Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task

Primary objective: Event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired in healthy participants during purposefully malingered and normal recognition memory performances to evaluate the neural substrates of feigned memory impairment. Methods and procedures: Pairwise, betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain injury 2008, Vol.22 (6), p.481-489
Hauptverfasser: Browndyke, Jeffrey N., Paskavitz, James, Sweet, Lawrence H., Cohen, Ronald A., Tucker, Karen A., Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A., Burke, James R., Schmechel, Donald E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 489
container_issue 6
container_start_page 481
container_title Brain injury
container_volume 22
creator Browndyke, Jeffrey N.
Paskavitz, James
Sweet, Lawrence H.
Cohen, Ronald A.
Tucker, Karen A.
Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
Burke, James R.
Schmechel, Donald E.
description Primary objective: Event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired in healthy participants during purposefully malingered and normal recognition memory performances to evaluate the neural substrates of feigned memory impairment. Methods and procedures: Pairwise, between-condition contrasts of neural activity associated with discrete recognition memory responses were conducted to isolate dissociable neural activity between normal and malingered responding while simultaneously controlling for shared stimulus familiarity and novelty effects. Response timing characteristics were also examined for any association with observed between-condition activity differences. Outcomes and results: Malingered recognition memory errors, regardless of type, were associated with inferior parietal and superior temporal activity relative to normal performance, while feigned recognition target misses produced additional dorsomedial frontal activation and feigned foil false alarms activated bilateral ventrolateral frontal regions. Malingered response times were associated with activity in the dorsomedial frontal, temporal and inferior parietal regions. Normal memory responses were associated with greater inferior occipitotemporal and dorsomedial parietal activity, suggesting greater reliance upon visual/attentional networks for proper task performance. Conclusions: The neural substrates subserving feigned recognition memory deficits are influenced by response demand and error type, producing differential activation of cortical regions important to complex visual processing, executive control, response planning and working memory processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02699050802084894
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18465389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69197129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-62751281a1245de85a3bad905741bdd194ecf630436b6ba30b32324eb877c5363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1rFDEUDaLYtfoDfJF58m00HzOZjIogpa2FqiAKvoU7mTu7qfnYJrPV_fdm3UUtQiFwQ-45557cQ8hTRl8wquhLymXf07ZcOVWN6pt7ZMGE5LWg7Nt9stj16wLgR-RRzleUUtYy-pAcMdXIVqh-QX5-xE2KEGCO3hpwlYkpoYMZcxWnyoOzYYkJx8qjj2lbWb8GmzyG-VV1elNKvYeP1fTh88WOM6LB9WxjqMqBKqGJy2B_Pxw0ZsjfH5MHE7iMTw71mHw9O_1y8r6-_HR-cfLusjatVHMtedcyrhgw3rQjqhbEAGP5U9ewYRxZ36CZpKCNkIMcQNBBcMEbHFTXmVZIcUze7nXXm8HjaIrjBE6vk_WQtjqC1bc7wa70Mt5orrqy2aYIPD8IpHi9wTxrb7NB5yBg3GQte9Z3jPcFyPZAk2LOCac_QxjVu7z0f3kVzrN_3f1lHAIqgDd7gA1TTB5-xORGPcPWxTQlCMZmLe7Sf32LvkJw88pAQn0VNymUzd_h7hd3JbiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69197129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Browndyke, Jeffrey N. ; Paskavitz, James ; Sweet, Lawrence H. ; Cohen, Ronald A. ; Tucker, Karen A. ; Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A. ; Burke, James R. ; Schmechel, Donald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Browndyke, Jeffrey N. ; Paskavitz, James ; Sweet, Lawrence H. ; Cohen, Ronald A. ; Tucker, Karen A. ; Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A. ; Burke, James R. ; Schmechel, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Primary objective: Event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired in healthy participants during purposefully malingered and normal recognition memory performances to evaluate the neural substrates of feigned memory impairment. Methods and procedures: Pairwise, between-condition contrasts of neural activity associated with discrete recognition memory responses were conducted to isolate dissociable neural activity between normal and malingered responding while simultaneously controlling for shared stimulus familiarity and novelty effects. Response timing characteristics were also examined for any association with observed between-condition activity differences. Outcomes and results: Malingered recognition memory errors, regardless of type, were associated with inferior parietal and superior temporal activity relative to normal performance, while feigned recognition target misses produced