Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities

Animals can shape their timed behaviors based on experienced probabilistic relations in a nearly optimal fashion. On the other hand, it is not clear if they adopt these timed decisions by making computations based on previously learnt task parameters (time intervals, locations, and probabilities) or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2016-01, Vol.113 (3), p.787-792
Hauptverfasser: Tosun, Tuğçe, Gür, Ezgi, Balcı, Fuat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 792
container_issue 3
container_start_page 787
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 113
creator Tosun, Tuğçe
Gür, Ezgi
Balcı, Fuat
description Animals can shape their timed behaviors based on experienced probabilistic relations in a nearly optimal fashion. On the other hand, it is not clear if they adopt these timed decisions by making computations based on previously learnt task parameters (time intervals, locations, and probabilities) or if they gradually develop their decisions based on trial and error. To address this question, we tested mice in the timed-switching task, which required them to anticipate when (after a short or long delay) and at which of the two delay locations a reward would be presented. The probability of short trials differed between test groups in two experiments. Critically, we first trained mice on relevant task parameters by signaling the active trial with a discriminative stimulus and delivered the corresponding reward after the associated delay without any response requirement (without inducing switching behavior). During the test phase, both options were presented simultaneously to characterize the emergence and temporal characteristics of the switching behavior. Mice exhibited timed-switching behavior starting from the first few test trials, and their performance remained stable throughout testing in the majority of the conditions. Furthermore, as the probability of the short trial increased, mice waited longer before switching from the short to long location (experiment 1). These behavioral adjustments were in directions predicted by reward maximization. These results suggest that rather than gradually adjusting their time-dependent choice behavior, mice abruptly adopted temporal decision strategies by directly integrating their previous knowledge of task parameters into their timed behavior, supporting the model-based representational account of temporal risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1518316113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_26733674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26467464</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26467464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-bc3edd915f47b99c78e2bf92395eab90aba12ff2456189c20eaac06327e129863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpabZJzz01GHrpoU70Zcm6BMLSL0jpJT0LSR6nWrySK2kX8t9XJttN0pPEzO895s0g9I7gC4Ilu5yDyRekIz0jghD2Aq0IVqQVXOGXaIUxlW3PKT9Bb3LeYIxV1-PX6IQKyZiQfIXGH95BM08mNAM4n30MTS7JFLjzkBtrMgxNrc0J9j7u8nTfTGBSqNXit9D4UCDtzZQ_NVN0plR9_ZowVEW0xvrJl2p0hl6NFYK3h_cU_fry-Xb9rb35-fX7-vqmdVx0pbWOwTAo0o1cWqWc7IHaUVGmOjBWYWMNoeNIeSdIrxzFYIzDglEJhKpesFN09eA77-wWBgehZpn0nPzWpHsdjdfPO8H_1ndxr7mkXYdxNfh4MEjxzw5y0VufHUx1QVDjayJFXbBQPa_oh__QTdylUOMtFJGcKrVMdPlAuRRzTjAehyFYLzfUyw314w2r4vxphiP_72gVeH8AFuXRjjDNtOzlY3-TS0xP9LyqBWd_ASpwrXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761742996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Tosun, Tuğçe ; Gür, Ezgi ; Balcı, Fuat</creator><creatorcontrib>Tosun, Tuğçe ; Gür, Ezgi ; Balcı, Fuat</creatorcontrib><description>Animals can shape their timed behaviors based on experienced probabilistic relations in a nearly optimal fashion. On the other hand, it is not clear if they adopt these timed decisions by making computations based on previously learnt task parameters (time intervals, locations, and probabilities) or if they gradually develop their decisions based on trial and error. To address this question, we tested mice in the timed-switching task, which required them to anticipate when (after a short or long delay) and at which of the two delay locations a reward would be presented. The probability of short trials differed between test groups in two experiments. Critically, we first trained mice on relevant task parameters by signaling the active trial with a discriminative stimulus and delivered the corresponding reward after the associated delay without any response requirement (without inducing switching behavior). During the test phase, both options were presented simultaneously to characterize the emergence and temporal characteristics of the switching behavior. Mice exhibited timed-switching behavior starting from the first few test trials, and their performance remained stable throughout testing in the majority of the conditions. Furthermore, as the probability of the short trial increased, mice waited longer before switching from the short to long location (experiment 1). These behavioral adjustments were in directions predicted by reward maximization. These results suggest that rather than gradually adjusting their time-dependent choice behavior, mice abruptly adopted temporal decision strategies by directly integrating their previous knowledge of task parameters into their timed behavior, supporting the model-based representational account of temporal risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518316113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26733674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biological Sciences ; Decision Making ; Learning ; Mice ; Models, Neurological ; Probability ; Reaction Time ; Risk assessment ; Rodents ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2016-01, Vol.113 (3), p.787-792</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–113, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Jan 19, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-bc3edd915f47b99c78e2bf92395eab90aba12ff2456189c20eaac06327e129863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-bc3edd915f47b99c78e2bf92395eab90aba12ff2456189c20eaac06327e129863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/113/3.