An Informatics Benchmarking Statement

Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods of information in medicine 2007-01, Vol.46 (4), p.394-398
Hauptverfasser: Pigott, K, de Lusignan, S, Rapley, A, Robinson, J, Pritchard-Copley, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 4
container_start_page 394
container_title Methods of information in medicine
container_volume 46
creator Pigott, K
de Lusignan, S
Rapley, A
Robinson, J
Pritchard-Copley, A
description Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of any established benchmarking statements for informatics a new biomedical informatics course at St. George’s has developed a first benchmarking statement – which defines the skills knowledge and understanding a biomedical informatics student should acquire by the time they complete the course. Methods: Review of national biomedical science and computing subject benchmarking statements and academic educational objectives and national occupational competencies in informatics. Results: We have developed a twenty-item benchmarking statement and this is available on-line at: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/. This benchmarking statement includes a definition and justification for all twenty statements. We found international educational objectives and national informatics competencies useful and these are mapped to each one. National subject benchmarks for computing and biomedical science were less useful and have not been systematically mapped. Conclusions: Benchmarking the skills, knowledge and understanding that a student should acquire during their course of study may be more useful than setting a standard curriculum. This benchmarking statement is a first step towards defining the learning outcomes and competencies a student of this discipline should acquire. The international informatics community should consider moving from a standard curriculum to an agreed subject benchmarking statement for medical, health and biomedical informatics.
doi_str_mv 10.1160/ME0442
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17694230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68154726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-17d2ed3293a85ff82e51c143030a814b6774ea125b3da85b727ef68ec7b352a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrFkE9rFTEUxYMo9ln1I8jb1N1o_mfespZaCxUXKri7ZDJ3OqkzmTHJ-PB9mC78pKa8hxUEt0LgQu6Pc885hDxn9BVjmr5-f06l5A_IiivGKkPVl4dkRSnXFeOGHpEnKd1QSuuaysfkiBm9kVzQFTk5DevL0E1xtNm7tH6DwfWjjV99uF5_zDbjiCE_JY86OyR8dpjH5PPb809n76qrDxeXZ6dXldNS5YqZlmMr-EbYWnVdzVExx6SggtqayUYbI9EyrhrRFqIx3GCna3SmEYrbjTgmL_e6c5y-LZgyjD45HAYbcFoS6Jopabi-B12cUorYwRx9sf0DGIW7QmBfSAFfHBSXZsT2Hjs0UICTPZB7X7LCzbTEUDL-LXS755Lrbc52wfhbrM95hu12C3_sWrx7o722Ox8QFmwwJu_6DDv0uYDRdxkDWNjBiLmf2gRuCuUrJ7DR9f57yW9Da2MLPqUFQRtZBMOSXPRzhlpJAamftuX-OBSDP_-3wTSj83b4h8lfutrl-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68154726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Informatics Benchmarking Statement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Pigott, K ; de Lusignan, S ; Rapley, A ; Robinson, J ; Pritchard-Copley, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Pigott, K ; de Lusignan, S ; Rapley, A ; Robinson, J ; Pritchard-Copley, A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of any established benchmarking statements for informatics a new biomedical informatics course at St. George’s has developed a first benchmarking statement – which defines the skills knowledge and understanding a biomedical informatics student should acquire by the time they complete the course. Methods: Review of national biomedical science and computing subject benchmarking statements and academic educational objectives and national occupational competencies in informatics. Results: We have developed a twenty-item benchmarking statement and this is available on-line at: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/. This benchmarking statement includes a definition and justification for all twenty statements. We found international educational objectives and national informatics competencies useful and these are mapped to each one. National subject benchmarks for computing and biomedical science were less useful and have not been systematically mapped. Conclusions: Benchmarking the skills, knowledge and understanding that a student should acquire during their course of study may be more useful than setting a standard curriculum. This benchmarking statement is a first step towards defining the learning outcomes and competencies a student of this discipline should acquire. The international informatics community should consider moving from a standard curriculum to an agreed subject benchmarking statement for medical, health and biomedical informatics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2511-705X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1160/ME0442</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17694230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; curriculum ; educational measurements ; informatics ; learning ; Medical Informatics - standards ; United States</subject><ispartof>Methods of information in medicine, 2007-01, Vol.46 (4), p.394-398</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-17d2ed3293a85ff82e51c143030a814b6774ea125b3da85b727ef68ec7b352a93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1160/ME0442.