Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review

The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Using the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients underg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgery 2014-12, Vol.121 Suppl, p.210
Hauptverfasser: Tuleasca, Constantin, Carron, Romain, Resseguier, Noémie, Donnet, Anne, Roussel, Philippe, Gaudart, Jean, Levivier, Marc, Régis, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 210
container_title Journal of neurosurgery
container_volume 121 Suppl
creator Tuleasca, Constantin
Carron, Romain
Resseguier, Noémie
Donnet, Anne
Roussel, Philippe
Gaudart, Jean
Levivier, Marc
Régis, Jean
description The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Using the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients undergoing GKS for TN Type 1 from July 1992 to November 2010. Among the 497 patients with initial pain cessation, 34.4% (157/456 with ≥ 1-year follow-up) experienced at least 1 recurrence. Thirteen patients (1.8%) were considered for a second GKS, proposed only if the patients had good and prolonged initial pain cessation after the first GKS, with no other treatment alternative at the moment of recurrence. As for the first GKS, a single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.6 mm (range 4-14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve (retrogasserian target). A median maximum dose of 90 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) was delivered. Data for 9 patients with at least 1-year followup were analyzed. A systematic review of literature was also performed, and results are compared with those of the Marseille study. The median time to retreatment in the Marseille study was 72 months (range 12-125 months) and in the literature it was 17 months (range 3-146 months). In the Marseille study, the median follow-up period was 33.9 months (range 12-96 months), and 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) had initial pain cessation with a median of 6.5 days (range 1-180 days). The actuarial rate for new hypesthesia was 33.3% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year, which remained stable for 7 years. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining pain relief without medication at 6 months and 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively, and remained stable for 7 years. The systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes for repeat GKS for recurrent TN, with a total of 626 patients. Both the selection of the cases for retreatment and the way of reporting outcomes vary widely among studies, with a median rate for initial pain cessation of 88% (range 60%-100%) and for new hypesthesia of 33% (range 11%-80%). Results from the Marseille study raise the question of surgical alternatives after failed GKS for TN. The rates of initial pain cessation and recurrence seem comparable to, or even better than, those of the first GKS, according to different studies, but toxicity is much higher, both in the Marseille study and in the published data. Neither the Ma
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2014.8.GKS141487
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_25434955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25434955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-64f2388caf8beb03b73a61c4378b0bd5dac5ac7aeb3c12b00c43d0edf2291f6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j1tLwzAYQIMgbk7ffZL8gc7cmra-ydApGwhenseX9EuJNO1IUmX_fgP16TwcOHAIueFsKXnF7wTjalkv15t3rriqqzMy542UBdONnJHLlL4Y41ppcUFmolRSNWU5J90b7hEyXUMIQDeDd0jTFDuMB-rGSCPaKUYcMs3Rdxj8AD0dcIrQdx7uaT8OXZExBjpO2Y4BE4WhpemQMgbI3p4K3x5_rsi5gz7h9R8X5PPp8WP1XGxf1y-rh21hpda50MoJWdcWXG3QMGkqCZpbJavaMNOWLdgSbAVopOXCMHZSLcPWCdFwp0EuyO1vdz-ZgO1uH32AeNj9H8sjcEdZdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tuleasca, Constantin ; Carron, Romain ; Resseguier, Noémie ; Donnet, Anne ; Roussel, Philippe ; Gaudart, Jean ; Levivier, Marc ; Régis, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuleasca, Constantin ; Carron, Romain ; Resseguier, Noémie ; Donnet, Anne ; Roussel, Philippe ; Gaudart, Jean ; Levivier, Marc ; Régis, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Using the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients undergoing GKS for TN Type 1 from July 1992 to November 2010. Among the 497 patients with initial pain cessation, 34.4% (157/456 with ≥ 1-year follow-up) experienced at least 1 recurrence. Thirteen patients (1.8%) were considered for a second GKS, proposed only if the patients had good and prolonged initial pain cessation after the first GKS, with no other treatment alternative at the moment of recurrence. As for the first GKS, a single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.6 mm (range 4-14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve (retrogasserian target). A median maximum dose of 90 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) was delivered. Data for 9 patients with at least 1-year followup were analyzed. A systematic review of literature was also performed, and results are compared with those of the Marseille study. The median time to retreatment in the Marseille study was 72 months (range 12-125 months) and in the literature it was 17 months (range 3-146 months). In the Marseille study, the median follow-up period was 33.9 months (range 12-96 months), and 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) had initial pain cessation with a median of 6.5 days (range 1-180 days). The actuarial rate for new hypesthesia was 33.3% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year, which remained stable for 7 years. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining pain relief without medication at 6 months and 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively, and remained stable for 7 years. The systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes for repeat GKS for recurrent TN, with a total of 626 patients. Both the selection of the cases for retreatment and the way of reporting outcomes vary widely among studies, with a median rate for initial pain cessation of 88% (range 60%-100%) and for new hypesthesia of 33% (range 11%-80%). Results from the Marseille study raise the question of surgical alternatives after failed GKS for TN. The rates of initial pain cessation and recurrence seem comparable to, or even better than, those of the first GKS, according to different studies, but toxicity is much higher, both in the Marseille study and in the published data. Neither the Marseille study data nor literature data answer the 3 cardinal questions regarding repeat radiosurgery in recurrent TN: which patients to retreat, which target is optimal, and which dose to use.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1933-0693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.GKS141487</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25434955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Databases, Factual ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiosurgery - adverse effects ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Recurrence ; Reoperation - adverse effects ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Trigeminal Neuralgia - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgery, 2014-12, Vol.121 Suppl, p.210</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-64f2388caf8beb03b73a61c4378b0bd5dac5ac7aeb3c12b00c43d0edf2291f6a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25434955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuleasca, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carron, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resseguier, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnet, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudart, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levivier, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Régis, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review</title><title>Journal of neurosurgery</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Using the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients undergoing GKS for TN Type 1 from July 1992 to November 2010. Among the 497 patients with initial pain cessation, 34.4% (157/456 with ≥ 1-year follow-up) experienced at least 1 recurrence. Thirteen patients (1.8%) were considered for a second GKS, proposed only if the patients had good and prolonged initial pain cessation after the first GKS, with no other treatment alternative at the moment of recurrence. As for the first GKS, a single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.6 mm (range 4-14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve (retrogasserian target). A median maximum dose of 90 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) was delivered. Data for 9 patients with at least 1-year followup were analyzed. A systematic review of literature was also performed, and results are compared with those of the Marseille study. The median time to retreatment in the Marseille study was 72 months (range 12-125 months) and in the literature it was 17 months (range 3-146 months). In the Marseille study, the median follow-up period was 33.9 months (range 12-96 months), and 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) had initial pain cessation with a median of 6.5 days (range 1-180 days). The actuarial rate for new hypesthesia was 33.3% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year, which remained stable for 7 years. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining pain relief without medication at 6 months and 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively, and remained stable for 7 years. The systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes for repeat GKS for recurrent TN, with a total of 626 patients. Both the selection of the cases for retreatment and the way of reporting outcomes vary widely among studies, with a median rate for initial pain cessation of 88% (range 60%-100%) and for new hypesthesia of 33% (range 11%-80%). Results from the Marseille study raise the question of surgical alternatives after failed GKS for TN. The rates of initial pain cessation and recurrence seem comparable to, or even better than, those of the first GKS, according to different studies, but toxicity is much higher, both in the Marseille study and in the published data. Neither the Marseille study data nor literature data answer the 3 cardinal questions regarding repeat radiosurgery in recurrent TN: which patients to retreat, which target is optimal, and which dose to use.