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26467464$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26467464$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,805,887,27931,27932,53798,53800,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26733674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tosun, Tuğçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gür, Ezgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcı, Fuat</creatorcontrib><title>Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Animals can shape their timed behaviors based on experienced probabilistic relations in a nearly optimal fashion. On the other hand, it is not clear if they adopt these timed decisions by making computations based on previously learnt task parameters (time intervals, locations, and probabilities) or if they gradually develop their decisions based on trial and error. To address this question, we tested mice in the timed-switching task, which required them to anticipate when (after a short or long delay) and at which of the two delay locations a reward would be presented. The probability of short trials differed between test groups in two experiments. Critically, we first trained mice on relevant task parameters by signaling the active trial with a discriminative stimulus and delivered the corresponding reward after the associated delay without any response requirement (without inducing switching behavior). During the test phase, both options were presented simultaneously to characterize the emergence and temporal characteristics of the switching behavior. Mice exhibited timed-switching behavior starting from the first few test trials, and their performance remained stable throughout testing in the majority of the conditions. Furthermore, as the probability of the short trial increased, mice waited longer before switching from the short to long location (experiment 1). These behavioral adjustments were in directions predicted by reward maximization. These results suggest that rather than gradually adjusting their time-dependent choice behavior, mice abruptly adopted temporal decision strategies by directly integrating their previous knowledge of task parameters into their timed behavior, supporting the model-based representational account of temporal risk assessment.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpabZJzz01GHrpoU70Zcm6BMLSL0jpJT0LSR6nWrySK2kX8t9XJttN0pPEzO895s0g9I7gC4Ilu5yDyRekIz0jghD2Aq0IVqQVXOGXaIUxlW3PKT9Bb3LeYIxV1-PX6IQKyZiQfIXGH95BM08mNAM4n30MTS7JFLjzkBtrMgxNrc0J9j7u8nTfTGBSqNXit9D4UCDtzZQ_NVN0plR9_ZowVEW0xvrJl2p0hl6NFYK3h_cU_fry-Xb9rb35-fX7-vqmdVx0pbWOwTAo0o1cWqWc7IHaUVGmOjBWYWMNoeNIeSdIrxzFYIzDglEJhKpesFN09eA77-wWBgehZpn0nPzWpHsdjdfPO8H_1ndxr7mkXYdxNfh4MEjxzw5y0VufHUx1QVDjayJFXbBQPa_oh__QTdylUOMtFJGcKrVMdPlAuRRzTjAehyFYLzfUyw314w2r4vxphiP_72gVeH8AFuXRjjDNtOzlY3-TS0xP9LyqBWd_ASpwrXg</recordid><startdate>20160119</startdate><enddate>20160119</enddate><creator>Tosun, Tuğçe</creator><creator>Gür, Ezgi</creator><creator>Balcı, Fuat</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160119</creationdate><title>Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities</title><author>Tosun, Tuğçe ; Gür, Ezgi ; Balcı, Fuat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-bc3edd915f47b99c78e2bf92395eab90aba12ff2456189c20eaac06327e129863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tosun, Tuğçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gür, Ezgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcı, Fuat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tosun, Tuğçe</au><au>Gür, Ezgi</au><au>Balcı, Fuat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2016-01-19</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>787-792</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Animals can shape their timed behaviors based on experienced probabilistic relations in a nearly optimal fashion. On the other hand, it is not clear if they adopt these timed decisions by making computations based on previously learnt task parameters (time intervals, locations, and probabilities) or if they gradually develop their decisions based on trial and error. To address this question, we tested mice in the timed-switching task, which required them to anticipate when (after a short or long delay) and at which of the two delay locations a reward would be presented. The probability of short trials differed between test groups in two experiments. Critically, we first trained mice on relevant task parameters by signaling the active trial with a discriminative stimulus and delivered the corresponding reward after the associated delay without any response requirement (without inducing switching behavior). During the test phase, both options were presented simultaneously to characterize the emergence and temporal characteristics of the switching behavior. Mice exhibited timed-switching behavior starting from the first few test trials, and their performance remained stable throughout testing in the majority of the conditions. Furthermore, as the probability of the short trial increased, mice waited longer before switching from the short to long location (experiment 1). These behavioral adjustments were in directions predicted by reward maximization. These results suggest that rather than gradually adjusting their time-dependent choice behavior, mice abruptly adopted temporal decision strategies by directly integrating their previous knowledge of task parameters into their timed behavior, supporting the model-based representational account of temporal risk assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>26733674</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1518316113</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2016-01, Vol.113 (3), p.787-792
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_26733674
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Biological Sciences
Decision Making
Learning
Mice
Models, Neurological
Probability
Reaction Time
Risk assessment
Rodents
Time Factors
title Mice plan decision strategies based on previously learned time intervals, locations, and probabilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mice%20plan%20decision%20strategies%20based%20on%20previously%20learned%20time%20intervals,%20locations,%20and%20probabilities&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Tosun,%20Tu%C4%9F%C3%A7e&rft.date=2016-01-19&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=787-792&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1518316113&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26467464%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761742996&rft_id=info:pmid/26733674&rft_jstor_id=26467464&rfr_iscdi=true