EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm

The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the qualit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2008-08, Vol.88 (2), p.163
Hauptverfasser: Baumert, Brigitta G, Brada, Michael, Bernier, Jacques, Kortmann, Rolf D, Dehing-Oberije, Cary, Collette, Laurence, Davis, J Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Radiotherapy and oncology
container_volume 88
creator Baumert, Brigitta G
Brada, Michael
Bernier, Jacques
Kortmann, Rolf D
Dehing-Oberije, Cary
Collette, Laurence
Davis, J Bernard
description The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the quality of a supposedly highly accurate treatment technique such as stereotactic radiotherapy. A second aim was to investigate a possible relation between the clinical results of the stereotactic boost arm and the results of the QA. The trial was closed in 2001 due to low accrual. In total, 25 patients were randomized: 14 into the experimental arm and 11 into the control arm. Six centres randomized patients, 8 centres had completed the dummy run (DR) for the stereotactic boost part. All participating centres (9) were asked to complete a quality-assurance questionnaire. The DR consisted of treatment planning according to the guidelines of the protocol on 3 different tumour volumes drawn on CT images of a humanized phantom. The SRT technique to be used was evaluated by the questionnaire. Clinical data from patients recruited to the boost arm from 6 participating centres were analysed. There was a full compliance to the protocol requirements for 5 centres. Major and minor deviations in conformality were observed for 2 and 3 centres, respectively. Of the 8 centres which completed the DR, one centre did not comply with the requirements of stereotactic radiotherapy concerning accuracy, dosimetry and planning. Median follow-up and median overall survival were 39.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. Acute and late toxicities of the stereotactic boost were low. One radiation necrosis was seen for a patient who has not received the SRT boost. Three reported serious adverse events were all seizures and probably therapy-related. Overall compliance was good but not ideal from the point of view of this highly precise radiation technique. Survival in the subgroup of patients with small volume disease was encouraging, but the study does not provide sufficient information about the potential value of fSRT boost in patients with malignant glioma.Toxicity due to an additional stereotactic boost of 20 Gy in 4 fractions was low and may be considered as a safe treatment option for patients with small tumours.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.03.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18455252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18455252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a7c8936533049932e07948ced2a7c148b90b52d618e7e720105eaa686b2e345d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUEtOwzAU9AJES-EGCPkCSZ_tOInZQcRPKqpUlXXlJE7qyomD7YJ6PG5GymfHaqSZeTOjh9AVgZgASee72Mna9lVMAfIYWAyUn6DpKGVRThKYoHPvdwBAgWVnaELyhHPK6RR93i9X6wJTKjIa0VQIMn9ZFfhuRQAHp6W5wY2TVdC2l0HV2AfllA1HpsKltT7gxhpjP3Tf4sr276r_9ho8LtI2bJWTwwHbBm91u8XtyCrcGm076WNcGN3rajTLvsZve2l0OETS-72TfaWwU35vgj9ej0H_dUvXXaDTRhqvLn9xhl4f7tfFU7RYPj4Xt4tooCBCJLMqFyzljEEiBKMKMpHklarpqJAkLwWUnNYpyVWmMgoEuJIyzdOSKpbwms3Q9U_usC87VW8GpzvpDpu_X7Iv1tl4Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baumert, Brigitta G ; Brada, Michael ; Bernier, Jacques ; Kortmann, Rolf D ; Dehing-Oberije, Cary ; Collette, Laurence ; Davis, J Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Baumert, Brigitta G ; Brada, Michael ; Bernier, Jacques ; Kortmann, Rolf D ; Dehing-Oberije, Cary ; Collette, Laurence ; Davis, J Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the quality of a supposedly highly accurate treatment technique such as stereotactic radiotherapy. A second aim was to investigate a possible relation between the clinical results of the stereotactic boost arm and the results of the QA. The trial was closed in 2001 due to low accrual. In total, 25 patients were randomized: 14 into the experimental arm and 11 into the control arm. Six centres randomized patients, 8 centres had completed the dummy run (DR) for the stereotactic boost part. All participating centres (9) were asked to complete a quality-assurance questionnaire. The DR consisted of treatment planning according to the guidelines of the protocol on 3 different tumour volumes drawn on CT images of a humanized phantom. The SRT technique to be used was evaluated by the questionnaire. Clinical data from patients recruited to the boost arm from 6 participating centres were analysed. There was a full compliance to the protocol requirements for 5 centres. Major and minor deviations in conformality were observed for 2 and 3 centres, respectively. Of the 8 centres which completed the DR, one centre did not comply with the requirements of stereotactic radiotherapy concerning accuracy, dosimetry and planning. Median follow-up and median overall survival were 39.