Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills

In order to improve the estimation of surface gas emissions in landfill, we evaluated a combination of geophysical and greenhouse gas measurement methodologies. Based on fifteen 2D electrical resistivity tomographies (ERTs), longitudinal cross section images of the buried waste layers were developed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2008-01, Vol.389 (2-3), p.522
Hauptverfasser: Georgaki, I, Soupios, P, Sakkas, N, Ververidis, F, Trantas, E, Vallianatos, F, Manios, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 522
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 389
creator Georgaki, I
Soupios, P
Sakkas, N
Ververidis, F
Trantas, E
Vallianatos, F
Manios, T
description In order to improve the estimation of surface gas emissions in landfill, we evaluated a combination of geophysical and greenhouse gas measurement methodologies. Based on fifteen 2D electrical resistivity tomographies (ERTs), longitudinal cross section images of the buried waste layers were developed, identifying place and cross section size of organic waste (OW), organic waste saturated in leachates (SOW), low organic and non-organic waste. CH(4) and CO(2) emission measurements were then conducted using the static chamber technique at 5 surface points along two tomographies: (a) across a high-emitting area, ERT#2, where different amounts of relatively fresh OW and SOW were detected, and (b) across the oldest (at least eight years) cell in the landfill, ERT#6, with significant amounts of OW. Where the highest emission rates were recorded, they were strongly affected by the thickness of the OW and SOW fraction underneath each gas sampling point. The main reason for lower than expected values was the age of the layered buried waste. Lower than predicted emissions were also attributed to soil condition, which was the case at sampling points with surface ponding, i.e. surface accumulation of leachate (or precipitated water).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17936876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17936876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-f636045fadbd6b0b71724d973f88a6d02e88882a5ab45fa3cd3716531be3fd4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1qwzAQhHVoadK0r1D2mBwMtmVL9rGYtCkEcsk9SNYqUZF_KsmBnPviVdp0LgvDx8ywd2SepkWV1KzmM_Lo_WcaxavsgcwyXlNWcTYn3-uzsJMIpj9COCFMHmHQgBbb4EwrLDj0xgdzNuECphPHXxLbU2--JgQ9uOiObjhf_WazLFYgegXNbpmvADvjvRl6cCIgYIzpYtXQezA92MhpY61_IvdaWI_Pt7sg-7f1vtkk2937R_O6TcayYIlmlKVFqYWSislU8oznhao51VUlmEpzrKJyUQp5pWirKM9YSTOJVKtC0QV5-YsdJ9mhOowurnGXw_8z6A9RRlw6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Georgaki, I ; Soupios, P ; Sakkas, N ; Ververidis, F ; Trantas, E ; Vallianatos, F ; Manios, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Georgaki, I ; Soupios, P ; Sakkas, N ; Ververidis, F ; Trantas, E ; Vallianatos, F ; Manios, T</creatorcontrib><description>In order to improve the estimation of surface gas emissions in landfill, we evaluated a combination of geophysical and greenhouse gas measurement methodologies. Based on fifteen 2D electrical resistivity tomographies (ERTs), longitudinal cross section images of the buried waste layers were developed, identifying place and cross section size of organic waste (OW), organic waste saturated in leachates (SOW), low organic and non-organic waste. CH(4) and CO(2) emission measurements were then conducted using the static chamber technique at 5 surface points along two tomographies: (a) across a high-emitting area, ERT#2, where different amounts of relatively fresh OW and SOW were detected, and (b) across the oldest (at least eight years) cell in the landfill, ERT#6, with significant amounts of OW. Where the highest emission rates were recorded, they were strongly affected by the thickness of the OW and SOW fraction underneath each gas sampling point. The main reason for lower than expected values was the age of the layered buried waste. Lower than predicted emissions were also attributed to soil condition, which was the case at sampling points with surface ponding, i.e. surface accumulation of leachate (or precipitated water).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17936876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Electric Impedance ; Electrodes ; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Methane - analysis ; Refuse Disposal</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2008-01, Vol.389 (2-3), p.522</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17936876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Georgaki, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soupios, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakkas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ververidis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trantas, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallianatos, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manios, T</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>In order to improve the estimation of surface gas emissions in landfill, we evaluated a combination of geophysical and greenhouse gas measurement