Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes
Enteral nutrition (EN) provisions are typically calculated based on a 24-hour infusion period. However, feedings are often interrupted for daily activities, procedures, or gastrointestinal intolerance. The study's objective was to determine the delivered EN quantities provided to stable hospita...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrition in clinical practice 2014-10, Vol.29 (5), p.662 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 662 |
container_title | Nutrition in clinical practice |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Walker, Renee Nichole Utech, Anne Velez, Maria Eugenia Schwartz, Katie |
description | Enteral nutrition (EN) provisions are typically calculated based on a 24-hour infusion period. However, feedings are often interrupted for daily activities, procedures, or gastrointestinal intolerance. The study's objective was to determine the delivered EN quantities provided to stable hospitalized patients, using cellular time and measured volumes to verify our EN calculation adjustment.
A supply of consecutively numbered ready-to-hang (RTH) EN product was delivered to the bedside of 26 inpatients with established EN tolerance at goal rates on various types of nursing units. The dietitian weighed the volume remaining in the infusing product and recorded the measurement time. On the following days, the dietitian continued to weigh the infusing RTH product and the empty RTH bottles saved by nursing. The primary outcome was the difference between the prescribed and delivered EN provisions, which was calculated with a paired t test.
Patients received significantly more calories in the delivered enteral feeding (mean [SD], 1678 [385] kcal) than prescribed calories in the EN order (1489 [246 kcal]; t = 3.736, P = .001), adjusting for observed time. No significant differences were found between nursing units, product, and rate.
EN delivered may actually exceed ordered amounts by 5%–21% (mean, 12%) with feeding pump inaccuracy as the primary contributing factor. This differs from what others have found. Our findings support using a volume-based ordering system vs a rate-based ordering system for more accurate EN delivery. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_25606647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25606647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_256066473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMTXiYOAqLs4yMDC0MDa3YGfgMDI1MzAzMzHnZHBwSc3JLEstSk1RKMvPKc1NLVbIT1NIzStJLUrMUcgrLSnKLMnMz1NIrUhOBaopKEotTi7KTEIo52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDHJuriHOHroFpUm5qSnxBUWZuYlFlfEwK40JKgAAGUo3Sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Walker, Renee Nichole ; Utech, Anne ; Velez, Maria Eugenia ; Schwartz, Katie</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Renee Nichole ; Utech, Anne ; Velez, Maria Eugenia ; Schwartz, Katie</creatorcontrib><description>Enteral nutrition (EN) provisions are typically calculated based on a 24-hour infusion period. However, feedings are often interrupted for daily activities, procedures, or gastrointestinal intolerance. The study's objective was to determine the delivered EN quantities provided to stable hospitalized patients, using cellular time and measured volumes to verify our EN calculation adjustment.
A supply of consecutively numbered ready-to-hang (RTH) EN product was delivered to the bedside of 26 inpatients with established EN tolerance at goal rates on various types of nursing units. The dietitian weighed the volume remaining in the infusing product and recorded the measurement time. On the following days, the dietitian continued to weigh the infusing RTH product and the empty RTH bottles saved by nursing. The primary outcome was the difference between the prescribed and delivered EN provisions, which was calculated with a paired t test.
Patients received significantly more calories in the delivered enteral feeding (mean [SD], 1678 [385] kcal) than prescribed calories in the EN order (1489 [246 kcal]; t = 3.736, P = .001), adjusting for observed time. No significant differences were found between nursing units, product, and rate.
EN delivered may actually exceed ordered amounts by 5%–21% (mean, 12%) with feeding pump inaccuracy as the primary contributing factor. This differs from what others have found. Our findings support using a volume-based ordering system vs a rate-based ordering system for more accurate EN delivery.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2452</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25606647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Energy Intake ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Enteral Nutrition - standards ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nutritional Requirements ; Prescriptions ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Nutrition in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.29 (5), p.662</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25606647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Renee Nichole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utech, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velez, Maria Eugenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Katie</creatorcontrib><title>Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes</title><title>Nutrition in clinical practice</title><addtitle>Nutr Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Enteral nutrition (EN) provisions are typically calculated based on a 24-hour infusion period. However, feedings are often interrupted for daily activities, procedures, or gastrointestinal intolerance. The study's objective was to determine the delivered EN quantities provided to stable hospitalized patients, using cellular time and measured volumes to verify our EN calculation adjustment.
