New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?

New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317
Hauptverfasser: Grandcolas, Philippe, Murienne, Jérôme, Robillard, Tony, Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure, Jourdan, Hervé, Guilbert, Eric, Deharveng, Louis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3317
container_issue 1508
container_start_page 3309
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 363
creator Grandcolas, Philippe
Murienne, Jérôme
Robillard, Tony
Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure
Jourdan, Hervé
Guilbert, Eric
Deharveng, Louis
description New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2008.0122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18765357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20208747</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20208747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUtBCILYUrN1BOXFDKc2zHDge-unxJqyJB2avlxs7W3TQudtJSfj3OpipUiL3Yst_MvDdjI_QYwwRDIV740C4mGYCYAM6yO2iEKcdpVnC4i0ZQ5FkqKMnP0IMQVgBQME7vozMseM4I4yP0fGZ2yVTVRrvGqpeJSrbG7xNX6-Rc-Z2Nl01iQ60a_fohulepOphHh32Mvn94P59-Si--fPw8fXuRKs5YmzIqNIARVFVVuSg1rxQtOMkKXeaK4YJiJSjnUIHOFgsARYCWpS40N5hUeU7G6NWgu-kWa6NL07Re1XLj7Vr5vXTKytNKY5fyym1llgMnAkeBZwcB7350JrRybUNp6ujCuC7IvIjm-2WMJgOw9C4Eb6pjEwyyz1f2-co-X9nnGwlP_x7tD_wQaASQAeDdPmbkSmvavVy5zjfx-H_Z69tYX7_N321JTixmPUMQDJwyxuQvuxmkYlHaEDojbyCn8v92ezJ0W4XW-aOHDDIQnPYe0qFuQ2t-HuvKX8ucE87kpaByBpez-eycyR6PB_zSXi131ht5YiMeNocRb4YjBIrIeXMrp5-4dE0bX_iUKauujn9BV-Q3sjbr_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69535695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><description>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18765357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; Biological Evolution ; Biological taxonomies ; Biota ; Cockroaches ; Darwinism ; Dispersal ; Endemism ; Evolution ; Geological Phenomena ; Geology ; Models, Biological ; New Caledonia ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Population Dynamics ; Review ; Speciation</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20208747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20208747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,805,887,27933,27934,53800,53802,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18765357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murienne, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robillard, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbert, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Cockroaches</subject><subject>Darwinism</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Endemism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Geological Phenomena</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>New Caledonia</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUtBCILYUrN1BOXFDKc2zHDge-unxJqyJB2avlxs7W3TQudtJSfj3OpipUiL3Yst_MvDdjI_QYwwRDIV740C4mGYCYAM6yO2iEKcdpVnC4i0ZQ5FkqKMnP0IMQVgBQME7vozMseM4I4yP0fGZ2yVTVRrvGqpeJSrbG7xNX6-Rc-Z2Nl01iQ60a_fohulepOphHh32Mvn94P59-Si--fPw8fXuRKs5YmzIqNIARVFVVuSg1rxQtOMkKXeaK4YJiJSjnUIHOFgsARYCWpS40N5hUeU7G6NWgu-kWa6NL07Re1XLj7Vr5vXTKytNKY5fyym1llgMnAkeBZwcB7350JrRybUNp6ujCuC7IvIjm-2WMJgOw9C4Eb6pjEwyyz1f2-co-X9nnGwlP_x7tD_wQaASQAeDdPmbkSmvavVy5zjfx-H_Z69tYX7_N321JTixmPUMQDJwyxuQvuxmkYlHaEDojbyCn8v92ezJ0W4XW-aOHDDIQnPYe0qFuQ2t-HuvKX8ucE87kpaByBpez-eycyR6PB_zSXi131ht5YiMeNocRb4YjBIrIeXMrp5-4dE0bX_iUKauujn9BV-Q3sjbr_w</recordid><startdate>20081027</startdate><enddate>20081027</enddate><creator>Grandcolas, Philippe</creator><creator>Murienne, Jérôme</creator><creator>Robillard, Tony</creator><creator>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creator><creator>Jourdan, Hervé</creator><creator>Guilbert, Eric</creator><creator>Deharveng, Louis</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081027</creationdate><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><author>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Cockroaches</topic><topic>Darwinism</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Endemism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Geological Phenomena</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>New Caledonia</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murienne, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robillard, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbert, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grandcolas, Philippe</au><au>Murienne, Jérôme</au><au>Robillard, Tony</au><au>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</au><au>Jourdan, Hervé</au><au>Guilbert, Eric</au><au>Deharveng, Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2008-10-27</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>363</volume><issue>1508</issue><spage>3309</spage><epage>3317</epage><pages>3309-3317</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>18765357</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2008.0122</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18765357
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Adaptation
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Biological Evolution
Biological taxonomies
Biota
Cockroaches
Darwinism
Dispersal
Endemism
Evolution
Geological Phenomena
Geology
Models, Biological
New Caledonia
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Population Dynamics
Review
Speciation
title New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T01%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Caledonia:%20a%20very%20old%20Darwinian%20island?&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Grandcolas,%20Philippe&rft.date=2008-10-27&rft.volume=363&rft.issue=1508&rft.spage=3309&rft.epage=3317&rft.pages=3309-3317&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2008.0122&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20208747%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69535695&rft_id=info:pmid/18765357&rft_jstor_id=20208747&rfr_iscdi=true