methodologies. Based on fifteen 2D electrical resistivity tomographies (ERTs), longitudinal cross section images of the buried waste layers were developed, identifying place and cross section size of organic waste (OW), organic waste saturated in leachates (SOW), low organic and non-organic waste. CH(4) and CO(2) emission measurements were then conducted using the static chamber technique at 5 surface points along two tomographies: (a) across a high-emitting area, ERT#2, where different amounts of relatively fresh OW and SOW were detected, and (b) across the oldest (at least eight years) cell in the landfill, ERT#6, with significant amounts of OW. Where the highest emission rates were recorded, they were strongly affected by the thickness of the OW and SOW fraction underneath each gas sampling point. The main reason for lower than expected values was the age of the layered buried waste. Lower than predicted emissions were also attributed to soil condition, which was the case at sampling points with surface ponding, i.e. surface accumulation of leachate (or precipitated water).</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1qwzAQhHVoadK0r1D2mBwMtmVL9rGYtCkEcsk9SNYqUZF_KsmBnPviVdp0LgvDx8ywd2SepkWV1KzmM_Lo_WcaxavsgcwyXlNWcTYn3-uzsJMIpj9COCFMHmHQgBbb4EwrLDj0xgdzNuECphPHXxLbU2--JgQ9uOiObjhf_WazLFYgegXNbpmvADvjvRl6cCIgYIzpYtXQezA92MhpY61_IvdaWI_Pt7sg-7f1vtkk2937R_O6TcayYIlmlKVFqYWSislU8oznhao51VUlmEpzrKJyUQp5pWirKM9YSTOJVKtC0QV5-YsdJ9mhOowurnGXw_8z6A9RRlw6</recordid><startdate>20080125</startdate><enddate>20080125</enddate><creator>Georgaki, I</creator><creator>Soupios, P</creator><creator>Sakkas, N</creator><creator>Ververidis, F</creator><creator>Trantas, E</creator><creator>Vallianatos, F</creator><creator>Manios, T</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080125</creationdate><title>Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills</title><author>Georgaki, I ; Soupios, P ; Sakkas, N ; Ververidis, F ; Trantas, E ; Vallianatos, F ; Manios, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-f636045fadbd6b0b71724d973f88a6d02e88882a5ab45fa3cd3716531be3fd4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Georgaki, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soupios, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakkas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ververidis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trantas, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallianatos, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manios, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Georgaki, I</au><au>Soupios, P</au><au>Sakkas, N</au><au>Ververidis, F</au><au>Trantas, E</au><au>Vallianatos, F</au><au>Manios, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2008-01-25</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>389</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>522</spage><pages>522-</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><abstract>In order to improve the estimation of surface gas emissions in landfill, we evaluated a combination of geophysical and greenhouse gas measurement methodologies. Based on fifteen 2D electrical resistivity tomographies (ERTs), longitudinal cross section images of the buried waste layers were developed, identifying place and cross section size of organic waste (OW), organic waste saturated in leachates (SOW), low organic and non-organic waste. CH(4) and CO(2) emission measurements were then conducted using the static chamber technique at 5 surface points along two tomographies: (a) across a high-emitting area, ERT#2, where different amounts of relatively fresh OW and SOW were detected, and (b) across the oldest (at least eight years) cell in the landfill, ERT#6, with significant amounts of OW. Where the highest emission rates were recorded, they were strongly affected by the thickness of the OW and SOW fraction underneath each gas sampling point. The main reason for lower than expected values was the age of the layered buried waste. Lower than predicted emissions were also attributed to soil condition, which was the case at sampling points with surface ponding, i.e. surface accumulation of leachate (or precipitated water).</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>17936876</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2008-01, Vol.389 (2-3), p.522
issn 0048-9697
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_17936876
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
Electric Impedance
Electrodes
Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Methane - analysis
Refuse Disposal
title Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A02%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20use%20of%20electrical%20resistivity%20imaging%20technique%20for%20improving%20CH(4)%20and%20CO(2)%20emission%20rate%20estimations%20in%20landfills&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Georgaki,%20I&rft.date=2008-01-25&rft.volume=389&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=522&rft.pages=522-&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E17936876%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/17936876&rfr_iscdi=true