Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving

We assessed the frequency of glove perforation during major and minor orthopaedic surgeries, in order to determine the efficacy of double gloving. A total number of 1528 gloves (622 inner and 906 outer) used in 200 procedures (100 major-100 minor), and 100 pairs of unused gloves were examined. Glove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta orthopaedica belgica 2007-12, Vol.73 (6), p.760
Hauptverfasser: Ersozlu, Salim, Sahin, Orcun, Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi, Akkaya, Tolga, Tuncay, Cengiz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 760
container_title Acta orthopaedica belgica
container_volume 73
creator Ersozlu, Salim
Sahin, Orcun
Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi
Akkaya, Tolga
Tuncay, Cengiz
description We assessed the frequency of glove perforation during major and minor orthopaedic surgeries, in order to determine the efficacy of double gloving. A total number of 1528 gloves (622 inner and 906 outer) used in 200 procedures (100 major-100 minor), and 100 pairs of unused gloves were examined. Glove perforation rate, incidence among surgical team, location of perforation and duration of surgery were compared. The overall perforation rate was 15.8% (242/1528). Perforation rates for major versus minor surgical procedures were 21.6% and 3.6%, respectively. The perforation rate for the unused control group was 1% (2/200). Inner-outer gloves perforation rates were 3.7% (23/622) and 22.7% (206/906), respectively. Surgeons had a higher perforation rate compared with the other staff. The right thumb and left index finger had more punctures than other fingers. Routine use of double gloving during orthopaedic procedures is recommended, because this significantly reduces the perforation of inner gloves.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_18260490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18260490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-bfca8919e457b2288cfd3d5de7cb61303eb7cfbb1a4cac387c0901528e62afa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j91KwzAYQHOhuDl9BckLFL4kbZpcytCpDLzR65Gfr11Gm5SkVfb2DtSrc64OnCuyBgBWyVryFbkt5QQgNZPshqyY4hJqDWvythvSF9JpiW5eMhYaIh3NKWVqoqdjiBdLeT6myaAPjpYl95jP9DvMR-rTYgek_SURYn9HrjszFLz_44Z8Pj99bF-q_fvudfu4ryYOeq5s54zSTGPdtJZzpVznhW88ts5KJkCgbV1nLTO1M06o1oEG1nCFkpvOSLEhD7_dabEj-sOUw2jy-fA_JX4APGZJSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ersozlu, Salim ; Sahin, Orcun ; Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi ; Akkaya, Tolga ; Tuncay, Cengiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Ersozlu, Salim ; Sahin, Orcun ; Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi ; Akkaya, Tolga ; Tuncay, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the frequency of glove perforation during major and minor orthopaedic surgeries, in order to determine the efficacy of double gloving. A total number of 1528 gloves (622 inner and 906 outer) used in 200 procedures (100 major-100 minor), and 100 pairs of unused gloves were examined. Glove perforation rate, incidence among surgical team, location of perforation and duration of surgery were compared. The overall perforation rate was 15.8% (242/1528). Perforation rates for major versus minor surgical procedures were 21.6% and 3.6%, respectively. The perforation rate for the unused control group was 1% (2/200). Inner-outer gloves perforation rates were 3.7% (23/622) and 22.7% (206/906), respectively. Surgeons had a higher perforation rate compared with the other staff. The right thumb and left index finger had more punctures than other fingers. Routine use of double gloving during orthopaedic procedures is recommended, because this significantly reduces the perforation of inner gloves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6462</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18260490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belgium</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Acta orthopaedica belgica, 2007-12, Vol.73 (6), p.760</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18260490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ersozlu, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncay, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><title>Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving</title><title>Acta orthopaedica belgica</title><addtitle>Acta Orthop Belg</addtitle><description>We assessed the frequency of glove perforation during major and minor orthopaedic surgeries, in order to determine the efficacy of double gloving. A total number of 1528 gloves (622 inner