Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention
Earlier studies have shown that the spatial Stroop effect systematically decreases when a peripheral precue is presented at the same location as the target, compared to an uncued location condition. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether the cueing modulation of spatial Str...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2010-03, Vol.63 (3), p.516-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Luo, Chunming Lupiáñez, Juan Funes, María Jesús Fu, Xiaolan |
description | Earlier studies have shown that the spatial Stroop effect systematically decreases when a peripheral precue is presented at the same location as the target, compared to an uncued location condition. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether the cueing modulation of spatial Stroop is object based and/or space based. In Experiment 1, we found evidence favouring the view that the cueing modulation of the spatial Stroop effect is entirely object based, as no differences were found in conflict reduction for the same-location and same-object conditions. In Experiment 2, the cue was predictive, and a similar object-based modulation of spatial Stroop was still observed. However, the direction of such modulation was affected by the rectangles' orientation. Overall, the pattern of results obtained favours the object-integration (Lupiáñez & Milliken, 1999; Lupiáñez, Milliken, Solano, Weaver, & Tipper, 2001) and referential-coding accounts (Danziger, Kingstone, & Ward, 2001) and seems to provide evidence against the attention-shift account (Rubichi, Nicoletti, Iani, & Umilta, 1997; Stoffer, 1991). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470210903004638 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_19565432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470210903004638</sage_id><sourcerecordid>888103973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f5502304d905735160c58ded717d27b4739b59a54b254013e525b37f4397452f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI10I646ntyaFtzI4A0UFyouQ9Km0qHTjEmKztubcUYFB51Ncgjfd37Ij9AhhiGGHE6xYAIIhgIoAMtovoEG87cUCMk2v2ec76Bd78eRoSIT22gHFzzjjJIBer6zVd-q0NgusXXip3FUbfIQnLXTRM8Sq8emDKlW3lSJCsF0n6zuQ9LZMCeiU5rfwD7aqlXrzcHy3kNPlxePo-v09v7qZnR-m5ZciJDWnAOhwKoCuKAcZ1DyvDKVwKIiQjNBC80LxZkmnAGmhhOuqagZLQTjpKZ76GSxd-rsa298kJPGl6ZtVWds72WBIWO8IGItmec5hriWricFYzmJZyTxgiyd9d6ZWk5dM1FuJjHIeUVypaLoHC2393piqh9j2UkEjpeA8qVqa6e6svHfHCE8tkghcsMF59WLkWPbuy7-9L_JYiE0XW3dRL1Z11YyqFlr3VfKiiXDe4jm2VqT_h38Aao_yH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874482874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Luo, Chunming ; Lupiáñez, Juan ; Funes, María Jesús ; Fu, Xiaolan</creator><creatorcontrib>Luo, Chunming ; Lupiáñez, Juan ; Funes, María Jesús ; Fu, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><description>Earlier studies have shown that the spatial Stroop effect systematically decreases when a peripheral precue is presented at the same location as the target, compared to an uncued location condition. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether the cueing modulation of spatial Stroop is object based and/or space based. In Experiment 1, we found evidence favouring the view that the cueing modulation of the spatial Stroop effect is entirely object based, as no differences were found in conflict reduction for the same-location and same-object conditions. In Experiment 2, the cue was predictive, and a similar object-based modulation of spatial Stroop was still observed. However, the direction of such modulation was affected by the rectangles' orientation. Overall, the pattern of results obtained favours the object-integration (Lupiáñez & Milliken, 1999; Lupiáñez, Milliken, Solano, Weaver, & Tipper, 2001) and referential-coding accounts (Danziger, Kingstone, & Ward, 2001) and seems to provide evidence against the attention-shift account (Rubichi, Nicoletti, Iani, & Umilta, 1997; Stoffer, 1991).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470210903004638</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19565432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Object-based attention ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Space-based attention ; Spatial code ; Spatial Stroop effect ; Stroop Test ; Students ; Universities ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2010-03, Vol.63 (3), p.516-530</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2010</rights><rights>2010 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f5502304d905735160c58ded717d27b4739b59a54b254013e525b37f4397452f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f5502304d905735160c58ded717d27b4739b59a54b254013e525b37f4397452f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470210903004638$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210903004638$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22537630$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19565432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luo, Chunming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupiáñez, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><title>Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Earlier studies have shown that the spatial Stroop effect systematically decreases when a peripheral precue is presented at the same location as the target, compared to an uncued location condition. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether the cueing modulation of spatial Stroop is object based and/or space based. In Experiment 1, we found evidence favouring the view that the cueing modulation of the spatial Stroop effect is entirely object based, as no differences were found in conflict reduction for the same-location and same-object conditions. In Experiment 2, the cue was predictive, and a similar object-based modulation of spatial Stroop was still observed. However, the direction of such modulation was affected by the rectangles' orientation. Overall, the pattern of results obtained favours the object-integration (Lupiáñez & Milliken, 1999; Lupiáñez, Milliken, Solano, Weaver, & Tipper, 2001) and referential-coding accounts (Danziger, Kingstone, & Ward, 2001) and seems to provide evidence against the attention-shift account (Rubichi, Nicoletti, Iani, & Umilta, 1997; Stoffer, 1991).</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object-based attention</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Space-based attention</subject><subject>Spatial code</subject><subject>Spatial Stroop effect</subject><subject>Stroop Test</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI10I646ntyaFtzI4A0UFyouQ9Km0qHTjEmKztubcUYFB51Ncgjfd37Ij9AhhiGGHE6xYAIIhgIoAMtovoEG87cUCMk2v2ec76Bd78eRoSIT22gHFzzjjJIBer6zVd-q0NgusXXip3FUbfIQnLXTRM8Sq8emDKlW3lSJCsF0n6zuQ9LZMCeiU5rfwD7aqlXrzcHy3kNPlxePo-v09v7qZnR-m5ZciJDWnAOhwKoCuKAcZ1DyvDKVwKIiQjNBC80LxZkmnAGmhhOuqagZLQTjpKZ76GSxd-rsa298kJPGl6ZtVWds72WBIWO8IGItmec5hriWricFYzmJZyTxgiyd9d6ZWk5dM1FuJjHIeUVypaLoHC2393piqh9j2UkEjpeA8qVqa6e6svHfHCE8tkghcsMF59WLkWPbuy7-9L_JYiE0XW3dRL1Z11YyqFlr3VfKiiXDe4jm2VqT_h38Aao_yH0</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Luo, Chunming</creator><creator>Lupiáñez, Juan</creator><creator>Funes, María Jesús</creator><creator>Fu, Xiaolan</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention</title><author>Luo, Chunming ; Lupiáñez, Juan ; Funes, María Jesús ; Fu, Xiaolan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-f5502304d905735160c58ded717d27b4739b59a54b254013e525b37f4397452f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object-based attention</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Space-based attention</topic><topic>Spatial code</topic><topic>Spatial Stroop effect</topic><topic>Stroop Test</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Chunming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupiáñez, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funes, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xiaolan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Chunming</au><au>Lupiáñez, Juan</au><au>Funes, María Jesús</au><au>Fu, Xiaolan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>516-530</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Earlier studies have shown that the spatial Stroop effect systematically decreases when a peripheral precue is presented at the same location as the target, compared to an uncued location condition. In this study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether the cueing modulation of spatial Stroop is object based and/or space based. In Experiment 1, we found evidence favouring the view that the cueing modulation of the spatial Stroop effect is entirely object based, as no differences were found in conflict reduction for the same-location and same-object conditions. In Experiment 2, the cue was predictive, and a similar object-based modulation of spatial Stroop was still observed. However, the direction of such modulation was affected by the rectangles' orientation. Overall, the pattern of results obtained favours the object-integration (Lupiáñez & Milliken, 1999; Lupiáñez, Milliken, Solano, Weaver, & Tipper, 2001) and referential-coding accounts (Danziger, Kingstone, & Ward, 2001) and seems to provide evidence against the attention-shift account (Rubichi, Nicoletti, Iani, & Umilta, 1997; Stoffer, 1991).</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>19565432</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470210903004638</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2010-03, Vol.63 (3), p.516-530 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_19565432 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Activity levels. Psychomotricity Analysis of Variance Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cues Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Object-based attention Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation - methods Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Space Perception - physiology Space-based attention Spatial code Spatial Stroop effect Stroop Test Students Universities Vigilance. Attention. Sleep |
title | Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A59%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulation%20of%20spatial%20Stroop%20by%20object-based%20attention%20but%20not%20by%20space-based%20attention&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Luo,%20Chunming&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=516-530&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470210903004638&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E888103973%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874482874&rft_id=info:pmid/19565432&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470210903004638&rfr_iscdi=true |