Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications

We investigated the role and the weight of the parameters involved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) method, for prostate and head-and-neck plans. We systematically varied the parameters (gEUDmax and weight) invol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2008-03, Vol.53 (6), p.1665-1675
Hauptverfasser: Widesott, L, Strigari, L, Pressello, M C, Benassi, M, Landoni, V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1675
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1665
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 53
creator Widesott, L
Strigari, L
Pressello, M C
Benassi, M
Landoni, V
description We investigated the role and the weight of the parameters involved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) method, for prostate and head-and-neck plans. We systematically varied the parameters (gEUDmax and weight) involved in the gEUD-based optimization of rectal wall and parotid glands. We found that the proper value of weight factor, still guaranteeing planning treatment volumes coverage, produced similar organs at risks dose-volume (DV) histograms for different gEUDmax with fixed a=1. Most of all, we formulated a simple relation that links the reference gEUDmax and the associated weight factor. As secondary objective, we evaluated plans obtained with the gEUD-based optimization and ones based on DV criteria, using the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. gEUD criteria seemed to improve sparing of rectum and parotid glands with respect to DV-based optimization: the mean dose, the V40 and V50 values to the rectal wall were decreased of about 10%, the mean dose to parotids decreased of about 20-30%. But more than the OARs sparing, we underlined the halving of the OARs optimization time with the implementation of the gEUD-based cost function. Using NTCP models we enhanced differences between the two optimization criteria for parotid glands, but no for rectum wall.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18367795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18367795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f4315c69b7079e3f720fbda114e42234b7b7d92587a4813656a29a1ddff2bcc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMozjj6Ai4kWxe1SdM07VIG_2BAEF2HtEnGSNrUpDPgPIJPbUplXAy4yiXf-e6FA8AlRjcYlWWKEMFJhSlNKUmLFGF8BOaYFDgpaIGOwXwPzMBZCB8oEmWWn4IZLknBWEXn4PvFWQWdhsO7gr3wolWD8gGabuvsVsk4TJEVHXT9YFqzE4NxHaxFiLGb4rXqlBfW7OKX-tyYrbCqG-CmM9r5FkoXFBSdhF5I42rjrFubRlho2t7GYVwYzsGJFjaoi993Ad7u716Xj8nq-eFpebtKGsLIkOicYNoUVc0QqxTRLEO6lgLjXOVZRvKa1UxWGS2ZyMtogxYiqwSWUuusbhpMFiCb9jbeheCV5r03rfBfHCM-iuWjNz5645TwgkdtsXQ1lfpN3Sr5V_k1GYHrCTCu36eHi3gvdWSTQ_af4z-FqZEp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Widesott, L ; Strigari, L ; Pressello, M C ; Benassi, M ; Landoni, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Widesott, L ; Strigari, L ; Pressello, M C ; Benassi, M ; Landoni, V</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the role and the weight of the parameters involved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) method, for prostate and head-and-neck plans. We systematically varied the parameters (gEUDmax and weight) involved in the gEUD-based optimization of rectal wall and parotid glands. We found that the proper value of weight factor, still guaranteeing planning treatment volumes coverage, produced similar organs at risks dose-volume (DV) histograms for different gEUDmax with fixed a=1. Most of all, we formulated a simple relation that links the reference gEUDmax and the associated weight factor. As secondary objective, we evaluated plans obtained with the gEUD-based optimization and ones based on DV criteria, using the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. gEUD criteria seemed to improve sparing of rectum and parotid glands with respect to DV-based optimization: the mean dose, the V40 and V50 values to the rectal wall were decreased of about 10%, the mean dose to parotids decreased of about 20-30%. But more than the OARs sparing, we underlined the halving of the OARs optimization time with the implementation of the gEUD-based cost function. Using NTCP models we enhanced differences between the two optimization criteria for parotid glands, but no for rectum wall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18367795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Head - radiation effects ; Humans ; Male ; Neck - radiation effects ; Probability ; Prostate - radiation effects ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiobiology ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2008-03, Vol.53 (6), p.1665-1675</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f4315c69b7079e3f720fbda114e42234b7b7d92587a4813656a29a1ddff2bcc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f4315c69b7079e3f720fbda114e42234b7b7d92587a4813656a29a1ddff2bcc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/011/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,53829,53909</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widesott, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strigari, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressello, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benassi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landoni, V</creatorcontrib><title>Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>We investigated the role and the weight of the parameters involved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) method, for prostate and head-and-neck plans. We systematically varied the parameters (gEUDmax and weight) involved in the