Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services: The Status of the "100 Best Treatment Centers for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse" of 1988
This study explores the impact of managed care on the substance abuse service system by reviewing the current status of the programs that were among the elite service providers in 1988. A survey was conducted assessing the status of the one hundred centers touted as "the 100 best treatment cent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of health & social policy 2005, Vol.20 (3), p.67-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Journal of health & social policy |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Macmaster, Samuel A. Holleran, Lori K. Chantus, Daryl Kostyk, Lauren |
description | This study explores the impact of managed care on the substance abuse service system by reviewing the current status of the programs that were among the elite service providers in 1988. A survey was conducted assessing the status of the one hundred centers touted as "the 100 best treatment centers for alcoholism and drug abuse" (Sunshine & Wright, 1988). Findings include the following: Almost a third of these centers (31%) are no longer providing services, the majority of the programs who reported data continue to provide services primarily at a residential level of care (92%); however occupancy rates have dropped, the number of annual inpatient admissions have risen, and the length of treatment episodes has significantly decreased. In 1988, almost all (97.5%) facilities adhered to the 28-day treatment regiment, as evidenced by average treatment episodes of 26 days or longer. However, in 2001, the majority of programs (57.5%) reported treatment episodes of 25 days or less. While these facilities represent a fraction of the number of facilities that provide substance abuse services, they do exemplify elite programs that should be insulated from economic troubles, and help to document the changes that have occurred in the delivery system. Awareness of these changes is important for every social worker that advocates for substance abuse services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1300/J045v20n03_04 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_16236679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61383795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ab38acfee9ed8491e2e2917da3466d5e623c1fac5cb7b34ad8557e1dc243f6093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLw0AUhuFZKLZWl24lK3fRuWQuWUlpvVJwUV0Pk8lJO5JM6kxS6b830oIIgquzefg4vAhdEHxNGMY3zzjjW4o9ZhpnR2iMVS5TSZQYodMY3zEmSubiBI2IoEwImY_R7by1fQO-c36VzNbGryAmzifdGpI51G4LYZe0VbLsi9gZbyGZFn2EZAlh6yzEM3RcmTrC-eFO0Nv93evsMV28PDzNpovUUsm61BRMGVsB5FCqLCdAgeZEloZlQpQchn8sqYzltpAFy0ypOJdASkszVgmcswm62u9uQvvRQ-x046KFujYe2j5qQZhiMuf_Qi4ppYKTAaZ7aEMbY4BKb4JrTNhpgvV3Tv0r5-AvD8N90UD5ow8tB6D2wPmqDY35bENd6s7s6jZUYWjnomZ_b38Bxb-E_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57222651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services: The Status of the "100 Best Treatment Centers for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse" of 1988</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Macmaster, Samuel A. ; Holleran, Lori K. ; Chantus, Daryl ; Kostyk, Lauren</creator><creatorcontrib>Macmaster, Samuel A. ; Holleran, Lori K. ; Chantus, Daryl ; Kostyk, Lauren</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the impact of managed care on the substance abuse service system by reviewing the current status of the programs that were among the elite service providers in 1988. A survey was conducted assessing the status of the one hundred centers touted as "the 100 best treatment centers for alcoholism and drug abuse" (Sunshine & Wright, 1988). Findings include the following: Almost a third of these centers (31%) are no longer providing services, the majority of the programs who reported data continue to provide services primarily at a residential level of care (92%); however occupancy rates have dropped, the number of annual inpatient admissions have risen, and the length of treatment episodes has significantly decreased. In 1988, almost all (97.5%) facilities adhered to the 28-day treatment regiment, as evidenced by average treatment episodes of 26 days or longer. However, in 2001, the majority of programs (57.5%) reported treatment episodes of 25 days or less. While these facilities represent a fraction of the number of facilities that provide substance abuse services, they do exemplify elite programs that should be insulated from economic troubles, and help to document the changes that have occurred in the delivery system. Awareness of these changes is important for every social worker that advocates for substance abuse services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-7186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1300/J045v20n03_04</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16236679</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHSPEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Alcoholism ; Alcoholism - therapy ; Care management ; Data Collection ; Delivery Systems ; Documentation ; Drug abuse ; Health Care Services ; Health services ; Humans ; managed care ; Managed Care Programs ; Managed Care Services ; Substance Abuse ; substance abuse services ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - classification ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - economics ; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - organization & administration ; Substance-Related Disorders - therapy ; Treatment ; Treatment Programs ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of health & social policy, 2005, Vol.20 (3), p.67-77</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ab38acfee9ed8491e2e2917da3466d5e623c1fac5cb7b34ad8557e1dc243f6093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904,30979,33754</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16236679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macmaster, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holleran, Lori K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantus, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostyk, Lauren</creatorcontrib><title>Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services: The Status of the "100 Best Treatment Centers for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse" of 1988</title><title>Journal of health & social policy</title><addtitle>J Health Soc Policy</addtitle><description>This study explores the impact of managed care on the substance abuse service system by reviewing the current status of the programs that were among the elite service providers in 1988. A survey was conducted assessing the status of the one hundred centers touted as "the 100 best treatment centers for alcoholism and drug abuse" (Sunshine & Wright, 1988). Findings include the following: Almost a third of these centers (31%) are no longer providing services, the majority of the programs who reported data continue to provide services primarily at a residential level of care (92%); however occupancy rates have dropped, the number of annual inpatient admissions have risen, and the length of treatment episodes has significantly decreased. In 1988, almost all (97.5%) facilities adhered to the 28-day treatment regiment, as evidenced by average treatment episodes of 26 days or longer. However, in 2001, the majority of programs (57.5%) reported treatment episodes of 25 days or less. While these facilities represent a fraction of the number of facilities that provide substance abuse services, they do exemplify elite programs that should be insulated from economic troubles, and help to document the changes that have occurred in the delivery system. Awareness of these changes is important for every social worker that advocates for substance abuse services.