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Trigeminal Neuralgia - surgery</subject><issn>1933-0693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j1tLwzAYQIMgbk7ffZL8gc7cmra-ydApGwhenseX9EuJNO1IUmX_fgP16TwcOHAIueFsKXnF7wTjalkv15t3rriqqzMy542UBdONnJHLlL4Y41ppcUFmolRSNWU5J90b7hEyXUMIQDeDd0jTFDuMB-rGSCPaKUYcMs3Rdxj8AD0dcIrQdx7uaT8OXZExBjpO2Y4BE4WhpemQMgbI3p4K3x5_rsi5gz7h9R8X5PPp8WP1XGxf1y-rh21hpda50MoJWdcWXG3QMGkqCZpbJavaMNOWLdgSbAVopOXCMHZSLcPWCdFwp0EuyO1vdz-ZgO1uH32AeNj9H8sjcEdZdA</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Tuleasca, Constantin</creator><creator>Carron, Romain</creator><creator>Resseguier, Noémie</creator><creator>Donnet, Anne</creator><creator>Roussel, Philippe</creator><creator>Gaudart, Jean</creator><creator>Levivier, Marc</creator><creator>Régis, Jean</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review</title><author>Tuleasca, Constantin ; Carron, Romain ; Resseguier, Noémie ; Donnet, Anne ; Roussel, Philippe ; Gaudart, Jean ; Levivier, Marc ; Régis, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-64f2388caf8beb03b73a61c4378b0bd5dac5ac7aeb3c12b00c43d0edf2291f6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Trigeminal Neuralgia - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuleasca, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carron, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resseguier, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnet, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudart, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levivier, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Régis, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuleasca, Constantin</au><au>Carron, Romain</au><au>Resseguier, Noémie</au><au>Donnet, Anne</au><au>Roussel, Philippe</au><au>Gaudart, Jean</au><au>Levivier, Marc</au><au>Régis, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>121 Suppl</volume><spage>210</spage><pages>210-</pages><eissn>1933-0693</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of repeat Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Using the prospective database of TN patients treated with GKS in Timone University Hospital (Marseille, France), data were analyzed for 737 patients undergoing GKS for TN Type 1 from July 1992 to November 2010. Among the 497 patients with initial pain cessation, 34.4% (157/456 with ≥ 1-year follow-up) experienced at least 1 recurrence. Thirteen patients (1.8%) were considered for a second GKS, proposed only if the patients had good and prolonged initial pain cessation after the first GKS, with no other treatment alternative at the moment of recurrence. As for the first GKS, a single 4-mm isocenter was positioned in the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve at a median distance of 7.6 mm (range 4-14 mm) anterior to the emergence of the nerve (retrogasserian target). A median maximum dose of 90 Gy (range 70-90 Gy) was delivered. Data for 9 patients with at least 1-year followup were analyzed. A systematic review of literature was also performed, and results are compared with those of the Marseille study. The median time to retreatment in the Marseille study was 72 months (range 12-125 months) and in the literature it was 17 months (range 3-146 months). In the Marseille study, the median follow-up period was 33.9 months (range 12-96 months), and 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) had initial pain cessation with a median of 6.5 days (range 1-180 days). The actuarial rate for new hypesthesia was 33.3% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year, which remained stable for 7 years. The actuarial probabilities of maintaining pain relief without medication at 6 months and 1 year were 100% and 75%, respectively, and remained stable for 7 years. The systematic review analyzed 20 peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes for repeat GKS for recurrent TN, with a total of 626 patients. Both the selection of the cases for retreatment and the way of reporting outcomes vary widely among studies, with a median rate for initial pain cessation of 88% (range 60%-100%) and for new hypesthesia of 33% (range 11%-80%). Results from the Marseille study raise the question of surgical alternatives after failed GKS for TN. The rates of initial pain cessation and recurrence seem comparable to, or even better than, those of the first GKS, according to different studies, but toxicity is much higher, both in the Marseille study and in the published data. Neither the Marseille study data nor literature data answer the 3 cardinal questions regarding repeat radiosurgery in recurrent TN: which patients to retreat, which target is optimal, and which dose to use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25434955</pmid><doi>10.3171/2014.8.GKS141487</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1933-0693
ispartof Journal of neurosurgery, 2014-12, Vol.121 Suppl, p.210
issn 1933-0693
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_25434955
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Databases, Factual
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radiation Dosage
Radiosurgery - adverse effects
Radiosurgery - methods
Recurrence
Reoperation - adverse effects
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Trigeminal Neuralgia - surgery
title Repeat Gamma Knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20Gamma%20Knife%20surgery%20for%20recurrent%20trigeminal%20neuralgia:%20long-term%20outcomes%20and%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Tuleasca,%20Constantin&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=121%20Suppl&rft.spage=210&rft.pages=210-&rft.eissn=1933-0693&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2014.8.GKS141487&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E25434955%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25434955&rfr_iscdi=true