Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

To compare the results of audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) parameters between staffs working in a noisy environment and normal subjects. Hearing function of 32 noise-exposed workers and 18 reference subjects were assessed with DPOAEs and pure-tone audiometry. Results w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2008-07, Vol.91 (7), p.1066
Hauptverfasser: Atchariyasathian, Viraporn, Chayarpham, Satit, Saekhow, Suchada
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Audiometry - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Surveys
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - diagnosis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise - adverse effects
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Surveys and Questionnaires
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1066
container_title Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand
container_volume 91
creator Atchariyasathian, Viraporn
Chayarpham, Satit
Saekhow, Suchada
description To compare the results of audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) parameters between staffs working in a noisy environment and normal subjects. Hearing function of 32 noise-exposed workers and 18 reference subjects were assessed with DPOAEs and pure-tone audiometry. Results were compared among three groups: 1) ears of reference subjects, 2) audiometrically normal ears of noise-exposed subjects, and 3) audiometrically abnormal ears of noise-exposed subjects. DPOAEs parameters, statistically significant difference were found between group 1 and 2 and group 1 and 3 at all frequencies. Statistically significant differences in pass rate for DPOAEs at 4-6 kilohertz (kHz) were also found between group 1 and 2. DPOAEs are more sensitive than audiometry to detect pre-symptomatic inner ear damage. It may play a role as screening and monitoring test for noise-exposed workers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18839846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18839846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p124t-f2d813db93469611e4854abd2d5aab529c9eeea24dc79f690ffb148d550d1fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j8tKAzEUhrNQbK2-guQFBnKdJksp9QKFbnRdzsw5sZHOZEgyim9v8bL6Fj_fD98FWwqpbKOUcAt2Xcq7EMb6Vl-xhXROe2faJaPtB5xmqDGNPAU-plioiSPOPSE_EuQ4vvFTKoV_xnrkMGNMA1XKHEbkGEtN-UeecjpLlaeaoE9zqbHnNMRSzmO5YZcBToVu_7hirw_bl81Ts9s_Pm_ud80klalNUOikxs5r0_pWSjLOGuhQoQXorPK9JyJQBvu1D60XIXTSOLRWoAyw1it29_s7zd1AeJhyHCB_Hf579TdJOFQD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn ; Chayarpham, Satit ; Saekhow, Suchada</creator><creatorcontrib>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn ; Chayarpham, Satit ; Saekhow, Suchada</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the results of audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) parameters between staffs working in a noisy environment and normal subjects. Hearing function of 32 noise-exposed workers and 18 reference subjects were assessed with DPOAEs and pure-tone audiometry. Results were compared among three groups: 1) ears of reference subjects, 2) audiometrically normal ears of noise-exposed subjects, and 3) audiometrically abnormal ears of noise-exposed subjects. DPOAEs parameters, statistically significant difference were found between group 1 and 2 and group 1 and 3 at all frequencies. Statistically significant differences in pass rate for DPOAEs at 4-6 kilohertz (kHz) were also found between group 1 and 2. DPOAEs are more sensitive than audiometry to detect pre-symptomatic inner ear damage. It may play a role as screening and monitoring test for noise-exposed workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0125-2208</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18839846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thailand</publisher><subject>Adult ; Audiometry - methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - diagnosis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise - adverse effects ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 2008-07, Vol.91 (7), p.1066</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18839846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chayarpham, Satit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saekhow, Suchada</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions</title><title>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</title><addtitle>J Med Assoc Thai</addtitle><description>To compare the results of audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) parameters between staffs working in a noisy environment and normal subjects. Hearing function of 32 noise-exposed workers and 18 reference subjects were assessed with DPOAEs and pure-tone audiometry. Results were compared among three groups: 1) ears of reference subjects, 2) audiometrically normal ears of noise-exposed subjects, and 3) audiometrically abnormal ears of noise-exposed subjects. DPOAEs parameters, statistically significant difference were found between group 1 and 2 and group 1 and 3 at all frequencies. Statistically significant differences in pass rate for DPOAEs at 4-6 kilohertz (kHz) were also found between group 1 and 2. DPOAEs are more sensitive than audiometry to detect pre-symptomatic inner ear damage. It may play a role as screening and monitoring test for noise-exposed workers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0125-2208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j8tKAzEUhrNQbK2-guQFBnKdJksp9QKFbnRdzsw5sZHOZEgyim9v8bL6Fj_fD98FWwqpbKOUcAt2Xcq7EMb6Vl-xhXROe2faJaPtB5xmqDGNPAU-plioiSPOPSE_EuQ4vvFTKoV_xnrkMGNMA1XKHEbkGEtN-UeecjpLlaeaoE9zqbHnNMRSzmO5YZcBToVu_7hirw_bl81Ts9s_Pm_ud80klalNUOikxs5r0_pWSjLOGuhQoQXorPK9JyJQBvu1D60XIXTSOLRWoAyw1it29_s7zd1AeJhyHCB_Hf579TdJOFQD</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn</creator><creator>Chayarpham, Satit</creator><creator>Saekhow, Suchada</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions</title><author>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn ; Chayarpham, Satit ; Saekhow, Suchada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p124t-f2d813db93469611e4854abd2d5aab529c9eeea24dc79f690ffb148d550d1fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chayarpham, Satit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saekhow, Suchada</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atchariyasathian, Viraporn</au><au>Chayarpham, Satit</au><au>Saekhow, Suchada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Assoc Thai</addtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1066</spage><pages>1066-</pages><issn>0125-2208</issn><abstract>To compare the results of audiogram and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) parameters between staffs working in a noisy environment and normal subjects. Hearing function of 32 noise-exposed workers and 18 reference subjects were assessed with DPOAEs and pure-tone audiometry. Results were compared among three groups: 1) ears of reference subjects, 2) audiometrically normal ears of noise-exposed subjects, and 3) audiometrically abnormal ears of noise-exposed subjects. DPOAEs parameters, statistically significant difference were found between group 1 and 2 and group 1 and 3 at all frequencies. Statistically significant differences in pass rate for DPOAEs at 4-6 kilohertz (kHz) were also found between group 1 and 2. DPOAEs are more sensitive than audiometry to detect pre-symptomatic inner ear damage. It may play a role as screening and monitoring test for noise-exposed workers.</abstract><cop>Thailand</cop><pmid>18839846</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0125-2208
ispartof Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 2008-07, Vol.91 (7), p.1066
issn 0125-2208
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18839846
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Audiometry - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Surveys
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - diagnosis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Noise - adverse effects
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with audiometer and distortion product otoacoustic emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A10%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20noise-induced%20hearing%20loss%20with%20audiometer%20and%20distortion%20product%20otoacoustic%20emissions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Medical%20Association%20of%20Thailand&rft.au=Atchariyasathian,%20Viraporn&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1066&rft.pages=1066-&rft.issn=0125-2208&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E18839846%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18839846&rfr_iscdi=true