New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?
New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1508 |
container_start_page | 3309 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 363 |
creator | Grandcolas, Philippe Murienne, Jérôme Robillard, Tony Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure Jourdan, Hervé Guilbert, Eric Deharveng, Louis |
description | New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2008.0122 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18765357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20208747</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20208747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUtBCILYUrN1BOXFDKc2zHDge-unxJqyJB2avlxs7W3TQudtJSfj3OpipUiL3Yst_MvDdjI_QYwwRDIV740C4mGYCYAM6yO2iEKcdpVnC4i0ZQ5FkqKMnP0IMQVgBQME7vozMseM4I4yP0fGZ2yVTVRrvGqpeJSrbG7xNX6-Rc-Z2Nl01iQ60a_fohulepOphHh32Mvn94P59-Si--fPw8fXuRKs5YmzIqNIARVFVVuSg1rxQtOMkKXeaK4YJiJSjnUIHOFgsARYCWpS40N5hUeU7G6NWgu-kWa6NL07Re1XLj7Vr5vXTKytNKY5fyym1llgMnAkeBZwcB7350JrRybUNp6ujCuC7IvIjm-2WMJgOw9C4Eb6pjEwyyz1f2-co-X9nnGwlP_x7tD_wQaASQAeDdPmbkSmvavVy5zjfx-H_Z69tYX7_N321JTixmPUMQDJwyxuQvuxmkYlHaEDojbyCn8v92ezJ0W4XW-aOHDDIQnPYe0qFuQ2t-HuvKX8ucE87kpaByBpez-eycyR6PB_zSXi131ht5YiMeNocRb4YjBIrIeXMrp5-4dE0bX_iUKauujn9BV-Q3sjbr_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69535695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><description>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18765357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; Biological Evolution ; Biological taxonomies ; Biota ; Cockroaches ; Darwinism ; Dispersal ; Endemism ; Evolution ; Geological Phenomena ; Geology ; Models, Biological ; New Caledonia ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Population Dynamics ; Review ; Speciation</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2008 The Royal Society 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20208747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20208747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,805,887,27933,27934,53800,53802,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18765357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murienne, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robillard, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbert, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Cockroaches</subject><subject>Darwinism</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Endemism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Geological Phenomena</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>New Caledonia</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUtBCILYUrN1BOXFDKc2zHDge-unxJqyJB2avlxs7W3TQudtJSfj3OpipUiL3Yst_MvDdjI_QYwwRDIV740C4mGYCYAM6yO2iEKcdpVnC4i0ZQ5FkqKMnP0IMQVgBQME7vozMseM4I4yP0fGZ2yVTVRrvGqpeJSrbG7xNX6-Rc-Z2Nl01iQ60a_fohulepOphHh32Mvn94P59-Si--fPw8fXuRKs5YmzIqNIARVFVVuSg1rxQtOMkKXeaK4YJiJSjnUIHOFgsARYCWpS40N5hUeU7G6NWgu-kWa6NL07Re1XLj7Vr5vXTKytNKY5fyym1llgMnAkeBZwcB7350JrRybUNp6ujCuC7IvIjm-2WMJgOw9C4Eb6pjEwyyz1f2-co-X9nnGwlP_x7tD_wQaASQAeDdPmbkSmvavVy5zjfx-H_Z69tYX7_N321JTixmPUMQDJwyxuQvuxmkYlHaEDojbyCn8v92ezJ0W4XW-aOHDDIQnPYe0qFuQ2t-HuvKX8ucE87kpaByBpez-eycyR6PB_zSXi131ht5YiMeNocRb4YjBIrIeXMrp5-4dE0bX_iUKauujn9BV-Q3sjbr_w</recordid><startdate>20081027</startdate><enddate>20081027</enddate><creator>Grandcolas, Philippe</creator><creator>Murienne, Jérôme</creator><creator>Robillard, Tony</creator><creator>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creator><creator>Jourdan, Hervé</creator><creator>Guilbert, Eric</creator><creator>Deharveng, Louis</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081027</creationdate><title>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</title><author>Grandcolas, Philippe ; Murienne, Jérôme ; Robillard, Tony ; Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure ; Jourdan, Hervé ; Guilbert, Eric ; Deharveng, Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a755t-548d00e84affcbcd7fa497329dc6a51941a84770f0d2bb00a304ccd9d7e13f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Cockroaches</topic><topic>Darwinism</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Endemism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Geological Phenomena</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>New Caledonia</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grandcolas, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murienne, Jérôme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robillard, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilbert, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deharveng, Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grandcolas, Philippe</au><au>Murienne, Jérôme</au><au>Robillard, Tony</au><au>Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure</au><au>Jourdan, Hervé</au><au>Guilbert, Eric</au><au>Deharveng, Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island?</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2008-10-27</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>363</volume><issue>1508</issue><spage>3309</spage><epage>3317</epage><pages>3309-3317</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>New Caledonia has generally been considered a continental island, the biota of which largely dates back to Gondwanan times owing to its geological origin and the presence of phylogenetic relicts. This view is contradicted by geological evidence indicating long Palaeocene and Eocene submersions and by recent biogeographic and phylogenetic studies, with molecular or geophysical dating placing the biota no older than the Oligocene. Phylogenetic relicts do not provide conclusive information in this respect, as their presence cannot be explained by simple hypotheses but requires assumption of many ad hoc extinction events. The implication of this new scenario is that all the New Caledonian biota colonized the island since 37 Ma Local richness can be explained by local radiation and adaptation after colonization but also by many dispersal events, often repeated within the same groups of organisms. Local microendemism is another remarkable feature of the biota. It seems to be related to recent speciation mediated by climate, orography, soil type and perhaps unbalanced biotic interactions created by colonization disharmonies. New Caledonia must be considered as a very old Darwinian island, a concept that offers many more fascinating opportunities of study.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>18765357</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2008.0122</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2008-10, Vol.363 (1508), p.3309-3317 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_18765357 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adaptation Biodiversity Biogeography Biological Evolution Biological taxonomies Biota Cockroaches Darwinism Dispersal Endemism Evolution Geological Phenomena Geology Models, Biological New Caledonia Phylogenetics Phylogeny Population Dynamics Review Speciation |
title | New Caledonia: a very old Darwinian island? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T01%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Caledonia:%20a%20very%20old%20Darwinian%20island?&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Grandcolas,%20Philippe&rft.date=2008-10-27&rft.volume=363&rft.issue=1508&rft.spage=3309&rft.epage=3317&rft.pages=3309-3317&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2008.0122&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20208747%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69535695&rft_id=info:pmid/18765357&rft_jstor_id=20208747&rfr_iscdi=true |