Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the safety of substituting the first day post-operative review after routine cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with a telephone survey. Design/methodology/approach – Prospective non-randomised cohort study. A standardised questionnaire of five...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of health care quality assurance 2014-01, Vol.27 (4), p.347-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | International journal of health care quality assurance |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Tan, Petrina Yee Foo, Fong C. Teoh, Stephen Tym Wong, Hon |
description | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine the safety of substituting the first day post-operative review after routine cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with a telephone survey.
Design/methodology/approach
– Prospective non-randomised cohort study. A standardised questionnaire of five common ocular symptoms (general condition, vision, eye pain, headache, nausea or vomiting) was administered by a trained nurse on the first post-operative day. The patients were reviewed in clinic two to 14 days later. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for complications (endophthalmitis, raised intra-ocular pressure, wound leaks and uveitis) requiring deviation from standard treatment.
Findings
– Over 13 months, 256 eyes of 238 patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification by four consultant surgeons. Only one patient reported poor general condition, blurred vision and eye pain. She was subsequently found to have corneal oedema and raised intra-ocular pressure when recalled for an earlier review. Best corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 was achieved in 80.5 per cent of patients. There were no other post-operative complications noted from medical records review.
Research limitations/implications
– Non-randomised nature, skewed surgical expertise, lack of a control group and patient experience data. In all, 22 patients (9.2 per cent) were also uncontactable for the telephone interview.
Practical implications
– A nurse-administered telephone survey seemed to be a safe and effective alternative to first day post-operative review after routine phacoemulsification. The survey also enabled the detection of serious post-operative complications. The first day post-operative hospital visit may be safely substituted in a selected patient population with greater patient convenience achieved and liberation of clinic resources.
Originality/value
– This is the first study which utilises a standardised questionnaire as a form of post-operative review in an Asian population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_25076608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1551021090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c278a7514fa8f8b85e9b56b2ce3ba6cb30f31e9b2459e6fa3f03eaab12f081583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktFr1TAUxoM43N30LxAk4IsvceckTZo-jsvcJgMR9LmkvSeuo21q0t6x_950dxMUxIeQw-H3fcnJF8beInxEBHt2_flq-_VcIAoJKEVe8IJtsNRWGF3Il2wDlZbCWCOP2UlKdwCglC5fsWOpoTQG7IZNF3vXL27uwsiD5_Mt8SXRWjo-LjGRcLuhG7s0U6Qdn6mn6TaMxH8ulFbV6LpI3IfIp5BmESaK2W1PvHWzi66deVriD4oPPNK-o_vX7Mi7PtGbp_2Uff908W17JW6-XF5vz29EW0A1i1aW1pUaC--st43VVDXaNLIl1TjTNgq8wtyTha7IeKc8KHKuQenBorbqlH04-E4xPN61HrrUUt-7kcKSaiwlKq0tFv9HtUaQCBVk9P1f6F1Y4pgHyZQyyqIt17PVgWpjSCmSr6fYDS4-1Aj1ml19yC7X9ZpdvWaXVe-evJdmoN1vzXNYGZAHgIb8yP3uH65__Aj1C57bpPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536381878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Tan, Petrina ; Yee Foo, Fong ; C. Teoh, Stephen ; Tym Wong, Hon</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Petrina ; Yee Foo, Fong ; C. Teoh, Stephen ; Tym Wong, Hon</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine the safety of substituting the first day post-operative review after routine cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with a telephone survey.
Design/methodology/approach
– Prospective non-randomised cohort study. A standardised questionnaire of five common ocular symptoms (general condition, vision, eye pain, headache, nausea or vomiting) was administered by a trained nurse on the first post-operative day. The patients were reviewed in clinic two to 14 days later. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for complications (endophthalmitis, raised intra-ocular pressure, wound leaks and uveitis) requiring deviation from standard treatment.
