Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2016-01, Vol.96 (1), p.99-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Urologia internationalis |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Wu, Haihu Wang, Jianwei Lu, Jiaju Wang, Yuqiu Niu, Zhihong |
description | Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. A stone-free status or fragmentation of stones to 4 mm or smaller was considered efficacious. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the overall stone-free rate was 64.4%, and the efficacy rate was 70.7%. The efficacy rate was 89.4% for patients with a residual stone surface area ≤50% of baseline after the first ESWL, while the efficacy rate was 32.4% for other patients. The efficacy was 92.2% for stones ≤400 mm 2 and those with lower radiodensity, as determined by a plain (KUB) film. Conclusions: For renal stones with a surface area ≤400 mm 2 and a radiodensity equal to or less than that of the 12th rib as determined by a KUB film, ESWL may be considered the first line of treatment, even for stones with a diameter ≥20 mm. For large stones requiring repeat treatments, the surface area of the residual stones after the first ESWL is a predictor of the final treatment result. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000441424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_26551031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761465297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-5dd64dec5fc04082f51cf7dc61bc97a6de02d02864ecb9036a8fce90ff4aab2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0L9OwzAQBnALgWgpDOwIWWKBIXB2nH8jqgpUKiBBK8bIcWwamtTBToE-Ag_Ci_EkGKVkYjrp7vfd8CF0SOCckCC5AADGCKNsC_Xd8D3wk2Qb9d2aeoT4cQ_tWfsC4HAS7aIeDYOAgE_66HZqJG8quWywVvhBLnmJHxu9lBZ_f35RwFWF34tmjkcfjeFCm1q7gDNzLRb4ib9JPHFn3Ziitut9tKN4aeXBZg7Q7Go0Hd54k_vr8fBy4gkGrPGCPA9ZLkWgBDCIqQqIUFEuQpKJJOJhLoHmQOOQSZEl4Ic8VkImoBTjPKOZP0Cn7d_a6NeVtE1aFVbIsuRLqVc2JVFIWBjQJHL0rKXCaGuNVGltioqbdUog_W0v7dpz9njzdpVVMu_kX10OHLVgwc2zNB3o8if_nmfju1akda78Hyozf7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761465297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wu, Haihu ; Wang, Jianwei ; Lu, Jiaju ; Wang, Yuqiu ; Niu, Zhihong</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haihu ; Wang, Jianwei ; Lu, Jiaju ; Wang, Yuqiu ; Niu, Zhihong</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. A stone-free status or fragmentation of stones to 4 mm or smaller was considered efficacious. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the overall stone-free rate was 64.4%, and the efficacy rate was 70.7%. The efficacy rate was 89.4% for patients with a residual stone surface area ≤50% of baseline after the first ESWL, while the efficacy rate was 32.4% for other patients. The efficacy was 92.2% for stones ≤400 mm 2 and those with lower radiodensity, as determined by a plain (KUB) film. Conclusions: For renal stones with a surface area ≤400 mm 2 and a radiodensity equal to or less than that of the 12th rib as determined by a KUB film, ESWL may be considered the first line of treatment, even for stones with a diameter ≥20 mm. For large stones requiring repeat treatments, the surface area of the residual stones after the first ESWL is a predictor of the final treatment result.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000441424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26551031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Calculi - therapy ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Original Paper ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Software ; Treatment Outcome ; X-Rays ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2016-01, Vol.96 (1), p.99-105</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-5dd64dec5fc04082f51cf7dc61bc97a6de02d02864ecb9036a8fce90ff4aab2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-5dd64dec5fc04082f51cf7dc61bc97a6de02d02864ecb9036a8fce90ff4aab2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jiaju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Zhihong</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. A stone-free status or fragmentation of stones to 4 mm or smaller was considered efficacious. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the overall stone-free rate was 64.4%, and the efficacy rate was 70.7%. The efficacy rate was 89.4% for patients with a residual stone surface area ≤50% of baseline after the first ESWL, while the efficacy rate was 32.4% for other patients. The efficacy was 92.2% for stones ≤400 mm 2 and those with lower radiodensity, as determined by a plain (KUB) film. Conclusions: For renal stones with a surface area ≤400 mm 2 and a radiodensity equal to or less than that of the 12th rib as determined by a KUB film, ESWL may be considered the first line of treatment, even for stones with a diameter ≥20 mm. For large stones requiring repeat treatments, the surface area of the residual stones after the first ESWL is a predictor of the final treatment result.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - therapy</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0L9OwzAQBnALgWgpDOwIWWKBIXB2nH8jqgpUKiBBK8bIcWwamtTBToE-Ag_Ci_EkGKVkYjrp7vfd8CF0SOCckCC5AADGCKNsC_Xd8D3wk2Qb9d2aeoT4cQ_tWfsC4HAS7aIeDYOAgE_66HZqJG8quWywVvhBLnmJHxu9lBZ_f35RwFWF34tmjkcfjeFCm1q7gDNzLRb4ib9JPHFn3Ziitut9tKN4aeXBZg7Q7Go0Hd54k_vr8fBy4gkGrPGCPA9ZLkWgBDCIqQqIUFEuQpKJJOJhLoHmQOOQSZEl4Ic8VkImoBTjPKOZP0Cn7d_a6NeVtE1aFVbIsuRLqVc2JVFIWBjQJHL0rKXCaGuNVGltioqbdUog_W0v7dpz9njzdpVVMu_kX10OHLVgwc2zNB3o8if_nmfju1akda78Hyozf7s</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Wu, Haihu</creator><creator>Wang, Jianwei</creator><creator>Lu, Jiaju</creator><creator>Wang, Yuqiu</creator><creator>Niu, Zhihong</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy</title><author>Wu, Haihu ; Wang, Jianwei ; Lu, Jiaju ; Wang, Yuqiu ; Niu, Zhihong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-5dd64dec5fc04082f51cf7dc61bc97a6de02d02864ecb9036a8fce90ff4aab2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - therapy</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Haihu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jiaju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Zhihong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Haihu</au><au>Wang, Jianwei</au><au>Lu, Jiaju</au><au>Wang, Yuqiu</au><au>Niu, Zhihong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>99-105</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><abstract>Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. A stone-free status or fragmentation of stones to 4 mm or smaller was considered efficacious. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the overall stone-free rate was 64.4%, and the efficacy rate was 70.7%. The efficacy rate was 89.4% for patients with a residual stone surface area ≤50% of baseline after the first ESWL, while the efficacy rate was 32.4% for other patients. The efficacy was 92.2% for stones ≤400 mm 2 and those with lower radiodensity, as determined by a plain (KUB) film. Conclusions: For renal stones with a surface area ≤400 mm 2 and a radiodensity equal to or less than that of the 12th rib as determined by a KUB film, ESWL may be considered the first line of treatment, even for stones with a diameter ≥20 mm. For large stones requiring repeat treatments, the surface area of the residual stones after the first ESWL is a predictor of the final treatment result.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>26551031</pmid><doi>10.1159/000441424</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-1138 |
ispartof | Urologia internationalis, 2016-01, Vol.96 (1), p.99-105 |
issn | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_26551031 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging Kidney Calculi - therapy Lithotripsy - methods Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Original Paper Radiography, Abdominal Software Treatment Outcome X-Rays Young Adult |
title | Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Renal%20Stones%20%E2%89%A520%20mm%20with%20Extracorporeal%20Shock%20Wave%20Lithotripsy&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Wu,%20Haihu&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=99-105&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000441424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1761465297%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761465297&rft_id=info:pmid/26551031&rfr_iscdi=true |