Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex

ABSTRACTPrEP is a crucial new tool for the prevention of HIV. However, careful attention must be paid as to whether its widespread adoption could reduce condom usage, which may in turn increase STIs in the long-run. In this article we re-assess whether PrEP uptake may influence condom usage, and we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS (London) 2016-09
Hauptverfasser: Alaei, Kamair, Paynter, Christopher A, Juan, Shao-Chiu, Alaei, Arash
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title AIDS (London)
container_volume
creator Alaei, Kamair
Paynter, Christopher A
Juan, Shao-Chiu
Alaei, Arash
description ABSTRACTPrEP is a crucial new tool for the prevention of HIV. However, careful attention must be paid as to whether its widespread adoption could reduce condom usage, which may in turn increase STIs in the long-run. In this article we re-assess whether PrEP uptake may influence condom usage, and we call for vigilance by public health advocates to ensure that PrEP promotion does not lead to a drop-off in safe sex practices. Most of the evidence that PrEP does not change condom usage comes from double-blind clinical trials which are focused on the biological effect of PrEP on HIV incidence. However, subjects in these trials may not change their behavior because they do not actually know if they are taking PrEP. A number of focus group studies on individuals considering taking PrEP show that many see the drug as an opportunity for increasing unprotected sex. National survey data from the CDC show that condom rates are decreasing among MSM, which are a major target group for PrEP. Furthermore, data from public health records show that STIs are increasing among MSM in some areas with relatively high PrEP uptake. There is enough evidence that PrEP is contributing to rising STI infections to warrant concern. Public health advocates must ensure that PrEP uptake does not inadvertently threaten the publicʼs health and that thirty years of condom promotion are not wasted.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001262
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_wolte</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_27662553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27662553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p722-b48ac21a3dc3edd1caced94eca6ebf2f55502297d1a11c596acfd4e43a9a65cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkG1LwzAQx4Mobk6_gUg_gJ15aJLmlYw5H2DghPk6pMnVVdumJBtz3966KYj34o7_8ePgfghdEjwmWMmbl8ndGP8pQgU9QkOSSZZyLskxGmIqVKqYxAN0FuN7D3Gc56doQKUQlHM2RJPXWLVvySLMFtdJ7ffB-tb5Jt7ut0kXfOPXlW-TxuySTesgNFULSTRl3-DzHJ2Upo5w8TNHaHk_W04f0_nzw9N0Mk87SWlaZLmxlBjmLAPniDUWnMrAGgFFSUvOOaZUSUcMIZYrYWzpMsiYUUZwW7ARujqc7TZFA053oWpM2OnfV3ogPwBbX68hxI96s4WgV2Dq9UoTrL-t6d6a_m-NfQHjxF2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alaei, Kamair ; Paynter, Christopher A ; Juan, Shao-Chiu ; Alaei, Arash</creator><creatorcontrib>Alaei, Kamair ; Paynter, Christopher A ; Juan, Shao-Chiu ; Alaei, Arash</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTPrEP is a crucial new tool for the prevention of HIV. However, careful attention must be paid as to whether its widespread adoption could reduce condom usage, which may in turn increase STIs in the long-run. In this article we re-assess whether PrEP uptake may influence condom usage, and we call for vigilance by public health advocates to ensure that PrEP promotion does not lead to a drop-off in safe sex practices. Most of the evidence that PrEP does not change condom usage comes from double-blind clinical trials which are focused on the biological effect of PrEP on HIV incidence. However, subjects in these trials may not change their behavior because they do not actually know if they are taking PrEP. A number of focus group studies on individuals considering taking PrEP show that many see the drug as an opportunity for increasing unprotected sex. National survey data from the CDC show that condom rates are decreasing among MSM, which are a major target group for PrEP. Furthermore, data from public health records show that STIs are increasing among MSM in some areas with relatively high PrEP uptake. There is enough evidence that PrEP is contributing to rising STI infections to warrant concern. Public health advocates must ensure that PrEP uptake does not inadvertently threaten the publicʼs health and that thirty years of condom promotion are not wasted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001262</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27662553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><ispartof>AIDS (London), 2016-09</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27662553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alaei, Kamair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paynter, Christopher A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan, Shao-Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaei, Arash</creatorcontrib><title>Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex</title><title>AIDS (London)</title><addtitle>AIDS</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTPrEP is a crucial new tool for the prevention of HIV. However, careful attention must be paid as to whether