Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals
Objectives: Hospitals are increasingly under pressure to optimize their processes. So far, an instrument to systematically identify the potentials for improvement of a given business process is missing. The aim of this project is to develop such an instrument. Methods: Initially, central aspects of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods of information in medicine 2006, Vol.45 (5), p.506-514 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 514 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 506 |
container_title | Methods of information in medicine |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Ehlers, F Ammenwerth, E Haux, R |
description | Objectives: Hospitals are increasingly under pressure to optimize their processes. So far, an instrument to systematically identify the potentials for improvement of a given business process is missing. The aim of this project is to develop such an instrument. Methods: Initially, central aspects of the quality of a hospital process were identified on the basis of a systematic literature review. Secondary to that, criteria to measure quality aspects were defined: More than 300 criteria from medical and business informatics, economics and quality management publications were gathered and systematically aggregated. Results: As a result, the Process Potential Screening (PPS) instrument was developed. The PPS is a matrix containing two axes: Axis I comprises 30 quality aspects referring to results, execution and control of hospital processes. Axis II comprises 16 quality criteria (e.g., customer satisfaction, time). The PPS displays approximately 400 relevant combinations of those quality aspects and quality criteria that help to identify potentials for improvement of a given hospital process. It utilizes different methods for the measurement of the criteria and for application by way of individuals or groups. Conclusions: In using the PPS, relevant potentials for improvement were identified in ten typical hospital processes. The instrument’s practicability must now be examined in further studies by the final target group (e.g., quality or project managers, and the staff responsible for processes). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0038-1634111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_17019504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68923412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-79c242f1e921ac5cb97a25b69e50c403a89dbf42dff992a07000b60dbf5c89a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyhH5xC1l7Hz6WCqgK1WiEh_iZjnOpDFK7OBxumJ_TH9rvewKkCyN5Hnesd93suw1hwsOVfWOcoCizXldlJzzJ9lGVJznDVQ_nmYbAFHnXDRwlr0g-gkAbQvl8-yMN8BlBeUm-34bvEEidusjumj1xL6YgOisu2M5u3Rs6yiGdU5NFj3bzkvw98jer2TdH91Rj8SsY9eeFhv1RC-zZ0Mq-OpUz7NvHz98vbrObz5_2l5d3uSmkDLmjTSiFANHKbg2lelko0XV1RIrMCUUupV9N5SiHwYphYYmWehqSHeVaaWG4jx7e5ybfvVrRYpqtmRwmrRDv5KqWylSMiKBF0fQBE8UcFBLsLMOvxUHdUhSkTokqU5JJsGb0-S1m7H_h5-iS8DDESAz6hj1iuEvNMa4qN1up_7r9Xg4s77T-5ScWrHDQNaMUe3RxgQGO6QVKK32asY4-p6U8e6wFVI6mNHeJ3_a9Tr0yhKtmNxBGuhWMsEuUTVcgqLR79L781Q8AtSKrlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68923412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Ehlers, F ; Ammenwerth, E ; Haux, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehlers, F ; Ammenwerth, E ; Haux, R</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Hospitals are increasingly under pressure to optimize their processes. So far, an instrument to systematically identify the potentials for improvement of a given business process is missing. The aim of this project is to develop such an instrument. Methods: Initially, central aspects of the quality of a hospital process were identified on the basis of a systematic literature review. Secondary to that, criteria to measure quality aspects were defined: More than 300 criteria from medical and business informatics, economics and quality management publications were gathered and systematically aggregated. Results: As a result, the Process Potential Screening (PPS) instrument was developed. The PPS is a matrix containing two axes: Axis I comprises 30 quality aspects referring to results, execution and control of hospital processes. Axis II comprises 16 quality criteria (e.g., customer satisfaction, time). The PPS displays approximately 400 relevant combinations of those quality aspects and quality criteria that help to identify potentials for improvement of a given hospital process. It utilizes different methods for the measurement of the criteria and for application by way of individuals or groups. Conclusions: In using the PPS, relevant potentials for improvement were identified in ten typical hospital processes. The instrument’s practicability must now be examined in further studies by the final target group (e.g., quality or project managers, and the staff responsible for processes).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2511-705X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17019504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</publisher><subject>Business process ; Health Informatics ; Hospital Administration - standards ; process evaluation ; process management ; Quality Control ; Quality Management ; Total Quality Management - methods</subject><ispartof>Methods of information in medicine, 2006, Vol.45 (5), p.506-514</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3004,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17019504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehlers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammenwerth, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haux, R</creatorcontrib><title>Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals</title><title>Methods of information in medicine</title><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: Hospitals are increasingly under pressure to optimize their processes. So far, an instrument to systematically identify the potentials for improvement of a given business process is missing. The aim of this project is to develop such an