Findings
– Over 13 months, 256 eyes of 238 patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification by four consultant surgeons. Only one patient reported poor general condition, blurred vision and eye pain. She was subsequently found to have corneal oedema and raised intra-ocular pressure when recalled for an earlier review. Best corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 was achieved in 80.5 per cent of patients. There were no other post-operative complications noted from medical records review.
Research limitations/implications
– Non-randomised nature, skewed surgical expertise, lack of a control group and patient experience data. In all, 22 patients (9.2 per cent) were also uncontactable for the telephone interview.
Practical implications
– A nurse-administered telephone survey seemed to be a safe and effective alternative to first day post-operative review after routine phacoemulsification. The survey also enabled the detection of serious post-operative complications. The first day post-operative hospital visit may be safely substituted in a selected patient population with greater patient convenience achieved and liberation of clinic resources.
Originality/value
– This is the first study which utilises a standardised questionnaire as a form of post-operative review in an Asian population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-6862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25076608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Antibiotics ; Cataracts ; Clinical medicine ; Cornea ; Disease prevention ; Edema ; Eye surgery ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Headaches ; Health & social care ; Health administration ; Health care access ; Health service delivery ; Health service quality ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; Nurses ; Pain ; Patients ; Phacoemulsification - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Singapore ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone ; Visual acuity ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>International journal of health care quality assurance, 2014-01, Vol.27 (4), p.347-354</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c278a7514fa8f8b85e9b56b2ce3ba6cb30f31e9b2459e6fa3f03eaab12f081583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c278a7514fa8f8b85e9b56b2ce3ba6cb30f31e9b2459e6fa3f03eaab12f081583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,12846,27924,27925,30999,52686,52689</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25076608$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Petrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee Foo, Fong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C. Teoh, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tym Wong, Hon</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review</title><title>International journal of health care quality assurance</title><addtitle>Int J Health Care Qual Assur</addtitle><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine the safety of substituting the first day post-operative review after routine cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with a telephone survey.
Design/methodology/approach
– Prospective non-randomised cohort study. A standardised questionnaire of five common ocular symptoms (general condition, vision, eye pain, headache, nausea or vomiting) was administered by a trained nurse on the first post-operative day. The patients were reviewed in clinic two to 14 days later. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for complications (endophthalmitis, raised intra-ocular pressure, wound leaks and uveitis) requiring deviation from standard treatment.
Findings
– Over 13 months, 256 eyes of 238 patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification by four consultant surgeons. Only one patient reported poor general condition, blurred vision and eye pain. She was subsequently found to have corneal oedema and raised intra-ocular pressure when recalled for an earlier review. Best corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 was achieved in 80.5 per cent of patients. There were no other post-operative complications noted from medical records review.
Research limitations/implications
– Non-randomised nature, skewed surgical expertise, lack of a control group and patient experience data. In all, 22 patients (9.2 per cent) were also uncontactable for the telephone interview.
Practical implications
– A nurse-administered telephone survey seemed to be a safe and effective alternative to first day post-operative review after routine phacoemulsification. The survey also enabled the detection of serious post-operative complications. The first day post-operative hospital visit may be safely substituted in a selected patient population with greater patient convenience achieved and liberation of clinic resources.