additional dorsomedial frontal activation and feigned foil false alarms activated bilateral ventrolateral frontal regions. Malingered response times were associated with activity in the dorsomedial frontal, temporal and inferior parietal regions. Normal memory responses were associated with greater inferior occipitotemporal and dorsomedial parietal activity, suggesting greater reliance upon visual/attentional networks for proper task performance. Conclusions: The neural substrates subserving feigned recognition memory deficits are influenced by response demand and error type, producing differential activation of cortical regions important to complex visual processing, executive control, response planning and working memory processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1362-301X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699050802084894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18465389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiopathology ; Deception ; deficits ; Female ; fMRI ; forensic psychiatry ; functional ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; malingering ; Malingering - physiopathology ; memory ; Memory Disorders - physiopathology ; MRI ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Reaction Time ; Regression Analysis</subject><ispartof>Brain injury, 2008, Vol.22 (6), p.481-489</ispartof><rights>2008 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-62751281a1245de85a3bad905741bdd194ecf630436b6ba30b32324eb877c5363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-62751281a1245de85a3bad905741bdd194ecf630436b6ba30b32324eb877c5363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02699050802084894$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699050802084894$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4022,27922,27923,27924,59646,59752,60435,60541,61220,61255,61401,61436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18465389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Browndyke, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paskavitz, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Ronald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Karen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmechel, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><title>Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task</title><title>Brain injury</title><addtitle>Brain Inj</addtitle><description>Primary objective: Event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired in healthy participants during purposefully malingered and normal recognition memory performances to evaluate the neural substrates of feigned memory impairment. Methods and procedures: Pairwise, between-condition contrasts of neural activity associated with discrete recognition memory responses were conducted to isolate dissociable neural activity between normal and malingered responding while simultaneously controlling for shared stimulus familiarity and novelty effects. Response timing characteristics were also examined for any association with observed between-condition activity differences. Outcomes and results: Malingered recognition memory errors, regardless of type, were associated with inferior parietal and superior temporal activity relative to normal performance, while feigned recognition target misses produced additional dorsomedial frontal activation and feigned foil false alarms activated bilateral ventrolateral frontal regions. Malingered response times were associated with activity in the dorsomedial frontal, temporal and inferior parietal regions. Normal memory responses were associated with greater inferior occipitotemporal and dorsomedial parietal activity, suggesting greater reliance upon visual/attentional networks for proper task performance. Conclusions: The neural substrates subserving feigned recognition memory deficits are influenced by response demand and error type, producing differential activation of cortical regions important to complex visual processing, executive control, response planning and working memory processes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>deficits</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>forensic psychiatry</subject><subject>functional</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>malingering</subject><subject>Malingering - physiopathology</subject><subject>memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><issn>0269-9052</issn><issn>1362-301X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1rFDEUDaLYtfoDfJF58m00HzOZjIogpa2FqiAKvoU7mTu7qfnYJrPV_fdm3UUtQiFwQ-45557cQ8hTRl8wquhLymXf07ZcOVWN6pt7ZMGE5LWg7Nt9stj16wLgR-RRzleUUtYy-pAcMdXIVqh-QX5-xE2KEGCO3hpwlYkpoYMZcxWnyoOzYYkJx8qjj2lbWb8GmzyG-VV1elNKvYeP1fTh88WOM6LB9WxjqMqBKqGJy2B_Pxw0ZsjfH5MHE7iMTw71mHw9O_1y8r6-_HR-cfLusjatVHMtedcyrhgw3rQjqhbEAGP5U9ewYRxZ36CZpKCNkIMcQNBBcMEbHFTXmVZIcUze7nXXm8HjaIrjBE6vk_WQtjqC1bc7wa70Mt5orrqy2aYIPD8IpHi9wTxrb7NB5yBg3GQte9Z3jPcFyPZAk2LOCac_QxjVu7z0f3kVzrN_3f1lHAIqgDd7gA1TTB5-xORGPcPWxTQlCMZmLe7Sf32LvkJw88pAQn0VNymUzd_h7hd3JbiU</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Browndyke, Jeffrey N.