Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis

The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751
Hauptverfasser: Mulligan, Neil W., Lozito, Jeffrey P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 751
container_issue 5
container_start_page 732
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 60
creator Mulligan, Neil W.
Lozito, Jeffrey P.
description The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, & Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, & Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17470210600785141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17455079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470210600785141</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70418219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASwoC2yBs_PhBLGgCgoSEgvMlpOcIZUTFzsB-u8xJNABAZNPd-9zH68JOaBwQiGDU8pjDoxCCsCzhMZ0g-x85EJgLN38jmk2IbvOLQDiiKd8m0x8IUmA5ztkfmcrtEHdKmMb2dWmDWRbBcoiBhZLqfVZcPkide9r7WPQPWFQd9iE5hN7Wi2NT7na7ZEtJbXD_fGdkoery_vZdXh7N7-ZXdyGZZzmXZhhJBUCRAwZJirHMvG7lFXhV5O8wKKg1N-Ux3kRJYqpAjLmFQriFLM4ldGUHA99l9Y89-g60dSuRK1li6Z3gkNMM0ZzL6SDsLTGOYtKLG3dSLsSFMSHe-KHe545HJv3RYPVmhjt8oKjUSCd90ZZ2Za1W-syHrHEXzclJ4POyUcUC9Pb1pvy52Q-AONHvBqrK9HJlTb2a8oPSnRvnSfP_yWj3we_A5HZqMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70418219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><description>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, &amp; Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, &amp; Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470210600785141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17455079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Mental Recall ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 2007</rights><rights>2007 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470210600785141$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210600785141$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18732500$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17455079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, &amp; Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, &amp; Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASwoC2yBs_PhBLGgCgoSEgvMlpOcIZUTFzsB-u8xJNABAZNPd-9zH68JOaBwQiGDU8pjDoxCCsCzhMZ0g-x85EJgLN38jmk2IbvOLQDiiKd8m0x8IUmA5ztkfmcrtEHdKmMb2dWmDWRbBcoiBhZLqfVZcPkide9r7WPQPWFQd9iE5hN7Wi2NT7na7ZEtJbXD_fGdkoery_vZdXh7N7-ZXdyGZZzmXZhhJBUCRAwZJirHMvG7lFXhV5O8wKKg1N-Ux3kRJYqpAjLmFQriFLM4ldGUHA99l9Y89-g60dSuRK1li6Z3gkNMM0ZzL6SDsLTGOYtKLG3dSLsSFMSHe-KHe545HJv3RYPVmhjt8oKjUSCd90ZZ2Za1W-syHrHEXzclJ4POyUcUC9Pb1pvy52Q-AONHvBqrK9HJlTb2a8oPSnRvnSfP_yWj3we_A5HZqMk</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Neil W.</creator><creator>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology press</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</title><author>Mulligan, Neil W. ; Lozito, Jeffrey P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-8e3afe0032e2e5f9ec5174cdb043a7bebb11470949b35f2fb082517f046e846a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Neil W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Neil W.</au><au>Lozito, Jeffrey P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>732-751</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>The item-order hypothesis proposes that order information plays an important role in recall from long-term memory, and it is commonly used to account for the moderating effects of experimental design in memory research. Recent research (Engelkamp, Jahn, &amp; Seiler, 2003; McDaniel, DeLosh, &amp; Merritt, 2000) raises questions about the assumptions underlying the item-order hypothesis. Four experiments tested these assumptions by examining the relationship between free recall and order memory for lists of varying length (8, 16, or 24 unrelated words or pictures). Some groups were given standard free-recall instructions, other groups were explicitly instructed to use order information in free recall, and other groups were given free-recall tests intermixed with tests of order memory (order reconstruction). The results for short lists were consistent with the assumptions of the item-order account. For intermediate-length lists, explicit order instructions and intermixed order tests made recall more reliant on order information, but under standard conditions, order information played little role in recall. For long lists, there was little evidence that order information contributed to recall. In sum, the assumptions of the item-order account held for short lists, received mixed support with intermediate lists, and received no support for longer lists.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>17455079</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470210600785141</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2007-05, Vol.60 (5), p.732-751
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_17455079
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Memory
Memory - physiology
Mental Recall
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Vocabulary
title Order information and free recall: Evaluating the item-order hypothesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20information%20and%20free%20recall:%20Evaluating%20the%20item-order%20hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Neil%20W.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=732-751&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470210600785141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70418219%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70418219&rft_id=info:pmid/17455079&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470210600785141&rfr_iscdi=true