When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat
The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition and emotion 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Cognition and emotion |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Jostmann, Nils B. Karremans, Johan Finkenauer, Catrin |
description | The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02699931.2010.541139 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_21432690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>870996041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginMd_QciAReuOp40X60bkcEvGBBEcRnSNPFmaJNOkirz703pHRcunNUhyXOSHF6EnhO4INDBa2hF3_eUXLRQtzgjhPYP0IEwwRoQAA_RYSPNZs7Qk5yvAYBRBo_RWUsYrWdwQDc_jjbgKf6y2GccYsHD5MP4Bn9dZx908TFgPy_ap7zVyRtfsHbOmoKT_blOJxLqKi8xZItLxCnOOhRv6uYO8tEvuByT1eUpeuT0lO2zUz1H3z-8_3b5qbn68vHz5burxjDOSjPWqdqubcmgNaNWS9q3AxdgR2cpGZxjbmBcjtw4cFw4Z7QmYAXvRzPQsaXn6NV-75LizWpzUbPPxk6TDjauWXUS-l4AI_dLISUTVLL7Je9kRynlVb78R17HNYU6sKKECA5SdqIqtiuTYs7JOrUkP-t0qwioLWV1l7LaUlZ7yrXtxenydZjt-LfpLtYK3u7ABxfTrH_HNI2q6NspJpd0MH77xv-e-AOIeLdF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116507786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><description>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.541139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21432690</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COEMEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Affect ; Cognition ; Conditioning ; Emotional regulation ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Implicit affect regulation ; Interpersonal Relations ; Love ; Male ; Relationship threat ; Reminders ; Romantic relationships ; Rumination ; Social Control, Informal ; State orientation ; Thinking ; Threatening ; Threats ; Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518</ispartof><rights>Copyright Psychology Press Ltd 2011</rights><rights>2011 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business</rights><rights>Copyright Psychology Press Ltd. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21432690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karremans, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Emotional regulation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit affect regulation</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Relationship threat</subject><subject>Reminders</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Rumination</subject><subject>Social Control, Informal</subject><subject>State orientation</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><subject>Threatening</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Unconscious (Psychology)</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2L1TAUBuAginMd_QciAReuOp40X60bkcEvGBBEcRnSNPFmaJNOkirz703pHRcunNUhyXOSHF6EnhO4INDBa2hF3_eUXLRQtzgjhPYP0IEwwRoQAA_RYSPNZs7Qk5yvAYBRBo_RWUsYrWdwQDc_jjbgKf6y2GccYsHD5MP4Bn9dZx908TFgPy_ap7zVyRtfsHbOmoKT_blOJxLqKi8xZItLxCnOOhRv6uYO8tEvuByT1eUpeuT0lO2zUz1H3z-8_3b5qbn68vHz5burxjDOSjPWqdqubcmgNaNWS9q3AxdgR2cpGZxjbmBcjtw4cFw4Z7QmYAXvRzPQsaXn6NV-75LizWpzUbPPxk6TDjauWXUS-l4AI_dLISUTVLL7Je9kRynlVb78R17HNYU6sKKECA5SdqIqtiuTYs7JOrUkP-t0qwioLWV1l7LaUlZ7yrXtxenydZjt-LfpLtYK3u7ABxfTrH_HNI2q6NspJpd0MH77xv-e-AOIeLdF</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Jostmann, Nils B.</creator><creator>Karremans, Johan</creator><creator>Finkenauer, Catrin</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</title><author>Jostmann, Nils B. ; Karremans, Johan ; Finkenauer, Catrin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-d01028221baa43ea7392b560edfe31bff4fb457d5cf0f56ffcaa10e659dcb3d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Emotional regulation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit affect regulation</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Relationship threat</topic><topic>Reminders</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Rumination</topic><topic>Social Control, Informal</topic><topic>State orientation</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><topic>Threatening</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Unconscious (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jostmann, Nils B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karremans, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkenauer, Catrin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jostmann, Nils B.</au><au>Karremans, Johan</au><au>Finkenauer, Catrin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>506-518</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><coden>COEMEC</coden><abstract>The present research examined how rumination influences implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat. In three studies, the disposition to ruminate impaired the ability to maintain positive feelings about the romantic partner in the face of explicit or implicit reminders of relationship threatening events. In Study 1, a high disposition to ruminate was correlated with impaired down-regulation of negative feelings toward the partner in response to a hurtful relationship incident. Two follow-up studies manipulated relationship threat explicitly through an experiential recall procedure (Study 2) or implicitly through a subliminal evaluative-conditioning procedure (Study 3). In both studies only individuals with low disposition to ruminate were able to ward off negative feelings and maintain positive feelings toward the partner. These findings illuminate the role of implicit affect regulation in the context of relationship threat-and how it is inextricably connected with the processes underlying rumination.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>21432690</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2010.541139</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-9931 |
ispartof | Cognition and emotion, 2011-04, Vol.25 (3), p.506-518 |
issn | 0269-9931 1464-0600 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_21432690 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Affect Cognition Conditioning Emotional regulation Emotions Female Humans Implicit affect regulation Interpersonal Relations Love Male Relationship threat Reminders Romantic relationships Rumination Social Control, Informal State orientation Thinking Threatening Threats Unconscious (Psychology) |
title | When love is not blind: Rumination impairs implicit affect regulation in response to romantic relationship threat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A26%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20love%20is%20not%20blind:%20Rumination%20impairs%20implicit%20affect%20regulation%20in%20response%20to%20romantic%20relationship%20threat&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Jostmann,%20Nils%20B.&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=506-518&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft.coden=COEMEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2010.541139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E870996041%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116507786&rft_id=info:pmid/21432690&rfr_iscdi=true |