Identification of VDR-Responsive Gene Signatures in Breast Cancer Cells

Objectives: Defining transcriptional profiles which predict cancer cell anti-proliferative responsiveness towards 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 [1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 ] is required to improve and tailor the chemotherapeutic application of this seco-steroid hormone to individual cancer patients. Methods: We un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncology 2006-01, Vol.71 (1-2), p.111-123
Hauptverfasser: Towsend, Kelly, Trevino, Victor, Falciani, Francesco, Stewart, Paul M., Hewison, Martin, Campbell, Moray J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: Defining transcriptional profiles which predict cancer cell anti-proliferative responsiveness towards 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 [1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 ] is required to improve and tailor the chemotherapeutic application of this seco-steroid hormone to individual cancer patients. Methods: We undertook a transcriptomic approach with Affymetrix human U133 GeneChips to determine responsive and resistant gene signatures in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 -resistant MCF-7 Res cells, respectively. Principal component and hierarchical clustering analyses demonstrated that the patterns of responsiveness between the 2 cell types differed clearly and were used to generate heat maps. Differentially regulated gene targets were validated with Q-RT-PCR and the biological impact upon proliferation measured. Results: In untreated MCF-7 Res cells, 163 genes were up-regulated and 274 down-regulated (with a log 2 ratio of >0.5) compared to the MCF-7 controls. Using the same gene expression threshold, 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 treatment (100 nM, 6 h) of MCF-7 cells up-regulated 91 genes and down-regulated 5, whereas in MCF-7 Res , despite their resistance to the anti-proliferative effects, 156 genes were modulated with 91 being down-regulated. Strikingly, CYP24 was the only induced gene that was common to the genetic profiles of the 2 sets of 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 -treated cells. Heat map analyses defined 2 sub-clusters of genes: (1) basal expression patterns associated with insensitivity towards 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 and (2) regulated expression patterns associated with 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 sensitivity. This latter cluster contained BAX, GADD45α, IGFBP-3, EGFR, MAPK4 and TGF-β 2 . Time course studies confirmed the 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 regulation of TGF-β 2 in MCF-7 and non-tumourigenic MCF-12A cells but not in MCF-7 Res cells. Co-treatment of MCF-7 Res cells with exogenous TGF-β 2 plus 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 enhanced anti-proliferative and vitamin D receptor transcriptional effects. Conclusions: Basal and regulated gene patterns can be used to predict and monitor the cellular response towards vitamin D 3 compounds and may possibly be applied as a further diagnostic tool.
ISSN:0030-2414
1423-0232
DOI:10.1159/000100989