When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat

The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognition and emotion 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518
Hauptverfasser: Jostmann, Nils B., Karremans, Johan, Finkenauer, Catrin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 3
container_start_page 506
container_title Cognition and emotion
container_volume 25
creator Jostmann, Nils B.
Karremans, Johan
Finkenauer, Catrin
description The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02699931.2010.541139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21432690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>870996041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginMd_QciAReuOp40X60bkcEvGBBEcRnSNPFmaJNOkirz703pHRcunNUhyXOSHF6EnhO4INDBa2hF3_eUXLRQtzgjhPYP0IEwwRoQAA_RYSPNZs7Qk5yvAYBRBo_RWUsYrWdwQDc_jjbgKf6y2GccYsHD5MP4Bn9dZx908TFgPy_ap7zVyRtfsHbOmoKT_blOJxLqKi8xZItLxCnOOhRv6uYO8tEvuByT1eUpeuT0lO2zUz1H3z-8_3b5qbn68vHz5burxjDOSjPWqdqubcmgNaNWS9q3AxdgR2cpGZxjbmBcjtw4cFw4Z7QmYAXvRzPQsaXn6NV-75LizWpzUbPPxk6TDjauWXUS-l4AI_dLISUTVLL7Je9kRynlVb78R17HNYU6sKKECA5SdqIqtiuTYs7JOrUkP-t0qwioLWV1l7LaUlZ7yrXtxenydZjt-LfpLtYK3u7ABxfTrH_HNI2q6NspJpd0MH77xv-e-AOIeLdF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116507786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><description>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.541139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21432690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COEMEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Affect ; Cognition ; Conditioning ; Emotional regulation ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Implicit affect regulation ; Interpersonal Relations ; Love ; Male ; Relationship threat ; Reminders ; Romantic relationships ; Rumination ; Social Control, Informal ; State orientation ; Thinking ; Threatening ; Threats ; Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright Psychology Press Ltd 2011</rights><rights>2011 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor &amp; Francis Group, an Informa business</rights><rights>Copyright Psychology Press Ltd. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21432690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karremans, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Emotional regulation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit affect regulation</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Relationship threat</subject><subject>Reminders</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Rumination</subject><subject>Social Control, Informal</subject><subject>State orientation</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><subject>Threatening</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginMd_QciAReuOp40X60bkcEvGBBEcRnSNPFmaJNOkirz703pHRcunNUhyXOSHF6EnhO4INDBa2hF3_eUXLRQtzgjhPYP0IEwwRoQAA_RYSPNZs7Qk5yvAYBRBo_RWUsYrWdwQDc_jjbgKf6y2GccYsHD5MP4Bn9dZx908TFgPy_ap7zVyRtfsHbOmoKT_blOJxLqKi8xZItLxCnOOhRv6uYO8tEvuByT1eUpeuT0lO2zUz1H3z-8_3b5qbn68vHz5burxjDOSjPWqdqubcmgNaNWS9q3AxdgR2cpGZxjbmBcjtw4cFw4Z7QmYAXvRzPQsaXn6NV-75LizWpzUbPPxk6TDjauWXUS-l4AI_dLISUTVLL7Je9kRynlVb78R17HNYU6sKKECA5SdqIqtiuTYs7JOrUkP-t0qwioLWV1l7LaUlZ7yrXtxenydZjt-LfpLtYK3u7ABxfTrH_HNI2q6NspJpd0MH77xv-e-AOIeLdF</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Jostmann, Nils B.</creator><creator>Karremans, Johan</creator><creator>Finkenauer, Catrin</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><author>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Emotional regulation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit affect regulation</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Relationship threat</topic><topic>Reminders</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Rumination</topic><topic>Social Control, Informal</topic><topic>State orientation</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><topic>Threatening</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Unconscious (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karremans, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jostmann, Nils B.</au><au>Karremans, Johan</au><au>Finkenauer, Catrin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>506-518</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><coden>COEMEC</coden><abstract>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>21432690</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2010.541139</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9931
ispartof Cognition and emotion, 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518
issn 0269-9931
1464-0600
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_21432690
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete
subjects Affect
Cognition
Conditioning
Emotional regulation
Emotions
Female
Humans
Implicit affect regulation
Interpersonal Relations
Love
Male
Relationship threat
Reminders
Romantic relationships
Rumination
Social Control, Informal
State orientation
Thinking
Threatening
Threats
Unconscious (Psychology)
title When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A26%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20love%20is%20not%20blind:%20Rumination%20impairs%20implicit%20affect%20regulation%20in%20response%20to%20romantic%20relationship%20threat&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Jostmann,%20Nils%20B.&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=506-518&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft.coden=COEMEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2010.541139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E870996041%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116507786&rft_id=info:pmid/21432690&rfr_iscdi=true