Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study
The role of local ischaemia in the pathogenesis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is not known. This study investigates the role of local ischaemia caused by sutures in an experimental colonic anastomosis model. 36 mice were assigned to three types of anastomosis, all using running sutures; in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European surgical research 2013-01, Vol.50 (1), p.24-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | European surgical research |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Daams, F. Monkhorst, K. van den Broek, J. Slieker, J.C. Jeekel, J. Lange, J.F. |
description | The role of local ischaemia in the pathogenesis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is not known. This study investigates the role of local ischaemia caused by sutures in an experimental colonic anastomosis model. 36 mice were assigned to three types of anastomosis, all using running sutures; in the first group 5 stitches were used, in the second group 12 stitches were used, and in the third group at least 30 stitches were used. After 7 days the mice were re-operated, signs of AL were scored, and coronal sections of the anastomosis were histologically analyzed. The distribution of weight was not significantly different between the three groups. Mortality was 44% and not significantly different between the groups (group 1: 5/12, group 2: 4/12, and group 3: 7/12, p = 0.72). Faecal and purulent AL were observed in 6 animals in group 1, 2 in group 2, and 3 in group 3 (group 1: 50%, group 2: 17%, and group 3: 25%, p = 0.19). The distance between the two colonic edges (group 1: 0.51 μm, group 2: 1.34 μm, and group 3: 0.53 μm, p = 0.18), the diameter of the lumen at the site of the anastomosis (group 1: 2.92 μm, group 2: 4.06 μm, and group 3: 3.2 μm, p = 0.9), and the largest diameter of the lumen proximally to the anastomosis (group 1: 2.05 μm, group 2: 3.1 μm, and group 3: 2.6 μm, p = 0.25) were not different between the groups. Histological parameters of wound healing were not significantly different for the three groups. In this study no macroscopic and microscopic differences were observed between colon anastomosis with 5 stitches versus 12 and >30 stitches. This might indicate that local ischaemia does not negatively influence colonic wound healing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000348411 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_23548268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2995831371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-877a0ab776202e22b9dd755d6f7954dd160cb103e4b17f5ce73f81c4c711a8393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M1LwzAYBvAgipvTg3eRghc9VPMmTdN4E506mAp-gLeSpm-12jazacH990Y2J4iHEBJ-PG_yELIL9BhAqBNKKY-SCGCNDCFiECrFYJ0MKYUo5MCeB2TLuTd_FEqqTTJgXEQJi5MhuZlao6tg4syrxrrUwYVFF9zaLpg0RdVjYzA4a7TrbG270gTXqKuyeTn1l8H4c4ZtWWPT-YSHrs_n22Sj0JXDneU-Ik-X48fz63B6dzU5P5uGhsesCxMpNdWZlDGjDBnLVJ5LIfK4kEpEeQ4xNRlQjlEGshAGJS8SMJGRADrhio_I4SJ31tqPHl2X1qUzWFW6Qdu7FLjgKolpwjw9-EPfbN82_nVexVLEnPk1IkcLZVrrXItFOvM_0-08BZp-d5yuOvZ2f5nYZzXmK_lT6u_Id92-YLsC44f7RUQ6ywuv9v5VyylfKGCI2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1367563256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Daams, F. ; Monkhorst, K. ; van den Broek, J. ; Slieker, J.C. ; Jeekel, J. ; Lange, J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Daams, F. ; Monkhorst, K. ; van den Broek, J. ; Slieker, J.C. ; Jeekel, J. ; Lange, J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of local ischaemia in the pathogenesis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is not known. This study investigates the role of local ischaemia caused by sutures in an experimental colonic anastomosis model. 36 mice were assigned to three types of anastomosis, all using running sutures; in the first group 5 stitches were used, in the second group 12 stitches were used, and in the third group at least 30 stitches were used. After 7 days the mice were re-operated, signs of AL were scored, and coronal sections of the anastomosis were histologically analyzed. The distribution of weight was not significantly different between the three groups. Mortality was 44% and not significantly different between the groups (group 1: 5/12, group 2: 4/12, and group 3: 7/12, p = 0.72). Faecal and purulent AL were observed in 6 animals in group 1, 2 in group 2, and 3 in group 3 (group 1: 50%, group 2: 17%, and group 3: 25%, p = 0.19). The