Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2012-10, Vol.109 (42), p.17028-17033
Hauptverfasser:	Fang, Ferric C., Steen, R. Grant, Casadevall, Arturo
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Article retractions Biochemistry Biological Sciences Biomedical research Blood Duplicate Publication as Topic Epidemics Ethics Fraud Impact factor Medical research Plagiarism Primary literature PubMed Research ethics Research fraud Retraction of Publication as Topic Scientific Misconduct - statistics & numerical data Scientific Misconduct - trends Time Factors
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!