Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change
Forecasting climate change effects on aquatic fauna and their habitat requires an understanding of how water temperature responds to changing air temperature (i.e., thermal sensitivity). Previous efforts to forecast climate effects on brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) habitat have generally assu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2015-07, Vol.25 (5), p.1397-1419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1397 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Snyder, Craig D Hitt, Nathaniel P Young, John A |
description | Forecasting climate change effects on aquatic fauna and their habitat requires an understanding of how water temperature responds to changing air temperature (i.e., thermal sensitivity). Previous efforts to forecast climate effects on brook trout (
Salvelinus fontinalis
) habitat have generally assumed uniform air-water temperature relationships over large areas that cannot account for groundwater inputs and other processes that operate at finer spatial scales. We developed regression models that accounted for groundwater influences on thermal sensitivity from measured air-water temperature relationships within forested watersheds in eastern North America (Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA, 78 sites in nine watersheds). We used these reach-scale models to forecast climate change effects on stream temperature and brook trout thermal habitat, and compared our results to previous forecasts based upon large-scale models. Observed stream temperatures were generally less sensitive to air temperature than previously assumed, and we attribute this to the moderating effect of shallow groundwater inputs. Predicted groundwater temperatures from air-water regression models corresponded well to observed groundwater temperatures elsewhere in the study area. Predictions of brook trout future habitat loss derived from our fine-grained models were far less pessimistic than those from prior models developed at coarser spatial resolutions. However, our models also revealed spatial variation in thermal sensitivity within and among catchments resulting in a patchy distribution of thermally suitable habitat. Habitat fragmentation due to thermal barriers therefore may have an increasingly important role for trout population viability in headwater streams. Our results demonstrate that simple adjustments to air-water temperature regression models can provide a powerful and cost-effective approach for predicting future stream temperatures while accounting for effects of groundwater. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/14-1354.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_26485964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24432137</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24432137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4387-728d7091b2a8f4e2dafad6f3cdf76b6741cae576d854ea31dffdc48a5e69c1673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMozti68AcoATe6qLFunpVlM4wPGNCFsw7p5Ka7hnq0SZqx_71panyACmaR3HC_e8g5IeQ5tBfQmfYtiAa4FBfwgJyD4aaRsmMPa91KaFqt4Iw8yfm2rYsx9picMSU6aZQ4Jzdr7-fDVPppS-Oc6DbVW7hzBRPtJ5pLQjfS2OcdLTtMoxvozm364gpNmPfzlDHTMlM_9GMdon7npi0-JY-iGzI-uz9X5Obd1ZfLD831p_cfL9fXjRO8041mXdCtgQ1zXRTIgosuqMh9iFptlBbgHUqtQicFOg4hxuBF5yQq40FpviKvF919mr8eMBc79tnjMLgJ50O2oJmuMoyp_0GlZNwIU9E3C-rTnHPCaPepuktHC609BW5B2FPgdVuRl_eyh82I4Sf5I-EKyAW46wc8_lvJXq0_sxZkfQVwc7L2Ypm7zWVOv3SF4Az4qf9q6btyrN9gMbvfxPYh2vKt_J36w8R3hHyqyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725523949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Snyder, Craig D ; Hitt, Nathaniel P ; Young, John A</creator><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Craig D ; Hitt, Nathaniel P ; Young, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Forecasting climate change effects on aquatic fauna and their habitat requires an understanding of how water temperature responds to changing air temperature (i.e., thermal sensitivity). Previous efforts to forecast climate effects on brook trout (
Salvelinus fontinalis
) habitat have generally assumed uniform air-water temperature relationships over large areas that cannot account for groundwater inputs and other processes that operate at finer spatial scales. We developed regression models that accounted for groundwater influences on thermal sensitivity from measured air-water temperature relationships within forested watersheds in eastern North America (Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA, 78 sites in nine watersheds). We used these reach-scale models to forecast climate change effects on stream temperature and brook trout thermal habitat, and compared our results to previous forecasts based upon large-scale models. Observed stream temperatures were generally less sensitive to air temperature than previously assumed, and we attribute this to the moderating effect of shallow groundwater inputs. Predicted groundwater temperatures from air-water regression models corresponded well to observed groundwater temperatures elsewhere in the study area. Predictions of brook trout future habitat loss derived from our fine-grained models were far less pessimistic than those from prior models developed at coarser spatial resolutions. However, our models also revealed spatial variation in thermal sensitivity within and among catchments resulting in a patchy distribution of thermally suitable habitat. Habitat fragmentation due to thermal barriers therefore may have an increasingly important role for trout population viability in headwater streams. Our results demonstrate that simple adjustments to air-water temperature regression models can provide a powerful and cost-effective approach for predicting future stream temperatures while accounting for effects of groundwater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/14-1354.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26485964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; brook trout ; Climate Change ; Climate models ; Groundwater ; Habitat loss ; headwater streams ; Modeling ; Models, Biological ; Rivers ; Salvelinus fontinalis ; Shenandoah National Park, USA ; Stream habitats ; Streams ; Temperature ; thermal habitat ; Trout ; Trout - physiology ; Virginia ; Water temperature ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2015-07, Vol.25 (5), p.1397-1419</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4387-728d7091b2a8f4e2dafad6f3cdf76b6741cae576d854ea31dffdc48a5e69c1673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4387-728d7091b2a8f4e2dafad6f3cdf76b6741cae576d854ea31dffdc48a5e69c1673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24432137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24432137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26485964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Craig D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Nathaniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Forecasting climate change effects on aquatic fauna and their habitat requires an understanding of how water temperature responds to changing air temperature (i.e., thermal sensitivity). Previous efforts to forecast climate effects on brook trout (
