The role of social cognition in decision making
Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2008-12, Vol.363 (1511), p.3875-3886 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3886 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1511 |
container_start_page | 3875 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 363 |
creator | Frith, Chris D Singer, Tania |
description | Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and sensations with others. 'Theory of mind' allows us to understand more abstract concepts such as beliefs or wishes in others. In all these cases, evidence has accumulated that we use the specific neural networks engaged in processing mental states in ourselves to understand the same mental states in others. However, the magnitude of the brain activity in these shared networks is modulated by contextual appraisal of the situation or the other person. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concerns the interaction of reason and emotion. We consider four domains where such interactions occur: our sense of fairness, altruistic punishment, trust and framing effects. In these cases, social motivations and emotions compete with each other, while higher-level control processes modulate the interactions of these low-level biases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2008.0156 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18829429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20208841</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20208841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c687t-223ffc93c5d3ce1f54f2808caf1aa9fa3cd1715143e09ea30cf37870f721f3d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkuP0zAUhS0EYsrAlh0oK3bp-JHE9gbBVDxViVdBiM2Vx7Fbd9K42MlA-fU4k6pQIWZlW_ecc68_G6GHBE8JluIsxO5iSjEWU0zK6haakIKTnEqOb6MJlhXNRcGqE3QvxjXGWJa8uItOiBBUFlRO0NliZbLgG5N5m0WvnWoy7Zet65xvM9dmtdEuDvuNunTt8j66Y1UTzYP9eoo-v3yxmL3O5-9evZk9n-e6ErzLKWXWasl0WTNtiC0LSwUWWlmilLSK6ZpwUpKCGSyNYlhbxgXHllNiWS3YKXo65m77i42ptWm7oBrYBrdRYQdeOTiutG4FS38FtBSEC5YCnuwDgv_em9jBxkVtmka1xvcRKsmJlIQk4XQU6uBjDMYemhAMA2MYGMPAGAbGyfD479H-yPdQk4CNguB3iVGCarodrH0f2nT8f-zlTa6PnxbnV6xiLlEjgAUjmBdlKeGX245RqQguxt7AteQ4_t9uj8Zu69j5cLgDxRQLUQxU8rHuYmd-HuoqXELFGS_hiyhgNn_7_px_-Arfkp6M-pVbrn64YODoGumw3Y94PRwTvEyeZzd6hom1b7v0wsdOsH2T_kJt2W_P--5f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69719911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of social cognition in decision making</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Frith, Chris D ; Singer, Tania</creator><creatorcontrib>Frith, Chris D ; Singer, Tania</creatorcontrib><description>Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and sensations with others. 'Theory of mind' allows us to understand more abstract concepts such as beliefs or wishes in others. In all these cases, evidence has accumulated that we use the specific neural networks engaged in processing mental states in ourselves to understand the same mental states in others. However, the magnitude of the brain activity in these shared networks is modulated by contextual appraisal of the situation or the other person. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concerns the interaction of reason and emotion. We consider four domains where such interactions occur: our sense of fairness, altruistic punishment, trust and framing effects. In these cases, social motivations and emotions compete with each other, while higher-level control processes modulate the interactions of these low-level biases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0156</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18829429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Behavioral neuroscience ; Brain - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Decision Making - physiology ; Emotional expression ; Empathy ; Fairness ; Humans ; Joint Action ; Mind ; Mirror Neurons ; Models, Biological ; Models, Economic ; Review ; Social Behavior ; Social Cognition ; Social interaction ; Theory Of Mind ; Transponders ; Trust ; Ultimatum game</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-12, Vol.363 (1511), p.3875-3886</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 The Royal Society 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c687t-223ffc93c5d3ce1f54f2808caf1aa9fa3cd1715143e09ea30cf37870f721f3d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c687t-223ffc93c5d3ce1f54f2808caf1aa9fa3cd1715143e09ea30cf37870f721f3d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20208841$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20208841$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18829429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frith, Chris D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Tania</creatorcontrib><title>The role of social cognition in decision making</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and sensations with others. 'Theory of mind' allows us to understand more abstract concepts such as beliefs or wishes in others. In all these cases, evidence has accumulated that we use the specific neural networks engaged in processing mental states in ourselves to understand the same mental states in others. However, the magnitude of the brain activity in these shared networks is modulated by contextual appraisal of the situation or the other person. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concerns the interaction of reason and emotion. We consider four domains where such interactions occur: our sense of fairness, altruistic punishment, trust and framing effects. In these cases, social motivations and emotions compete with each other, while higher-level control processes modulate the interactions of these low-level biases.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Behavioral neuroscience</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Emotional expression</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Action</subject><subject>Mind</subject><subject>Mirror Neurons</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Theory Of Mind</subject><subject>Transponders</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Ultimatum game</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkuP0zAUhS0EYsrAlh0oK3bp-JHE9gbBVDxViVdBiM2Vx7Fbd9K42MlA-fU4k6pQIWZlW_ecc68_G6GHBE8JluIsxO5iSjEWU0zK6haakIKTnEqOb6MJlhXNRcGqE3QvxjXGWJa8uItOiBBUFlRO0NliZbLgG5N5m0WvnWoy7Zet65xvM9dmtdEuDvuNunTt8j66Y1UTzYP9eoo-v3yxmL3O5-9evZk9n-e6ErzLKWXWasl0WTNtiC0LSwUWWlmilLSK6ZpwUpKCGSyNYlhbxgXHllNiWS3YKXo65m77i42ptWm7oBrYBrdRYQdeOTiutG4FS38FtBSEC5YCnuwDgv_em9jBxkVtmka1xvcRKsmJlIQk4XQU6uBjDMYemhAMA2MYGMPAGAbGyfD479H-yPdQk4CNguB3iVGCarodrH0f2nT8f-zlTa6PnxbnV6xiLlEjgAUjmBdlKeGX245RqQguxt7AteQ4_t9uj8Zu69j5cLgDxRQLUQxU8rHuYmd-HuoqXELFGS_hiyhgNn_7_px_-Arfkp6M-pVbrn64YODoGumw3Y94PRwTvEyeZzd6hom1b7v0wsdOsH2T_kJt2W_P--5f</recordid><startdate>20081212</startdate><enddate>20081212</enddate><creator>Frith, Chris D</creator><creator>Singer, Tania</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081212</creationdate><title>The role of social cognition in decision making</title><author>Frith, Chris D ; Singer, Tania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c687t-223ffc93c5d3ce1f54f2808caf1aa9fa3cd1715143e09ea30cf37870f721f3d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Behavioral neuroscience</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Emotional expression</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Action</topic><topic>Mind</topic><topic>Mirror Neurons</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Theory Of Mind</topic><topic>Transponders</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Ultimatum game</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frith, Chris D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Tania</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frith, Chris D</au><au>Singer, Tania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of social cognition in decision making</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2008-12-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>363</volume><issue>1511</issue><spage>3875</spage><epage>3886</epage><pages>3875-3886</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and sensations with others. 'Theory of mind' allows us to understand more abstract concepts such as beliefs or wishes in others. In all these cases, evidence has accumulated that we use the specific neural networks engaged in processing mental states in ourselves to understand the same mental states in others. However, the magnitude of the brain activity in these shared networks is modulated by contextual appraisal of the situation or the other person. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concerns the interaction of reason and emotion. We consider four domains where such interactions occur: our sense of fairness, altruistic punishment, trust and framing effects. In these cases, social motivations and emotions compete with each other, while higher-level control processes modulate the interactions of these low-level biases.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>18829429</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2008.0156</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-12, Vol.363 (1511), p.3875-3886 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_18829429 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Altruism Behavioral neuroscience Brain - physiology Cognition - physiology Decision Making - physiology Emotional expression Empathy Fairness Humans Joint Action Mind Mirror Neurons Models, Biological Models, Economic Review Social Behavior Social Cognition Social interaction Theory Of Mind Transponders Trust Ultimatum game |
title | The role of social cognition in decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A48%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20social%20cognition%20in%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Frith,%20Chris%20D&rft.date=2008-12-12&rft.volume=363&rft.issue=1511&rft.spage=3875&rft.epage=3886&rft.pages=3875-3886&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2008.0156&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20208841%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69719911&rft_id=info:pmid/18829429&rft_jstor_id=20208841&rfr_iscdi=true |