Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches
Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the dist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pharmaceutical development and technology 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 934 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 926 |
container_title | Pharmaceutical development and technology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Gaunø, Mette Høg Larsen, Crilles Casper Vilhelmsen, Thomas Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn Wittendorff, Jørgen Rantanen, Jukka |
description | Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/10837450.2011.619542 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_23215949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1351614336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO3TAURa2KqlDaP6hQhkxy6xM_4kyKEKIFCakTOrZOYqfXyIkvflDRr2-iC0VMGNnyWWdvaxHyBeiGAe2-AlWs5YJuGgqwkdAJ3rwjR8uorTsl24P1rli9MofkY0p3lILqqPhADhvWgOh4d0R-XT6gL5hdmKswViaGnbe5Su6vrYxLObq-rMNUleTm31WZ3QNGh9lWOJtqKj6_POx2MeCwtekTeT-iT_bz03lMbr9f3l5c1Tc_f1xfnN_UAweVayuNgh4EGyRHg0L0UgnTMGFUY-VIecu6nnMqmW2saiRncuigRz62PXBkx-R0H7v03hebsp5cGqz3ONtQkgYmQAJnTC4o36NDDClFO-pddBPGRw1Urz71s0-9-tR7n8vayVND6Sdr_i89C1yAsz3g5jHECf-E6I3O-OhDHCPOg0tr_JsV314lbC36vB0wWn0XSpwXf2__8R_eZ5ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1351614336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><description>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-9867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10837450.2011.619542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23215949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Air Pressure ; atomization ; Cellulose - analogs & derivatives ; Cellulose - chemistry ; Droplet size ; Drug Compounding - methods ; Ethanol - chemistry ; Multivariate Analysis ; Particle Size ; Principal Component Analysis ; principal component analysis (PCA) ; two-fluid nozzle</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutical development and technology, 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934</ispartof><rights>2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23215949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><title>Pharmaceutical development and technology</title><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><description>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</description><subject>Air Pressure</subject><subject>atomization</subject><subject>Cellulose - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Cellulose - chemistry</subject><subject>Droplet size</subject><subject>Drug Compounding - methods</subject><subject>Ethanol - chemistry</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>principal component analysis (PCA)</subject><subject>two-fluid nozzle</subject><issn>1083-7450</issn><issn>1097-9867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtO3TAURa2KqlDaP6hQhkxy6xM_4kyKEKIFCakTOrZOYqfXyIkvflDRr2-iC0VMGNnyWWdvaxHyBeiGAe2-AlWs5YJuGgqwkdAJ3rwjR8uorTsl24P1rli9MofkY0p3lILqqPhADhvWgOh4d0R-XT6gL5hdmKswViaGnbe5Su6vrYxLObq-rMNUleTm31WZ3QNGh9lWOJtqKj6_POx2MeCwtekTeT-iT_bz03lMbr9f3l5c1Tc_f1xfnN_UAweVayuNgh4EGyRHg0L0UgnTMGFUY-VIecu6nnMqmW2saiRncuigRz62PXBkx-R0H7v03hebsp5cGqz3ONtQkgYmQAJnTC4o36NDDClFO-pddBPGRw1Urz71s0-9-tR7n8vayVND6Sdr_i89C1yAsz3g5jHECf-E6I3O-OhDHCPOg0tr_JsV314lbC36vB0wWn0XSpwXf2__8R_eZ5ig</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creator><creator>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creator><creator>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creator><creator>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creator><creator>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creator><creator>Rantanen, Jukka</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</title><author>Gaunø, Mette Høg ; Larsen, Crilles Casper ; Vilhelmsen, Thomas ; Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn ; Wittendorff, Jørgen ; Rantanen, Jukka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e6d81b153c64ada55b685d235d82e6f04739b44063e2e826436c91ba4f7b14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air Pressure</topic><topic>atomization</topic><topic>Cellulose - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Cellulose - chemistry</topic><topic>Droplet size</topic><topic>Drug Compounding - methods</topic><topic>Ethanol - chemistry</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>principal component analysis (PCA)</topic><topic>two-fluid nozzle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaunø, Mette Høg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Crilles Casper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittendorff, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rantanen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaunø, Mette Høg</au><au>Larsen, Crilles Casper</au><au>Vilhelmsen, Thomas</au><au>Møller-Sonnergaard, Jørn</au><au>Wittendorff, Jørgen</au><au>Rantanen, Jukka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutical development and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharm Dev Technol</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>934</epage><pages>926-934</pages><issn>1083-7450</issn><eissn>1097-9867</eissn><abstract>Pharmaceutically relevant material characteristics are often analyzed based on univariate descriptors instead of utilizing the whole information available in the full distribution. One example is droplet size distribution, which is often described by the median droplet size and the width of the distribution. The current study was aiming to compare univariate and multivariate approach in evaluating droplet size distributions. As a model system, the atomization of a coating solution from a two-fluid nozzle was investigated. The effect of three process parameters (concentration of ethyl cellulose in ethanol, atomizing air pressure, and flow rate of coating solution) on the droplet size and droplet size distribution using a full mixed factorial design was used. The droplet size produced by a two-fluid nozzle was measured by laser diffraction and reported as volume based size distribution. Investigation of loading and score plots from principal component analysis (PCA) revealed additional information on the droplet size distributions and it was possible to identify univariate statistics (volume median droplet size), which were similar, however, originating from varying droplet size distributions. The multivariate data analysis was proven to be an efficient tool for evaluating the full information contained in a distribution.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>23215949</pmid><doi>10.3109/10837450.2011.619542</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1083-7450 |
ispartof | Pharmaceutical development and technology, 2013-07, Vol.18 (4), p.926-934 |
issn | 1083-7450 1097-9867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_23215949 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Air Pressure atomization Cellulose - analogs & derivatives Cellulose - chemistry Droplet size Drug Compounding - methods Ethanol - chemistry Multivariate Analysis Particle Size Principal Component Analysis principal component analysis (PCA) two-fluid nozzle |
title | Evaluation of droplet size distributions using univariate and multivariate approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20droplet%20size%20distributions%20using%20univariate%20and%20multivariate%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutical%20development%20and%20technology&rft.au=Gaun%C3%B8,%20Mette%20H%C3%B8g&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=934&rft.pages=926-934&rft.issn=1083-7450&rft.eissn=1097-9867&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10837450.2011.619542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1351614336%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1351614336&rft_id=info:pmid/23215949&rfr_iscdi=true |