Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches

Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the dist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmaceutical development and technology 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934
Hauptverfasser: Gaunø, Mette Høg, Larsen, Crilles Casper, Vilhelmsen, Thomas, Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn, Wittendorff, Jørgen, Rantanen, Jukka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 934
container_issue 4
container_start_page 926
container_title Pharmaceutical development and technology
container_volume 18
creator Gaunø, Mette Høg
Larsen, Crilles Casper
Vilhelmsen, Thomas
Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn
Wittendorff, Jørgen
Rantanen, Jukka
description Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/10837450.2011.619542
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_23215949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1351614336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO3TAURa2KqlDaP6hQhkxy6xM_4kyKEKIFCakTOrZOYqfXyIkvflDRr2-iC0VMGNnyWWdvaxHyBeiGAe2-AlWs5YJuGgqwkdAJ3rwjR8uorTsl24P1rli9MofkY0p3lILqqPhADhvWgOh4d0R-XT6gL5hdmKswViaGnbe5Su6vrYxLObq-rMNUleTm31WZ3QNGh9lWOJtqKj6_POx2MeCwtekTeT-iT_bz03lMbr9f3l5c1Tc_f1xfnN_UAweVayuNgh4EGyRHg0L0UgnTMGFUY-VIecu6nnMqmW2saiRncuigRz62PXBkx-R0H7v03hebsp5cGqz3ONtQkgYmQAJnTC4o36NDDClFO-pddBPGRw1Urz71s0-9-tR7n8vayVND6Sdr_i89C1yAsz3g5jHECf-E6I3O-OhDHCPOg0tr_JsV314lbC36vB0wWn0XSpwXf2__8R_eZ5ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1351614336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><description>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-9867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10837450.2011.619542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23215949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Air Pressure ; atomization ; Cellulose - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Cellulose - chemistry ; Droplet size ; Drug Compounding - methods ; Ethanol - chemistry ; Multivariate Analysis ; Particle Size ; Principal Component Analysis ; principal component analysis (PCA) ; two-fluid nozzle</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical development and technology, 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934</ispartof><rights>2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23215949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><title>Pharmaceutical development and technology</title><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><description>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</description><subject>Air Pressure</subject><subject>atomization</subject><subject>Cellulose - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Cellulose - chemistry</subject><subject>Droplet size</subject><subject>Drug Compounding - methods</subject><subject>Ethanol - chemistry</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>principal component analysis (PCA)</subject><subject>two-fluid nozzle</subject><issn>1083-7450</issn><issn>1097-9867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtO3TAURa2KqlDaP6hQhkxy6xM_4kyKEKIFCakTOrZOYqfXyIkvflDRr2-iC0VMGNnyWWdvaxHyBeiGAe2-AlWs5YJuGgqwkdAJ3rwjR8uorTsl24P1rli9MofkY0p3lILqqPhADhvWgOh4d0R-XT6gL5hdmKswViaGnbe5Su6vrYxLObq-rMNUleTm31WZ3QNGh9lWOJtqKj6_POx2MeCwtekTeT-iT_bz03lMbr9f3l5c1Tc_f1xfnN_UAweVayuNgh4EGyRHg0L0UgnTMGFUY-VIecu6nnMqmW2saiRncuigRz62PXBkx-R0H7v03hebsp5cGqz3ONtQkgYmQAJnTC4o36NDDClFO-pddBPGRw1Urz71s0-9-tR7n8vayVND6Sdr_i89C1yAsz3g5jHECf-E6I3O-OhDHCPOg0tr_JsV314lbC36vB0wWn0XSpwXf2__8R_eZ5ig</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creator><creator>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creator><creator>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creator><creator>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creator><creator>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creator><creator>Rantanen, Jukka</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><author>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air Pressure</topic><topic>atomization</topic><topic>Cellulose - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Cellulose - chemistry</topic><topic>Droplet size</topic><topic>Drug Compounding - methods</topic><topic>Ethanol - chemistry</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>principal component analysis (PCA)</topic><topic>two-fluid nozzle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaunø, Mette Høg</au><au>Larsen, Crilles Casper</au><au>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</au><au>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</au><au>Wittendorff, Jørgen</au><au>Rantanen, Jukka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>934</epage><pages>926-934</pages><issn>1083-7450</issn><eissn>1097-9867</eissn><abstract>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>23215949</pmid><doi>10.3109/10837450.2011.619542</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-7450
ispartof Pharmaceutical development and technology, 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934
issn 1083-7450
1097-9867
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_23215949
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Air Pressure
atomization
Cellulose - analogs & derivatives
Cellulose - chemistry
Droplet size
Drug Compounding - methods
Ethanol - chemistry
Multivariate Analysis
Particle Size
Principal Component Analysis
principal component analysis (PCA)
two-fluid nozzle
title Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20droplet%20size%20distributions%20using%20univariate%20and%20multivariate%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20development%20and%20technology&rft.au=Gaun%C3%B8,%20Mette%20H%C3%B8g&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=934&rft.pages=926-934&rft.issn=1083-7450&rft.eissn=1097-9867&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10837450.2011.619542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1351614336%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1351614336&rft_id=info:pmid/23215949&rfr_iscdi=true