Single-Arc IMRT?

The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2009-01, Vol.54 (1), p.N9-N20
Hauptverfasser: Bortfeld, Thomas, Webb, Steve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page N20
container_issue 1
container_start_page N9
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 54
creator Bortfeld, Thomas
Webb, Steve
description The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_19075362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66738359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-a496292d93903e67b9bb1613c99f85433f5d0ca0281ce96f7ac744d601df927b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AUxBdRbK2CZw_iSfCw5r39zJ6kFD8KVUHreUk2uxJJm5htDv73prTUQ8HTO8xv5jFDyAXCLUKaJgAcqUEpEykSTF6AHZAhcoVUSQWHZLgDBuQkxi8AxJSJYzJAA1pyxYbk_L1cflaejlt3NX1-m9-dkqOQVdGfbe-IfDzczydPdPb6OJ2MZ9RxzVc0E0YxwwrDDXCvdG7yHBVyZ0xIpeA8yAJcBixF540KOnNaiEIBFsEwnfMRud7kNm393fm4sosyOl9V2dLXXbRKaZ5yaXqQbUDX1jG2PtimLRdZ-2MR7HoHu65p1zWtFBZtv0Nvutymd_nCF3-WbfEeuNkAZd3s1P0g2xShZ-k--8_zXzyZbvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66738359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Arc IMRT?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Bortfeld, Thomas ; Webb, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas ; Webb, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19075362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2009-01, Vol.54 (1), p.N9-N20</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-a496292d93903e67b9bb1613c99f85433f5d0ca0281ce96f7ac744d601df927b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-a496292d93903e67b9bb1613c99f85433f5d0ca0281ce96f7ac744d601df927b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19075362$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Arc IMRT?</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AUxBdRbK2CZw_iSfCw5r39zJ6kFD8KVUHreUk2uxJJm5htDv73prTUQ8HTO8xv5jFDyAXCLUKaJgAcqUEpEykSTF6AHZAhcoVUSQWHZLgDBuQkxi8AxJSJYzJAA1pyxYbk_L1cflaejlt3NX1-m9-dkqOQVdGfbe-IfDzczydPdPb6OJ2MZ9RxzVc0E0YxwwrDDXCvdG7yHBVyZ0xIpeA8yAJcBixF540KOnNaiEIBFsEwnfMRud7kNm393fm4sosyOl9V2dLXXbRKaZ5yaXqQbUDX1jG2PtimLRdZ-2MR7HoHu65p1zWtFBZtv0Nvutymd_nCF3-WbfEeuNkAZd3s1P0g2xShZ-k--8_zXzyZbvU</recordid><startdate>20090107</startdate><enddate>20090107</enddate><creator>Bortfeld, Thomas</creator><creator>Webb, Steve</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090107</creationdate><title>Single-Arc IMRT?</title><author>Bortfeld, Thomas ; Webb, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-a496292d93903e67b9bb1613c99f85433f5d0ca0281ce96f7ac744d601df927b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bortfeld, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bortfeld, Thomas</au><au>Webb, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-Arc IMRT?</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2009-01-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>N9</spage><epage>N20</epage><pages>N9-N20</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>19075362</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2009-01, Vol.54 (1), p.N9-N20
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_19075362
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Benchmarking
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
Tomography
title Single-Arc IMRT?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Arc%20IMRT?&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Bortfeld,%20Thomas&rft.date=2009-01-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=N9&rft.epage=N20&rft.pages=N9-N20&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E66738359%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66738359&rft_id=info:pmid/19075362&rfr_iscdi=true