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. Acute and late toxicities of the stereotactic boost were low. One radiation necrosis was seen for a patient who has not received the SRT boost. Three reported serious adverse events were all seizures and probably therapy-related. Overall compliance was good but not ideal from the point of view of this highly precise radiation technique. Survival in the subgroup of patients with small volume disease was encouraging, but the study does not provide sufficient information about the potential value of fSRT boost in patients with malignant glioma.Toxicity due to an additional stereotactic boost of 20 Gy in 4 fractions was low and may be considered as a safe treatment option for patients with small tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.03.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18455252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Cranial Irradiation - methods ; Cranial Irradiation - standards ; Dose Fractionation ; Female ; Glioma - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Stereotaxic Techniques ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2008-08, Vol.88 (2), p.163</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18455252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baumert, Brigitta G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brada, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernier, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortmann, Rolf D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehing-Oberije, Cary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collette, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the quality of a supposedly highly accurate treatment technique such as stereotactic radiotherapy. A second aim was to investigate a possible relation between the clinical results of the stereotactic boost arm and the results of the QA. The trial was closed in 2001 due to low accrual. In total, 25 patients were randomized: 14 into the experimental arm and 11 into the control arm. Six centres randomized patients, 8 centres had completed the dummy run (DR) for the stereotactic boost part. All participating centres (9) were asked to complete a quality-assurance questionnaire. The DR consisted of treatment planning according to the guidelines of the protocol on 3 different tumour volumes drawn on CT images of a humanized phantom. The SRT technique to be used was evaluated by the questionnaire. Clinical data from patients recruited to the boost arm from 6 participating centres were analysed. There was a full compliance to the protocol requirements for 5 centres. Major and minor deviations in conformality were observed for 2 and 3 centres, respectively. Of the 8 centres which completed the DR, one centre did not comply with the requirements of stereotactic radiotherapy concerning accuracy, dosimetry and planning. Median follow-up and median overall survival were 39.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. Acute and late toxicities of the stereotactic boost were low. One radiation necrosis was seen for a patient who has not received the SRT boost. Three reported serious adverse events were all seizures and probably therapy-related. Overall compliance was good but not ideal from the point of view of this highly precise radiation technique. Survival in the subgroup of patients with small volume disease was encouraging, but the study does not provide sufficient information about the potential value of fSRT boost in patients with malignant glioma.Toxicity due to an additional stereotactic boost of 20 Gy in 4 fractions was low and may be considered as a safe treatment option for patients with small tumours.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Cranial Irradiation - methods</subject><subject>Cranial Irradiation - standards</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Stereotaxic Techniques</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptUEtOwzAU9AJES-EGCPkCSZ_tOInZQcRPKqpUlXXlJE7qyomD7YJ6PG5GymfHaqSZeTOjh9AVgZgASee72Mna9lVMAfIYWAyUn6DpKGVRThKYoHPvdwBAgWVnaELyhHPK6RR93i9X6wJTKjIa0VQIMn9ZFfhuRQAHp6W5wY2TVdC2l0HV2AfllA1HpsKltT7gxhpjP3Tf4sr276r_9ho8LtI2bJWTwwHbBm91u8XtyCrcGm076WNcGN3rajTLvsZve2l0OETS-72TfaWwU35vgj9ej0H_dUvXXaDTRhqvLn9xhl4f7tfFU7RYPj4Xt4tooCBCJLMqFyzljEEiBKMKMpHklarpqJAkLwWUnNYpyVWmMgoEuJIyzdOSKpbwms3Q9U_usC87VW8GpzvpDpu_X7Iv1tl4Ew</recordid><startdate>200808</startdate><enddate>200808</enddate><creator>Baumert, Brigitta G</creator><creator>Brada, Michael</creator><creator>Bernier, Jacques</creator><creator>Kortmann, Rolf