Salvelinus fontinalis
) habitat have generally assumed uniform air-water temperature relationships over large areas that cannot account for groundwater inputs and other processes that operate at finer spatial scales. We developed regression models that accounted for groundwater influences on thermal sensitivity from measured air-water temperature relationships within forested watersheds in eastern North America (Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA, 78 sites in nine watersheds). We used these reach-scale models to forecast climate change effects on stream temperature and brook trout thermal habitat, and compared our results to previous forecasts based upon large-scale models. Observed stream temperatures were generally less sensitive to air temperature than previously assumed, and we attribute this to the moderating effect of shallow groundwater inputs. Predicted groundwater temperatures from air-water regression models corresponded well to observed groundwater temperatures elsewhere in the study area. Predictions of brook trout future habitat loss derived from our fine-grained models were far less pessimistic than those from prior models developed at coarser spatial resolutions. However, our models also revealed spatial variation in thermal sensitivity within and among catchments resulting in a patchy distribution of thermally suitable habitat. Habitat fragmentation due to thermal barriers therefore may have an increasingly important role for trout population viability in headwater streams. Our results demonstrate that simple adjustments to air-water temperature regression models can provide a powerful and cost-effective approach for predicting future stream temperatures while accounting for effects of groundwater.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>brook trout</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>headwater streams</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salvelinus fontinalis</subject><subject>Shenandoah National Park, USA</subject><subject>Stream habitats</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>thermal habitat</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Trout - physiology</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMozti68AcoATe6qLFunpVlM4wPGNCFsw7p5Ka7hnq0SZqx_71panyACmaR3HC_e8g5IeQ5tBfQmfYtiAa4FBfwgJyD4aaRsmMPa91KaFqt4Iw8yfm2rYsx9picMSU6aZQ4Jzdr7-fDVPppS-Oc6DbVW7hzBRPtJ5pLQjfS2OcdLTtMoxvozm364gpNmPfzlDHTMlM_9GMdon7npi0-JY-iGzI-uz9X5Obd1ZfLD831p_cfL9fXjRO8041mXdCtgQ1zXRTIgosuqMh9iFptlBbgHUqtQicFOg4hxuBF5yQq40FpviKvF919mr8eMBc79tnjMLgJ50O2oJmuMoyp_0GlZNwIU9E3C-rTnHPCaPepuktHC609BW5B2FPgdVuRl_eyh82I4Sf5I-EKyAW46wc8_lvJXq0_sxZkfQVwc7L2Ypm7zWVOv3SF4Az4qf9q6btyrN9gMbvfxPYh2vKt_J36w8R3hHyqyQ</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Snyder, Craig D</creator><creator>Hitt, Nathaniel P</creator><creator>Young, John A</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change</title><author>Snyder, Craig D ; Hitt, Nathaniel P ; Young, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4387-728d7091b2a8f4e2dafad6f3cdf76b6741cae576d854ea31dffdc48a5e69c1673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>brook trout</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>headwater streams</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salvelinus fontinalis</topic><topic>Shenandoah National Park, USA</topic><topic>Stream habitats</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>thermal habitat</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Trout - physiology</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Craig D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Nathaniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snyder, Craig D</au><au>Hitt, Nathaniel P</au><au>Young, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1397</spage><epage>1419</epage><pages>1397-1419</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Forecasting climate change effects on aquatic fauna and their habitat requires an understanding of how water temperature responds to changing air temperature (i.e., thermal sensitivity). Previous efforts to forecast climate effects on brook trout (
Salvelinus fontinalis
) habitat have generally assumed uniform air-water temperature relationships over large areas that cannot account for groundwater inputs and other processes that operate at finer spatial scales. We developed regression models that accounted for groundwater influences on thermal sensitivity from measured air-water temperature relationships within forested watersheds in eastern North America (Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA, 78 sites in nine watersheds). We used these reach-scale models to forecast climate change effects on stream temperature and brook trout thermal habitat, and compared our results to previous forecasts based upon large-scale models. Observed stream temperatures were generally less sensitive to air temperature than previously assumed, and we attribute this to the moderating effect of shallow groundwater inputs. Predicted groundwater temperatures from air-water regression models corresponded well to observed groundwater temperatures elsewhere in the study area. Predictions of brook trout future habitat loss derived from our fine-grained models were far less pessimistic than those from prior models developed at coarser spatial resolutions. However, our models also revealed spatial variation in thermal sensitivity within and among catchments resulting in a patchy distribution of thermally suitable habitat. Habitat fragmentation due to thermal barriers therefore may have an increasingly important role for trout population viability in headwater streams. Our results demonstrate that simple adjustments to air-water temperature regression models can provide a powerful and cost-effective approach for predicting future stream temperatures while accounting for effects of groundwater.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>26485964</pmid><doi>10.1890/14-1354.1</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2015-07, Vol.25 (5), p.1397-1419 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_26485964 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals brook trout Climate Change Climate models Groundwater Habitat loss headwater streams Modeling Models, Biological Rivers Salvelinus fontinalis Shenandoah National Park, USA Stream habitats Streams Temperature thermal habitat Trout Trout - physiology Virginia Water temperature Watersheds |
title | Accounting for groundwater in stream fish thermal habitat responses to climate change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A23%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accounting%20for%20groundwater%20in%20stream%20fish%20thermal%20habitat%20responses%20to%20climate%20change&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Snyder,%20Craig%20D&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1397&rft.epage=1419&rft.pages=1397-1419&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/14-1354.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E24432137%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725523949&rft_id=info:pmid/26485964&rft_jstor_id=24432137&rfr_iscdi=true |