Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio
In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Skin pharmacology and physiology 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Skin pharmacology and physiology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Syring, Felicia Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen Schanzer, Sabine Meinke, Martina C. Knorr, Fanny Lademann, Jürgen |
description | In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000441037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_26501151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4152357111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAgipvTg3eRgifBatLmoznKcDqYKNOdS5qms7NNZtIO_Ef8e-3H7MnTC7zfey-8B8A5grcIEX4HIcQYwZAdgDGiFPqEhORweAdsBE6c20AYUIboMRgFlMCmEo3Bz1zvlKvytahyoz2Tec8mVYX3VmsnrVLamxlb1kWXdt7UlFthc732qg_VIu_VmkrJrngmZGXsTZda6XynrBPF_8gTOu3cUqS5bFQ7pf_Csg2n4CgThVNn-zgBq9nD-_TJX7w8zqf3C19iSCufiVAIzriKVKgIZRnnAsMsYUKEmCkYKEkkTSOSEBIhwRPMWEYwopwjnkY0nICrvu_Wmq-6WUS8MbXVzcgYRSggBDLcquteSWucsyqLtzYvhf2OEYzbC8TDBRp7ue9YJ6VKB_m38gZc9OBT2LWyA9jX_wJNyIrf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812550746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-5527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-5535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000441037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26501151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Antioxidants - pharmacology ; Erythema - chemically induced ; Female ; Free Radicals - metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Original Paper ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin - metabolism ; Skin - radiation effects ; Spectrum Analysis ; Sun Protection Factor ; Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology ; Swine ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Skin pharmacology and physiology, 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,2425,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knorr, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><title>Skin pharmacology and physiology</title><addtitle>Skin Pharmacol Physiol</addtitle><description>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antioxidants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Erythema - chemically induced</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Free Radicals - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin - metabolism</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>Sun Protection Factor</subject><subject>Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1660-5527</issn><issn>1660-5535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAgipvTg3eRgifBatLmoznKcDqYKNOdS5qms7NNZtIO_Ef8e-3H7MnTC7zfey-8B8A5grcIEX4HIcQYwZAdgDGiFPqEhORweAdsBE6c20AYUIboMRgFlMCmEo3Bz1zvlKvytahyoz2Tec8mVYX3VmsnrVLamxlb1kWXdt7UlFthc732qg_VIu_VmkrJrngmZGXsTZda6XynrBPF_8gTOu3cUqS5bFQ7pf_Csg2n4CgThVNn-zgBq9nD-_TJX7w8zqf3C19iSCufiVAIzriKVKgIZRnnAsMsYUKEmCkYKEkkTSOSEBIhwRPMWEYwopwjnkY0nICrvu_Wmq-6WUS8MbXVzcgYRSggBDLcquteSWucsyqLtzYvhf2OEYzbC8TDBRp7ue9YJ6VKB_m38gZc9OBT2LWyA9jX_wJNyIrf</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Syring, Felicia</creator><creator>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Schanzer, Sabine</creator><creator>Meinke, Martina C.</creator><creator>Knorr, Fanny</creator><creator>Lademann, Jürgen</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><author>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antioxidants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Erythema - chemically induced</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Free Radicals - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin - metabolism</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>Sun Protection Factor</topic><topic>Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knorr, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Skin pharmacology and physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Syring, Felicia</au><au>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Schanzer, Sabine</au><au>Meinke, Martina C.</au><au>Knorr, Fanny</au><au>Lademann, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</atitle><jtitle>Skin pharmacology and physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Skin Pharmacol Physiol</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>1660-5527</issn><eissn>1660-5535</eissn><abstract>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26501151</pmid><doi>10.1159/000441037</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-5527 |
ispartof | Skin pharmacology and physiology, 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23 |
issn | 1660-5527 1660-5535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_26501151 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Animals Antioxidants - pharmacology Erythema - chemically induced Female Free Radicals - metabolism Humans Male Original Paper Skin - drug effects Skin - metabolism Skin - radiation effects Spectrum Analysis Sun Protection Factor Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology Swine Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects Young Adult |
title | Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Model%20Sunscreen%20Formulations%20Comparing%20the%20Sun%20Protection%20Factor,%20the%20Universal%20Sun%20Protection%20Factor%20and%20the%20Radical%20Formation%20Ratio&rft.jtitle=Skin%20pharmacology%20and%20physiology&rft.au=Syring,%20Felicia&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=1660-5527&rft.eissn=1660-5535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000441037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4152357111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812550746&rft_id=info:pmid/26501151&rfr_iscdi=true |