On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system
This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR 60Co sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric sph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2008-12, Vol.35 (12), p.5263 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5263 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Baltas, D Lymperopoulou, G Zamboglou, N |
description | This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR 60Co sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric spheres; the internal consisting of selected concentrations, C, of a radiographic contrast solution in water (Omnipaque 300) to simulate the MammoSite balloon and the external consisting of water to simulate surrounding tissue. The magnitude of the perturbation of delivered dose due to the radiographic contrast medium used in the MammoSite applicator is calculated. At the very close vicinity of the balloon surface, a dose build-up region is observed, which leads to a dose overestimation by the treatment planning system (TPS) which depends on Omnipaque 300 solution concentration (and is in order of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 4.5%, respectively, at 1 mm away from the balloon - water interface, for C=10%, 15%, and 20%). However, dose overestimation by the TPS is minimal for points lying at the prescription distance (d=1 cm) or beyond, for all simulated concentrations and radii of MammoSite balloon. An analytical estimation of the integral dose outside the CTV in the simple geometries simulated shows that dose to the breast for MammoSite applications is expected to be comparable using HDR 60Co and 192Ir sources, and higher than that for 169Yb. The higher enegies of 60Co sources result to approximately twice radiation protection requirements as compared to 169Ir sources. However, they allow for more accurate dosimetry calculation with currently used treatment planning algorithms for 60Co sources, compared to 169Ir. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_19175085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19175085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-b022c800c7028c2833261be3e0d38b76121f35e458e3b61960e9cf1b627f557f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tqwzAUBbVoSdKkv1D0A4YryXp4WdxHAgmBNvsgyVfEpaqNJFP894W0XZ3FMAPnhqwAmrriNcglucv5AwCUkLAgS9YwLcHIFdkdv2i5IJ0y0iHQ7dMbVdAONA9T8ki_-3K58oONcXjvC9Jku96Wfrh6yY4zzXMuGDfkNtjPjPd_uyanl-dTu632x9dd-7ivRlnLygHn3gB4Ddx4boTgijkUCJ0wTivGWRASa2lQOMUaBdj4wJziOkipg1iTh9_sOLmI3XlMfbRpPv9fEj-aK0TM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baltas, D ; Lymperopoulou, G ; Zamboglou, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Baltas, D ; Lymperopoulou, G ; Zamboglou, N</creatorcontrib><description>This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR 60Co sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric spheres; the internal consisting of selected concentrations, C, of a radiographic contrast solution in water (Omnipaque 300) to simulate the MammoSite balloon and the external consisting of water to simulate surrounding tissue. The magnitude of the perturbation of delivered dose due to the radiographic contrast medium used in the MammoSite applicator is calculated. At the very close vicinity of the balloon surface, a dose build-up region is observed, which leads to a dose overestimation by the treatment planning system (TPS) which depends on Omnipaque 300 solution concentration (and is in order of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 4.5%, respectively, at 1 mm away from the balloon - water interface, for C=10%, 15%, and 20%). However, dose overestimation by the TPS is minimal for points lying at the prescription distance (d=1 cm) or beyond, for all simulated concentrations and radii of MammoSite balloon. An analytical estimation of the integral dose outside the CTV in the simple geometries simulated shows that dose to the breast for MammoSite applications is expected to be comparable using HDR 60Co and 192Ir sources, and higher than that for 169Yb. The higher enegies of 60Co sources result to approximately twice radiation protection requirements as compared to 169Ir sources. However, they allow for more accurate dosimetry calculation with currently used treatment planning algorithms for 60Co sources, compared to 169Ir.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19175085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Brachytherapy - methods ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Cobalt Radioisotopes ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Iridium Radioisotopes - pharmacology ; Monte Carlo Method ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Radiometry ; Radiotherapy - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-12, Vol.35 (12), p.5263</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baltas, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lymperopoulou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamboglou, N</creatorcontrib><title>On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR 60Co sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric spheres; the internal consisting of selected concentrations, C, of a radiographic contrast solution in water (Omnipaque 300) to simulate the MammoSite balloon and the external consisting of water to simulate