distance between the two colonic edges (group 1: 0.51 μm, group 2: 1.34 μm, and group 3: 0.53 μm, p = 0.18), the diameter of the lumen at the site of the anastomosis (group 1: 2.92 μm, group 2: 4.06 μm, and group 3: 3.2 μm, p = 0.9), and the largest diameter of the lumen proximally to the anastomosis (group 1: 2.05 μm, group 2: 3.1 μm, and group 3: 2.6 μm, p = 0.25) were not different between the groups. Histological parameters of wound healing were not significantly different for the three groups. In this study no macroscopic and microscopic differences were observed between colon anastomosis with 5 stitches versus 12 and >30 stitches. This might indicate that local ischaemia does not negatively influence colonic wound healing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-312X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000348411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23548268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Animals ; Colon - blood supply ; Colon - pathology ; Colon - surgery ; Ischemia - complications ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Original Paper ; Suture Techniques - adverse effects ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>European surgical research, 2013-01, Vol.50 (1), p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2013 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-877a0ab776202e22b9dd755d6f7954dd160cb103e4b17f5ce73f81c4c711a8393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-877a0ab776202e22b9dd755d6f7954dd160cb103e4b17f5ce73f81c4c711a8393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2427,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23548268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daams, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monkhorst, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Broek, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slieker, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeekel, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study</title><title>European surgical research</title><addtitle>Eur Surg Res</addtitle><description>The role of local ischaemia in the pathogenesis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is not known. This study investigates the role of local ischaemia caused by sutures in an experimental colonic anastomosis model. 36 mice were assigned to three types of anastomosis, all using running sutures; in the first group 5 stitches were used, in the second group 12 stitches were used, and in the third group at least 30 stitches were used. After 7 days the mice were re-operated, signs of AL were scored, and coronal sections of the anastomosis were histologically analyzed. The distribution of weight was not significantly different between the three groups. Mortality was 44% and not significantly different between the groups (group 1: 5/12, group 2: 4/12, and group 3: 7/12, p = 0.72). Faecal and purulent AL were observed in 6 animals in group 1, 2 in group 2, and 3 in group 3 (group 1: 50%, group 2: 17%, and group 3: 25%, p = 0.19). The distance between the two colonic edges (group 1: 0.51 μm, group 2: 1.34 μm, and group 3: 0.53 μm, p = 0.18), the diameter of the lumen at the site of the anastomosis (group 1: 2.92 μm, group 2: 4.06 μm, and group 3: 3.2 μm, p = 0.9), and the largest diameter of the lumen proximally to the anastomosis (group 1: 2.05 μm, group 2: 3.1 μm, and group 3: 2.6 μm, p = 0.25) were not different between the groups. Histological parameters of wound healing were not significantly different for the three groups. In this study no macroscopic and microscopic differences were observed between colon anastomosis with 5 stitches versus 12 and >30 stitches. This might indicate that local ischaemia does not negatively influence colonic wound healing.</description><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Colon - blood supply</subject><subject>Colon - pathology</subject><subject>Colon - surgery</subject><subject>Ischemia - complications</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Suture Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0014-312X</issn><issn>1421-9921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0M1LwzAYBvAgipvTg3eRghc9VPMmTdN4E506mAp-gLeSpm-12jazacH990Y2J4iHEBJ-PG_yELIL9BhAqBNKKY-SCGCNDCFiECrFYJ0MKYUo5MCeB2TLuTd_FEqqTTJgXEQJi5MhuZlao6tg4syrxrrUwYVFF9zaLpg0RdVjYzA4a7TrbG270gTXqKuyeTn1l8H4c4ZtWWPT-YSHrs_n22Sj0JXDneU-Ik-X48fz63B6dzU5P5uGhsesCxMpNdWZlDGjDBnLVJ5LIfK4kEpEeQ4xNRlQjlEGshAGJS8SMJGRADrhio_I4SJ31tqPHl2X1qUzWFW6Qdu7FLjgKolpwjw9-EPfbN82_nVexVLEnPk1IkcLZVrrXItFOvM_0-08BZp-d5yuOvZ2f5nYZzXmK_lT6u_Id92-YLsC44f7RUQ6ywuv9v5VyylfKGCI2Q</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Daams, F.