Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation

Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neural engineering 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454
Hauptverfasser: Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn, Grill, Warren M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 454
container_issue 4
container_start_page 443
container_title Journal of neural engineering
container_volume 5
creator Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn
Grill, Warren M
description Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_19015584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69812524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQJ8RAiC-JY3tEFV9SJRaYrasdI6OkDnEy8O9xSVAZYPLp_LzvSQ8h50BvgAqRAi8gyVhJU5YWKaXygMynHcsOf80zchLCO6U5cEmPyQwkBcZEMSd85Zt26LF3fov1svGmqt32bentsmqdGbq41L7rnY5D6F0z1N_sKTmyWIfqbHoX5PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wt-tEFznrE06z3CDkoAW3BgWiRSYEgoDSGik4IMsMSqQZy0ormUQOmnO90bkpOOYLcjn2tp3_GKrQq8YFXdU1bis_BFVKATFaRBBGUHc-hK6yqu1cg92nAqp2ttTOhtrZUkwVKtqKmYupfNg0ldknJj0RuBoB59v979jDsp8e1Rob0es_0H9PfwHuLH7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69812524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><description>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-2552</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1741-2560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19015584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodes ; Epidural Space - physiology ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Models, Statistical ; Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neural engineering, 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19015584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><title>Journal of neural engineering</title><addtitle>J Neural Eng</addtitle><description>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Epidural Space - physiology</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><issn>1741-2552</issn><issn>1741-2560</issn><issn>1741-2552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQJ8RAiC-JY3tEFV9SJRaYrasdI6OkDnEy8O9xSVAZYPLp_LzvSQ8h50BvgAqRAi8gyVhJU5YWKaXygMynHcsOf80zchLCO6U5cEmPyQwkBcZEMSd85Zt26LF3fov1svGmqt32bentsmqdGbq41L7rnY5D6F0z1N_sKTmyWIfqbHoX5PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wt-tEFznrE06z3CDkoAW3BgWiRSYEgoDSGik4IMsMSqQZy0ormUQOmnO90bkpOOYLcjn2tp3_GKrQq8YFXdU1bis_BFVKATFaRBBGUHc-hK6yqu1cg92nAqp2ttTOhtrZUkwVKtqKmYupfNg0ldknJj0RuBoB59v979jDsp8e1Rob0es_0H9PfwHuLH7s</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creator><creator>Grill, Warren M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><author>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Epidural Space - physiology</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</au><au>Grill, Warren M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neural engineering</jtitle><addtitle>J Neural Eng</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>443-454</pages><issn>1741-2552</issn><issn>1741-2560</issn><eissn>1741-2552</eissn><abstract>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>19015584</pmid><doi>10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-2552
ispartof Journal of neural engineering, 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454
issn 1741-2552
1741-2560
1741-2552
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_19015584
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals; Institute of Physics Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Algorithms
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Computer Simulation
Electric Stimulation
Electrodes
Epidural Space - physiology
Finite Element Analysis
Humans
Models, Statistical
Motor Cortex - physiology
title Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20modeling%20of%20epidural%20cortical%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neural%20engineering&rft.au=Wongsarnpigoon,%20Amorn&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=443-454&rft.issn=1741-2552&rft.eissn=1741-2552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69812524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69812524&rft_id=info:pmid/19015584&rfr_iscdi=true