gEUD-based optimization of rectal wall and parotid glands. We found that the proper value of weight factor, still guaranteeing planning treatment volumes coverage, produced similar organs at risks dose-volume (DV) histograms for different gEUDmax with fixed a=1. Most of all, we formulated a simple relation that links the reference gEUDmax and the associated weight factor. As secondary objective, we evaluated plans obtained with the gEUD-based optimization and ones based on DV criteria, using the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. gEUD criteria seemed to improve sparing of rectum and parotid glands with respect to DV-based optimization: the mean dose, the V40 and V50 values to the rectal wall were decreased of about 10%, the mean dose to parotids decreased of about 20-30%. But more than the OARs sparing, we underlined the halving of the OARs optimization time with the implementation of the gEUD-based cost function. Using NTCP models we enhanced differences between the two optimization criteria for parotid glands, but no for rectum wall.</description><subject>Head - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neck - radiation effects</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prostate - radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiobiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAURoMozjj6Ai4kWxe1SdM07VIG_2BAEF2HtEnGSNrUpDPgPIJPbUplXAy4yiXf-e6FA8AlRjcYlWWKEMFJhSlNKUmLFGF8BOaYFDgpaIGOwXwPzMBZCB8oEmWWn4IZLknBWEXn4PvFWQWdhsO7gr3wolWD8gGabuvsVsk4TJEVHXT9YFqzE4NxHaxFiLGb4rXqlBfW7OKX-tyYrbCqG-CmM9r5FkoXFBSdhF5I42rjrFubRlho2t7GYVwYzsGJFjaoi993Ad7u716Xj8nq-eFpebtKGsLIkOicYNoUVc0QqxTRLEO6lgLjXOVZRvKa1UxWGS2ZyMtogxYiqwSWUuusbhpMFiCb9jbeheCV5r03rfBfHCM-iuWjNz5645TwgkdtsXQ1lfpN3Sr5V_k1GYHrCTCu36eHi3gvdWSTQ_af4z-FqZEp</recordid><startdate>20080321</startdate><enddate>20080321</enddate><creator>Widesott, L</creator><creator>Strigari, L</creator><creator>Pressello, M C</creator><creator>Benassi, M</creator><creator>Landoni, V</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080321</creationdate><title>Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications</title><author>Widesott, L ; Strigari, L ; Pressello, M C ; Benassi, M ; Landoni, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f4315c69b7079e3f720fbda114e42234b7b7d92587a4813656a29a1ddff2bcc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Head - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neck - radiation effects</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prostate - radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiobiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widesott, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strigari, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressello, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benassi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landoni, V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widesott, L</au><au>Strigari, L</au><au>Pressello, M C</au><au>Benassi, M</au><au>Landoni, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2008-03-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1665</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1665-1675</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>We investigated the role and the weight of the parameters involved in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) method, for prostate and head-and-neck plans. We systematically varied the parameters (gEUDmax and weight) involved in the gEUD-based optimization of rectal wall and parotid glands. We found that the proper value of weight factor, still guaranteeing planning treatment volumes coverage, produced similar organs at risks dose-volume (DV) histograms for different gEUDmax with fixed a=1. Most of all, we formulated a simple relation that links the reference gEUDmax and the associated weight factor. As secondary objective, we evaluated plans obtained with the gEUD-based optimization and ones based on DV criteria, using the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. gEUD criteria seemed to improve sparing of rectum and parotid glands with respect to DV-based optimization: the mean dose, the V40 and V50 values to the rectal wall were decreased of about 10%, the mean dose to parotids decreased of about 20-30%. But more than the OARs sparing, we underlined the halving of the OARs optimization time with the implementation of the gEUD-based cost function. Using NTCP models we enhanced differences between the two optimization criteria for parotid glands, but no for rectum wall.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>18367795</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2008-03, Vol.53 (6), p.1665-1675
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18367795
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Head - radiation effects
Humans
Male
Neck - radiation effects
Probability
Prostate - radiation effects
Radiation Dosage
Radiobiology
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Reproducibility of Results
title Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20the%20parameters%20involved%20in%20the%20plan%20optimization%20based%20on%20the%20generalized%20equivalent%20uniform%20dose%20and%20radiobiological%20implications&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Widesott,%20L&rft.date=2008-03-21&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1665&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1665-1675&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/011&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E18367795%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18367795&rfr_iscdi=true