Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation
Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neural engineering 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 454 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 443 |
container_title | Journal of neural engineering |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn Grill, Warren M |
description | Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_19015584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69812524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQJ8RAiC-JY3tEFV9SJRaYrasdI6OkDnEy8O9xSVAZYPLp_LzvSQ8h50BvgAqRAi8gyVhJU5YWKaXygMynHcsOf80zchLCO6U5cEmPyQwkBcZEMSd85Zt26LF3fov1svGmqt32bentsmqdGbq41L7rnY5D6F0z1N_sKTmyWIfqbHoX5PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wt-tEFznrE06z3CDkoAW3BgWiRSYEgoDSGik4IMsMSqQZy0ormUQOmnO90bkpOOYLcjn2tp3_GKrQq8YFXdU1bis_BFVKATFaRBBGUHc-hK6yqu1cg92nAqp2ttTOhtrZUkwVKtqKmYupfNg0ldknJj0RuBoB59v979jDsp8e1Rob0es_0H9PfwHuLH7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69812524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><description>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-2552</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1741-2560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19015584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Computer Simulation ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodes ; Epidural Space - physiology ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Models, Statistical ; Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neural engineering, 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19015584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><title>Journal of neural engineering</title><addtitle>J Neural Eng</addtitle><description>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Epidural Space - physiology</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><issn>1741-2552</issn><issn>1741-2560</issn><issn>1741-2552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQJ8RAiC-JY3tEFV9SJRaYrasdI6OkDnEy8O9xSVAZYPLp_LzvSQ8h50BvgAqRAi8gyVhJU5YWKaXygMynHcsOf80zchLCO6U5cEmPyQwkBcZEMSd85Zt26LF3fov1svGmqt32bentsmqdGbq41L7rnY5D6F0z1N_sKTmyWIfqbHoX5PX-7mX1mKyfH55Wt-tEFznrE06z3CDkoAW3BgWiRSYEgoDSGik4IMsMSqQZy0ormUQOmnO90bkpOOYLcjn2tp3_GKrQq8YFXdU1bis_BFVKATFaRBBGUHc-hK6yqu1cg92nAqp2ttTOhtrZUkwVKtqKmYupfNg0ldknJj0RuBoB59v979jDsp8e1Rob0es_0H9PfwHuLH7s</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creator><creator>Grill, Warren M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</title><author>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn ; Grill, Warren M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7023da131c87fda8aafa588a1816fd9871a52da9a02526f959a71c77cbc3d47a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Epidural Space - physiology</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grill, Warren M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wongsarnpigoon, Amorn</au><au>Grill, Warren M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neural engineering</jtitle><addtitle>J Neural Eng</addtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>443-454</pages><issn>1741-2552</issn><issn>1741-2560</issn><eissn>1741-2552</eissn><abstract>Epidural cortical stimulation (ECS) is a developing therapy to treat neurological disorders. However, it is not clear how the cortical anatomy or the polarity and position of the electrode affects current flow and neural activation in the cortex. We developed a 3D computational model simulating ECS over the precentral gyrus. With the electrode placed directly above the gyrus, about half of the stimulus current flowed through the crown of the gyrus while current density was low along the banks deep in the sulci. Beneath the electrode, neurons oriented perpendicular to the cortical surface were depolarized by anodic stimulation, and neurons oriented parallel to the boundary were depolarized by cathodic stimulation. Activation was localized to the crown of the gyrus, and neurons on the banks deep in the sulci were not polarized. During regulated voltage stimulation, the magnitude of the activating function was inversely proportional to the thickness of the CSF and dura. During regulated current stimulation, the activating function was not sensitive to the thickness of the dura but was slightly more sensitive than during regulated voltage stimulation to the thickness of the CSF. Varying the width of the gyrus and the position of the electrode altered the distribution of the activating function due to changes in the orientation of the neurons beneath the electrode. Bipolar stimulation, although often used in clinical practice, reduced spatial selectivity as well as selectivity for neuron orientation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>19015584</pmid><doi>10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-2552 |
ispartof | Journal of neural engineering, 2008-12, Vol.5 (4), p.443-454 |
issn | 1741-2552 1741-2560 1741-2552 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_19015584 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals; Institute of Physics Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Algorithms Cerebral Cortex - physiology Computer Simulation Electric Stimulation Electrodes Epidural Space - physiology Finite Element Analysis Humans Models, Statistical Motor Cortex - physiology |
title | Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20modeling%20of%20epidural%20cortical%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neural%20engineering&rft.au=Wongsarnpigoon,%20Amorn&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=443-454&rft.issn=1741-2552&rft.eissn=1741-2552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69812524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69812524&rft_id=info:pmid/19015584&rfr_iscdi=true |