Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock?
Livestock populations in protected areas are viewed negatively because of their interaction with native ungulates through direct competition for food resources. However, livestock and native prey can also interact indirectly through their shared predator. Indirect interactions between two prey speci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2012-02, Vol.93 (2), p.272-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 272 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Sundararaj, Vijayan McLaren, Brian E Morris, Douglas W Goyal, S. P |
description | Livestock populations in protected areas are viewed negatively because of their interaction with native ungulates through direct competition for food resources. However, livestock and native prey can also interact indirectly through their shared predator. Indirect interactions between two prey species occur when one prey modifies either the functional or numerical responses of a shared predator. This interaction is often manifested as negative effects (apparent competition) on one or both prey species through increased predation risk. But indirect interactions can also yield positive effects on a focal prey if the shared predator modifies its functional response toward increased consumption of an abundant and higher-quality alternative prey. Such a phenomenon between two prey species is underappreciated and overlooked in nature. Positive indirect effects can be expected to occur in livestock-dominated wildlife reserves containing large carnivores. We searched for such positive effects in
Acacia-Zizhypus
forests of India's Gir sanctuary where livestock (
Bubalus bubalis
and
Bos indicus
) and a coexisting native prey (chital deer,
Axis axis
) are consumed by Asiatic lions (
Panthera leo
persica
). Chital vigilance was higher in areas with low livestock density than in areas with high livestock density. This positive indirect effect occurred because lion predation rates on livestock were twice as great where livestock were abundant than where livestock density was low. Positive indirect interactions mediated by shared predators may be more common than generally thought with rather major consequences for ecological understanding and conservation. We encourage further studies to understand outcomes of indirect interactions on long-term predator-prey dynamics in livestock-dominated protected areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/10-2050.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_22624309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23143908</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23143908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5232-3f8e9edd5d9cdc52d0822e509aa821501c32417f90495f095259ec8a10b0c133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCgR8AREJIcAiM7TjJnBBalQ-pEgfaA6fI6zglS2KndtJ2_30nykIRKhI-eGTPMzOeec3YUw5veYnwjkMqQNHhHltxlJgiL-A-WwFwkWKuyiP2KMYd0OJZ-ZAdCZGLTAKu2NlGuyToYJPBx3ZsL23SutEGbcbWu5hsrfG9TWjrvUuufliXdDqc040Orr30wUZyujgR1FF0HL35-f4xe9DoLtonB7tmpx-PTzef05Ovn75sPpykWgkpUtmUFm1dqxpNbZSooRTCKkCtS8EVcCNFxosGIUPVACqh0JpSc9iC4VKu2esl7RD8xUS1q76NxnaddtZPseLACywyEPn_oHleyFzN6Mu_0J2fgqM-iALkpUCliHqzUCb4GINtqiG0vQ57gqpZldnOqlSc2OeHjNO2t_Vv8pcMBLw6ADoa3TVBO9PGW06VHAoa2ZplC3fVdnb_74rV8ea7IPFRClHMYc-WsB3JE27TSp5JhJL8LxZ_o32lzwOVPvtG8Tn9FywA_5iJHveDd5WN-s4-76QObxrqphqvR3kDUm7KGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009182955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sundararaj, Vijayan ; McLaren, Brian E ; Morris, Douglas W ; Goyal, S. P</creator><contributor>Kotler, BP</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sundararaj, Vijayan ; McLaren, Brian E ; Morris, Douglas W ; Goyal, S. P ; Kotler, BP</creatorcontrib><description>Livestock populations in protected areas are viewed negatively because of their interaction with native ungulates through direct competition for food resources. However, livestock and native prey can also interact indirectly through their shared predator. Indirect interactions between two prey species occur when one prey modifies either the functional or numerical responses of a shared predator. This interaction is often manifested as negative effects (apparent competition) on one or both prey species through increased predation risk. But indirect interactions can also yield positive effects on a focal prey if the shared predator modifies its functional response toward increased consumption of an abundant and higher-quality alternative prey. Such a phenomenon between two prey species is underappreciated and overlooked in nature. Positive indirect effects can be expected to occur in livestock-dominated wildlife reserves containing large carnivores. We searched for such positive effects in
Acacia-Zizhypus
forests of India's Gir sanctuary where livestock (
Bubalus bubalis
and
Bos indicus
) and a coexisting native prey (chital deer,
Axis axis
) are consumed by Asiatic lions (
Panthera leo
persica
