Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system
Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional positio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1093 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1087 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Jin, Jian-Yue Ryu, Samuel Rock, Jack Faber, Kathleen Chen, Qing Ajlouni, Munther Movsas, Benjamin |
description | Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was
0.7
±
1.8
,
0.7
±
1.5
, and
0.7
±
1.6
deg
along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was
0.1
±
0.9
,
0.2
±
1.2
, and
0.2
±
1.0
mm
in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.2839097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18404943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70491748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAQx4Mouj4OfgHJSVCoJk36ugiy-AJfBz2HbDJdI92mZtqV_fZWW9CL4mkg88uPmf8Qss_ZCec8P-UncS4KVmRrZBLLTEQyZsU6mTBWyCiWLNki24ivjLFUJGyTbPFcMllIMSH-YqmrTrfO19SXNAA62-mKNv0T1C1tPLqv5lIHN2ClDxQbV_dU0NZ57MIcwop26Oo5bV-A3vte6pC6hZ4DnXfOgqW4whYWu2Sj1BXC3lh3yPPlxdP0Orp9uLqZnt9GRso0i3hspU5LI2cCOBPpTKZ5YjSABC5EWkoTw4xnGvLCprwwuc3jQidGZlkaJ0kudsjh4G2Cf-sAW7VwaKCqdA2-Q5X1-_NMfoJHA2iCRwxQqib0c4eV4kx9pqu4GtPt2YNR2s0WYL_JMc4eiAbg3VWw-t2k7h5H4dnAo3HtV7q___k-lPKlGg7VC47_LfgLXvrwY7rGluID0_-1-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70491748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was
0.7
±
1.8
,
0.7
±
1.5
, and
0.7
±
1.6
deg
along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was
0.1
±
0.9
,
0.2
±
1.2
, and
0.2
±
1.0
mm
in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2839097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18404943</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>biomedical optical imaging ; Computed tomography ; Dose Fractionation ; Dosimetry ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Image detection systems ; image fusion ; image guided radiotherapy ; intrafraction motion ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image spatial resolution ; Medical imaging ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; Movement ; phantoms ; position uncertainty ; Radiosurgery ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotation ; spinal radiotherapy ; Spine - surgery ; surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Uncertainty ; Visual imaging ; X‐ray imaging ; X‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.2839097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2839097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18404943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajlouni, Munther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was
0.7
±
1.8
,
0.7
±
1.5
, and
0.7
±
1.6
deg
along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was
0.1
±
0.9
,
0.2
±
1.2
, and
0.2
±
1.0
mm
in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</description><subject>biomedical optical imaging</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image detection systems</subject><subject>image fusion</subject><subject>image guided radiotherapy</subject><subject>intrafraction motion</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image spatial resolution</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>phantoms</subject><subject>position uncertainty</subject><subject>Radiosurgery</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>spinal radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spine - surgery</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual imaging</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>X‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAQx4Mouj4OfgHJSVCoJk36ugiy-AJfBz2HbDJdI92mZtqV_fZWW9CL4mkg88uPmf8Qss_ZCec8P-UncS4KVmRrZBLLTEQyZsU6mTBWyCiWLNki24ivjLFUJGyTbPFcMllIMSH-YqmrTrfO19SXNAA62-mKNv0T1C1tPLqv5lIHN2ClDxQbV_dU0NZ57MIcwop26Oo5bV-A3vte6pC6hZ4DnXfOgqW4whYWu2Sj1BXC3lh3yPPlxdP0Orp9uLqZnt9GRso0i3hspU5LI2cCOBPpTKZ5YjSABC5EWkoTw4xnGvLCprwwuc3jQidGZlkaJ0kudsjh4G2Cf-sAW7VwaKCqdA2-Q5X1-_NMfoJHA2iCRwxQqib0c4eV4kx9pqu4GtPt2YNR2s0WYL_JMc4eiAbg3VWw-t2k7h5H4dnAo3HtV7q___k-lPKlGg7VC47_LfgLXvrwY7rGluID0_-1-w</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Jin, Jian-Yue</creator><creator>Ryu, Samuel</creator><creator>Rock, Jack</creator><creator>Faber, Kathleen</creator><creator>Chen, Qing</creator><creator>Ajlouni, Munther</creator><creator>Movsas, Benjamin</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</title><author>Jin, Jian-Yue ; Ryu, Samuel ; Rock, Jack ; Faber, Kathleen ; Chen, Qing ; Ajlouni, Munther ; Movsas, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4467-12d4a6fc4b3e1036b4685caee4e1336f4c2eb17ae89d619c8d829a5c477625583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>biomedical optical imaging</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image detection systems</topic><topic>image fusion</topic><topic>image guided radiotherapy</topic><topic>intrafraction motion</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image spatial resolution</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>phantoms</topic><topic>position uncertainty</topic><topic>Radiosurgery</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>spinal radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spine - surgery</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual imaging</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>X‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jian-Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rock, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajlouni, Munther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Movsas, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin, Jian-Yue</au><au>Ryu, Samuel</au><au>Rock, Jack</au><au>Faber, Kathleen</au><au>Chen, Qing</au><au>Ajlouni, Munther</au><au>Movsas, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1087-1093</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: The Novalis system has been demonstrated to achieve accurate target localization on anthropomorphic phantoms. However, other factors, such as rotational deviation, patient intrafraction motion, and image fusion uncertainty due to patient body deformation, could contribute additional position uncertainty for actual patients. This study evaluates such position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive spinal radiosurgery patients were included in the study. Rotational deviation was evaluated from 6-deg of freedom (6D) fusion results for all patients. The combined uncertainty of patient motion and image fusion was determined from fusion results of additional kV x-ray images acquired before, during, and after treatment for 25 of the 52 patients. The uncertainty of image fusion was also evaluated by performing 6D fusion ten different times with various regions of interest in the images selected for fusion. This was performed for two patients with L3 and T2 lesions, respectively, for comparison. Results: The mean rotational deviation was
0.7
±
1.8
,
0.7
±
1.5
, and
0.7
±
1.6
deg
along the yaw, roll, and pitch directions, respectively. The combined uncertainty from patient motion and image fusion was
0.1
±
0.9
,
0.2
±
1.2
, and
0.2
±
1.0
mm
in the anteroposterior (AP), longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. The uncertainty (standard deviation) due to image fusion was less than 0.28 mm in any direction for the L3 lesion and 0.8 mm in the AP direction for the T2 lesion. Conclusion: Overall position uncertainty for spinal radiosurgery patients has been evaluated. Rotational deviation and patient motion were the main factors contributed to position uncertainty for actual patient treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>18404943</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.2839097</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2008-03, Vol.35 (3), p.1087-1093 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_18404943 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | biomedical optical imaging Computed tomography Dose Fractionation Dosimetry Humans Image analysis Image detection systems image fusion image guided radiotherapy intrafraction motion medical image processing Medical image quality Medical image spatial resolution Medical imaging Medical X‐ray imaging Movement phantoms position uncertainty Radiosurgery Radiosurgery - methods Retrospective Studies Rotation spinal radiotherapy Spine - surgery surgery Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Uncertainty Visual imaging X‐ray imaging X‐rays |
title | Evaluation of residual patient position variation for spinal radiosurgery using the Novalis image guided system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A57%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20residual%20patient%20position%20variation%20for%20spinal%20radiosurgery%20using%20the%20Novalis%20image%20guided%20system&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Jin,%20Jian-Yue&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1087-1093&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2839097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70491748%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70491748&rft_id=info:pmid/18404943&rfr_iscdi=true |