Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?
Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta cytologica 2013-01, Vol.57 (6), p.581-584 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 584 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | Acta cytologica |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Çetiner, Handan Kır, Gözde Kaygusuz, Ecmel Sağlıcan, Yeşim Kabaca, Canan |
description | Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H. Study Design: Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development. Results: A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000353824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_24107612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1464887886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e03ea50ed3ed4d01115accefd334604cd4618268020b0c0c527f4335dd8a393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT9PwzAQxS0EgvJnYEfIIwyhduw47oSqCkqlCoayR659LYYkDnYC9OPxzTC0dGBisXW-33vW3UPolJIrSrNBnxDCMiZTvoN6dMBkkoqM7KJefKdJlvH8AB2G8BwpJgTbRwcppyQXNO2hz0nA7RPgqXtPxl4ZwLPXTlWuC3hSt15BY2O7tKrEUwjW1f1hu2qsjvUWHEFZxlPVtWvxzYcuu2hzZ5dP_3OMyhaWzq_wMASnbawMfo9QNPZvP1_9Fd6Da0oVrMLp9THaW6gywMnmPkKz25vH0V0yfRhPRsNpohmnbQKEgcoIGAaGG0Lj4pTWsDCMcUG4NlxQmQpJUjInmugszRecscwYqdiAHaGLtWvj3WsHoS0qG3QcXNUQRysoF1zKXEoR0cs1qr0LwcOiaLytlF8VlBTfeRXbvCJ7vrHt5hWYLfkbUATO1sCL8kvwW2Cj_wKQbpxj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464887886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Çetiner, Handan ; Kır, Gözde ; Kaygusuz, Ecmel ; Sağlıcan, Yeşim ; Kabaca, Canan</creator><creatorcontrib>Çetiner, Handan ; Kır, Gözde ; Kaygusuz, Ecmel ; Sağlıcan, Yeşim ; Kabaca, Canan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H. Study Design: Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development. Results: A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000353824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24107612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Female ; Gynecologic Cytopathology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Papanicolaou Test ; Prevalence ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Vaginal Smears ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 2013-01, Vol.57 (6), p.581-584</ispartof><rights>2013 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e03ea50ed3ed4d01115accefd334604cd4618268020b0c0c527f4335dd8a393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e03ea50ed3ed4d01115accefd334604cd4618268020b0c0c527f4335dd8a393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24107612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çetiner, Handan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kır, Gözde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaygusuz, Ecmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlıcan, Yeşim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabaca, Canan</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytologica</addtitle><description>Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H. Study Design: Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development. Results: A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologic Cytopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><issn>1938-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT9PwzAQxS0EgvJnYEfIIwyhduw47oSqCkqlCoayR659LYYkDnYC9OPxzTC0dGBisXW-33vW3UPolJIrSrNBnxDCMiZTvoN6dMBkkoqM7KJefKdJlvH8AB2G8BwpJgTbRwcppyQXNO2hz0nA7RPgqXtPxl4ZwLPXTlWuC3hSt15BY2O7tKrEUwjW1f1hu2qsjvUWHEFZxlPVtWvxzYcuu2hzZ5dP_3OMyhaWzq_wMASnbawMfo9QNPZvP1_9Fd6Da0oVrMLp9THaW6gywMnmPkKz25vH0V0yfRhPRsNpohmnbQKEgcoIGAaGG0Lj4pTWsDCMcUG4NlxQmQpJUjInmugszRecscwYqdiAHaGLtWvj3WsHoS0qG3QcXNUQRysoF1zKXEoR0cs1qr0LwcOiaLytlF8VlBTfeRXbvCJ7vrHt5hWYLfkbUATO1sCL8kvwW2Cj_wKQbpxj</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Çetiner, Handan</creator><creator>Kır, Gözde</creator><creator>Kaygusuz, Ecmel</creator><creator>Sağlıcan, Yeşim</creator><creator>Kabaca, Canan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?</title><author>Çetiner, Handan ; Kır, Gözde ; Kaygusuz, Ecmel ; Sağlıcan, Yeşim ; Kabaca, Canan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-e03ea50ed3ed4d01115accefd334604cd4618268020b0c0c527f4335dd8a393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologic Cytopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çetiner, Handan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kır, Gözde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaygusuz, Ecmel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlıcan, Yeşim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabaca, Canan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çetiner, Handan</au><au>Kır, Gözde</au><au>Kaygusuz, Ecmel</au><au>Sağlıcan, Yeşim</au><au>Kabaca, Canan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytologica</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>581-584</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><eissn>1938-2650</eissn><abstract>Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H. Study Design: Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development. Results: A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>24107612</pmid><doi>10.1159/000353824</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5547 |
ispartof | Acta cytologica, 2013-01, Vol.57 (6), p.581-584 |
issn | 0001-5547 1938-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_24107612 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology Female Gynecologic Cytopathology Humans Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Papanicolaou Test Prevalence Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Vaginal Smears Young Adult |
title | Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A49%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Low-Grade%20Squamous%20Intraepithelial%20Lesion/Atypical%20Squamous%20Cells%20Cannot%20Exclude%20High-Grade%20Squamous%20Intraepithelial%20Lesion%20Category%20Associated%20with%20Cervical%20Intraepithelial%20Neoplasia%202?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=%C3%87etiner,%20Handan&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=581-584&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft.eissn=1938-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000353824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1464887886%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464887886&rft_id=info:pmid/24107612&rfr_iscdi=true |