De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill
This paper examines the social construction of 'choice' in women's use of the oral contraceptive birth control pill. Using social and historical critiques of neo-liberalism, it is argued that the contemporary priority placed on 'choice' positions women in contradictory ways-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Culture, health & sexuality health & sexuality, 2007-01, Vol.9 (1), p.43-54 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Culture, health & sexuality |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Granzow, Kara |
description | This paper examines the social construction of 'choice' in women's use of the oral contraceptive birth control pill. Using social and historical critiques of neo-liberalism, it is argued that the contemporary priority placed on 'choice' positions women in contradictory ways-requiring them to be both 'choosing' reproductive subjects and reproductive subjects with very few options. The paper works to de-construct contemporary understandings of choice and finds that women's use of the birth control pill is less an exercise of idealized individual agency than it is an act of repetition, tied to ambiguity around what a lived experience of choice might be. To elaborate elements of the theoretical discussion, findings from a qualitative study of women's use of the oral contraceptive are discussed. These reveal that women's articulations of 'choice' challenge the notion of genuinely available and viable alternatives for women, and demonstrate how the use of a technology can silence understandings of contraception as something other than an individual responsibility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13691050600963948 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17364713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4005549</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4005549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ea1c29b2bbef1cb03273def6545cf1053584b45704af5cc736ed7c3394a98dc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERcvCD0BCyBfYU2CcsZ2k4oIKtEiVuJQDp8hxbNaVEy-2Q-m_r9Eu9FChPVhj6X3vaUaPkBcM3jJo4R1D2TEQIAE6iR1vH5ETxiWvBAr2uPyLXhWgPSZPU7oGAFbeE3LMGpS8YXhCvn80lQ5zynHR2c0_6FpvgtNmfUqvNoamoJ3y1E1bE1V2vwxV80hvwmTmdaJLMjRYmgs4uJg3tCTlGDzdOu-fkSOrfDLP93NFvn3-dHV2UV1-Pf9y9uGy0oJhroxiuu6GehiMZXoArBscjZWCC23L7ihaPnDRAFdWaF0WN2OjsVyrunbUHFfkzS53G8PPxaTcTy5p472aTVhS30Dd1iDlQVAyiQU-DKKUUtSIBWQ7UMeQUjS230Y3qXjbM-j_NNQ_aKh4Xu3Dl2Ey471jX0kBXu8BlbTyNqpZu3TPtbzDFuvCvdxx1ymH-E_nAEIUZEWanexmG-KkbkL0Y5_VrQ_xb-aD7fr8Oxfn-4NO_P-Bd4CZxdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36665233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Granzow, Kara</creator><creatorcontrib>Granzow, Kara</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the social construction of 'choice' in women's use of the oral contraceptive birth control pill. Using social and historical critiques of neo-liberalism, it is argued that the contemporary priority placed on 'choice' positions women in contradictory ways-requiring them to be both 'choosing' reproductive subjects and reproductive subjects with very few options. The paper works to de-construct contemporary understandings of choice and finds that women's use of the birth control pill is less an exercise of idealized individual agency than it is an act of repetition, tied to ambiguity around what a lived experience of choice might be. To elaborate elements of the theoretical discussion, findings from a qualitative study of women's use of the oral contraceptive are discussed. These reveal that women's articulations of 'choice' challenge the notion of genuinely available and viable alternatives for women, and demonstrate how the use of a technology can silence understandings of contraception as something other than an individual responsibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-1058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13691050600963948</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17364713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Agency ; Birth Control ; choice ; Choice Behavior ; Choices ; Contraception ; Contraception Behavior ; Contraceptives, Oral ; Cream ; deconstruction ; Female ; Females ; Freedom of choice ; Gender equality ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Human reproduction ; Humans ; Individual behaviour ; Liberal feminism ; Neoliberalism ; Oral contraceptives ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive technology ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual health ; Sexuality ; Social Values ; Sociology ; Sociology of the family. Age groups ; Woman social status. Women's emancipation ; Women's Health ; Women's Rights ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Culture, health & sexuality, 2007-01, Vol.9 (1), p.43-54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2007</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Taylor & Francis</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ea1c29b2bbef1cb03273def6545cf1053584b45704af5cc736ed7c3394a98dc43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4005549$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4005549$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27923,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18493832$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17364713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Granzow, Kara</creatorcontrib><title>De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill</title><title>Culture, health & sexuality</title><addtitle>Cult Health Sex</addtitle><description>This paper examines the social construction of 'choice' in women's use of the oral contraceptive birth control pill. Using social and historical critiques of neo-liberalism, it is argued that the contemporary priority placed on 'choice' positions women in contradictory ways-requiring them to be both 'choosing' reproductive subjects and reproductive subjects with very few options. The paper works to de-construct contemporary understandings of choice and finds that women's use of the birth control pill is less an exercise of idealized individual agency than it is an act of repetition, tied to ambiguity around what a lived experience of choice might be. To elaborate elements of the theoretical discussion, findings from a qualitative study of women's use of the oral contraceptive are discussed. These reveal that women's articulations of 'choice' challenge the notion of genuinely available and viable alternatives for women, and demonstrate how the use of a technology can silence understandings of contraception as something other than an individual responsibility.