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1160/ME0442$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3018,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17694230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pigott, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lusignan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapley, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard-Copley, A</creatorcontrib><title>An Informatics Benchmarking Statement</title><title>Methods of information in medicine</title><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of any established benchmarking statements for informatics a new biomedical informatics course at St. George’s has developed a first benchmarking statement – which defines the skills knowledge and understanding a biomedical informatics student should acquire by the time they complete the course. Methods: Review of national biomedical science and computing subject benchmarking statements and academic educational objectives and national occupational competencies in informatics. Results: We have developed a twenty-item benchmarking statement and this is available on-line at: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/. This benchmarking statement includes a definition and justification for all twenty statements. We found international educational objectives and national informatics competencies useful and these are mapped to each one. National subject benchmarks for computing and biomedical science were less useful and have not been systematically mapped. Conclusions: Benchmarking the skills, knowledge and understanding that a student should acquire during their course of study may be more useful than setting a standard curriculum. This benchmarking statement is a first step towards defining the learning outcomes and competencies a student of this discipline should acquire. The international informatics community should consider moving from a standard curriculum to an agreed subject benchmarking statement for medical, health and biomedical informatics.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>curriculum</subject><subject>educational measurements</subject><subject>informatics</subject><subject>learning</subject><subject>Medical Informatics - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-1270</issn><issn>2511-705X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNrFkE9rFTEUxYMo9ln1I8jb1N1o_mfespZaCxUXKri7ZDJ3OqkzmTHJ-PB9mC78pKa8hxUEt0LgQu6Pc885hDxn9BVjmr5-f06l5A_IiivGKkPVl4dkRSnXFeOGHpEnKd1QSuuaysfkiBm9kVzQFTk5DevL0E1xtNm7tH6DwfWjjV99uF5_zDbjiCE_JY86OyR8dpjH5PPb809n76qrDxeXZ6dXldNS5YqZlmMr-EbYWnVdzVExx6SggtqayUYbI9EyrhrRFqIx3GCna3SmEYrbjTgmL_e6c5y-LZgyjD45HAYbcFoS6Jopabi-B12cUorYwRx9sf0DGIW7QmBfSAFfHBSXZsT2Hjs0UICTPZB7X7LCzbTEUDL-LXS755Lrbc52wfhbrM95hu12C3_sWrx7o722Ox8QFmwwJu_6DDv0uYDRdxkDWNjBiLmf2gRuCuUrJ7DR9f57yW9Da2MLPqUFQRtZBMOSXPRzhlpJAamftuX-OBSDP_-3wTSj83b4h8lfutrl-g</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Pigott, K</creator><creator>de Lusignan, S</creator><creator>Rapley, A</creator><creator>Robinson, J</creator><creator>Pritchard-Copley, A</creator><general>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</general><general>Schattauer GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>An Informatics Benchmarking Statement</title><author>Pigott, K ; de Lusignan, S ; Rapley, A ; Robinson, J ; Pritchard-Copley, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-17d2ed3293a85ff82e51c143030a814b6774ea125b3da85b727ef68ec7b352a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>curriculum</topic><topic>educational measurements</topic><topic>informatics</topic><topic>learning</topic><topic>Medical Informatics - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pigott, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lusignan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapley, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard-Copley, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pigott, K</au><au>de Lusignan, S</au><au>Rapley, A</au><au>Robinson, J</au><au>Pritchard-Copley, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Informatics Benchmarking Statement</atitle><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>394-398</pages><issn>0026-1270</issn><eissn>2511-705X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: Benchmarking statements provide a mechanism for making academic standards explicit within a subject area. They allow comparisons between courses to be based on learning outcomes rather than by defining a curriculum. No such statement has been produced for informatics. In the absence of any established benchmarking statements for informatics a new biomedical informatics course at St. George’s has developed a first benchmarking statement – which defines the skills knowledge and understanding a biomedical informatics student should acquire by the time they complete the course. Methods: Review of national biomedical science and computing subject benchmarking statements and academic educational objectives and national occupational competencies in informatics. Results: We have developed a twenty-item benchmarking statement and this is available on-line at: http://www.gpinformatics.org/benchmark2006/. This benchmarking statement includes a definition and justification for all twenty statements. We found international educational objectives and national informatics competencies useful and these are mapped to each one. National subject benchmarks for computing and biomedical science were less useful and have not been systematically mapped. Conclusions: Benchmarking the skills, knowledge and understanding that a student should acquire during their course of study may be more useful than setting a standard curriculum. This benchmarking statement is a first step towards defining the learning outcomes and competencies a student of this discipline should acquire. The international informatics community should consider moving from a standard curriculum to an agreed subject benchmarking statement for medical, health and biomedical informatics.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</pub><pmid>17694230</pmid><doi>10.1160/ME0442</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1270
ispartof Methods of information in medicine, 2007-01, Vol.46 (4), p.394-398
issn 0026-1270
2511-705X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_17694230
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Benchmarking
curriculum
educational measurements
informatics
learning
Medical Informatics - standards
United States
title An Informatics Benchmarking Statement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A44%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Informatics%20Benchmarking%20Statement&rft.jtitle=Methods%20of%20information%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Pigott,%20K&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=394-398&rft.issn=0026-1270&rft.eissn=2511-705X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1160/ME0442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68154726%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68154726&rft_id=info:pmid/17694230&rfr_iscdi=true