A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers

Radiation dosimetry of highly modulated dose distributions requires a detector with a high spatial resolution. Liquid filled ionization chambers (LICs) have the potential to become a valuable tool for the characterization of such radiation fields. However, the effect of an increased recombination of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2012-11, Vol.57 (21), p.7161-7175
Hauptverfasser: Andersson, Jonas, Kaiser, Franz-Joachim, Gómez, Faustino, Jäkel, Oliver, Pardo-Montero, Juan, Tölli, Heikki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7175
container_issue 21
container_start_page 7161
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 57
creator Andersson, Jonas
Kaiser, Franz-Joachim
Gómez, Faustino
Jäkel, Oliver
Pardo-Montero, Juan
Tölli, Heikki
description Radiation dosimetry of highly modulated dose distributions requires a detector with a high spatial resolution. Liquid filled ionization chambers (LICs) have the potential to become a valuable tool for the characterization of such radiation fields. However, the effect of an increased recombination of the charge carriers, as compared to using air as the sensitive medium has to be corrected for. Due to the presence of initial recombination in LICs, the correction for general recombination losses is more complicated than for air-filled ionization chambers. In the present work, recently published experimental methods for general recombination correction for LICs are compared and investigated for both pulsed and continuous beams. The experimental methods are all based on one of two approaches: either measurements at two different dose rates (two-dose-rate methods), or measurements at three different LIC polarizing voltages (three-voltage methods). In a comparison with the two-dose-rate methods, the three-voltage methods fail to achieve accurate corrections in several instances, predominantly at low polarizing voltages and dose rates. However, for continuous beams in the range of polarizing voltages recommended by the manufacturer of the LICs used, the agreement between the different methods is generally within the experimental uncertainties. For pulsed beams, the agreement between the methods is poor. The inaccuracies found in the results from the three-voltage methods are associated with numerical difficulties in solving the resulting equation systems, which also make these methods sensitive to small variations in the experimental data. These issues are more pronounced for the case of pulsed beams. Furthermore, the results suggest that the theoretical modelling of initial recombination used in the three-voltage methods may be a contributing factor to the deviating results observed.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_23060077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1113221115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d4fb914c69f0c74f383fb596f1a52eeeba353a6e0b421ce2154e79dfdf3d33053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS1EBcufb4BQjhwa1mPHTnJcLYUiIfXScrWcZAxGSZy1EwH99Djsskcu9nj0e2_kN4RcAL0GWhRLSjmkJQixFPmSwTIHCQdkAVxCKoWkh2SxR47JSQgvlAIULDsix4xTSWmeL4hfJbXrBu1tcH3iTNJYY9BjPyb4NqC3XSx1m3Q4PrsmJMb55Al79LHnMUor2-vRRm3tfGx8ljPU2s1kmyQ-7f8d8Ky7Cn04Iz-MbgOe7-5T8u_219_17_Thz939evWQ1rwQY9pkpiohq2VpaJ1nhhfcVKKUBrRgiFhpLriWSKuMQY0MRIZ52ZjG8IZzKvgp-bn1Da84TJUa4me0f1dOW3VjH1fK-Sc1dZOSNBM84ldbfPBuM2EYVWdDjW2re3RTUADAGYvn7Jxt0dq7EDyavTdQNS9HzcmrOXklcsVAzcuJssvdhKnqsNmLvrYRAboFrBvUi5t8H_P53vMDKGObhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1113221115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Andersson, Jonas ; Kaiser, Franz-Joachim ; Gómez, Faustino ; Jäkel, Oliver ; Pardo-Montero, Juan ; Tölli, Heikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Jonas ; Kaiser, Franz-Joachim ; Gómez, Faustino ; Jäkel, Oliver ; Pardo-Montero, Juan ; Tölli, Heikki</creatorcontrib><description>Radiation dosimetry of highly modulated dose distributions requires a detector with a high spatial resolution. Liquid filled ionization chambers (LICs) have the potential to become a valuable tool for the characterization of such radiation fields. However, the effect of an increased recombination of the charge carriers, as compared to using air as the sensitive medium has to be corrected for. Due to the presence of initial recombination in LICs, the correction for general recombination losses is more complicated than for air-filled ionization chambers. In the present work, recently published experimental methods for general recombination correction for LICs are compared and investigated for both pulsed and continuous beams. The experimental methods are all based on one of two approaches: either measurements at two different dose rates (two-dose-rate methods), or measurements at three different LIC polarizing voltages (three-voltage methods). In a comparison with the two-dose-rate methods, the three-voltage methods fail to achieve accurate corrections in several instances, predominantly