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Birth Control</subject><subject>choice</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior</subject><subject>Contraceptives, Oral</subject><subject>Cream</subject><subject>deconstruction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Freedom of choice</subject><subject>Gender equality</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Human reproduction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual behaviour</subject><subject>Liberal feminism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Oral contraceptives</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual health</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of the family. Age groups</subject><subject>Woman social status. Women's emancipation</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><subject>Women's Rights</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1369-1058</issn><issn>1464-5351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERcvCD0BCyBfYU2CcsZ2k4oIKtEiVuJQDp8hxbNaVEy-2Q-m_r9Eu9FChPVhj6X3vaUaPkBcM3jJo4R1D2TEQIAE6iR1vH5ETxiWvBAr2uPyLXhWgPSZPU7oGAFbeE3LMGpS8YXhCvn80lQ5zynHR2c0_6FpvgtNmfUqvNoamoJ3y1E1bE1V2vwxV80hvwmTmdaJLMjRYmgs4uJg3tCTlGDzdOu-fkSOrfDLP93NFvn3-dHV2UV1-Pf9y9uGy0oJhroxiuu6GehiMZXoArBscjZWCC23L7ihaPnDRAFdWaF0WN2OjsVyrunbUHFfkzS53G8PPxaTcTy5p472aTVhS30Dd1iDlQVAyiQU-DKKUUtSIBWQ7UMeQUjS230Y3qXjbM-j_NNQ_aKh4Xu3Dl2Ey471jX0kBXu8BlbTyNqpZu3TPtbzDFuvCvdxx1ymH-E_nAEIUZEWanexmG-KkbkL0Y5_VrQ_xb-aD7fr8Oxfn-4NO_P-Bd4CZxdQ</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Granzow, Kara</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill</title><author>Granzow, Kara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-ea1c29b2bbef1cb03273def6545cf1053584b45704af5cc736ed7c3394a98dc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Birth Control</topic><topic>choice</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior</topic><topic>Contraceptives, Oral</topic><topic>Cream</topic><topic>deconstruction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Freedom of choice</topic><topic>Gender equality</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Human reproduction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual behaviour</topic><topic>Liberal feminism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Oral contraceptives</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual health</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of the family. Age groups</topic><topic>Woman social status. Women's emancipation</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><topic>Women's Rights</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Granzow, Kara</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Culture, health & sexuality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Granzow, Kara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill</atitle><jtitle>Culture, health & sexuality</jtitle><addtitle>Cult Health Sex</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>43-54</pages><issn>1369-1058</issn><eissn>1464-5351</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the social construction of 'choice' in women's use of the oral contraceptive birth control pill. Using social and historical critiques of neo-liberalism, it is argued that the contemporary priority placed on 'choice' positions women in contradictory ways-requiring them to be both 'choosing' reproductive subjects and reproductive subjects with very few options. The paper works to de-construct contemporary understandings of choice and finds that women's use of the birth control pill is less an exercise of idealized individual agency than it is an act of repetition, tied to ambiguity around what a lived experience of choice might be. To elaborate elements of the theoretical discussion, findings from a qualitative study of women's use of the oral contraceptive are discussed. These reveal that women's articulations of 'choice' challenge the notion of genuinely available and viable alternatives for women, and demonstrate how the use of a technology can silence understandings of contraception as something other than an individual responsibility.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>17364713</pmid><doi>10.1080/13691050600963948</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-1058 |
ispartof | Culture, health & sexuality, 2007-01, Vol.9 (1), p.43-54 |
issn | 1369-1058 1464-5351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_17364713 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Agency Birth Control choice Choice Behavior Choices Contraception Contraception Behavior Contraceptives, Oral Cream deconstruction Female Females Freedom of choice Gender equality Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Human reproduction Humans Individual behaviour Liberal feminism Neoliberalism Oral contraceptives Pregnancy Reproductive technology Sexual Behavior Sexual health Sexuality Social Values Sociology Sociology of the family. Age groups Woman social status. Women's emancipation Women's Health Women's Rights Womens health |
title | De-constructing 'choice': The social imperative and women's use of the birth control pill |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De-constructing%20'choice':%20The%20social%20imperative%20and%20women's%20use%20of%20the%20birth%20control%20pill&rft.jtitle=Culture,%20health%20&%20sexuality&rft.au=Granzow,%20Kara&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=43-54&rft.issn=1369-1058&rft.eissn=1464-5351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13691050600963948&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E4005549%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36665233&rft_id=info:pmid/17364713&rft_jstor_id=4005549&rfr_iscdi=true |