</creator><creator>Paskavitz, James</creator><creator>Sweet, Lawrence H.</creator><creator>Cohen, Ronald A.</creator><creator>Tucker, Karen A.</creator><creator>Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.</creator><creator>Burke, James R.</creator><creator>Schmechel, Donald E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task</title><author>Browndyke, Jeffrey N. ; Paskavitz, James ; Sweet, Lawrence H. ; Cohen, Ronald A. ; Tucker, Karen A. ; Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A. ; Burke, James R. ; Schmechel, Donald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c568t-62751281a1245de85a3bad905741bdd194ecf630436b6ba30b32324eb877c5363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>deficits</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>forensic psychiatry</topic><topic>functional</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>malingering</topic><topic>Malingering - physiopathology</topic><topic>memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Browndyke, Jeffrey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paskavitz, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Ronald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Karen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmechel, Donald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Brain injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Browndyke, Jeffrey N.</au><au>Paskavitz, James</au><au>Sweet, Lawrence H.</au><au>Cohen, Ronald A.</au><au>Tucker, Karen A.</au><au>Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.</au><au>Burke, James R.</au><au>Schmechel, Donald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task</atitle><jtitle>Brain injury</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Inj</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>481-489</pages><issn>0269-9052</issn><eissn>1362-301X</eissn><abstract>Primary objective: Event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired in healthy participants during purposefully malingered and normal recognition memory performances to evaluate the neural substrates of feigned memory impairment. Methods and procedures: Pairwise, between-condition contrasts of neural activity associated with discrete recognition memory responses were conducted to isolate dissociable neural activity between normal and malingered responding while simultaneously controlling for shared stimulus familiarity and novelty effects. Response timing characteristics were also examined for any association with observed between-condition activity differences. Outcomes and results: Malingered recognition memory errors, regardless of type, were associated with inferior parietal and superior temporal activity relative to normal performance, while feigned recognition target misses produced additional dorsomedial frontal activation and feigned foil false alarms activated bilateral ventrolateral frontal regions. Malingered response times were associated with activity in the dorsomedial frontal, temporal and inferior parietal regions. Normal memory responses were associated with greater inferior occipitotemporal and dorsomedial parietal activity, suggesting greater reliance upon visual/attentional networks for proper task performance. Conclusions: The neural substrates subserving feigned recognition memory deficits are influenced by response demand and error type, producing differential activation of cortical regions important to complex visual processing, executive control, response planning and working memory processes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>18465389</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699050802084894</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9052
ispartof Brain injury, 2008, Vol.22 (6), p.481-489
issn 0269-9052
1362-301X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18465389
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Brain - physiopathology
Deception
deficits
Female
fMRI
forensic psychiatry
functional
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
malingering
Malingering - physiopathology
memory
Memory Disorders - physiopathology
MRI
Neuropsychological Tests
Reaction Time
Regression Analysis
title Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: Event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A16%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuroanatomical%20correlates%20of%20malingered%20memory%20impairment:%20Event-related%20fMRI%20of%20deception%20on%20a%20recognition%20memory%20task&rft.jtitle=Brain%20injury&rft.au=Browndyke,%20Jeffrey%20N.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=481-489&rft.issn=0269-9052&rft.eissn=1362-301X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699050802084894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69197129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69197129&rft_id=info:pmid/18465389&rfr_iscdi=true