Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world
Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Klieg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2181 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Trawley, Steven L. Law, Anna S. Logie, Robert H. |
description | Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel,
2010
). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470218.2011.584976 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21740113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2011.584976</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1081897877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtPwyAcxYnRuDn9Bsb0xehLJ5cO6JMxy7wkS3zR54bSfxeWXia0M_v2UtvNt_kCBH7nHDggdE3wlGCJH4iIBKZETikmZDqTUSz4CRp32yGmlJ8e1kSO0IVza4wjJrg4RyPqT7yKjRFfbKFqwlQ5yIKNrd0GdGO2EFgooUzBmmoVmCpQwdbYplVF8F3bIrtEZ7kqHFwN8wR9Pi8-5q_h8v3lbf60DPWMsCYUFBhWksVMChbxnGaccyK10nEmKFGgAVIyA6Ky2A85JzrVhEeUCsEgjdgE3fW-_mpfLbgmKY3TUBSqgrp1SYwplt4de_L-KOk7IzIW0htPUNSj2r_XWciTjTWlsjsPdZwfhm6Trtuk79bLboaENi0hO4j2ZXrgdgCU06rIraq0cX9cJDgXtMsnPefUCpJ13drKd_hf-GOvMVVe21L9_kLSqF1R230QO-rwA5lVodM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081897877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><description>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel,
2010
). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.584976</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21740113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Individuality ; Intention ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Episodic ; Movement - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Planning ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regression Analysis ; Time Factors ; User-Computer Interface ; Verbal Learning ; Virtual reality ; Working memory</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2011</rights><rights>2011 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24766727$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel,
2010
). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Episodic</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtPwyAcxYnRuDn9Bsb0xehLJ5cO6JMxy7wkS3zR54bSfxeWXia0M_v2UtvNt_kCBH7nHDggdE3wlGCJH4iIBKZETikmZDqTUSz4CRp32yGmlJ8e1kSO0IVza4wjJrg4RyPqT7yKjRFfbKFqwlQ5yIKNrd0GdGO2EFgooUzBmmoVmCpQwdbYplVF8F3bIrtEZ7kqHFwN8wR9Pi8-5q_h8v3lbf60DPWMsCYUFBhWksVMChbxnGaccyK10nEmKFGgAVIyA6Ky2A85JzrVhEeUCsEgjdgE3fW-_mpfLbgmKY3TUBSqgrp1SYwplt4de_L-KOk7IzIW0htPUNSj2r_XWciTjTWlsjsPdZwfhm6Trtuk79bLboaENi0hO4j2ZXrgdgCU06rIraq0cX9cJDgXtMsnPefUCpJ13drKd_hf-GOvMVVe21L9_kLSqF1R230QO-rwA5lVodM</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Trawley, Steven L.</creator><creator>Law, Anna S.</creator><creator>Logie, Robert H.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</title><author>Trawley, Steven L. ; Law, Anna S. ; Logie, Robert H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-72e30a839387346f2d66618cac9d721aeceeb15e1ad9e1af61cbc16422773eb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Episodic</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logie, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trawley, Steven L.</au><au>Law, Anna S.</au><au>Logie, Robert H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2181</spage><epage>2193</epage><pages>2181-2193</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel,
2010
). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actions. However, participant-driven access to the cue has not been examined in laboratory studies focused on healthy young adults, and its relationship with planned intentions is poorly understood. Here we report a study of PM performance in a controlled, laboratory setting, but with participant-driven actions leading to the availability of the PM cue. This uses a novel PM methodology based upon analysis of participant movements as they attempted a series of errands in a large virtual building on the computer screen. A PM failure was identified as a situation in which a participant entered and exited the "cue" area outside an errand related room without performing the required errand whilst still successfully remembering that errand post test. Additional individual difference measures assessed retrospective and working memory capacity, planning ability and PM. Multiple regression analysis showed that the independent measures of verbal working memory span, planning ability, and PM were significant predictors of PM failure. Correlational analyses with measures of planning suggest that sticking with an original plan (good or bad) is related to better overall PM performance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>21740113</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2011.584976</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2011-11, Vol.64 (11), p.2181-2193 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_21740113 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cues Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Individuality Intention Learning. Memory Male Memory Memory, Episodic Movement - physiology Neuropsychological Tests Planning Predictive Value of Tests Prospective memory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Regression Analysis Time Factors User-Computer Interface Verbal Learning Virtual reality Working memory |
title | Event-based prospective remembering in a virtual world |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Event-based%20prospective%20remembering%20in%20a%20virtual%20world&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Trawley,%20Steven%20L.&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2181&rft.epage=2193&rft.pages=2181-2193&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2011.584976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1081897877%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081897877&rft_id=info:pmid/21740113&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2011.584976&rfr_iscdi=true |