</description><subject>Alcoholism</subject><subject>Alcoholism - therapy</subject><subject>Care management</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs</subject><subject>Managed Care Services</subject><subject>Substance Abuse</subject><subject>substance abuse services</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - classification</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - economics</subject><subject>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - organization & administration</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Programs</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0897-7186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLw0AUhuFZKLZWl24lK3fRuWQuWUlpvVJwUV0Pk8lJO5JM6kxS6b830oIIgquzefg4vAhdEHxNGMY3zzjjW4o9ZhpnR2iMVS5TSZQYodMY3zEmSubiBI2IoEwImY_R7by1fQO-c36VzNbGryAmzifdGpI51G4LYZe0VbLsi9gZbyGZFn2EZAlh6yzEM3RcmTrC-eFO0Nv93evsMV28PDzNpovUUsm61BRMGVsB5FCqLCdAgeZEloZlQpQchn8sqYzltpAFy0ypOJdASkszVgmcswm62u9uQvvRQ-x046KFujYe2j5qQZhiMuf_Qi4ppYKTAaZ7aEMbY4BKb4JrTNhpgvV3Tv0r5-AvD8N90UD5ow8tB6D2wPmqDY35bENd6s7s6jZUYWjnomZ_b38Bxb-E_A</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Macmaster, Samuel A.</creator><creator>Holleran, Lori K.</creator><creator>Chantus, Daryl</creator><creator>Kostyk, Lauren</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services</title><author>Macmaster, Samuel A. ; Holleran, Lori K. ; Chantus, Daryl ; Kostyk, Lauren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ab38acfee9ed8491e2e2917da3466d5e623c1fac5cb7b34ad8557e1dc243f6093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Alcoholism</topic><topic>Alcoholism - therapy</topic><topic>Care management</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs</topic><topic>Managed Care Services</topic><topic>Substance Abuse</topic><topic>substance abuse services</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - classification</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - economics</topic><topic>Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - organization & administration</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Programs</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macmaster, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holleran, Lori K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantus, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostyk, Lauren</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of health & social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macmaster, Samuel A.</au><au>Holleran, Lori K.</au><au>Chantus, Daryl</au><au>Kostyk, Lauren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services: The Status of the "100 Best Treatment Centers for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse" of 1988</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health & social policy</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Soc Policy</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>67-77</pages><issn>0897-7186</issn><coden>JHSPEH</coden><abstract>This study explores the impact of managed care on the substance abuse service system by reviewing the current status of the programs that were among the elite service providers in 1988. A survey was conducted assessing the status of the one hundred centers touted as "the 100 best treatment centers for alcoholism and drug abuse" (Sunshine & Wright, 1988). Findings include the following: Almost a third of these centers (31%) are no longer providing services, the majority of the programs who reported data continue to provide services primarily at a residential level of care (92%); however occupancy rates have dropped, the number of annual inpatient admissions have risen, and the length of treatment episodes has significantly decreased. In 1988, almost all (97.5%) facilities adhered to the 28-day treatment regiment, as evidenced by average treatment episodes of 26 days or longer. However, in 2001, the majority of programs (57.5%) reported treatment episodes of 25 days or less. While these facilities represent a fraction of the number of facilities that provide substance abuse services, they do exemplify elite programs that should be insulated from economic troubles, and help to document the changes that have occurred in the delivery system. Awareness of these changes is important for every social worker that advocates for substance abuse services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>16236679</pmid><doi>10.1300/J045v20n03_04</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-7186 |
ispartof | Journal of health & social policy, 2005, Vol.20 (3), p.67-77 |
issn | 0897-7186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_16236679 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
subjects | Alcoholism Alcoholism - therapy Care management Data Collection Delivery Systems Documentation Drug abuse Health Care Services Health services Humans managed care Managed Care Programs Managed Care Services Substance Abuse substance abuse services Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - classification Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - economics Substance Abuse Treatment Centers - organization & administration Substance-Related Disorders - therapy Treatment Treatment Programs United States |
title | Documenting Changes in the Delivery of Substance Abuse Services: The Status of the "100 Best Treatment Centers for Alcoholism and Drug Abuse" of 1988 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Documenting%20Changes%20in%20the%20Delivery%20of%20Substance%20Abuse%20Services:%20The%20Status%20of%20the%20%22100%20Best%20Treatment%20Centers%20for%20Alcoholism%20and%20Drug%20Abuse%22%20of%201988&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20&%20social%20policy&rft.au=Macmaster,%20Samuel%20A.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=67-77&rft.issn=0897-7186&rft.coden=JHSPEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1300/J045v20n03_04&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E61383795%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57222651&rft_id=info:pmid/16236679&rfr_iscdi=true |