and 906 outer) used in 200 procedures (100 major-100 minor), and 100 pairs of unused gloves were examined. Glove perforation rate, incidence among surgical team, location of perforation and duration of surgery were compared. The overall perforation rate was 15.8% (242/1528). Perforation rates for major versus minor surgical procedures were 21.6% and 3.6%, respectively. The perforation rate for the unused control group was 1% (2/200). Inner-outer gloves perforation rates were 3.7% (23/622) and 22.7% (206/906), respectively. Surgeons had a higher perforation rate compared with the other staff. The right thumb and left index finger had more punctures than other fingers. Routine use of double gloving during orthopaedic procedures is recommended, because this significantly reduces the perforation of inner gloves.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Gloves, Surgical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0001-6462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j91KwzAYQHOhuDl9BckLFL4kbZpcytCpDLzR65Gfr11Gm5SkVfb2DtSrc64OnCuyBgBWyVryFbkt5QQgNZPshqyY4hJqDWvythvSF9JpiW5eMhYaIh3NKWVqoqdjiBdLeT6myaAPjpYl95jP9DvMR-rTYgek_SURYn9HrjszFLz_44Z8Pj99bF-q_fvudfu4ryYOeq5s54zSTGPdtJZzpVznhW88ts5KJkCgbV1nLTO1M06o1oEG1nCFkpvOSLEhD7_dabEj-sOUw2jy-fA_JX4APGZJSg</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Ersozlu, Salim</creator><creator>Sahin, Orcun</creator><creator>Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi</creator><creator>Akkaya, Tolga</creator><creator>Tuncay, Cengiz</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving</title><author>Ersozlu, Salim ; Sahin, Orcun ; Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi ; Akkaya, Tolga ; Tuncay, Cengiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-bfca8919e457b2288cfd3d5de7cb61303eb7cfbb1a4cac387c0901528e62afa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Gloves, Surgical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ersozlu, Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Orcun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncay, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica belgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ersozlu, Salim</au><au>Sahin, Orcun</au><au>Ozgur, Ahmet Fevzi</au><au>Akkaya, Tolga</au><au>Tuncay, Cengiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving</atitle><jtitle>Acta orthopaedica belgica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Orthop Belg</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>760</spage><pages>760-</pages><issn>0001-6462</issn><abstract>We assessed the frequency of glove perforation during major and minor orthopaedic surgeries, in order to determine the efficacy of double gloving. A total number of 1528 gloves (622 inner and 906 outer) used in 200 procedures (100 major-100 minor), and 100 pairs of unused gloves were examined. Glove perforation rate, incidence among surgical team, location of perforation and duration of surgery were compared. The overall perforation rate was 15.8% (242/1528). Perforation rates for major versus minor surgical procedures were 21.6% and 3.6%, respectively. The perforation rate for the unused control group was 1% (2/200). Inner-outer gloves perforation rates were 3.7% (23/622) and 22.7% (206/906), respectively. Surgeons had a higher perforation rate compared with the other staff. The right thumb and left index finger had more punctures than other fingers. Routine use of double gloving during orthopaedic procedures is recommended, because this significantly reduces the perforation of inner gloves.</abstract><cop>Belgium</cop><pmid>18260490</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6462
ispartof Acta orthopaedica belgica, 2007-12, Vol.73 (6), p.760
issn 0001-6462
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_18260490
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Gloves, Surgical
Humans
Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control
Occupational Diseases - prevention & control
Orthopedic Procedures - statistics & numerical data
title Glove punctures in major and minor orthopaedic surgery with double gloving
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T14%3A27%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glove%20punctures%20in%20major%20and%20minor%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20with%20double%20gloving&rft.jtitle=Acta%20orthopaedica%20belgica&rft.au=Ersozlu,%20Salim&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=760&rft.pages=760-&rft.issn=0001-6462&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E18260490%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18260490&rfr_iscdi=true