Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis
The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Me...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 751 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 732 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Mulligan, Neil W. Lozito, Jeffrey P. |
description | The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470210600785141 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17455079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470210600785141</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70418219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASwoC2yBs_PhBLGgCgoSEgvMlpOcIZUTFzsB-u8xJNABAZNPd-9zH68JOaBwQiGDU8pjDoxCCsCzhMZ0g-x85EJgLN38jmk2IbvOLQDiiKd8m0x8IUmA5ztkfmcrtEHdKmMb2dWmDWRbBcoiBhZLqfVZcPkide9r7WPQPWFQd9iE5hN7Wi2NT7na7ZEtJbXD_fGdkoery_vZdXh7N7-ZXdyGZZzmXZhhJBUCRAwZJirHMvG7lFXhV5O8wKKg1N-Ux3kRJYqpAjLmFQriFLM4ldGUHA99l9Y89-g60dSuRK1li6Z3gkNMM0ZzL6SDsLTGOYtKLG3dSLsSFMSHe-KHe545HJv3RYPVmhjt8oKjUSCd90ZZ2Za1W-syHrHEXzclJ4POyUcUC9Pb1pvy52Q-AONHvBqrK9HJlTb2a8oPSnRvnSfP_yWj3we_A5HZqMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70418219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><description>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470210600785141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17455079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Mental Recall ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2007</rights><rights>2007 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470210600785141$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210600785141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18732500$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17455079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASwoC2yBs_PhBLGgCgoSEgvMlpOcIZUTFzsB-u8xJNABAZNPd-9zH68JOaBwQiGDU8pjDoxCCsCzhMZ0g-x85EJgLN38jmk2IbvOLQDiiKd8m0x8IUmA5ztkfmcrtEHdKmMb2dWmDWRbBcoiBhZLqfVZcPkide9r7WPQPWFQd9iE5hN7Wi2NT7na7ZEtJbXD_fGdkoery_vZdXh7N7-ZXdyGZZzmXZhhJBUCRAwZJirHMvG7lFXhV5O8wKKg1N-Ux3kRJYqpAjLmFQriFLM4ldGUHA99l9Y89-g60dSuRK1li6Z3gkNMM0ZzL6SDsLTGOYtKLG3dSLsSFMSHe-KHe545HJv3RYPVmhjt8oKjUSCd90ZZ2Za1W-syHrHEXzclJ4POyUcUC9Pb1pvy52Q-AONHvBqrK9HJlTb2a8oPSnRvnSfP_yWj3we_A5HZqMk</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Neil W.</creator><creator>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology press</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><author>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Neil W.</au><au>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>732-751</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>17455079</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470210600785141</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_17455079 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Memory Memory - physiology Mental Recall Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vocabulary |
title | Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20information%20and%20free%20recall:%20Evaluating%20the%20item-order%20hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Neil%20W.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=732-751&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470210600785141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70418219%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70418219&rft_id=info:pmid/17455079&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470210600785141&rfr_iscdi=true |