Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems

Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems to aid in optimizing dose and image noise have become standard on computed tomography (CT) scanners over the last decade. ATCM systems of the main vendors modulate tube current in slightly different ways, with some using a control parameter related to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiological protection 2017-03, Vol.37 (1), p.84-96
Hauptverfasser: Sookpeng, Supawitoo, Martin, Colin J, Cheebsumon, Patsuree, Pengpan, Thanyawee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title Journal of radiological protection
container_volume 37
creator Sookpeng, Supawitoo
Martin, Colin J
Cheebsumon, Patsuree
Pengpan, Thanyawee
description Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems to aid in optimizing dose and image noise have become standard on computed tomography (CT) scanners over the last decade. ATCM systems of the main vendors modulate tube current in slightly different ways, with some using a control parameter related to image noise (e.g. Toshiba, GE) while others use a quality reference image mAs (e.g. Siemens). The translation of clinical protocols including ATCM operation between CT scanners from different manufacturers in order to obtain similar levels of image quality with optimized exposure variables has become an important issue. In this study, cylindrical phantoms of different sizes representing small, average and large patients, have been combined into one phantom, which has been scanned on Siemens, Toshiba and GE CT scanners with the full ranges of ATCM image quality settings. The volume weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image noise over each section of the phantom were recorded for every setting. Relationships between the image quality level settings, and CTDIvol and measured image noise were analysed in order to investigate ATCM performance. Equations were developed from fits of the data to enable CTDIvol and image noise to be expressed in terms of the image quality parameters for different size phantoms on each scanner. The Siemens scanner protocol was chosen as the reference, as it avoided high doses for large patients, while allowing full modulation of tube current for patients of all sizes, and so was considered to provide optimized performance. The equations derived were used to equate the noise parameters on Toshiba and GE scanners to the quality reference mAs on the Siemens scanner, so that clinical protocols incorporating similar levels of optimization could be obtained on the three CT scanners.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/84
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_27977415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1852688039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8f4f5a2b55b2da4bc4335a1c4d24374e8caffe87e8bd303b7f5f3af160cc13093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OAyEURonR2Fp9ADeGxI2bsTAwA102jX-JRhd1TRjmEqlTZgSa2rd3arUrXZHcnO9c7ofQOSXXlEg5pqykWckncszEmI4lP0DD_ewQDcmkyDMueDlAJzEuCCElY_kxGuRiIgSnxRC9vwRtkjO6wfDZQXDgDUTsPE5vgFPQPloIuLXYNM5_c11oU2vaJuIK0hrA49kcR6O9hxDx2qU3XDvbp8AnPJ3PnnDcxATLeIqOrG4inP28I_R6ezOf3WePz3cPs-ljZlgpUiYtt4XOq6Ko8lrzynDGCk0Nr3POBAdpdG-XAmRVM8IqYQvLtKUlMYYyMmEjdLXz9j_9WEFMaumigabRHtpVVFQWeSklYVuU7lAT2hgDWNUFt9RhoyhR247Vtk-17VMxoaiSvM9c_OhX1RLqfeK31B643AGu7dSiXQXfX6sWoftVqK62PZX9Qf2_9gsb_pL9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1852688039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Sookpeng, Supawitoo ; Martin, Colin J ; Cheebsumon, Patsuree ; Pengpan, Thanyawee</creator><creatorcontrib>Sookpeng, Supawitoo ; Martin, Colin J ; Cheebsumon, Patsuree ; Pengpan, Thanyawee</creatorcontrib><description>Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems to aid in optimizing dose and image noise have become standard on computed tomography (CT) scanners over the last decade. ATCM systems of the main vendors modulate tube current in slightly different ways, with some using a control parameter related to image noise (e.g. Toshiba, GE) while others use a quality reference image mAs (e.g. Siemens). The translation of clinical protocols including ATCM operation between CT scanners from different manufacturers in order to obtain similar levels of image quality with optimized exposure variables has become an important issue. In this study, cylindrical phantoms of different sizes representing small, average and large patients, have been combined into one phantom, which has been scanned on Siemens, Toshiba and GE CT scanners with the full ranges of ATCM image quality settings. The volume weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image noise over each section of the phantom were recorded for every setting. Relationships between the image quality level settings, and CTDIvol and measured image noise were analysed in order to investigate ATCM performance. Equations were developed from fits of the data to enable CTDIvol and image noise to be expressed in terms of the image quality parameters for different size phantoms on each scanner. The Siemens scanner protocol was chosen as the reference, as it avoided high doses for large patients, while allowing full modulation of tube current for patients of all sizes, and so was considered to provide optimized performance. The equations derived were used to equate the noise parameters on Toshiba and GE scanners to the quality reference mAs on the Siemens scanner, so that clinical protocols incorporating similar levels of optimization could be obtained on the three CT scanners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-4746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/84</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27977415</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRPREA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; automatic tube current modulation ; Calibration ; Clinical Protocols ; CT AEC ; CT protocol translation ; Equipment Design ; Guidelines as Topic ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection ; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiological protection, 2017-03, Vol.37 (1), p.84-96</ispartof><rights>2016 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8f4f5a2b55b2da4bc4335a1c4d24374e8caffe87e8bd303b7f5f3af160cc13093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8f4f5a2b55b2da4bc4335a1c4d24374e8caffe87e8bd303b7f5f3af160cc13093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/84/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914,53835,53882</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27977415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sookpeng, Supawitoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheebsumon, Patsuree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pengpan, Thanyawee</creatorcontrib><title>Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems</title><title>Journal of radiological protection</title><addtitle>JRP</addtitle><addtitle>J. Radiol. Prot</addtitle><description>Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems to aid in optimizing dose and image noise have become standard on