A supply of consecutively numbered ready-to-hang (RTH) EN product was delivered to the bedside of 26 inpatients with established EN tolerance at goal rates on various types of nursing units. The dietitian weighed the volume remaining in the infusing product and recorded the measurement time. On the following days, the dietitian continued to weigh the infusing RTH product and the empty RTH bottles saved by nursing. The primary outcome was the difference between the prescribed and delivered EN provisions, which was calculated with a paired t test.
Patients received significantly more calories in the delivered enteral feeding (mean [SD], 1678 [385] kcal) than prescribed calories in the EN order (1489 [246 kcal]; t = 3.736, P = .001), adjusting for observed time. No significant differences were found between nursing units, product, and rate.
EN delivered may actually exceed ordered amounts by 5%–21% (mean, 12%) with feeding pump inaccuracy as the primary contributing factor. This differs from what others have found. Our findings support using a volume-based ordering system vs a rate-based ordering system for more accurate EN delivery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1941-2452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1DUyMTXiYOAqLs4yMDC0MDa3YGfgMDI1MzAzMzHnZHBwSc3JLEstSk1RKMvPKc1NLVbIT1NIzStJLUrMUcgrLSnKLMnMz1NIrUhOBaopKEotTi7KTEIo52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDHJuriHOHroFpUm5qSnxBUWZuYlFlfEwK40JKgAAGUo3Sg</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Walker, Renee Nichole</creator><creator>Utech, Anne</creator><creator>Velez, Maria Eugenia</creator><creator>Schwartz, Katie</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes</title><author>Walker, Renee Nichole ; Utech, Anne ; Velez, Maria Eugenia ; Schwartz, Katie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_256066473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Renee Nichole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utech, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velez, Maria Eugenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Katie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Renee Nichole</au><au>Utech, Anne</au><au>Velez, Maria Eugenia</au><au>Schwartz, Katie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>662</spage><pages>662-</pages><eissn>1941-2452</eissn><abstract>Enteral nutrition (EN) provisions are typically calculated based on a 24-hour infusion period. However, feedings are often interrupted for daily activities, procedures, or gastrointestinal intolerance. The study's objective was to determine the delivered EN quantities provided to stable hospitalized patients, using cellular time and measured volumes to verify our EN calculation adjustment.
A supply of consecutively numbered ready-to-hang (RTH) EN product was delivered to the bedside of 26 inpatients with established EN tolerance at goal rates on various types of nursing units. The dietitian weighed the volume remaining in the infusing product and recorded the measurement time. On the following days, the dietitian continued to weigh the infusing RTH product and the empty RTH bottles saved by nursing. The primary outcome was the difference between the prescribed and delivered EN provisions, which was calculated with a paired t test.
Patients received significantly more calories in the delivered enteral feeding (mean [SD], 1678 [385] kcal) than prescribed calories in the EN order (1489 [246 kcal]; t = 3.736, P = .001), adjusting for observed time. No significant differences were found between nursing units, product, and rate.
EN delivered may actually exceed ordered amounts by 5%–21% (mean, 12%) with feeding pump inaccuracy as the primary contributing factor. This differs from what others have found. Our findings support using a volume-based ordering system vs a rate-based ordering system for more accurate EN delivery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25606647</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1941-2452 |
ispartof | Nutrition in clinical practice, 2014-10, Vol.29 (5), p.662 |
issn | 1941-2452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_25606647 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Energy Intake Enteral Nutrition - methods Enteral Nutrition - standards Female Hospitalization Humans Male Middle Aged Nutritional Requirements Prescriptions Prospective Studies |
title | Delivered volumes of enteral nutrition exceed prescribed volumes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A49%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivered%20volumes%20of%20enteral%20nutrition%20exceed%20prescribed%20volumes&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Walker,%20Renee%20Nichole&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=662&rft.pages=662-&rft.eissn=1941-2452&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E25606647%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25606647&rfr_iscdi=true |