Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI
Viewing cognitive functions as mediated by networks has begun to play a central role in interpreting neuroscientific data, and studies evaluating interregional functional and effective connectivity have become staples of the neuroimaging literature. The neurobiological substrates of functional and e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2005-05, Vol.360 (1457), p.1093-1108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1457 |
container_start_page | 1093 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 360 |
creator | Horwitz, Barry Warner, Brent Fitzer, Julie Tagamets, M.-A Husain, Fatima T Long, Theresa W |
description | Viewing cognitive functions as mediated by networks has begun to play a central role in interpreting neuroscientific data, and studies evaluating interregional functional and effective connectivity have become staples of the neuroimaging literature. The neurobiological substrates of functional and effective connectivity are, however, uncertain. We have constructed neurobiologically realistic models for visual and auditory object processing with multiple interconnected brain regions that perform delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks. We used these models to investigate how neurobiological parameters affect the interregional functional connectivity between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-series. Variability is included in the models as subject-to-subject differences in the strengths of anatomical connections, scan-to-scan changes in the level of attention, and trial-to-trial interactions with non-specific neurons processing noise stimuli. We find that time-series correlations between integrated synaptic activities between the anterior temporal and the prefrontal cortex were larger during the DMS task than during a control task. These results were less clear when the integrated synaptic activity was haemodynamically convolved to generate simulated fMRI activity. As the strength of the model anatomical connectivity between temporal and frontal cortex was weakened, so too was the strength of the corresponding functional connectivity. These results provide a partial validation for using fMRI functional connectivity to assess brain interregional relations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2005.1647 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_16087450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30041327</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30041327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-f3ca7dea53fcc5fb45184bf3e7baea4123cdaec36a304d7850a9336265707d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsGO0zAUjBCILQtXbqCcuKXYsR0nF8RugVJpEWJZuCHLcezW3dQOtlMoX4_TVIUKsac4nnkz771xkjyFYApBVb50PtTTHAAyhQWm95IJxBRmeUXB_WQCqiLPSoyKs-SR92sAQEUofpicwQKUFBMwSb4tzFb6oJc8aLNMw0qmRvaOt2nNvfapsi5VvRFBWxMvuWlSqZSM_1uZCmvM_qjDbppedF2rBR-YabCp-nC9eJw8ULz18snhe558eff2ZvY-u_o4X8wurjJBCQ2ZQoLTRnKClBBE1ZjAEtcKSVpzyTHMkWi4FKjgCOCGlgTwCqEiLwgFtMkxOk9ejbpdX29kI6QJcQTWOb3hbscs1-wUMXrFlnbLYElwhUAUeHEQcPZ7HxfCNtoL2bbcSNt7VpSYUIpRJE5HonDWeyfV0QQCNiTChkTYkAgbEokFz_9u7Q_9EEEkoJHg7C7uyAotw46tbe_iwv3_ZW_vqrr-fHO5RQXQMPbNQIkgIKQgiP3S3SgVQaa97yXbU07l_3V7NrqtfbDuOAMCAEOUD3g24toH-fOIc3fLCoooYV9LzNCnyzmcgTl7E_mvR_5KL1c_tJPsZIy9e3xcIaa1b3TfYlwDYqpvY66NihLwTgm76w5THovRb9B4_7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68457743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Horwitz, Barry ; Warner, Brent ; Fitzer, Julie ; Tagamets, M.-A ; Husain, Fatima T ; Long, Theresa W</creator><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Barry ; Warner, Brent ; Fitzer, Julie ; Tagamets, M.-A ; Husain, Fatima T ; Long, Theresa W</creatorcontrib><description>Viewing cognitive functions as mediated by networks has begun to play a central role in interpreting neuroscientific data, and studies evaluating interregional functional and effective connectivity have become staples of the neuroimaging literature. The neurobiological substrates of functional and effective connectivity are, however, uncertain. We have constructed neurobiologically realistic models for visual and auditory object processing with multiple interconnected brain regions that perform delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks. We used these models to investigate how neurobiological parameters affect the interregional functional connectivity between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-series. Variability is included in the models as subject-to-subject differences in the strengths of anatomical connections, scan-to-scan changes in the level of attention, and trial-to-trial interactions with non-specific neurons processing noise stimuli. We find that time-series correlations between integrated synaptic activities between the anterior temporal and the prefrontal cortex were larger during the DMS task than during a control task. These results were less clear when the integrated synaptic activity was haemodynamically convolved to generate simulated fMRI activity. As the strength of the model anatomical connectivity between temporal and frontal cortex was weakened, so too was the strength of the corresponding functional connectivity. These results provide a partial validation for using fMRI functional connectivity to assess brain interregional relations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1647</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16087450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Autoradiography ; Brain ; Brain - anatomy & histology ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Computer Simulation ; Connected regions ; Connectivity ; Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Human ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Modeling ; Models, Neurological ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neural Modelling ; Neurons ; Neurons - physiology ; Object Processing ; Positron Emission Tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Region of integration ; Simulations ; Synapses - physiology ; Testing Hypothesis about Connectivity ; Time series ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2005-05, Vol.360 (1457), p.1093-1108</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2005 The Royal Society</rights><rights>2005 The Royal Society 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-f3ca7dea53fcc5fb45184bf3e7baea4123cdaec36a304d7850a9336265707d243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-f3ca7dea53fcc5fb45184bf3e7baea4123cdaec36a304d7850a9336265707d243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30041327$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30041327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16087450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzer, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagamets, M.