computed tomography (CT) scanners over the last decade. ATCM systems of the main vendors modulate tube current in slightly different ways, with some using a control parameter related to image noise (e.g. Toshiba, GE) while others use a quality reference image mAs (e.g. Siemens). The translation of clinical protocols including ATCM operation between CT scanners from different manufacturers in order to obtain similar levels of image quality with optimized exposure variables has become an important issue. In this study, cylindrical phantoms of different sizes representing small, average and large patients, have been combined into one phantom, which has been scanned on Siemens, Toshiba and GE CT scanners with the full ranges of ATCM image quality settings. The volume weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image noise over each section of the phantom were recorded for every setting. Relationships between the image quality level settings, and CTDIvol and measured image noise were analysed in order to investigate ATCM performance. Equations were developed from fits of the data to enable CTDIvol and image noise to be expressed in terms of the image quality parameters for different size phantoms on each scanner. The Siemens scanner protocol was chosen as the reference, as it avoided high doses for large patients, while allowing full modulation of tube current for patients of all sizes, and so was considered to provide optimized performance. The equations derived were used to equate the noise parameters on Toshiba and GE scanners to the quality reference mAs on the Siemens scanner, so that clinical protocols incorporating similar levels of optimization could be obtained on the three CT scanners.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>automatic tube current modulation</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>CT AEC</subject><subject>CT protocol translation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0952-4746</issn><issn>1361-6498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OAyEURonR2Fp9ADeGxI2bsTAwA102jX-JRhd1TRjmEqlTZgSa2rd3arUrXZHcnO9c7ofQOSXXlEg5pqykWckncszEmI4lP0DD_ewQDcmkyDMueDlAJzEuCCElY_kxGuRiIgSnxRC9vwRtkjO6wfDZQXDgDUTsPE5vgFPQPloIuLXYNM5_c11oU2vaJuIK0hrA49kcR6O9hxDx2qU3XDvbp8AnPJ3PnnDcxATLeIqOrG4inP28I_R6ezOf3WePz3cPs-ljZlgpUiYtt4XOq6Ko8lrzynDGCk0Nr3POBAdpdG-XAmRVM8IqYQvLtKUlMYYyMmEjdLXz9j_9WEFMaumigabRHtpVVFQWeSklYVuU7lAT2hgDWNUFt9RhoyhR247Vtk-17VMxoaiSvM9c_OhX1RLqfeK31B643AGu7dSiXQXfX6sWoftVqK62PZX9Qf2_9gsb_pL9</recordid><startdate>20170320</startdate><enddate>20170320</enddate><creator>Sookpeng, Supawitoo</creator><creator>Martin, Colin J</creator><creator>Cheebsumon, Patsuree</creator><creator>Pengpan, Thanyawee</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170320</creationdate><title>Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems</title><author>Sookpeng, Supawitoo ; Martin, Colin J ; Cheebsumon, Patsuree ; Pengpan, Thanyawee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8f4f5a2b55b2da4bc4335a1c4d24374e8caffe87e8bd303b7f5f3af160cc13093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>automatic tube current modulation</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>CT AEC</topic><topic>CT protocol translation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sookpeng, Supawitoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Colin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheebsumon, Patsuree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pengpan, Thanyawee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiological protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sookpeng, Supawitoo</au><au>Martin, Colin J</au><au>Cheebsumon, Patsuree</au><au>Pengpan, Thanyawee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiological protection</jtitle><stitle>JRP</stitle><addtitle>J. Radiol. Prot</addtitle><date>2017-03-20</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>84-96</pages><issn>0952-4746</issn><eissn>1361-6498</eissn><coden>JRPREA</coden><abstract>Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems to aid in optimizing dose and image noise have become standard on computed tomography (CT) scanners over the last decade. ATCM systems of the main vendors modulate tube current in slightly different ways, with some using a control parameter related to image noise (e.g. Toshiba, GE) while others use a quality reference image mAs (e.g. Siemens). The translation of clinical protocols including ATCM operation between CT scanners from different manufacturers in order to obtain similar levels of image quality with optimized exposure variables has become an important issue. In this study, cylindrical phantoms of different sizes representing small, average and large patients, have been combined into one phantom, which has been scanned on Siemens, Toshiba and GE CT scanners with the full ranges of ATCM image quality settings. The volume weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and image noise over each section of the phantom were recorded for every setting. Relationships between the image quality level settings, and CTDIvol and measured image noise were analysed in order to investigate ATCM performance. Equations were developed from fits of the data to enable CTDIvol and image noise to be expressed in terms of the image quality parameters for different size phantoms on each scanner. The Siemens scanner protocol was chosen as the reference, as it avoided high doses for large patients, while allowing full modulation of tube current for patients of all sizes, and so was considered to provide optimized performance. The equations derived were used to equate the noise parameters on Toshiba and GE scanners to the quality reference mAs on the Siemens scanner, so that clinical protocols incorporating similar levels of optimization could be obtained on the three CT scanners.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>27977415</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/84</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-4746
ispartof Journal of radiological protection, 2017-03, Vol.37 (1), p.84-96
issn 0952-4746
1361-6498
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_27977415
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Algorithms
automatic tube current modulation
Calibration
Clinical Protocols
CT AEC
CT protocol translation
Equipment Design
Guidelines as Topic
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection
Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed
title Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20experiences%20in%20the%20transfer%20of%20clinical%20protocols%20between%20CT%20scanners%20with%20different%20ATCM%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiological%20protection&rft.au=Sookpeng,%20Supawitoo&rft.date=2017-03-20&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=84-96&rft.issn=0952-4746&rft.eissn=1361-6498&rft.coden=JRPREA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6498/37/1/84&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1852688039%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1852688039&rft_id=info:pmid/27977415&rfr_iscdi=true