</creator><creator>Monkhorst, K.</creator><creator>van den Broek, J.</creator><creator>Slieker, J.C.</creator><creator>Jeekel, J.</creator><creator>Lange, J.F.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study</title><author>Daams, F. ; Monkhorst, K. ; van den Broek, J. ; Slieker, J.C. ; Jeekel, J. ; Lange, J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-877a0ab776202e22b9dd755d6f7954dd160cb103e4b17f5ce73f81c4c711a8393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Colon - blood supply</topic><topic>Colon - pathology</topic><topic>Colon - surgery</topic><topic>Ischemia - complications</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Suture Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daams, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monkhorst, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Broek, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slieker, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeekel, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daams, F.</au><au>Monkhorst, K.</au><au>van den Broek, J.</au><au>Slieker, J.C.</au><au>Jeekel, J.</au><au>Lange, J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study</atitle><jtitle>European surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Surg Res</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>0014-312X</issn><eissn>1421-9921</eissn><abstract>The role of local ischaemia in the pathogenesis of colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL) is not known. This study investigates the role of local ischaemia caused by sutures in an experimental colonic anastomosis model. 36 mice were assigned to three types of anastomosis, all using running sutures; in the first group 5 stitches were used, in the second group 12 stitches were used, and in the third group at least 30 stitches were used. After 7 days the mice were re-operated, signs of AL were scored, and coronal sections of the anastomosis were histologically analyzed. The distribution of weight was not significantly different between the three groups. Mortality was 44% and not significantly different between the groups (group 1: 5/12, group 2: 4/12, and group 3: 7/12, p = 0.72). Faecal and purulent AL were observed in 6 animals in group 1, 2 in group 2, and 3 in group 3 (group 1: 50%, group 2: 17%, and group 3: 25%, p = 0.19). The distance between the two colonic edges (group 1: 0.51 μm, group 2: 1.34 μm, and group 3: 0.53 μm, p = 0.18), the diameter of the lumen at the site of the anastomosis (group 1: 2.92 μm, group 2: 4.06 μm, and group 3: 3.2 μm, p = 0.9), and the largest diameter of the lumen proximally to the anastomosis (group 1: 2.05 μm, group 2: 3.1 μm, and group 3: 2.6 μm, p = 0.25) were not different between the groups. Histological parameters of wound healing were not significantly different for the three groups. In this study no macroscopic and microscopic differences were observed between colon anastomosis with 5 stitches versus 12 and >30 stitches. This might indicate that local ischaemia does not negatively influence colonic wound healing.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>23548268</pmid><doi>10.1159/000348411</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-312X |
ispartof | European surgical research, 2013-01, Vol.50 (1), p.24-31 |
issn | 0014-312X 1421-9921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_23548268 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals |
subjects | Anastomosis, Surgical Anastomotic Leak - etiology Animals Colon - blood supply Colon - pathology Colon - surgery Ischemia - complications Male Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Original Paper Suture Techniques - adverse effects Wound Healing |
title | Local Ischaemia Does Not Influence Anastomotic Healing: An Experimental Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Ischaemia%20Does%20Not%20Influence%20Anastomotic%20Healing:%20An%20Experimental%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Daams,%20F.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=0014-312X&rft.eissn=1421-9921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000348411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2995831371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1367563256&rft_id=info:pmid/23548268&rfr_iscdi=true |