). Chital vigilance was higher in areas with low livestock density than in areas with high livestock density. This positive indirect effect occurred because lion predation rates on livestock were twice as great where livestock were abundant than where livestock density was low. Positive indirect interactions mediated by shared predators may be more common than generally thought with rather major consequences for ecological understanding and conservation. We encourage further studies to understand outcomes of indirect interactions on long-term predator-prey dynamics in livestock-dominated protected areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/10-2050.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22624309</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>adverse effects ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Axis axis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bos indicus ; Bubalus bubalis ; buffaloes ; Buffaloes - physiology ; Carnivores ; Cattle - physiology ; chital ; CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS: EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY ; conservation areas ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Deer - physiology ; Ecological competition ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; environmental impact ; Forest conservation ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; India ; indirect interactions ; lion ; Lions ; Lions - physiology ; Livestock ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; native prey ; Panthera leo persica ; Population Density ; Predation ; predation risk ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; risk ; shared predator ; vigilance ; Wildlife ecology ; zebu</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2012-02, Vol.93 (2), p.272-280</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2012 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5232-3f8e9edd5d9cdc52d0822e509aa821501c32417f90495f095259ec8a10b0c133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5232-3f8e9edd5d9cdc52d0822e509aa821501c32417f90495f095259ec8a10b0c133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23143908$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23143908$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25810752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22624309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kotler, BP</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sundararaj, Vijayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, S. P</creatorcontrib><title>Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock?</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Livestock populations in protected areas are viewed negatively because of their interaction with native ungulates through direct competition for food resources. However, livestock and native prey can also interact indirectly through their shared predator. Indirect interactions between two prey species occur when one prey modifies either the functional or numerical responses of a shared predator. This interaction is often manifested as negative effects (apparent competition) on one or both prey species through increased predation risk. But indirect interactions can also yield positive effects on a focal prey if the shared predator modifies its functional response toward increased consumption of an abundant and higher-quality alternative prey. Such a phenomenon between two prey species is underappreciated and overlooked in nature. Positive indirect effects can be expected to occur in livestock-dominated wildlife reserves containing large carnivores. We searched for such positive effects in
Acacia-Zizhypus
forests of India's Gir sanctuary where livestock (
Bubalus bubalis
and
Bos indicus
) and a coexisting native prey (chital deer,
Axis axis
) are consumed by Asiatic lions (
Panthera leo
persica
). Chital vigilance was higher in areas with low livestock density than in areas with high livestock density. This positive indirect effect occurred because lion predation rates on livestock were twice as great where livestock were abundant than where livestock density was low. Positive indirect interactions mediated by shared predators may be more common than generally thought with rather major consequences for ecological understanding and conservation. We encourage further studies to understand outcomes of indirect interactions on long-term predator-prey dynamics in livestock-dominated protected areas.</description><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Axis axis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bos indicus</subject><subject>Bubalus bubalis</subject><subject>buffaloes</subject><subject>Buffaloes - physiology</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>chital</subject><subject>CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS: EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Deer - physiology</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>indirect interactions</subject><subject>lion</subject><subject>Lions</subject><subject>Lions - physiology</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>native prey</subject><subject>Panthera leo persica</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predation risk</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>shared predator</subject><subject>vigilance</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>zebu</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCgR8AREJIcAiM7TjJnBBalQ-pEgfaA6fI6zglS2KndtJ2_30nykIRKhI-eGTPMzOeec3YUw5veYnwjkMqQNHhHltxlJgiL-A-WwFwkWKuyiP2KMYd0OJZ-ZAdCZGLTAKu2NlGuyToYJPBx3ZsL23SutEGbcbWu5hsrfG9TWjrvUuufliXdDqc040Orr30wUZyujgR1FF0HL35-f4xe9DoLtonB7tmpx-PTzef05Ovn75sPpykWgkpUtmUFm1dqxpNbZSooRTCKkCtS8EVcCNFxosGIUPVACqh0JpSc9iC4VKu2esl7RD8xUS1q76NxnaddtZPseLACywyEPn_oHleyFzN6Mu_0J2fgqM-iALkpUCliHqzUCb4GINtqiG0vQ57gqpZldnOqlSc2OeHjNO2t_Vv8pcMBLw6ADoa3TVBO9PGW06VHAoa2ZplC3fVdnb_74rV8ea7IPFRClHMYc-WsB3JE27TSp5JhJL8LxZ_o32lzwOVPvtG8Tn9FywA_5iJHveDd5WN-s4-76QObxrqphqvR3kDUm7KGg</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Sundararaj, Vijayan</creator><creator>McLaren, Brian E</creator><creator>Morris, Douglas W</creator><creator>Goyal, S. P</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock?</title><author>Sundararaj, Vijayan ; McLaren, Brian E ; Morris, Douglas W ; Goyal, S. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5232-3f8e9edd5d9cdc52d0822e509aa821501c32417f90495f095259ec8a10b0c133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Axis axis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bos indicus</topic><topic>Bubalus bubalis</topic><topic>buffaloes</topic><topic>Buffaloes - physiology</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>chital</topic><topic>CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS: EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Deer - physiology</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>indirect interactions</topic><topic>lion</topic><topic>Lions</topic><topic>Lions - physiology</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>native prey</topic><topic>Panthera leo persica</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predation risk</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>shared predator</topic><topic>vigilance</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>zebu</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sundararaj, Vijayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, Brian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, S. P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sundararaj, Vijayan</au><au>McLaren, Brian E</au><au>Morris, Douglas W</au><au>Goyal, S. P</au><au>Kotler, BP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock?</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>272-280</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Livestock populations in protected areas are viewed negatively because of their interaction with native ungulates through direct competition for food resources. However, livestock and native prey can also interact indirectly through their shared predator. Indirect interactions between two prey species occur when one prey modifies either the functional or numerical responses of a shared predator. This interaction is often manifested as negative effects (apparent competition) on one or both prey species through increased predation risk. But indirect interactions can also yield positive effects on a focal prey if the shared predator modifies its functional response toward increased consumption of an abundant and higher-quality alternative prey. Such a phenomenon between two prey species is underappreciated and overlooked in nature. Positive indirect effects can be expected to occur in livestock-dominated wildlife reserves containing large carnivores. We searched for such positive effects in
Acacia-Zizhypus
forests of India's Gir sanctuary where livestock (
Bubalus bubalis
and
Bos indicus
) and a coexisting native prey (chital deer,
Axis axis
) are consumed by Asiatic lions (
Panthera leo
persica
). Chital vigilance was higher in areas with low livestock density than in areas with high livestock density. This positive indirect effect occurred because lion predation rates on livestock were twice as great where livestock were abundant than where livestock density was low. Positive indirect interactions mediated by shared predators may be more common than generally thought with rather major consequences for ecological understanding and conservation. We encourage further studies to understand outcomes of indirect interactions on long-term predator-prey dynamics in livestock-dominated protected areas.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>22624309</pmid><doi>10.1890/10-2050.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2012-02, Vol.93 (2), p.272-280 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_22624309 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE |
subjects | adverse effects Animal and plant ecology Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Axis axis Biological and medical sciences Bos indicus Bubalus bubalis buffaloes Buffaloes - physiology Carnivores Cattle - physiology chital CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS: EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY conservation areas Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Deer - physiology Ecological competition Ecology Ecosystem environmental impact Forest conservation Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects India indirect interactions lion Lions Lions - physiology Livestock Models, Biological Models, Statistical native prey Panthera leo persica Population Density Predation predation risk Predators Predatory Behavior risk shared predator vigilance Wildlife ecology zebu |
title | Can rare positive interactions become common when large carnivores consume livestock? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A40%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20rare%20positive%20interactions%20become%20common%20when%20large%20carnivores%20consume%20livestock?&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Sundararaj,%20Vijayan&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=272-280&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/10-2050.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E23143908%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009182955&rft_id=info:pmid/22624309&rft_jstor_id=23143908&rfr_iscdi=true |