instrument. Methods: Initially, central aspects of the quality of a hospital process were identified on the basis of a systematic literature review. Secondary to that, criteria to measure quality aspects were defined: More than 300 criteria from medical and business informatics, economics and quality management publications were gathered and systematically aggregated. Results: As a result, the Process Potential Screening (PPS) instrument was developed. The PPS is a matrix containing two axes: Axis I comprises 30 quality aspects referring to results, execution and control of hospital processes. Axis II comprises 16 quality criteria (e.g., customer satisfaction, time). The PPS displays approximately 400 relevant combinations of those quality aspects and quality criteria that help to identify potentials for improvement of a given hospital process. It utilizes different methods for the measurement of the criteria and for application by way of individuals or groups. Conclusions: In using the PPS, relevant potentials for improvement were identified in ten typical hospital processes. The instrument’s practicability must now be examined in further studies by the final target group (e.g., quality or project managers, and the staff responsible for processes).</description><subject>Business process</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Hospital Administration - standards</subject><subject>process evaluation</subject><subject>process management</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Quality Management</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - methods</subject><issn>0026-1270</issn><issn>2511-705X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1v1DAQhiMEokvhyhH5xC1l7Hz6WCqgK1WiEh_iZjnOpDFK7OBxumJ_TH9rvewKkCyN5Hnesd93suw1hwsOVfWOcoCizXldlJzzJ9lGVJznDVQ_nmYbAFHnXDRwlr0g-gkAbQvl8-yMN8BlBeUm-34bvEEidusjumj1xL6YgOisu2M5u3Rs6yiGdU5NFj3bzkvw98jer2TdH91Rj8SsY9eeFhv1RC-zZ0Mq-OpUz7NvHz98vbrObz5_2l5d3uSmkDLmjTSiFANHKbg2lelko0XV1RIrMCUUupV9N5SiHwYphYYmWehqSHeVaaWG4jx7e5ybfvVrRYpqtmRwmrRDv5KqWylSMiKBF0fQBE8UcFBLsLMOvxUHdUhSkTokqU5JJsGb0-S1m7H_h5-iS8DDESAz6hj1iuEvNMa4qN1up_7r9Xg4s77T-5ScWrHDQNaMUe3RxgQGO6QVKK32asY4-p6U8e6wFVI6mNHeJ3_a9Tr0yhKtmNxBGuhWMsEuUTVcgqLR79L781Q8AtSKrlY</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Ehlers, F</creator><creator>Ammenwerth, E</creator><creator>Haux, R</creator><general>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals</title><author>Ehlers, F ; Ammenwerth, E ; Haux, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-79c242f1e921ac5cb97a25b69e50c403a89dbf42dff992a07000b60dbf5c89a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Business process</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Hospital Administration - standards</topic><topic>process evaluation</topic><topic>process management</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Quality Management</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehlers, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammenwerth, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haux, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehlers, F</au><au>Ammenwerth, E</au><au>Haux, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>506-514</pages><issn>0026-1270</issn><eissn>2511-705X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: Hospitals are increasingly under pressure to optimize their processes. So far, an instrument to systematically identify the potentials for improvement of a given business process is missing. The aim of this project is to develop such an instrument. Methods: Initially, central aspects of the quality of a hospital process were identified on the basis of a systematic literature review. Secondary to that, criteria to measure quality aspects were defined: More than 300 criteria from medical and business informatics, economics and quality management publications were gathered and systematically aggregated. Results: As a result, the Process Potential Screening (PPS) instrument was developed. The PPS is a matrix containing two axes: Axis I comprises 30 quality aspects referring to results, execution and control of hospital processes. Axis II comprises 16 quality criteria (e.g., customer satisfaction, time). The PPS displays approximately 400 relevant combinations of those quality aspects and quality criteria that help to identify potentials for improvement of a given hospital process. It utilizes different methods for the measurement of the criteria and for application by way of individuals or groups. Conclusions: In using the PPS, relevant potentials for improvement were identified in ten typical hospital processes. The instrument’s practicability must now be examined in further studies by the final target group (e.g., quality or project managers, and the staff responsible for processes).</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</pub><pmid>17019504</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0038-1634111</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-1270 |
ispartof | Methods of information in medicine, 2006, Vol.45 (5), p.506-514 |
issn | 0026-1270 2511-705X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_17019504 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Business process Health Informatics Hospital Administration - standards process evaluation process management Quality Control Quality Management Total Quality Management - methods |
title | Process Potential Screening - An Instrument to Improve Business Processes in Hospitals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20Potential%20Screening%20-%20An%20Instrument%20to%20Improve%20Business%20Processes%20in%20Hospitals&rft.jtitle=Methods%20of%20information%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Ehlers,%20F&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=506-514&rft.issn=0026-1270&rft.eissn=2511-705X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0038-1634111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68923412%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68923412&rft_id=info:pmid/17019504&rfr_iscdi=true |