Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio

In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Skin pharmacology and physiology 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23
Hauptverfasser: Syring, Felicia, Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen, Schanzer, Sabine, Meinke, Martina C., Knorr, Fanny, Lademann, Jürgen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Skin pharmacology and physiology
container_volume 29
creator Syring, Felicia
Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen
Schanzer, Sabine
Meinke, Martina C.
Knorr, Fanny
Lademann, Jürgen
description In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000441037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_26501151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4152357111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAgipvTg3eRgifBatLmoznKcDqYKNOdS5qms7NNZtIO_Ef8e-3H7MnTC7zfey-8B8A5grcIEX4HIcQYwZAdgDGiFPqEhORweAdsBE6c20AYUIboMRgFlMCmEo3Bz1zvlKvytahyoz2Tec8mVYX3VmsnrVLamxlb1kWXdt7UlFthc732qg_VIu_VmkrJrngmZGXsTZda6XynrBPF_8gTOu3cUqS5bFQ7pf_Csg2n4CgThVNn-zgBq9nD-_TJX7w8zqf3C19iSCufiVAIzriKVKgIZRnnAsMsYUKEmCkYKEkkTSOSEBIhwRPMWEYwopwjnkY0nICrvu_Wmq-6WUS8MbXVzcgYRSggBDLcquteSWucsyqLtzYvhf2OEYzbC8TDBRp7ue9YJ6VKB_m38gZc9OBT2LWyA9jX_wJNyIrf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812550746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-5527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-5535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000441037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26501151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Antioxidants - pharmacology ; Erythema - chemically induced ; Female ; Free Radicals - metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Original Paper ; Skin - drug effects ; Skin - metabolism ; Skin - radiation effects ; Spectrum Analysis ; Sun Protection Factor ; Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology ; Swine ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Skin pharmacology and physiology, 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,2425,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26501151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knorr, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><title>Skin pharmacology and physiology</title><addtitle>Skin Pharmacol Physiol</addtitle><description>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antioxidants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Erythema - chemically induced</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Free Radicals - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Skin - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin - metabolism</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><subject>Sun Protection Factor</subject><subject>Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1660-5527</issn><issn>1660-5535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAgipvTg3eRgifBatLmoznKcDqYKNOdS5qms7NNZtIO_Ef8e-3H7MnTC7zfey-8B8A5grcIEX4HIcQYwZAdgDGiFPqEhORweAdsBE6c20AYUIboMRgFlMCmEo3Bz1zvlKvytahyoz2Tec8mVYX3VmsnrVLamxlb1kWXdt7UlFthc732qg_VIu_VmkrJrngmZGXsTZda6XynrBPF_8gTOu3cUqS5bFQ7pf_Csg2n4CgThVNn-zgBq9nD-_TJX7w8zqf3C19iSCufiVAIzriKVKgIZRnnAsMsYUKEmCkYKEkkTSOSEBIhwRPMWEYwopwjnkY0nICrvu_Wmq-6WUS8MbXVzcgYRSggBDLcquteSWucsyqLtzYvhf2OEYzbC8TDBRp7ue9YJ6VKB_m38gZc9OBT2LWyA9jX_wJNyIrf</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Syring, Felicia</creator><creator>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Schanzer, Sabine</creator><creator>Meinke, Martina C.</creator><creator>Knorr, Fanny</creator><creator>Lademann, Jürgen</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</title><author>Syring, Felicia ; Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen ; Schanzer, Sabine ; Meinke, Martina C. ; Knorr, Fanny ; Lademann, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-7a3aa979e8e3e567f99a40fb7aa347e02ec5c6d85b5581a9b477f54169919d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antioxidants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Erythema - chemically induced</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Free Radicals - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Skin - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin - metabolism</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><topic>Sun Protection Factor</topic><topic>Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Syring, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Martina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knorr, Fanny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lademann, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Skin pharmacology and physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Syring, Felicia</au><au>Weigmann, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Schanzer, Sabine</au><au>Meinke, Martina C.</au><au>Knorr, Fanny</au><au>Lademann, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio</atitle><jtitle>Skin pharmacology and physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Skin Pharmacol Physiol</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>1660-5527</issn><eissn>1660-5535</eissn><abstract>In view of globally rising skin cancer rates and harmful effects exerted by sunlight throughout the ultraviolet, visible and infrared ranges, an objective, safe and comprehensive method for determining sunscreen efficacy is required in order to warrant safe sun exposure. In this study, the influence of characteristic active ingredients (chemical filters, physical filters and antioxidants) on different sunscreen indicators, including the universal sun protection factor and the radical formation ratio, was determined and compared to their influence on sun protection factor values. Spectroscopic universal sun protection factor measurements were conducted ex vivo by analyzing tape strips taken from human skin, and radical formation ratio determination was performed via electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using porcine ear skin ex vivo. The sun protection factor determination was conducted according to ISO standards (ISO 24444:2010). It was shown that chemical filters provide a protective effect which was measurable by all methods examined (spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and erythema formation). Physical filters, when used as single active ingredients, increased protective values in universal sun protection factor and sun protection factor measurements but exhibited no significant effect on universal sun protection factor measurements when used in combination with chemical filters or antioxidants. Antioxidants were shown to increase sun protection factor values. Radical formation ratio values were shown to be influenced merely by chemical filters, leading to the conclusion that the universal sun protection factor is the most suitable efficacy indicator for the ultraviolet range.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26501151</pmid><doi>10.1159/000441037</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-5527
ispartof Skin pharmacology and physiology, 2016-02, Vol.29 (1), p.18-23
issn 1660-5527
1660-5535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_26501151
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Animals
Antioxidants - pharmacology
Erythema - chemically induced
Female
Free Radicals - metabolism
Humans
Male
Original Paper
Skin - drug effects
Skin - metabolism
Skin - radiation effects
Spectrum Analysis
Sun Protection Factor
Sunscreening Agents - pharmacology
Swine
Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects
Young Adult
title Investigation of Model Sunscreen Formulations Comparing the Sun Protection Factor, the Universal Sun Protection Factor and the Radical Formation Ratio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Model%20Sunscreen%20Formulations%20Comparing%20the%20Sun%20Protection%20Factor,%20the%20Universal%20Sun%20Protection%20Factor%20and%20the%20Radical%20Formation%20Ratio&rft.jtitle=Skin%20pharmacology%20and%20physiology&rft.au=Syring,%20Felicia&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=1660-5527&rft.eissn=1660-5535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000441037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4152357111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812550746&rft_id=info:pmid/26501151&rfr_iscdi=true