-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Fatima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Theresa W</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Viewing cognitive functions as mediated by networks has begun to play a central role in interpreting neuroscientific data, and studies evaluating interregional functional and effective connectivity have become staples of the neuroimaging literature. The neurobiological substrates of functional and effective connectivity are, however, uncertain. We have constructed neurobiologically realistic models for visual and auditory object processing with multiple interconnected brain regions that perform delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks. We used these models to investigate how neurobiological parameters affect the interregional functional connectivity between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-series. Variability is included in the models as subject-to-subject differences in the strengths of anatomical connections, scan-to-scan changes in the level of attention, and trial-to-trial interactions with non-specific neurons processing noise stimuli. We find that time-series correlations between integrated synaptic activities between the anterior temporal and the prefrontal cortex were larger during the DMS task than during a control task. These results were less clear when the integrated synaptic activity was haemodynamically convolved to generate simulated fMRI activity. As the strength of the model anatomical connectivity between temporal and frontal cortex was weakened, so too was the strength of the corresponding functional connectivity. These results provide a partial validation for using fMRI functional connectivity to assess brain interregional relations.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Autoradiography</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Connected regions</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Modelling</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Object Processing</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Region of integration</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Synapses - physiology</subject><subject>Testing Hypothesis about Connectivity</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsGO0zAUjBCILQtXbqCcuKXYsR0nF8RugVJpEWJZuCHLcezW3dQOtlMoX4_TVIUKsac4nnkz771xkjyFYApBVb50PtTTHAAyhQWm95IJxBRmeUXB_WQCqiLPSoyKs-SR92sAQEUofpicwQKUFBMwSb4tzFb6oJc8aLNMw0qmRvaOt2nNvfapsi5VvRFBWxMvuWlSqZSM_1uZCmvM_qjDbppedF2rBR-YabCp-nC9eJw8ULz18snhe558eff2ZvY-u_o4X8wurjJBCQ2ZQoLTRnKClBBE1ZjAEtcKSVpzyTHMkWi4FKjgCOCGlgTwCqEiLwgFtMkxOk9ejbpdX29kI6QJcQTWOb3hbscs1-wUMXrFlnbLYElwhUAUeHEQcPZ7HxfCNtoL2bbcSNt7VpSYUIpRJE5HonDWeyfV0QQCNiTChkTYkAgbEokFz_9u7Q_9EEEkoJHg7C7uyAotw46tbe_iwv3_ZW_vqrr-fHO5RQXQMPbNQIkgIKQgiP3S3SgVQaa97yXbU07l_3V7NrqtfbDuOAMCAEOUD3g24toH-fOIc3fLCoooYV9LzNCnyzmcgTl7E_mvR_5KL1c_tJPsZIy9e3xcIaa1b3TfYlwDYqpvY66NihLwTgm76w5THovRb9B4_7M</recordid><startdate>20050529</startdate><enddate>20050529</enddate><creator>Horwitz, Barry</creator><creator>Warner, Brent</creator><creator>Fitzer, Julie</creator><creator>Tagamets, M.-A</creator><creator>Husain, Fatima T</creator><creator>Long, Theresa W</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050529</creationdate><title>Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI</title><author>Horwitz, Barry ; Warner, Brent ; Fitzer, Julie ; Tagamets, M.-A ; Husain, Fatima T ; Long, Theresa W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c757t-f3ca7dea53fcc5fb45184bf3e7baea4123cdaec36a304d7850a9336265707d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Autoradiography</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Connected regions</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Modelling</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Object Processing</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Region of integration</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Synapses - physiology</topic><topic>Testing Hypothesis about Connectivity</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Brent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzer, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagamets, M.-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Fatima T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Theresa W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horwitz, Barry</au><au>Warner, Brent</au><au>Fitzer, Julie</au><au>Tagamets, M.-A</au><au>Husain, Fatima T</au><au>Long, Theresa W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2005-05-29</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>360</volume><issue>1457</issue><spage>1093</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1093-1108</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Viewing cognitive functions as mediated by networks has begun to play a central role in interpreting neuroscientific data, and studies evaluating interregional functional and effective connectivity have become staples of the neuroimaging literature. The neurobiological substrates of functional and effective connectivity are, however, uncertain. We have constructed neurobiologically realistic models for visual and auditory object processing with multiple interconnected brain regions that perform delayed match-to-sample (DMS) tasks. We used these models to investigate how neurobiological parameters affect the interregional functional connectivity between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time-series. Variability is included in the models as subject-to-subject differences in the strengths of anatomical connections, scan-to-scan changes in the level of attention, and trial-to-trial interactions with non-specific neurons processing noise stimuli. We find that time-series correlations between integrated synaptic activities between the anterior temporal and the prefrontal cortex were larger during the DMS task than during a control task. These results were less clear when the integrated synaptic activity was haemodynamically convolved to generate simulated fMRI activity. As the strength of the model anatomical connectivity between temporal and frontal cortex was weakened, so too was the strength of the corresponding functional connectivity. These results provide a partial validation for using fMRI functional connectivity to assess brain interregional relations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>16087450</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2005.1647</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2005-05, Vol.360 (1457), p.1093-1108 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_16087450 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anatomy Auditory Perception - physiology Autoradiography Brain Brain - anatomy & histology Brain - physiology Brain Mapping - methods Computer Simulation Connected regions Connectivity Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Human Humans Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Modeling Models, Neurological Nerve Net - physiology Neural Modelling Neurons Neurons - physiology Object Processing Positron Emission Tomography Positron-Emission Tomography - methods Region of integration Simulations Synapses - physiology Testing Hypothesis about Connectivity Time series Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A23%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20neural%20basis%20for%20functional%20and%20effective%20connectivity.%20Application%20to%20fMRI&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Horwitz,%20Barry&rft.date=2005-05-29&rft.volume=360&rft.issue=1457&rft.spage=1093&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1093-1108&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2005.1647&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E30041327%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68457743&rft_id=info:pmid/16087450&rft_jstor_id=30041327&rfr_iscdi=true |