at low polarizing voltages and dose rates. However, for continuous beams in the range of polarizing voltages recommended by the manufacturer of the LICs used, the agreement between the different methods is generally within the experimental uncertainties. For pulsed beams, the agreement between the methods is poor. The inaccuracies found in the results from the three-voltage methods are associated with numerical difficulties in solving the resulting equation systems, which also make these methods sensitive to small variations in the experimental data. These issues are more pronounced for the case of pulsed beams. Furthermore, the results suggest that the theoretical modelling of initial recombination used in the three-voltage methods may be a contributing factor to the deviating results observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23060077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Electricity ; General recombination ; initial recombination ; isooctane ; liquid ionization chamber ; Models, Theoretical ; radiation dosimetry ; radiation physics ; radiofysik ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; tetramethylsilane ; three-voltage method ; two-dose-rate method</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2012-11, Vol.57 (21), p.7161-7175</ispartof><rights>2012 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d4fb914c69f0c74f383fb596f1a52eeeba353a6e0b421ce2154e79dfdf3d33053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d4fb914c69f0c74f383fb596f1a52eeeba353a6e0b421ce2154e79dfdf3d33053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7161/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-60453$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Franz-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Faustino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäkel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo-Montero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tölli, Heikki</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Radiation dosimetry of highly modulated dose distributions requires a detector with a high spatial resolution. Liquid filled ionization chambers (LICs) have the potential to become a valuable tool for the characterization of such radiation fields. However, the effect of an increased recombination of the charge carriers, as compared to using air as the sensitive medium has to be corrected for. Due to the presence of initial recombination in LICs, the correction for general recombination losses is more complicated than for air-filled ionization chambers. In the present work, recently published experimental methods for general recombination correction for LICs are compared and investigated for both pulsed and continuous beams. The experimental methods are all based on one of two approaches: either measurements at two different dose rates (two-dose-rate methods), or measurements at three different LIC polarizing voltages (three-voltage methods). In a comparison with the two-dose-rate methods, the three-voltage methods fail to achieve accurate corrections in several instances, predominantly at low polarizing voltages and dose rates. However, for continuous beams in the range of polarizing voltages recommended by the manufacturer of the LICs used, the agreement between the different methods is generally within the experimental uncertainties. For pulsed beams, the agreement between the methods is poor. The inaccuracies found in the results from the three-voltage methods are associated with numerical difficulties in solving the resulting equation systems, which also make these methods sensitive to small variations in the experimental data. These issues are more pronounced for the case of pulsed beams. Furthermore, the results suggest that the theoretical modelling of initial recombination used in the three-voltage methods may be a contributing factor to the deviating results observed.</description><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>General recombination</subject><subject>initial recombination</subject><subject>isooctane</subject><subject>liquid ionization chamber</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>radiation dosimetry</subject><subject>radiation physics</subject><subject>radiofysik</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>tetramethylsilane</subject><subject>three-voltage method</subject><subject>two-dose-rate method</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P3DAQxS1EBcufb4BQjhwa1mPHTnJcLYUiIfXScrWcZAxGSZy1EwH99Djsskcu9nj0e2_kN4RcAL0GWhRLSjmkJQixFPmSwTIHCQdkAVxCKoWkh2SxR47JSQgvlAIULDsix4xTSWmeL4hfJbXrBu1tcH3iTNJYY9BjPyb4NqC3XSx1m3Q4PrsmJMb55Al79LHnMUor2-vRRm3tfGx8ljPU2s1kmyQ-7f8d8Ky7Cn04Iz-MbgOe7-5T8u_219_17_Thz939evWQ1rwQY9pkpiohq2VpaJ1nhhfcVKKUBrRgiFhpLriWSKuMQY0MRIZ52ZjG8IZzKvgp-bn1Da84TJUa4me0f1dOW3VjH1fK-Sc1dZOSNBM84ldbfPBuM2EYVWdDjW2re3RTUADAGYvn7Jxt0dq7EDyavTdQNS9HzcmrOXklcsVAzcuJssvdhKnqsNmLvrYRAboFrBvUi5t8H_P53vMDKGObhA</recordid><startdate>20121107</startdate><enddate>20121107</enddate><creator>Andersson, Jonas</creator><creator>Kaiser, Franz-Joachim</creator><creator>Gómez, Faustino</creator><creator>Jäkel, Oliver</creator><creator>Pardo-Montero, Juan</creator><creator>Tölli, Heikki</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D93</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121107</creationdate><title>A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers</title><author>Andersson, Jonas ; Kaiser, Franz-Joachim ; Gómez, Faustino ; Jäkel, Oliver ; Pardo-Montero, Juan ; Tölli, Heikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d4fb914c69f0c74f383fb596f1a52eeeba353a6e0b421ce2154e79dfdf3d33053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>General recombination</topic><topic>initial recombination</topic><topic>isooctane</topic><topic>liquid ionization chamber</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>radiation dosimetry</topic><topic>radiation physics</topic><topic>radiofysik</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>tetramethylsilane</topic><topic>three-voltage method</topic><topic>two-dose-rate method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Franz-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Faustino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäkel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo-Montero, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tölli, Heikki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Umeå universitet</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersson, Jonas</au><au>Kaiser, Franz-Joachim</au><au>Gómez, Faustino</au><au>Jäkel, Oliver</au><au>Pardo-Montero, Juan</au><au>Tölli, Heikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2012-11-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>7161</spage><epage>7175</epage><pages>7161-7175</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Radiation dosimetry of highly modulated dose distributions requires a detector with a high spatial resolution. Liquid filled ionization chambers (LICs) have the potential to become a valuable tool for the characterization of such radiation fields. However, the effect of an increased recombination of the charge carriers, as compared to using air as the sensitive medium has to be corrected for. Due to the presence of initial recombination in LICs, the correction for general recombination losses is more complicated than for air-filled ionization chambers. In the present work, recently published experimental methods for general recombination correction for LICs are compared and investigated for both pulsed and continuous beams. The experimental methods are all based on one of two approaches: either measurements at two different dose rates (two-dose-rate methods), or measurements at three different LIC polarizing voltages (three-voltage methods). In a comparison with the two-dose-rate methods, the three-voltage methods fail to achieve accurate corrections in several instances, predominantly at low polarizing voltages and dose rates. However, for continuous beams in the range of polarizing voltages recommended by the manufacturer of the LICs used, the agreement between the different methods is generally within the experimental uncertainties. For pulsed beams, the agreement between the methods is poor. The inaccuracies found in the results from the three-voltage methods are associated with numerical difficulties in solving the resulting equation systems, which also make these methods sensitive to small variations in the experimental data. These issues are more pronounced for the case of pulsed beams. Furthermore, the results suggest that the theoretical modelling of initial recombination used in the three-voltage methods may be a contributing factor to the deviating results observed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>23060077</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7161</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2012-11, Vol.57 (21), p.7161-7175
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_23060077
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Electricity
General recombination
initial recombination
isooctane
liquid ionization chamber
Models, Theoretical
radiation dosimetry
radiation physics
radiofysik
Radiometry - instrumentation
tetramethylsilane
three-voltage method
two-dose-rate method
title A comparison of different experimental methods for general recombination correction for liquid ionization chambers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20different%20experimental%20methods%20for%20general%20recombination%20correction%20for%20liquid%20ionization%20chambers&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Andersson,%20Jonas&rft.date=2012-11-07&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=7161&rft.epage=7175&rft.pages=7161-7175&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1113221115%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1113221115&rft_id=info:pmid/23060077&rfr_iscdi=true