D</creator><creator>Dehing-Oberije, Cary</creator><creator>Collette, Laurence</creator><creator>Davis, J Bernard</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200808</creationdate><title>EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm</title><author>Baumert, Brigitta G ; Brada, Michael ; Bernier, Jacques ; Kortmann, Rolf D ; Dehing-Oberije, Cary ; Collette, Laurence ; Davis, J Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a7c8936533049932e07948ced2a7c148b90b52d618e7e720105eaa686b2e345d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Cranial Irradiation - methods</topic><topic>Cranial Irradiation - standards</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Stereotaxic Techniques</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baumert, Brigitta G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brada, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernier, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kortmann, Rolf D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehing-Oberije, Cary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collette, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baumert, Brigitta G</au><au>Brada, Michael</au><au>Bernier, Jacques</au><au>Kortmann, Rolf D</au><au>Dehing-Oberije, Cary</au><au>Collette, Laurence</au><au>Davis, J Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2008-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><pages>163-</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><abstract>The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the quality of a supposedly highly accurate treatment technique such as stereotactic radiotherapy. A second aim was to investigate a possible relation between the clinical results of the stereotactic boost arm and the results of the QA. The trial was closed in 2001 due to low accrual. In total, 25 patients were randomized: 14 into the experimental arm and 11 into the control arm. Six centres randomized patients, 8 centres had completed the dummy run (DR) for the stereotactic boost part. All participating centres (9) were asked to complete a quality-assurance questionnaire. The DR consisted of treatment planning according to the guidelines of the protocol on 3 different tumour volumes drawn on CT images of a humanized phantom. The SRT technique to be used was evaluated by the questionnaire. Clinical data from patients recruited to the boost arm from 6 participating centres were analysed. There was a full compliance to the protocol requirements for 5 centres. Major and minor deviations in conformality were observed for 2 and 3 centres, respectively. Of the 8 centres which completed the DR, one centre did not comply with the requirements of stereotactic radiotherapy concerning accuracy, dosimetry and planning. Median follow-up and median overall survival were 39.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. Acute and late toxicities of the stereotactic boost were low. One radiation necrosis was seen for a patient who has not received the SRT boost. Three reported serious adverse events were all seizures and probably therapy-related. Overall compliance was good but not ideal from the point of view of this highly precise radiation technique. Survival in the subgroup of patients with small volume disease was encouraging, but the study does not provide sufficient information about the potential value of fSRT boost in patients with malignant glioma.Toxicity due to an additional stereotactic boost of 20 Gy in 4 fractions was low and may be considered as a safe treatment option for patients with small tumours.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pmid>18455252</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2008.03.025</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8140
ispartof Radiotherapy and oncology, 2008-08, Vol.88 (2), p.163
issn 0167-8140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18455252
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Cranial Irradiation - methods
Cranial Irradiation - standards
Dose Fractionation
Female
Glioma - radiotherapy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Stereotaxic Techniques
Surveys and Questionnaires
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T19%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EORTC%2022972-26991/MRC%20BR10%20trial:%20fractionated%20stereotactic%20boost%20following%20conventional%20radiotherapy%20of%20high%20grade%20gliomas.%20Clinical%20and%20quality-assurance%20results%20of%20the%20stereotactic%20boost%20arm&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Baumert,%20Brigitta%20G&rft.date=2008-08&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.pages=163-&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.03.025&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E18455252%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18455252&rfr_iscdi=true