its widespread adoption could reduce condom usage, which may in turn increase STIs in the long-run. In this article we re-assess whether PrEP uptake may influence condom usage, and we call for vigilance by public health advocates to ensure that PrEP promotion does not lead to a drop-off in safe sex practices. Most of the evidence that PrEP does not change condom usage comes from double-blind clinical trials which are focused on the biological effect of PrEP on HIV incidence. However, subjects in these trials may not change their behavior because they do not actually know if they are taking PrEP. A number of focus group studies on individuals considering taking PrEP show that many see the drug as an opportunity for increasing unprotected sex. National survey data from the CDC show that condom rates are decreasing among MSM, which are a major target group for PrEP. Furthermore, data from public health records show that STIs are increasing among MSM in some areas with relatively high PrEP uptake. There is enough evidence that PrEP is contributing to rising STI infections to warrant concern. Public health advocates must ensure that PrEP uptake does not inadvertently threaten the publicʼs health and that thirty years of condom promotion are not wasted.</description><issn>0269-9370</issn><issn>1473-5571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkG1LwzAQx4Mobk6_gUg_gJ15aJLmlYw5H2DghPk6pMnVVdumJBtz3966KYj34o7_8ePgfghdEjwmWMmbl8ndGP8pQgU9QkOSSZZyLskxGmIqVKqYxAN0FuN7D3Gc56doQKUQlHM2RJPXWLVvySLMFtdJ7ffB-tb5Jt7ut0kXfOPXlW-TxuySTesgNFULSTRl3-DzHJ2Upo5w8TNHaHk_W04f0_nzw9N0Mk87SWlaZLmxlBjmLAPniDUWnMrAGgFFSUvOOaZUSUcMIZYrYWzpMsiYUUZwW7ARujqc7TZFA053oWpM2OnfV3ogPwBbX68hxI96s4WgV2Dq9UoTrL-t6d6a_m-NfQHjxF2o</recordid><startdate>20160920</startdate><enddate>20160920</enddate><creator>Alaei, Kamair</creator><creator>Paynter, Christopher A</creator><creator>Juan, Shao-Chiu</creator><creator>Alaei, Arash</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160920</creationdate><title>Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex</title><author>Alaei, Kamair ; Paynter, Christopher A ; Juan, Shao-Chiu ; Alaei, Arash</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p722-b48ac21a3dc3edd1caced94eca6ebf2f55502297d1a11c596acfd4e43a9a65cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alaei, Kamair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paynter, Christopher A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan, Shao-Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaei, Arash</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>AIDS (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alaei, Kamair</au><au>Paynter, Christopher A</au><au>Juan, Shao-Chiu</au><au>Alaei, Arash</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex</atitle><jtitle>AIDS (London)</jtitle><addtitle>AIDS</addtitle><date>2016-09-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issn>0269-9370</issn><eissn>1473-5571</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTPrEP is a crucial new tool for the prevention of HIV. However, careful attention must be paid as to whether its widespread adoption could reduce condom usage, which may in turn increase STIs in the long-run. In this article we re-assess whether PrEP uptake may influence condom usage, and we call for vigilance by public health advocates to ensure that PrEP promotion does not lead to a drop-off in safe sex practices. Most of the evidence that PrEP does not change condom usage comes from double-blind clinical trials which are focused on the biological effect of PrEP on HIV incidence. However, subjects in these trials may not change their behavior because they do not actually know if they are taking PrEP. A number of focus group studies on individuals considering taking PrEP show that many see the drug as an opportunity for increasing unprotected sex. National survey data from the CDC show that condom rates are decreasing among MSM, which are a major target group for PrEP. Furthermore, data from public health records show that STIs are increasing among MSM in some areas with relatively high PrEP uptake. There is enough evidence that PrEP is contributing to rising STI infections to warrant concern. Public health advocates must ensure that PrEP uptake does not inadvertently threaten the publicʼs health and that thirty years of condom promotion are not wasted.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>27662553</pmid><doi>10.1097/QAD.0000000000001262</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9370
ispartof AIDS (London), 2016-09
issn 0269-9370
1473-5571
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_27662553
source Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Using PrEP, losing condoms? PrEP promotion may undermine safe sex
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_wolte&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20PrEP,%20losing%20condoms?%20PrEP%20promotion%20may%20undermine%20safe%20sex&rft.jtitle=AIDS%20(London)&rft.au=Alaei,%20Kamair&rft.date=2016-09-20&rft.issn=0269-9370&rft.eissn=1473-5571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001262&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_wolte%3E27662553%3C/pubmed_wolte%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27662553&rfr_iscdi=true