Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system

Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional positio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Jian-Yue, Ryu, Samuel, Rock, Jack, Faber, Kathleen, Chen, Qing, Ajlouni, Munther, Movsas, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1087
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 35
creator Jin, Jian-Yue
Ryu, Samuel
Rock, Jack
Faber, Kathleen
Chen, Qing
Ajlouni, Munther
Movsas, Benjamin
description Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7 ± 1.8 , 0.7 ± 1.5 , and 0.7 ± 1.6   deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1 ± 0.9 , 0.2 ± 1.2 , and 0.2 ± 1.0   mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2839097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18404943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70491748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAQx4Mouj4OfgHJSVCoJk36ugiy-AJfBz2HbDJdI92mZtqV_fZWW9CL4mkg88uPmf8Qss_ZCec8P-UncS4KVmRrZBLLTEQyZsU6mTBWyCiWLNki24ivjLFUJGyTbPFcMllIMSH-YqmrTrfO19SXNAA62-mKNv0T1C1tPLqv5lIHN2ClDxQbV_dU0NZ57MIcwop26Oo5bV-A3vte6pC6hZ4DnXfOgqW4whYWu2Sj1BXC3lh3yPPlxdP0Orp9uLqZnt9GRso0i3hspU5LI2cCOBPpTKZ5YjSABC5EWkoTw4xnGvLCprwwuc3jQidGZlkaJ0kudsjh4G2Cf-sAW7VwaKCqdA2-Q5X1-_NMfoJHA2iCRwxQqib0c4eV4kx9pqu4GtPt2YNR2s0WYL_JMc4eiAbg3VWw-t2k7h5H4dnAo3HtV7q___k-lPKlGg7VC47_LfgLXvrwY7rGluID0_-1-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70491748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7 ± 1.8 , 0.7 ± 1.5 , and 0.7 ± 1.6   deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1 ± 0.9 , 0.2 ± 1.2 , and 0.2 ± 1.0   mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2839097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18404943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>biomedical optical imaging ; Computed tomography ; Dose Fractionation ; Dosimetry ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Image detection systems ; image fusion ; image guided radiotherapy ; intrafraction motion ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image spatial resolution ; Medical imaging ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; Movement ; phantoms ; position uncertainty ; Radiosurgery ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotation ; spinal radiotherapy ; Spine - surgery ; surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Uncertainty ; Visual imaging ; X‐ray imaging ; X‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.2839097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2839097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18404943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajlouni, Munther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7 ± 1.8 , 0.7 ± 1.5 , and 0.7 ± 1.6   deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1 ± 0.9 , 0.2 ± 1.2 , and 0.2 ± 1.0   mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</description><subject>biomedical optical imaging</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image detection systems</subject><subject>image fusion</subject><subject>image guided radiotherapy</subject><subject>intrafraction motion</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image spatial resolution</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>position uncertainty</subject><subject>Radiosurgery</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>spinal radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spine - surgery</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual imaging</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>X‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAQx4Mouj4OfgHJSVCoJk36ugiy-AJfBz2HbDJdI92mZtqV_fZWW9CL4mkg88uPmf8Qss_ZCec8P-UncS4KVmRrZBLLTEQyZsU6mTBWyCiWLNki24ivjLFUJGyTbPFcMllIMSH-YqmrTrfO19SXNAA62-mKNv0T1C1tPLqv5lIHN2ClDxQbV_dU0NZ57MIcwop26Oo5bV-A3vte6pC6hZ4DnXfOgqW4whYWu2Sj1BXC3lh3yPPlxdP0Orp9uLqZnt9GRso0i3hspU5LI2cCOBPpTKZ5YjSABC5EWkoTw4xnGvLCprwwuc3jQidGZlkaJ0kudsjh4G2Cf-sAW7VwaKCqdA2-Q5X1-_NMfoJHA2iCRwxQqib0c4eV4kx9pqu4GtPt2YNR2s0WYL_JMc4eiAbg3VWw-t2k7h5H4dnAo3HtV7q___k-lPKlGg7VC47_LfgLXvrwY7rGluID0_-1-w</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Jin, Jian-Yue</creator><creator>Ryu, Samuel</creator><creator>Rock, Jack</creator><creator>Faber, Kathleen</creator><creator>Chen, Qing</creator><creator>Ajlouni, Munther</creator><creator>Movsas, Benjamin</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><author>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>biomedical optical imaging</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image detection systems</topic><topic>image fusion</topic><topic>image guided radiotherapy</topic><topic>intrafraction motion</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image spatial resolution</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>position uncertainty</topic><topic>Radiosurgery</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>spinal radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spine - surgery</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual imaging</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>X‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajlouni, Munther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin, Jian-Yue</au><au>Ryu, Samuel</au><au>Rock, Jack</au><au>Faber, Kathleen</au><au>Chen, Qing</au><au>Ajlouni, Munther</au><au>Movsas, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1087-1093</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was 0.7 ± 1.8 , 0.7 ± 1.5 , and 0.7 ± 1.6   deg along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was 0.1 ± 0.9 , 0.2 ± 1.2 , and 0.2 ± 1.0   mm in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>18404943</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.2839097</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18404943
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects biomedical optical imaging
Computed tomography
Dose Fractionation
Dosimetry
Humans
Image analysis
Image detection systems
image fusion
image guided radiotherapy
intrafraction motion
medical image processing
Medical image quality
Medical image spatial resolution
Medical imaging
Medical X‐ray imaging
Movement
phantoms
position uncertainty
Radiosurgery
Radiosurgery - methods
Retrospective Studies
Rotation
spinal radiotherapy
Spine - surgery
surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Uncertainty
Visual imaging
X‐ray imaging
X‐rays
title Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A57%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20residual%20patient%20position%20variation%20for%20spinal%20radiosurgery%20using%20the%20Novalis%20image%20guided%20system&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Jin,%20Jian-Yue&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1087-1093&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2839097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70491748%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70491748&rft_id=info:pmid/18404943&rfr_iscdi=true