Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world

Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Klieg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193
Hauptverfasser: Trawley, Steven L., Law, Anna S., Logie, Robert H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2193
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2181
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 64
creator Trawley, Steven L.
Law, Anna S.
Logie, Robert H.
description Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel, 2010 ). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17470218.2011.584976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21740113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2011.584976</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1081897877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtPwyAcxYnRuDn9Bsb0xehLJ5cO6JMxy7wkS3zR54bSfxeWXia0M_v2UtvNt_kCBH7nHDggdE3wlGCJH4iIBKZETikmZDqTUSz4CRp32yGmlJ8e1kSO0IVza4wjJrg4RyPqT7yKjRFfbKFqwlQ5yIKNrd0GdGO2EFgooUzBmmoVmCpQwdbYplVF8F3bIrtEZ7kqHFwN8wR9Pi8-5q_h8v3lbf60DPWMsCYUFBhWksVMChbxnGaccyK10nEmKFGgAVIyA6Ky2A85JzrVhEeUCsEgjdgE3fW-_mpfLbgmKY3TUBSqgrp1SYwplt4de_L-KOk7IzIW0htPUNSj2r_XWciTjTWlsjsPdZwfhm6Trtuk79bLboaENi0hO4j2ZXrgdgCU06rIraq0cX9cJDgXtMsnPefUCpJ13drKd_hf-GOvMVVe21L9_kLSqF1R230QO-rwA5lVodM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081897877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><description>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, &amp; Kliegel, 2010 ). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.584976</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21740113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Individuality ; Intention ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Episodic ; Movement - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Planning ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regression Analysis ; Time Factors ; User-Computer Interface ; Verbal Learning ; Virtual reality ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2011</rights><rights>2011 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24766727$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, &amp; Kliegel, 2010 ). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Episodic</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtPwyAcxYnRuDn9Bsb0xehLJ5cO6JMxy7wkS3zR54bSfxeWXia0M_v2UtvNt_kCBH7nHDggdE3wlGCJH4iIBKZETikmZDqTUSz4CRp32yGmlJ8e1kSO0IVza4wjJrg4RyPqT7yKjRFfbKFqwlQ5yIKNrd0GdGO2EFgooUzBmmoVmCpQwdbYplVF8F3bIrtEZ7kqHFwN8wR9Pi8-5q_h8v3lbf60DPWMsCYUFBhWksVMChbxnGaccyK10nEmKFGgAVIyA6Ky2A85JzrVhEeUCsEgjdgE3fW-_mpfLbgmKY3TUBSqgrp1SYwplt4de_L-KOk7IzIW0htPUNSj2r_XWciTjTWlsjsPdZwfhm6Trtuk79bLboaENi0hO4j2ZXrgdgCU06rIraq0cX9cJDgXtMsnPefUCpJ13drKd_hf-GOvMVVe21L9_kLSqF1R230QO-rwA5lVodM</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Trawley, Steven L.</creator><creator>Law, Anna S.</creator><creator>Logie, Robert H.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><author>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Episodic</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trawley, Steven L.</au><au>Law, Anna S.</au><au>Logie, Robert H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2181</spage><epage>2193</epage><pages>2181-2193</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, &amp; Kliegel, 2010 ). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>21740113</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2011.584976</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_21740113
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cues
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Individuality
Intention
Learning. Memory
Male
Memory
Memory, Episodic
Movement - physiology
Neuropsychological Tests
Planning
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective memory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Regression Analysis
Time Factors
User-Computer Interface
Verbal Learning
Virtual reality
Working memory
title Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Event-based%20prospective%20remembering%20in%20a%20virtual%20world&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Trawley,%20Steven%20L.&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2181&rft.epage=2193&rft.pages=2181-2193&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1081897877%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081897877&rft_id=info:pmid/21740113&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2011.584976&rfr_iscdi=true