surrounding tissue. The magnitude of the perturbation of delivered dose due to the radiographic contrast medium used in the MammoSite applicator is calculated. At the very close vicinity of the balloon surface, a dose build-up region is observed, which leads to a dose overestimation by the treatment planning system (TPS) which depends on Omnipaque 300 solution concentration (and is in order of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 4.5%, respectively, at 1 mm away from the balloon - water interface, for C=10%, 15%, and 20%). However, dose overestimation by the TPS is minimal for points lying at the prescription distance (d=1 cm) or beyond, for all simulated concentrations and radii of MammoSite balloon. An analytical estimation of the integral dose outside the CTV in the simple geometries simulated shows that dose to the breast for MammoSite applications is expected to be comparable using HDR 60Co and 192Ir sources, and higher than that for 169Yb. The higher enegies of 60Co sources result to approximately twice radiation protection requirements as compared to 169Ir sources. However, they allow for more accurate dosimetry calculation with currently used treatment planning algorithms for 60Co sources, compared to 169Ir.</description><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Cobalt Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Iridium Radioisotopes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tqwzAUBbVoSdKkv1D0A4YryXp4WdxHAgmBNvsgyVfEpaqNJFP894W0XZ3FMAPnhqwAmrriNcglucv5AwCUkLAgS9YwLcHIFdkdv2i5IJ0y0iHQ7dMbVdAONA9T8ki_-3K58oONcXjvC9Jku96Wfrh6yY4zzXMuGDfkNtjPjPd_uyanl-dTu632x9dd-7ivRlnLygHn3gB4Ddx4boTgijkUCJ0wTivGWRASa2lQOMUaBdj4wJziOkipg1iTh9_sOLmI3XlMfbRpPv9fEj-aK0TM</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Baltas, D</creator><creator>Lymperopoulou, G</creator><creator>Zamboglou, N</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system</title><author>Baltas, D ; Lymperopoulou, G ; Zamboglou, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-b022c800c7028c2833261be3e0d38b76121f35e458e3b61960e9cf1b627f557f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Cobalt Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Iridium Radioisotopes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baltas, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lymperopoulou, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamboglou, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baltas, D</au><au>Lymperopoulou, G</au><au>Zamboglou, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5263</spage><pages>5263-</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><abstract>This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR 60Co sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric spheres; the internal consisting of selected concentrations, C, of a radiographic contrast solution in water (Omnipaque 300) to simulate the MammoSite balloon and the external consisting of water to simulate surrounding tissue. The magnitude of the perturbation of delivered dose due to the radiographic contrast medium used in the MammoSite applicator is calculated. At the very close vicinity of the balloon surface, a dose build-up region is observed, which leads to a dose overestimation by the treatment planning system (TPS) which depends on Omnipaque 300 solution concentration (and is in order of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 4.5%, respectively, at 1 mm away from the balloon - water interface, for C=10%, 15%, and 20%). However, dose overestimation by the TPS is minimal for points lying at the prescription distance (d=1 cm) or beyond, for all simulated concentrations and radii of MammoSite balloon. An analytical estimation of the integral dose outside the CTV in the simple geometries simulated shows that dose to the breast for MammoSite applications is expected to be comparable using HDR 60Co and 192Ir sources, and higher than that for 169Yb. The higher enegies of 60Co sources result to approximately twice radiation protection requirements as compared to 169Ir sources. However, they allow for more accurate dosimetry calculation with currently used treatment planning algorithms for 60Co sources, compared to 169Ir.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19175085</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-12, Vol.35 (12), p.5263 |
issn | 0094-2405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_19175085 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Brachytherapy - methods Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Cobalt Radioisotopes Contrast Media - pharmacology Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Iridium Radioisotopes - pharmacology Monte Carlo Method Radiation Protection - methods Radiometry Radiotherapy - instrumentation Radiotherapy - methods Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods |
title | On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite radiation therapy system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20use%20of%20HDR%2060Co%20source%20with%20the%20MammoSite%20radiation%20therapy%20system&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Baltas,%20D&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5263&rft.pages=5263-&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E19175085%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19175085&rfr_iscdi=true |