higher costs of living for many organisms. Here, we report a significant effect of landscape degradation on the FMR of free-flying Apis mellifera, estimated using 86Rb radio-isotopic turnover. We validated the relationship between 86Rb kb and metabolic rate for worker bees in the laboratory using flow-through respirometry. We then released radioisotopically enriched individuals into a natural woodland and a heavily degraded and deforested plantation. FMRs of worker bees in natural woodland vegetation were significantly higher than in a deforested landscape. Nectar consumption, estimated using 22Na radio-isotopic turnover, also differed significantly between natural and degraded landscapes. In the deforested landscape, we infer that the costs of foraging exceeded energetic availability, and honeybees instead foraged less and depended more on stored resources in the hive. If this is generally the case with increasing landscape degradation, this will have important implications for the provision of pollination services and the effectiveness and resilience of ecological restoration practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>28179522</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2016.2676</doi><tpages>1</tpages><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-5391</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2017-02, Vol.284 (1848), p.20162676-20162676
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_28179522
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Apis mellifera
Bees
Bees - metabolism
Cost Of Living
Deforestation
Ecological effects
Ecology
Ecosystem
Energy budget
Environmental degradation
Field Metabolic Rate
Flight
Forage
Honeybee
Landscape
Metabolic rate
Metabolism
Nectar
Plant Nectar
Plantations
Pollination
Resource availability
Respirometry
Restoration
title Landscape context alters cost of living in honeybee metabolism and feeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%20context%20alters%20cost%20of%20living%20in%20honeybee%20metabolism%20and%20feeding&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Tomlinson,%20Sean&rft.date=2017-02-08&rft.volume=284&rft.issue=1848&rft.spage=20162676&rft.epage=20162676&rft.pages=20162676-20162676&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2016.2676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1872818793%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984081300&rft_id=info:pmid/28179522&rfr_iscdi=true