Originality/value
– This is the first study which utilises a standardised questionnaire as a form of post-operative review in an Asian population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Headaches</subject><subject>Health & social care</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health service delivery</subject><subject>Health service quality</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Singapore</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>0952-6862</issn><issn>1758-6542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFktFr1TAUxoM43N30LxAk4IsvceckTZo-jsvcJgMR9LmkvSeuo21q0t6x_950dxMUxIeQw-H3fcnJF8beInxEBHt2_flq-_VcIAoJKEVe8IJtsNRWGF3Il2wDlZbCWCOP2UlKdwCglC5fsWOpoTQG7IZNF3vXL27uwsiD5_Mt8SXRWjo-LjGRcLuhG7s0U6Qdn6mn6TaMxH8ulFbV6LpI3IfIp5BmESaK2W1PvHWzi66deVriD4oPPNK-o_vX7Mi7PtGbp_2Uff908W17JW6-XF5vz29EW0A1i1aW1pUaC--st43VVDXaNLIl1TjTNgq8wtyTha7IeKc8KHKuQenBorbqlH04-E4xPN61HrrUUt-7kcKSaiwlKq0tFv9HtUaQCBVk9P1f6F1Y4pgHyZQyyqIt17PVgWpjSCmSr6fYDS4-1Aj1ml19yC7X9ZpdvWaXVe-evJdmoN1vzXNYGZAHgIb8yP3uH65__Aj1C57bpPg</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Tan, Petrina</creator><creator>Yee Foo, Fong</creator><creator>C. Teoh, Stephen</creator><creator>Tym Wong, Hon</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review</title><author>Tan, Petrina ; Yee Foo, Fong ; C. Teoh, Stephen ; Tym Wong, Hon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-c278a7514fa8f8b85e9b56b2ce3ba6cb30f31e9b2459e6fa3f03eaab12f081583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Headaches</topic><topic>Health & social care</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health service delivery</topic><topic>Health service quality</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Singapore</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Petrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee Foo, Fong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>C. Teoh, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tym Wong, Hon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of health care quality assurance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Petrina</au><au>Yee Foo, Fong</au><au>C. Teoh, Stephen</au><au>Tym Wong, Hon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of health care quality assurance</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Health Care Qual Assur</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>347-354</pages><issn>0952-6862</issn><eissn>1758-6542</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine the safety of substituting the first day post-operative review after routine cataract surgery (phacoemulsification) with a telephone survey.
Design/methodology/approach
– Prospective non-randomised cohort study. A standardised questionnaire of five common ocular symptoms (general condition, vision, eye pain, headache, nausea or vomiting) was administered by a trained nurse on the first post-operative day. The patients were reviewed in clinic two to 14 days later. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for complications (endophthalmitis, raised intra-ocular pressure, wound leaks and uveitis) requiring deviation from standard treatment.
Findings
– Over 13 months, 256 eyes of 238 patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification by four consultant surgeons. Only one patient reported poor general condition, blurred vision and eye pain. She was subsequently found to have corneal oedema and raised intra-ocular pressure when recalled for an earlier review. Best corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 was achieved in 80.5 per cent of patients. There were no other post-operative complications noted from medical records review.
Research limitations/implications
– Non-randomised nature, skewed surgical expertise, lack of a control group and patient experience data. In all, 22 patients (9.2 per cent) were also uncontactable for the telephone interview.
Practical implications
– A nurse-administered telephone survey seemed to be a safe and effective alternative to first day post-operative review after routine phacoemulsification. The survey also enabled the detection of serious post-operative complications. The first day post-operative hospital visit may be safely substituted in a selected patient population with greater patient convenience achieved and liberation of clinic resources.
Originality/value
– This is the first study which utilises a standardised questionnaire as a form of post-operative review in an Asian population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><pmid>25076608</pmid><doi>10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-6862 |
ispartof | International journal of health care quality assurance, 2014-01, Vol.27 (4), p.347-354 |
issn | 0952-6862 1758-6542 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_25076608 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory Care Facilities Antibiotics Cataracts Clinical medicine Cornea Disease prevention Edema Eye surgery Female Glaucoma Headaches Health & social care Health administration Health care access Health service delivery Health service quality Hospitals Humans Male Medical records Middle Aged Nausea Nurses Pain Patients Phacoemulsification - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Period Prospective Studies Questionnaires Singapore Studies Surgeons Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Telephone Visual acuity Vomiting |
title | Evaluation of the use of a nurse-administered telephone questionnaire for post-operative cataract surgery review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20use%20of%20a%20nurse-administered%20telephone%20questionnaire%20for%20post-operative%20cataract%20surgery%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20health%20care%20quality%20assurance&rft.au=Tan,%20Petrina&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=347-354&rft.issn=0952-6862&rft.eissn=1758-6542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2012-0120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1551021090%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536381878&rft_id=info:pmid/25076608&rfr_iscdi=true |